FIDE Master Matyáš Zeman
Known in the chess realm by the enigmatic username mistrzemi, Matyáš Zeman has clawed his way up the ranks to earn the prestigious title of FIDE Master. This title isn’t given out lightly—only to those who master the art of outwitting opponents on 64 squares with strategy sharper than a knight’s fork.
Rating and Performance
Starting from humble beginnings with a blitz rating just shy of 1400 in 2016, Matyáš’s journey has been nothing short of a rollercoaster ride on the rating ladder, rocketing all the way up to an impressive peak blitz rating of 2575 in late 2024. Not to be outdone, his bullet rating peaked near the 2300 mark, while his rapid and daily ratings make it evident that no time control escapes his reach.
Playing Style and Tactical Prowess
Matyáš approaches the game with a lethal combination of patience and aggression. Averaging roughly 76 moves per win, it's clear he enjoys a good, lengthy battle rather than a quick skirmish—unless the opponent invites a swift end! His 87% comeback rate after setbacks showcases his resilience and knack for turning the tables when you least expect it.
His endgame frequency is impressively high at over 78%, proving that reaching the final stages of the game is where he thrives—because that's when the real magic happens. The occasional early resignation is kept low, signaling a fighter's spirit willing to tussle till the end.
Favorites on the Board
When it comes to openings, Matyáš favors strategic mainstays with a twist. The Indian Game reigns supreme in his arsenal, boasting a win rate over 53%. The Catalan Opening Closed also appears to be a pet line, shining with a stellar 61% win rate. Sometimes, he mixes it up with trusty old friends like the London System and the French Defense Exchange Variation, where he’s equally comfortable navigating complex positions.
Notable Achievements & Quirks
He boasts an enviable blitz win count of over 2000 games, a testament to his dedication and love for fast-paced chess adrenaline. While his psychological tilt factor clocks in at a modest 9 (because even FM’s have bad days), his best hour to unleash brilliance is curiously at 5 AM—fuelled by caffeine or sheer passion, who knows?
Recent Triumphs & Trials
One of his most recent notable victories was a clean checkmate against marvinguevara in a tense blitz battle, showcasing his trademark blend of tactical sharpness and positional finesse. Of course, even the best stumble sometimes; his latest loss to LyonBeast ended in a checkmate as well, proving that every defeat is just a lesson waiting to be turned into a victory.
In Summary
Whether you’re watching his games or playing against him, Matyáš Zeman is a player who embodies the spirit of chess: relentless, cunning, and occasionally unpredictable. His rise through the ranks shows a commitment to mastering every nuance of the game while keeping the fun alive—even when the clock is ticking faster than a bullet shot.
Quick summary
Matyáš — good fight in these recent blitz games. You show solid opening knowledge and create practical counterplay, but a few recurring issues (king safety, pawn-structure weaknesses and time management) are costing you in sharp, tactical positions. Below are concrete observations, examples, and a short training plan you can apply right away.
What you did well
- Consistent opening setup and piece development — you get bishops and knights out quickly and often seize central space (example: building a classical London-type setup with Bf4, Nbd2, c3).
- Creating counterplay when under pressure — you push pawns and open lines (b4, g4) to generate chances instead of passively defending.
- Tactical alertness — you spotted combinations (captures in the center, piece exchanges) that try to simplify or generate activity rather than just fold under pressure.
- Overall resilience — strength-adjusted win rate ~0.507 means your practical play is solid against varied opposition levels.
Key mistakes and recurring themes
Below are the patterns I saw most often in the recent games and the concrete ways they led to losses.
-
King safety and pawn weaknesses:
In the most recent loss vs Maxime Vachier-Lagrave you ended up with your king exposed after creating holes around it (capturing on h4, then advancing g-pawns). That allowed the opponent's pawns and pieces to break through and deliver a mating net (final pawn breakthrough on g2). Avoid creating irreversible holes near your king unless you are sure you gain counterplay.
-
Accepting pawn sacrifices that open lines against your king:
Example: 24 f3 followed by fxg3 and hxg3 left g2 and h‑files vulnerable. Before accepting a pawn sac near your king, ask: can I keep my king safe after the lines open? If not, decline or look for a less weakening recapture.
-
Time management / playing too fast into tactical complications:
Many decisive moments happened with only a few seconds on the clock. In increment games you should invest a little time on critical turns (when kingside pawns start to storm or rooks invade). Save time in quiet opening moves, and spend it when the position becomes sharp.
-
Handling of the London Poisoned Pawn and similar sharp sidelines:
Your results show this variation is a weaker area (WinRate ~45% in that line). The line often leads to asymmetric tactical play — plan concrete defensive measures and typical pawn-structure responses so you can avoid getting overwhelmed by early kingside attacks.
Concrete fixes — what to do in games
- Before capturing near your king, run a quick safety check: which enemy pieces gain open files/diagonals, are back-rank mates possible, can an enemy pawn become a battering ram? If the answer is “yes”, delay the capture or trade off the most dangerous attacker first.
- When facing a kingside pawn storm (g5/h4/g4 etc.), prioritize king safety (escape squares, rook to the g/h file for defense) instead of returning material immediately.
- Use a simple time rule: 10+ seconds on quiet opening moves, but spend 20–40 seconds on any move that changes the pawn structure around your king or gives the opponent open lines. Don’t burn all your time in the opening.
- If your plan requires pushing pawns around your king (g, h or f pawns), only do it when your king has a secure escape or when you can force a simplification that removes attackers.
Study & training plan (practical, blitz-focused)
- Short-term (daily, 15–30 minutes)
- 15 min tactics (focus on mating patterns and pawn breaks around the king — puzzles with mating nets, back-rank themes).
- 10 min review of the last loss: replay critical sequence slowly and ask “what if I decline the sac?” and “where could I improve king safety?” Use the embedded game viewer below to step through the final phase.
- Weekly (2–4 hours total)
- 1 hour on London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation — learn 2 main defensive ideas and one safe line you can play automatically in blitz.
- 1 hour endgame practice — basic rook endings and king + pawn vs king. Many blitz games swing on simple endgame technique.
- Practical blitz habits
- Play training blitz where your goal is one specific improvement (e.g., “I will not capture a pawn on the kingside if it opens the g-file”).
- Do 10-minute reflection after 5 blitz games: mark the turning move in each loss and the underlying reason (tactical miss, time trouble, bad structure).
Examples / reviewable game
Step through the final phase of your most recent loss vs Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and focus on the moves where the g-file opens — that sequence shows the exact patterns to avoid next time.
Interactive replay (tap to open):
Opening preparation suggestions
- Focus on one safe, low-maintenance London setup you can play quickly in blitz. Learn the key plans (where to put rooks, when to play h3/g4 and when not to) so you spend less clock time in the opening.
- Against sharp sidelines (Poisoned Pawn), memorize one defensive response that avoids immediate complications — trade off the dangerous piece or route your king to safety early.
- You do well in some French lines (Exchange/Advance). Keep those in your repertoire as “bullets of stability” when you want reliable results.
Next actions (for your next session)
- Replay the loss vs Maxime Vachier-Lagrave with the PGN viewer and mark three candidate moves you could have played instead at the moment the g-file opened.
- Do a 20-minute tactics session emphasizing mating nets and forced sequences; then play a mini‑set of 5 blitz games trying the time rule above.
- Pick one London variation line to memorize for blitz (one safe line vs the Poisoned Pawn).
Closing — encouraging note
Your overall long-term rating history and strength-adjusted win rate show you are a strong, practical player. These losses are fixable with a few targeted habits (king safety checks, a simple time budget, and focused blitz opening prep). Keep the good habits you already have — development and counterplay — and tighten the holes I pointed out. If you want, I can create a 4‑week training schedule tailored to your preferred openings.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| thereddot13 | 18W / 1L / 2D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| zelezo022 | 148W / 56L / 7D | View Games |
| Tomas Kraus | 31W / 30L / 5D | View Games |
| Richard Mladek | 25W / 34L / 4D | View Games |
| gameris466 | 37W / 13L / 4D | View Games |
| Petr Sprenar | 24W / 24L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2558 | 1300 | ||
| 2024 | 2539 | |||
| 2023 | 2385 | |||
| 2022 | 2430 | |||
| 2021 | 2289 | |||
| 2020 | 2162 | 2370 | 1919 | |
| 2019 | 2226 | 2436 | ||
| 2018 | 2173 | 2355 | 1603 | |
| 2017 | 1971 | 2257 | 800 | |
| 2016 | 1910 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10W / 7L / 3D | 13W / 3L / 3D | 52.4 |
| 2024 | 19W / 26L / 2D | 22W / 25L / 4D | 81.0 |
| 2023 | 36W / 45L / 7D | 30W / 54L / 11D | 79.3 |
| 2022 | 18W / 20L / 4D | 10W / 32L / 6D | 85.8 |
| 2021 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 52.5 |
| 2020 | 75W / 72L / 14D | 70W / 83L / 12D | 78.7 |
| 2019 | 331W / 277L / 36D | 317W / 292L / 40D | 77.3 |
| 2018 | 499W / 350L / 49D | 428W / 446L / 40D | 76.4 |
| 2017 | 191W / 132L / 26D | 181W / 144L / 23D | 74.4 |
| 2016 | 9W / 3L / 0D | 8W / 1L / 0D | 68.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 384 | 205 | 159 | 20 | 53.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 192 | 94 | 84 | 14 | 49.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 160 | 72 | 74 | 14 | 45.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 134 | 54 | 73 | 7 | 40.3% |
| Döry Defense | 130 | 59 | 64 | 7 | 45.4% |
| French Defense | 124 | 60 | 56 | 8 | 48.4% |
| Modern | 110 | 46 | 57 | 7 | 41.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 89 | 44 | 42 | 3 | 49.4% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 85 | 47 | 34 | 4 | 55.3% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 83 | 45 | 33 | 5 | 54.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 45 | 20 | 22 | 3 | 44.4% |
| Australian Defense | 26 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 69.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 24 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 18 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 61.1% |
| Modern | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 13 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 46.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 12 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 33.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 5 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |