Mitra Asgharzadeh - Woman International Master (WIM)
Meet Mitra Asgharzadeh, known in the chess world as mitraasz, a titled player who wields the prestigious Woman International Master (WIM) title awarded by FIDE. A thinker with a penchant for long battles and dramatic comebacks, Mitra embodies both the art and science of chess.
If chess were a battlefield, Mitra’s blitz games are a whirlwind of brilliance: with a blistering peak blitz rating of 2592 in 2025, Mitra has dazzled opponents by mixing precision with speed. Her bullet chess stats reveal a fighter who doesn’t just play quickly, but thoughtfully, boasting a ~50% win rate over thousands of games and a peak rating north of 2300. Her rapid games tell a story of solid strategic play and resilience, with a peak of 2369 and a tactical mind that thrives under pressure.
Mitra’s psychological resilience is legendary: with a 90% comeback rate after losing material, and an impeccable 100% win rate after losing a piece, she’s basically the Houdini of chess. Early resignation is practically absent in her style (just 1.06%), preferring to battle on and squeeze every last drop of advantage. While the average winning game takes around 72 moves, Mitra is not afraid to go deep into the endgame trenches—a stage where she truly shines, showing a near-constant hunger for complexity and victory.
Her performance varies like a good plot twist depending on the hour, with a sweet spot around midday, where her win rate peaks at nearly 57%—so if you want to catch Mitra off guard, maybe try early morning or late night! Weekends and Fridays bring her luck with win rates just over 51%. But don’t be fooled by her sportsmanlike behavior and steady pace—anyone on the board with Mitra is in for a fight because her longest winning streak stands impressively at 12 games.
Opponents beware: she’s undefeated against several challengers where she boasts a 100% win record, while some lucky few have managed to hold her to a draw or even a win. Mitra isn’t just a player; she’s a consistent force of nature in the chess community, blending tactical prowess with a deep psychological game.
In short, Mitra is the kind of opponent who doesn’t just play chess — she tells a story, full of twists, traps, and triumphant escapes. Chess fans, keep your eyes peeled, because this WIM proves that the queen isn’t just a piece on the board, but a title you earn move by move.
Feedback for Mitra Asgharzadeh
First of all, congratulations on your recent successes! You demonstrate a strong grasp of opening principles and solid positional understanding, especially noticeable in your handling of the King's Indian Defense and London System setups.
Strengths
- Opening Play: Your knowledge of key opening lines such as the King's Indian Defense (E61) and Indian Game London System is impressive. You seem comfortable with moves like Bh6 and timely pawn breaks, which help you gain good initiative early on.
- Endgame Technique: Games like your recent win against "Vinnkratos" show excellent endgame technique and patience, converting material advantages methodically.
- Active Piece Play: You consistently activate your pieces, often creating tactical threats, especially on the kingside and center, which puts pressure on your opponents to respond accurately.
- Time Management: You handle your clock well under rapid time controls, maintaining calm and accuracy even in complex positions.
Areas for Improvement
- Handling Counterattacks: In some losses, especially against strong opponents (e.g., game vs. Jospem), your position deteriorated due to underestimating tactical possibilities or allowing your opponent strong counterplay. Working on recognizing and defusing opponent threats earlier will be beneficial.
- Opening Preparation Depth: Although you play solid openings, some games showed you could benefit from deeper theoretical preparation or exploring alternative plans when the opponent deviates. This will help you avoid early disadvantage or passive positions.
- Endgame Precision under Pressure: While your endgame is strong overall, improving calculation precision and defensive technique in complex endgames, particularly under time pressure, will raise your winning chances and resilience.
- Structural Pawn Play: Occasionally, pawn advances (e.g., pushing h- and c-pawns) created weaknesses or allowed opponent counterplay. Be mindful of the long-term consequences of such breaks and ensure there is adequate support.
Next Steps
- Review your losses carefully, focusing on turning points that led to tactical or strategic mistakes.
- Practice solving tactical puzzles regularly to sharpen your calculation and pattern recognition.
- Study endgames, particularly king and pawn or minor piece endgames, to improve conversion accuracy.
- Consider exploring deeper opening theory for your favorite setups, identifying common sidelines and preparing responses.
Keep up the excellent work, and maintain your positive attitude towards continuous learning. Your recent games highlight a rising player with great potential!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Amir Hossein Jamshidi | 28W / 27L / 0D | View Games |
| Mobina Alinasab | 5W / 16L / 1D | View Games |
| Ali Rastbod | 1W / 16L / 0D | View Games |
| Oliver Kurmann | 5W / 9L / 0D | View Games |
| Yichen Han | 3W / 11L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2747 | 2771 | ||
| 2023 | 2403 | |||
| 2021 | 2244 | 2254 | ||
| 2020 | 2181 | 2307 | 2289 | |
| 2019 | 2055 | 2078 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 224W / 154L / 29D | 219W / 164L / 26D | 82.8 |
| 2023 | 2W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 2L / 1D | 86.0 |
| 2021 | 8W / 5L / 2D | 3W / 14L / 0D | 89.6 |
| 2020 | 422W / 364L / 42D | 378W / 412L / 39D | 75.5 |
| 2019 | 546W / 432L / 44D | 505W / 456L / 48D | 78.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Indian Defense | 320 | 159 | 139 | 22 | 49.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 278 | 153 | 118 | 7 | 55.0% |
| Australian Defense | 262 | 138 | 112 | 12 | 52.7% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 218 | 127 | 85 | 6 | 58.3% |
| Döry Defense | 184 | 91 | 90 | 3 | 49.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 151 | 89 | 57 | 5 | 58.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 141 | 70 | 64 | 7 | 49.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 136 | 69 | 59 | 8 | 50.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 135 | 51 | 73 | 11 | 37.8% |
| King's Indian Defense | 121 | 66 | 52 | 3 | 54.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Indian Defense | 24 | 10 | 12 | 2 | 41.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 17 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 47.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 15 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 40.0% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Döry Defense | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 12 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 16.7% |
| King's Indian Defense | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Indian Defense | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Döry Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Colle: 3...Bf5, Alekhine Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |