Profile Summary: molinov
Meet molinov, a chess player whose rating graph resembles a thrilling rollercoaster ride, but somehow with more checkmates and fewer screams. Having started at a modest Daily rating of 1200 back in 2013, molinov has since blitzed, bullet-ed, and rapided their way up the ranks, peaking impressively with a Blitz rating of 2664 as recently as March 2025.
Known for a creative style (and an obsession with tricky openings), molinov favors defenses like the Alapin Sicilian Defense and the French Defense Winawer Gambit, stuffing opponents’ cookies with a cocktail of strategic threats that keep us all wondering how they do it. With nearly 13 games won in a row at one point, molinov can turn a board of pawns into a symphony of victory – or a battlefield of brilliant chaos if the mood strikes.
On the psychological front, molinov’s tilt factor is a modest 15%, which means when the going gets tough, this player is more likely to channel inner zen than throw the mouse across the room. Even better? They shine brightest around 10 AM – so if you ever want to catch molinov off-guard, try scheduling a dawn duel.
Playing Style
- Prefers deep endgames, with a whopping 83.6% frequency of endgame battles. Because why finish early when you can outplay your opponent in a marathon?
- Known to carry fantastic comebacks, boasting an 86.5% comeback rate.
- Average victory lasts around 83 moves, giving opponents plenty of time to reconsider their life choices.
Achievements & Highlights
- Total Blitz wins exceed 5,100, counterbalanced by about 5,400 losses and roughly 970 draws – hey, even the best stumble now and then.
- Dominates bullet chess too, with almost 12,500 wins under their belt, and an enviable peak rating of 2609.
- Not just a one-trick pony, molinov’s opening repertoire includes strong performances with classic lines like the Queens Gambit Declined, Pirc Defense, and Giuoco Piano.
Recent Games
In a recent display of dominance on March 29, 2025, molinov secured a victory using the Queens Gambit Declined Orthodox Rubinstein Variation, winning by resignation against a higher-rated opponent. Another notable match saw molinov outwit a rival on time using the tricky Alapin Sicilian Defense Barmen Defense.
In conclusion: molinov is like that unpredictable grandmaster friend who will outlast you in a blitz, outsmart you in bullet, and never stop battling no matter how tangled the position – a true chess gladiator with an epic track record and an appetite for victory (and maybe some risk-taking fun).
What you did well in your recent bullet games
In fast time controls, you show a strong willingness to play aggressively and keep the opponent under pressure. You often enter sharp lines that create practical chances and test your opponent's decision‑making under quick time pressure. Across several games, you demonstrated consistency in applying opening ideas and maintaining initiative, which is a solid foundation for bullet play.
- You vote for active piece play and seek concrete tactical challenges rather than passive maneuvering.
- You keep the opponent reacting to your plans, which helps you seize initiative early in the game.
- You apply opening ideas with a clear sense of direction, helping you avoid drifting into completely unstructured positions.
Key improvement areas for bullet games
- Time management: A number of bullets show you running short on time. Build a simple clock discipline: allocate a quick, initial appraisal for each move, then only deepens calculations when you have a clear forcing line. If you’re unsure, choose a safe, solid continuation rather than a speculative tactical trap.
- Move ordering and risk control: Some aggressive sacrifices don’t yield a clear advantage before the clock runs out. Practice filtering candidate moves to 2–3 solid options in the first 10 moves, then decide which path gives you the best practical chances.
- Endgame conversion: In longer bullet sequences or after material imbalances, practice fast endgame technique to convert advantages or hold tough positions. Focusing on rook endings and simple pawn endings can boost your conversion rate under time pressure.
- Calculation under pressure: Develop a mental checklist for common tactical motifs (forks, skewers, discovered checks, forced trades) so you don’t miss straightforward threats from your opponent.
- Post‑game reflection: After a bullet game, jot down one key turning point and what you could have done differently. This helps crystallize patterns and reduces repeat mistakes.
Opening strategy and recommendations
Your Opening Performance shows you fare reasonably well with dynamic lines, but bullets reward quick, reliable plans. Consider focusing on 2–3 openings that fit your style and study their typical replies so you can respond instantly on the clock. For example:
- Amar Gambit and Modern‑style openings show solid results in your data; commit to 1–2 main responses to each common reply and learn a few robust follow‑ups. Amar Gambit Modern Opening
- Keep a dependable, lower‑risk option for Black against common 1.e4 moves (such as a well‑understood Scandinavian or French setup) to reduce time spent on difficult decisions when under the gun.
Training plan and next steps
- Daily 15–20 minutes of tactical puzzles focused on fast calculation and recognizing forcing sequences.
- Weekly 2–3 game review sessions: identify the top 2 moments where time pressure caused a mistake and build a brief corrective plan for similar situations.
- Time‑management drills: practice 1‑minute games with a strict pace, then gradually add 1–2 minutes per game while maintaining accuracy.
- Endgame basics: study common rook endings and pawn endings so you can convert advantages or salvage draws quickly when needed.
Rating trend context and practical takeaways
Longer‑term trends suggest growth, with positive slopes over 3, 6, and 12 months, even though the 6‑month change shows some fluctuation. Use this plan to stabilize improvement and reduce volatility in bullet play. Focus on solid, repeatable decision‑making and consistent post‑game reflection to sustain progress.
Would you like a targeted game analysis?
If you share a recent game, I can walk through concrete move‑by‑move improvements and show how to apply the plan above in practice. For quick context, you can link to your profile to keep this moving: molinov
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pranav Senthilkumar | 6W / 1L / 1D | View |
| recobaman | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| petros_pap | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| invocandoafischer | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| illustradochess | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dinhnguyen603 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| khachikyan-hayko | 2W / 2L / 1D | View |
| ror32gt | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| yarib97 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| maiconmelo | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| timeless limitless | 205W / 240L / 16D | View Games |
| bxb13 | 106W / 125L / 10D | View Games |
| eltipo2012 | 66W / 79L / 4D | View Games |
| Jayson Gonzales | 41W / 83L / 0D | View Games |
| zasdf | 49W / 66L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2584 | 2632 | 924 | |
| 2024 | 2508 | 2601 | ||
| 2022 | 2601 | 2575 | ||
| 2021 | 2492 | 2167 | ||
| 2020 | 2402 | |||
| 2019 | 2366 | 2372 | 1937 | |
| 2018 | 2325 | 2293 | 1937 | |
| 2017 | 2100 | 2097 | ||
| 2016 | 2145 | 2049 | 1857 | |
| 2015 | 2056 | 2006 | ||
| 2014 | 1922 | 1945 | ||
| 2013 | 1755 | 1873 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 614W / 413L / 104D | 515W / 487L / 124D | 95.7 |
| 2024 | 108W / 77L / 22D | 84W / 88L / 32D | 96.1 |
| 2022 | 34W / 24L / 9D | 25W / 32L / 10D | 92.5 |
| 2021 | 176W / 162L / 38D | 147W / 197L / 28D | 91.2 |
| 2020 | 235W / 262L / 47D | 244W / 265L / 48D | 84.8 |
| 2019 | 536W / 553L / 92D | 491W / 599L / 74D | 88.3 |
| 2018 | 491W / 507L / 85D | 478W / 533L / 72D | 84.1 |
| 2017 | 2741W / 3006L / 311D | 2659W / 3106L / 323D | 79.5 |
| 2016 | 2486W / 2837L / 247D | 2334W / 2981L / 264D | 79.9 |
| 2015 | 1225W / 1319L / 139D | 1125W / 1424L / 127D | 79.8 |
| 2014 | 362W / 375L / 44D | 350W / 400L / 39D | 77.2 |
| 2013 | 596W / 585L / 55D | 570W / 597L / 60D | 77.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1410 | 704 | 578 | 128 | 49.9% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 560 | 284 | 237 | 39 | 50.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 387 | 172 | 176 | 39 | 44.4% |
| French Defense | 373 | 196 | 146 | 31 | 52.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 353 | 157 | 166 | 30 | 44.5% |
| Scotch Game | 316 | 142 | 144 | 30 | 44.9% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit | 310 | 168 | 120 | 22 | 54.2% |
| Czech Defense | 268 | 120 | 124 | 24 | 44.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 259 | 112 | 120 | 27 | 43.2% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 249 | 114 | 120 | 15 | 45.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 1381 | 628 | 701 | 52 | 45.5% |
| French Defense | 1024 | 475 | 512 | 37 | 46.4% |
| Czech Defense | 970 | 441 | 487 | 42 | 45.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 921 | 433 | 447 | 41 | 47.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 885 | 406 | 452 | 27 | 45.9% |
| Modern | 879 | 418 | 423 | 38 | 47.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 782 | 365 | 375 | 42 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 690 | 317 | 334 | 39 | 45.9% |
| Scotch Game | 688 | 286 | 372 | 30 | 41.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 672 | 283 | 357 | 32 | 42.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Orthodox Defence | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 2 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |