Biography
Nathaniel Mullodzhanov, known online as N_Mullodzhanov, is a titled chess player who has carved out a distinctive presence on the boards and in the chat). He earned the National Master title from National, a badge he wears with pride and a hint of mischievous charm. His preferred time control is Blitz, where quick wit and quicker moves collide in a flurry of tactical skirmishes. Beyond the blitz mirror, he’s a thoughtful competitor with a knack for practical decision-making and a sense of humor that keeps teammates smiling even when the clock is sprinting to zero.
In online circles, he’s celebrated for versatility, a broad opening repertoire, and the calm persistence that turns pressure into chances.
Nathaniel MullodzhanovCareer Highlights
- National Master title from National.
- Peak blitz rating around 2850 in 2025, with a career peak at 2853 in August 2025.
- Long-running winning streaks and resilience in fast time controls (longest winning streak: 20).
- Extensive blitz and rapid experience across a wide opening spectrum, including Sicilian Alapin, Caro-Kann families, and more.
- Highly active in 2024–2025, churning out hundreds of games with solid win rates across blitz and rapid formats.
Playing Style
Nate plays with practical energy and a fearless confidence in the heat of the clock. His endgame technique is reliable (Endgame Frequency around 81%), and he thrives on turning practical chances into conversions. Off the board, his warmth and humor make long sessions feel shorter, and his teammates appreciate the balance of competitiveness and camaraderie he brings to the table.
Opening Repertoire & Performance
In blitz, he demonstrates depth across a broad opening range, with notable results in lines such as the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation and Caro-Kann families, among others. His games show a willingness to experiment and adapt, often catching opponents off guard in the early middlegame. 2850 (2025-08-20)
Representative Game Sample
A taste of his style in action:
Recent blitz performance snapshot
You’ve shown a willingness to enter sharp, tactical lines and to fight for initiative in blitz. Your games indicate you can convert complex middlegame play into pressure, but there are a few recurring patterns where you can tighten up to convert more of those positions into wins and limit losses under time pressure.
What you’re doing well
- You’re comfortable opting for aggressive plans that test your opponent's defense quickly, which is a solid way to score in blitz when accuracy holds up.
- You handle dynamic piece activity with courage, often choosing lines that create practical chances even when the position is unbalanced.
- You show willingness to explore offbeat or sharp openings, which can yield practical wins by catching opponents off guard in blitz.
- You are capable of producing strong middlegame ideas when the position is dynamic, keeping pressure on the opponent’s king and key weaknesses.
Key improvement areas
- Time management: In blitz, it’s easy to get drawn into long tactical lines. Practice a simple time budget per phase (opening, middlegame, endgame) to avoid rushing in the critical moves late in the game.
- Consistency in openings: Have a small, reliable repertoire for both colors. Rely on a couple of main lines you know deeply, rather than a broad spread of offbeat choices that you’re still learning under pressure.
- Endgame technique: Strengthen standard endgame patterns (rook endings, king activity with pawns, converting small advantages). Blitz often comes down to precise technique in these endings.
- Calculation discipline: In tactical middlegames, identify 2–3 candidate moves you evaluate thoroughly, then compare their tangible imbalances (material, king safety, open files, pawn structure) before committing.
- Pattern awareness: Sharpen recognition of common tactical motifs (pins, skewers, forks, discovered attacks) so you spot winning ideas faster and avoid missing forced lines.
Opening performance guidance
Your data shows you’ve had success with flexible, dynamic lines and some offbeat choices. To convert this into steadier results in blitz, consider these practical steps:
- Solidify a short core repertoire: pick 2–3 openings for White and 2–3 for Black that you understand deeply, with key middlegame plans and typical endgame ideas in mind.
- Lean into trusted aggressive setups where you know the typical maneuvering is comfortable for you, then gradually add one additional offbeat line that you’re comfortable with in specific matchups.
- Review a representative set of recent blitz games focusing on the opening phase: where did you get good initiative, and where did you get overextended or lose track of king safety?
Practical plan your next two weeks
- Choose and drill a compact repertoire: pick two White openings and two Black defenses to own. Create a one-page quick reference for each with plan ideas and typical middlegame themes.
- Endgame drills: practice standard rook endings and king-pawn endings (5–10 minutes per session) to convert late middlegame advantages into wins.
- Daily tactical puzzles (10–15 minutes): focus on motifs you encounter most in your blitz games (checks, captures on open files, and forcing sequences).
- Post-game analysis habit: after each blitz game, write down one-to-two alternative plans or moves in the critical transition points you missed and try to understand why they were stronger.
- Time-budget practice: play at a slightly longer blitz pace (3+2 or 5+0) in training sessions to train restraint and avoid last-minute blunders.
Openings performance snapshot (optional focus)
Based on your openings data, you’re performing well with a mix of unknowns and specific systems. Consider documenting your top three go-to openings with a few lines you’re confident in, and balance with one or two disciplined alternatives to keep your opponents guessing.
Placeholder: Nathaniel Mullodzhanov · Sicilian Defense · Italian Game
Practice resources to accelerate improvement
- Targeted puzzle sets focusing on tactical motifs and typical blitz missteps you’ve shown, 15 minutes per day.
- Short, focused opening study sessions: 20–30 minutes to reinforce the core plans in your chosen repertoire.
- Regular post-game reviews: identify a single improvement target per game and track progress over a two-week cycle.
- Endgame refresher: small, essential endgames (rook + pawn vs rook, king activity endgames) practiced weekly.
Notes and placeholders
If you’d like, I can embed a quick spotlight example from your recent games for deeper analysis, or add a PGN snippet to review a specific position. Example placeholders you can use later:
or Nathaniel Mullodzhanov.🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Iweta Rajlich | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Christian Toth | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Pieter Heesters | 5W / 8L / 2D | View |
| karen_fathi | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| koziororo | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| thefinal_move | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Evandro Amorim Barbosa | 2W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Claudio Paduano | 1W / 2L / 2D | View |
| Rowan-Atkinson | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| chessnotcheckers5255 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| DoctorPouliot | 51W / 20L / 6D | View Games |
| Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. | 48W / 22L / 0D | View Games |
| PracticeMakesOK | 31W / 33L / 2D | View Games |
| Andy Woodward | 1W / 46L / 0D | View Games |
| boris1491 | 22W / 22L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2781 | 2876 | 2609 | 400 |
| 2024 | 2810 | 2573 | 2317 | |
| 2023 | 2361 | 2485 | 2223 | |
| 2022 | 1702 | |||
| 2021 | 2129 | 1895 | 2239 | |
| 2020 | 1935 | 2376 | 2161 | |
| 2019 | 1979 | 2169 | 1525 | |
| 2018 | 1811 | 2030 | 1656 | |
| 2017 | 1214 | 1742 | 1617 | |
| 2016 | 1574 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 814W / 578L / 99D | 714W / 687L / 101D | 86.3 |
| 2024 | 735W / 552L / 94D | 675W / 613L / 96D | 81.7 |
| 2023 | 22W / 16L / 2D | 24W / 12L / 5D | 95.1 |
| 2022 | 3W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 3L / 0D | 0.0 |
| 2021 | 31W / 30L / 5D | 38W / 26L / 4D | 78.5 |
| 2020 | 113W / 85L / 20D | 103W / 103L / 19D | 86.2 |
| 2019 | 109W / 102L / 25D | 114W / 114L / 13D | 88.0 |
| 2018 | 165W / 95L / 11D | 151W / 106L / 11D | 80.5 |
| 2017 | 57W / 19L / 3D | 40W / 29L / 5D | 79.1 |
| 2016 | 44W / 23L / 6D | 33W / 34L / 7D | 81.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 359 | 162 | 167 | 30 | 45.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 167 | 98 | 65 | 4 | 58.7% |
| Modern | 146 | 73 | 63 | 10 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 143 | 80 | 56 | 7 | 55.9% |
| Czech Defense | 138 | 77 | 55 | 6 | 55.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 137 | 66 | 65 | 6 | 48.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 112 | 47 | 59 | 6 | 42.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 91 | 53 | 29 | 9 | 58.2% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 88 | 46 | 30 | 12 | 52.3% |
| Alekhine Defense | 80 | 45 | 32 | 3 | 56.2% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 391 | 219 | 170 | 2 | 56.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 345 | 187 | 121 | 37 | 54.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 290 | 127 | 140 | 23 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 120 | 62 | 50 | 8 | 51.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 102 | 52 | 44 | 6 | 51.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 85 | 33 | 45 | 7 | 38.8% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 85 | 50 | 31 | 4 | 58.8% |
| Scotch Game | 84 | 39 | 42 | 3 | 46.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 78 | 36 | 36 | 6 | 46.1% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 77 | 49 | 19 | 9 | 63.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 19 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 63.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 17 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 16 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 14 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 78.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 64.3% |
| Scotch Game | 14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 57.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 12 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 41.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 88.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 4 |
| Losing | 22 | 0 |