Player Profile: Nar2004
Meet Nar2004, a chess aficionado whose journey through the 64 squares is as epic as a well-fought battle in a fantasy novel — minus the dragons, but with plenty of knight forks!
Rating Evolution
Starting out modestly in 2016 with a Blitz rating just shy of 1300 and a Rapid rating barely over 1000, Nar2004 has shown an impressive climb through the ranks.
By 2025, Nar2004’s Blitz rating soars past 2300, Bullet flirtations hit the upper 2600s, and Rapid holding strong above 2100. Someone’s been practicing those openings and sharp endgames!
Playing Style & Strengths
- White Win Rate: A commanding 54.2% — not just good, but stylish when taking the first move.
- Endgame wizardry: 75% of games reach an endgame, which means Nar2004 doesn’t shy away from the crunch time. Expect tactical fireworks!
- Tactical Awareness: 87.45% comeback rate and a perfect 100% win rate even after losing a piece. Defying gravity and logic alike.
- Long games enthusiast: Wins on average take about 70 moves, so patience is a virtue — and Nar2004 has it in buckets.
- Early resignations: A humble 1.12% rate, so it’s clear Nar2004 fights till the bitter end.
Speed Demon: Blitz & Bullet
Whether it’s blitz or bullet, Nar2004 is your fierce competitor. With over 14,000 bullet wins out of nearly 27,000 games, smashing opponents at lightning speed is part of the repertoire. A true bullet warrior who can think fast enough to outpace a caffeine-fueled cheetah.
A Record Against Friends & Foes
Nar2004 has spent quality time battling opponents like alb2775, chessblitzer2332, and xayf, maintaining solid success. Achieving a perfect 100% win rate against many foes might raise some eyebrows — either Nar2004 is on fire or has an army of loyal pawns.
Chess Life & Quirks
Nar2004 tends to play best on Saturdays, where the win rate peaks at 53.1%, and late nights at 1 am see an astonishing 84.6% win rate — maybe just a little too much coffee? Tilt factor is a manageable 15, which means the occasional tilt happens, but isn’t career-defining. Also, beware: the psychological edge when playing rated games over casual drops, so casual games might be where Nar2004 truly lets loose the beast!
Longest Winning Streak & Current Form
The longest streak of dazzling victories? 17 games. Currently riding a 1-game winning streak, Nar2004 is always ready for the next challenge.
In Summary
Nar2004 is a relentless seeker of checkmates and an indomitable fighter across all time controls, especially bullet and blitz. With impeccable tactical prowess and a chess heart full of courage, this player proves that the knight’s tricky moves can outwit even the cleverest queens. If chess were a video game, Nar2004 would be the speedrunner with the highest score and the coolest combo moves. Watch out world — this one’s coming for the crown!
Quick summary
Nice cluster of clean wins recently — you convert active chances, you see tactical shots, and you know how to hunt a king in blitz. The losses show a recurring theme: time trouble and occasional overextension. Below are focused, practical points to keep the good stuff and fix the leaks.
Recent-game examples (click to replay)
Replay your most recent tidy win and a loss that highlights time-management problems.
- Most recent win vs alex883320 — key ideas: king hunt, passed pawns, promoting the pawn:
- Recent loss that ended by flag vs voso001 — shows how quickly a winning position can slip when the clock is ignored:
What you're doing well
- Hunting the king: you convert initiative into decisive material or mate quickly in many blitz wins.
- Endgame/promotion instincts: multiple games show clean pawn pushes and successful promotions — you spot passed-pawn races.
- Opening repertoire pays off: your favorite systems (Nimzo-Larsen, some Sicilian lines, and aggressive gambits) produce real winning chances — you get practical positions you understand.
- Tactical vision under time pressure — you find forks, captures and decisive tactics in short time controls.
Main issues to fix
- Time trouble is recurring — several losses end on the clock or in rushed mistakes. You need a simple, repeatable time plan for 5|0 games.
- Occasional over-optimistic simplifications: you sometimes allow counterplay when simplifying without checking the opponent's last resource (e.g., letting knight forks or back-rank counterplay appear).
- Opening-specific leaks: the Nimzo-Larsen Classical Variation shows a lower win rate than your other lines. That suggests some concrete move-order or typical middlegame plans are unclear there.
- Endgame technique in complex piece/rook endgames under clock — convert earlier or trade into simpler winning king-and-pawn endings when ahead.
Concrete next steps (weekly plan)
- Daily 15–20 min tactics (target: 50 puzzles/day). Focus on forks, pins, discovered attacks — patterns you already convert well.
- 3 times per week: one 15+10 rapid game for conversion practice. Play those serious (no pre-moves), analyze the turning points.
- Time management drill: play 10 games of 5|0 with the rule “use at least 5 seconds on every move in the first 12 moves.” This prevents burn-down to zero early.
- Study the Nimzo-Larsen Classical Variation 2× per week: pick two model games (annotated) and learn typical pawn breaks and where your pieces belong. Save 30 minutes for this.
- Endgame practice: 2× per week spend 20 minutes on king-and-pawn versus king and basic rook endgames (winning method, Lucena, Philidor). Converting passed pawns is already a strength — seal it.
Quick blitz tips you can apply immediately
- Before every move ask: "Is my opponent threatening mate or a fork?" — a 1–2 second safety check saves flags and blunders.
- If you’re ahead in material, trade queens and simplify when the opponent has counterplay — don’t chase flashy checks if it costs time or allows a counterattack.
- Use increment-style thinking even in 5|0: build a mental clock plan (e.g., keep 30–45 seconds for the last 10 moves).
- In large tactical complications, commit to a depth: calculate candidate captures and one clear forcing line rather than trying to calculate everything.
- When you win material early (knight forks, piece wins), convert by reducing the opponent’s activity — freeze their counterplay.
Study resources & focused drills
- Daily tactic trainer (pattern emphasis: forks, pins, discovered checks).
- Short endgame bite: Lucena/Philidor + king and pawn vs king checklists — 20 minutes twice a week.
- Opening folder: add 5–8 model games for Nimzo-Larsen Classical; summarize one-page notes: typical pawn breaks, piece squares, and a plan vs ...c5 or ...d5.
- Analyze 2 recent losses each week: mark the move where the advantage changed and annotate why — this builds pattern recognition for recurring mistakes.
- Use the tag LPDO (loose pieces) in your analysis — ask “Which of my opponent’s pieces are hanging this position?” before moving.
Short checklist to use at the board (5-second routine)
- Are any pieces hanging (LPDO)?
- Opponent's last move: any new threats? (rook lift, back-rank, knight fork)
- Material vs activity: can I simplify safely?
- Do I have enough time? If < 30s, choose safe practical moves.
Motivation & next milestone
Your long-term rating curve shows strong peaks and a positive short-term trend slope. With focused blitz drills on time management + targeted opening study you should stop the -81 slide and push the next stable zone higher. Aim to convert one extra winning position per session by applying the checklist above — that small improvement compounds fast in blitz.
If you want, next
- Send 3 recent games you felt unsure about and I’ll mark the exact turning moves and give a 10-point actionable checklist for each.
- Or ask for a 2-week training micro-plan tuned to your available time (I’ll use your openings data).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Wouter Bik | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| atrozen | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| garudu | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| carwynyeo | 2W / 10L / 0D | |
| vanhnolifechess | 5W / 3L / 0D | |
| flipsjde | 5W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| alb2775 | 197W / 78L / 6D | |
| Eddy Osei | 49W / 18L / 2D | |
| Xayf | 37W / 23L / 3D | |
| sshhaahhiinn | 23W / 24L / 3D | |
| Martinezzz2002 | 20W / 27L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2455 | 2226 | 2156 | |
| 2024 | 2549 | 2249 | 2172 | |
| 2023 | 2398 | 2254 | 2181 | |
| 2022 | 2231 | 2345 | 1854 | |
| 2021 | 1426 | 2180 | 1070 | |
| 2020 | 1909 | 2142 | ||
| 2019 | 1895 | 2054 | ||
| 2018 | 775 | 1288 | ||
| 2017 | 1314 | 1324 | 959 | |
| 2016 | 1286 | 1081 | 1445 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1144W / 771L / 158D | 984W / 931L / 154D | 78.3 |
| 2024 | 1369W / 927L / 144D | 1250W / 1032L / 152D | 74.5 |
| 2023 | 1811W / 1357L / 212D | 1669W / 1499L / 190D | 73.8 |
| 2022 | 1691W / 1163L / 170D | 1534W / 1336L / 178D | 73.1 |
| 2021 | 712W / 650L / 37D | 643W / 688L / 46D | 62.1 |
| 2020 | 868W / 810L / 64D | 870W / 808L / 68D | 65.6 |
| 2019 | 526W / 303L / 24D | 495W / 340L / 15D | 63.1 |
| 2018 | 75W / 97L / 1D | 69W / 107L / 2D | 43.5 |
| 2017 | 147W / 137L / 1D | 144W / 136L / 3D | 54.8 |
| 2016 | 10W / 16L / 1D | 5W / 21L / 0D | 40.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 2003 | 1087 | 844 | 72 | 54.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1919 | 1020 | 799 | 100 | 53.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1311 | 703 | 548 | 60 | 53.6% |
| Australian Defense | 923 | 499 | 380 | 44 | 54.1% |
| Modern | 843 | 480 | 327 | 36 | 56.9% |
| Czech Defense | 768 | 401 | 323 | 44 | 52.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 750 | 377 | 329 | 44 | 50.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 738 | 388 | 314 | 36 | 52.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 713 | 339 | 348 | 26 | 47.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 685 | 360 | 288 | 37 | 52.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 108 | 63 | 36 | 9 | 58.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 81 | 46 | 28 | 7 | 56.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 76 | 49 | 23 | 4 | 64.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 54 | 35 | 16 | 3 | 64.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 47 | 21 | 20 | 6 | 44.7% |
| Czech Defense | 39 | 19 | 18 | 2 | 48.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 37 | 20 | 16 | 1 | 54.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 32 | 20 | 12 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 32 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 31 | 17 | 12 | 2 | 54.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Modern | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 1 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |