Nasrin Babayeva - Woman FIDE Master
Nasrin Babayeva, proudly holding the title of Woman FIDE Master, is a formidable force on the chessboard with a knack for turning pawns into potential winners. Since 2018, Nasrin’s ratings have steadily climbed across all formats, showcasing a player who refuses to settle for less.
Chess Journey and Style
Starting with a rapid rating of 1418 in 2018, Nasrin quickly advanced to competing fiercely in Daily, Blitz, Bullet, and Rapid games. Not one to rush off early, Nasrin has an endgame frequency of nearly 63%, proving that the battles continue well beyond the opening moves. With an impressive comeback rate of 76%, Nasrin has mastered the art of bouncing back, and an astonishing 98% win rate after losing a piece suggests that this player has nerves of steel — or perhaps a secret stash of tactical tricks up their sleeve.
Strength Across Time Controls
- Bullet: With a peak rating soaring above 2000 (max 2053 in 2024), speed and sharp intuition are Nasrin’s allies, although wins can be a little harder to come by here (Win rate around 31%).
- Blitz: Nasrin’s blitz exploits boast a peak rating over 2200 and a respectable win ratio close to 48%, blending speed with skill.
- Rapid: This is where Nasrin seems to shine brightest with an excellent 67.8% win rate on top-secret openings and a max rating of 1920+.
- Daily: The patient battles of daily games have yielded a solid rating climb, peaking at 2014, proving that thoughtful strategy is key in Nasrin’s playbook.
Winning Streaks & Opponents
Nasrin’s longest winning streak stands tall at 19 games, but even when winning runs cool off, the current streak of 1 win shows there’s no time to rest. Off the board, Nasrin has matched up against a wide array of opponents, with some like larina_maria proving to be worthy rivals over 23 encounters. And yes, Nasrin definitely enjoys the challenge — having some notable perfect win records against plenty of players with downright intimidating usernames!
Mind Games and Magic Hours
Here’s a quirky fact: Nasrin’s best times to play are evenings, especially at 19:00 and 22:00 hours, where win rates leap to 75% and 73% respectively — clearly the board lights up when the sun goes down. And at 23:00? Well, a 100% win rate suggests Nasrin either feeds off late-night espresso or just prefers keeping opponents guessing while the rest of us are asleep.
Fun Facts
- Known for a modest early resignation rate (~6%), Nasrin believes every chess piece deserves a chance to dance.
- Average moves per win hover around 60, meaning the games are never short on excitement or strategy.
- Despite a tilt factor of 46 (because who doesn’t get a little salty sometimes?), Nasrin’s resilience turns setbacks into setup for wins.
In all, Nasrin Babayeva is not just making moves on the board, but also in the hearts of chess enthusiasts who admire tenacity, style, and a dash of late-night brilliance. Whether contesting with the clock in bullet or slowly maneuvering in daily games, Nasrin brings both passion and prowess to every match.
What Nasrin did well in recent games
- You consistently used solid English Opening ideas, keeping your pieces coordinated and your king safely tucked in after developing the bishop to g2. This gives you good control over the long diagonals and helps you create pressure in the middlegame.
- You showed good activity with piece play in several games, seizing chances to activate rooks and bring pieces to active squares. In particular, you pursued rook activity along open files and maintained chances to create threats against the opponent’s king.
- Endgame resilience was evident in some battles where you kept fighting and found chances to complicate or convert, especially when the position opened up and rooks and minor pieces could coordinate on weak points.
- You demonstrated practical decision making in dynamic positions, keeping lines open for tactical opportunities and not immediately simplifying when active play could yield chances to trap or pressure the opponent.
Key areas to improve
- Time management and pace: In some longer battles, critical moments arrived with limited time. Practice budgeting your thinking time, especially in the middlegame, so you can confirm a plan before diving into tactics. Build in a quick, repeatable routine for the first 20 moves of each game to reduce time pressure later.
- Pattern recognition in the middlegame: Strengthen your ability to spot typical pawn breaks and strategic ideas after the opening, so you can choose plans that exploit your space and piece activity without getting sidetracked by tempting but inefficient tactical lines.
- Endgame planning: When the position simplifies, focus on converting favorable pawn structures or rooks-to-open-files advantages. Practice two or three standard endgame transitions you’re comfortable with so you can steer toward a clear, winning plan rather than guessing in the final phase.
- Opening diversity and preparation: Your recent games show heavy use of English Opening structures. Consider adding a second dependable White setup and a few Black defenses you’re comfortable with to avoid predictable responses and to handle a wider range of opponents. This helps you adapt to different pawn structures and plans you’ll encounter in tournaments.
Opening choices and plans
You’ve been performing well with English Opening concepts, developing pieces smoothly and controlling long diagonals. To build on this strength, consider reinforcing two ideas:
- English Opening main lines: strengthen your understanding of typical middlegame plans that arise after you fianchetto the bishop and challenge the center with c4 and d4 moves. This helps you convert space advantages into concrete attacks.
- Secondary White setups: pick one flexible alternative to your current English plan so you can adapt to opponents who counter in slightly different ways. This reduces predictability and broadens your practical toolkit.
For targeted learning, you might explore resources on the English Opening: English Opening and consider reviewing a few practical games in the Barnes Defense and related English/Early-Bishop setups to compare plans.
Time management and calculation discipline
- Before each move, ask and answer three quick questions: What is my immediate threat or plan? What can my opponent threaten next? What is the simplest forcing line that improves my position?
- During the middlegame, allocate a fixed thinking budget for critical positions (for example, 60–90 seconds for a key decision) and use a consistent process (evaluate material, check king safety, inspect candidate moves, verify opponent responses).
- In training games, practice with a clock that mirrors tournament conditions to build a reliable rhythm and reduce last-minute time pressure.
Training plan and practical drills
- Weekly openings work: choose two main lines to study (for example, English Opening main line and one secondary White setup) and 1–2 Black replies you’re comfortable with. Practice with annotated model games to see typical ideas and plans.
- Daily tactics short session: 15–20 minutes of tactical puzzles focused on counting material and recognizing motif patterns (pins, forks, skewers, decoys) to sharpen calculation in real games.
- Endgame basics: dedicate 1–2 sessions per week to endgames, focusing on rook endings, king activity, and pawn endgames (e.g., how to convert a passed pawn, and how to protect a weakly placed pawn).
- Post-game review habit: after each daily game, write a short note on the key turning point, the best move you played, and one improvement you would try next time. This cements learning and accelerates improvement.
Next steps and offer
If you’d like, I can tailor a 4-week improvement plan around your current openings, time management goals, and endgame focus. I can also annotate a few of your recent games to highlight concrete improvements and provide a small set of practice tasks for the coming week. Would you like me to put together a personalized plan?
Profile and sample openings you’ve used can be explored here: Nasrin_Babayeva
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Maria Larina | 11W / 11L / 1D | View Games |
| Habil Javadov | 4W / 8L / 3D | View Games |
| krepelious | 14W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| the_adammammadov | 6W / 7L / 1D | View Games |
| Han Schut | 6W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2140 | 2187 | 2282 | 1855 |
| 2024 | 1902 | 2222 | 1920 | 1825 |
| 2023 | 2014 | 1853 | 1836 | 1897 |
| 2022 | 1340 | 1775 | 1901 | 1894 |
| 2021 | 1827 | 1558 | ||
| 2020 | 1385 | 1671 | 1591 | 1558 |
| 2019 | 1413 | 1715 | 1726 | 1517 |
| 2018 | 1418 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 210W / 203L / 21D | 186W / 226L / 29D | 62.8 |
| 2024 | 185W / 268L / 15D | 188W / 265L / 21D | 59.8 |
| 2023 | 139W / 176L / 17D | 116W / 206L / 13D | 61.8 |
| 2022 | 42W / 24L / 8D | 34W / 40L / 2D | 65.4 |
| 2021 | 2W / 2L / 0D | 0W / 2L / 0D | 17.3 |
| 2020 | 110W / 80L / 8D | 108W / 79L / 5D | 64.8 |
| 2019 | 180W / 140L / 18D | 175W / 149L / 15D | 56.9 |
| 2018 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 94.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 204 | 103 | 95 | 6 | 50.5% |
| Unknown | 104 | 56 | 48 | 0 | 53.9% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 85 | 43 | 40 | 2 | 50.6% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 69 | 32 | 32 | 5 | 46.4% |
| English Opening | 49 | 28 | 19 | 2 | 57.1% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 41 | 15 | 22 | 4 | 36.6% |
| Australian Defense | 34 | 13 | 21 | 0 | 38.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 30 | 14 | 16 | 0 | 46.7% |
| Modern Defense | 29 | 9 | 15 | 5 | 31.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 23 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 47.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 192 | 102 | 74 | 16 | 53.1% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 102 | 63 | 30 | 9 | 61.8% |
| English Opening | 78 | 57 | 18 | 3 | 73.1% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 42 | 21 | 19 | 2 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 41 | 23 | 15 | 3 | 56.1% |
| Modern Defense | 34 | 14 | 15 | 5 | 41.2% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 31 | 14 | 14 | 3 | 45.2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 30 | 14 | 13 | 3 | 46.7% |
| Australian Defense | 24 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 54.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 138 | 44 | 91 | 3 | 31.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 107 | 34 | 72 | 1 | 31.8% |
| English Opening | 85 | 35 | 46 | 4 | 41.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 83 | 29 | 51 | 3 | 34.9% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 60 | 31 | 25 | 4 | 51.7% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 57 | 18 | 39 | 0 | 31.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 53 | 25 | 28 | 0 | 47.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 45 | 7 | 37 | 1 | 15.6% |
| English Opening: Closed, Taimanov Variation | 37 | 11 | 25 | 1 | 29.7% |
| Modern Defense | 30 | 8 | 22 | 0 | 26.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 24 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 75.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 19 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 73.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 64.7% |
| English Opening | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Ruy Lopez | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Scotch Game | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 80.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 0 |
| Losing | 46 | 2 |