Nigel Fat — Grandmaster & Blitz Specialist
Nigel Fat (username: NigelFat) is a Grandmaster known for blistering play on the clock and a taste for sharp, uncompromising lines. A true blitz specialist, Nigel has built a reputation for tactical fireworks, long decisive games, and an uncanny ability to convert chaotic positions into wins. Expect daring gambits, late‑game endurance, and a ready smile after an unexpected finish.
Career highlights
- FIDE title: Grandmaster.
- Preferred time control: Blitz — Nigel’s strongest and most prolific arena for creative play.
- Peak Blitz rating: 3111 (2025-11-22) — a benchmark that reflects sustained elite performance in fast time controls.
- Peak Bullet rating: 2860 (2024-11-13) — an indicator of deadly speed in the shortest games.
- Longest winning streak: 43 consecutive wins — evidence of purple-patch dominance.
Playing style & strengths
Nigel combines aggressive opening choices with deep tactical awareness and surprising endgame stamina. Key traits:
- Blitz instincts: exceptional at time-pressure tactics and rapid calculation.
- Endgame resilience: high endgame frequency and long average decisive games (often grinding wins out over many moves).
- Comeback ability: strong comeback rate — routinely turns difficult positions around.
- Psychology: plays best in late-night & early-morning spikes (notably a top performing hour around 02:00).
Openings & repertoire
Nigel favors lively, sometimes offbeat systems that lead to imbalanced play — ideal for blitz. He scores especially well with aggressive gambits and certain surprise systems.
- Favorites: Amar Gambit, London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation, Caro-Kann Defense.
- Notable results: outstanding win rates with the Amar Gambit in blitz and a very strong record in the London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation in bullet.
- Versatility: comfortable transposing into symmetrical English structures or sharp Nimzo-Larsen lines when the situation demands.
Memorable stats & quirks
- Blitz corpus: hundreds of games with a high win share — Nigel has logged many months where blitz was the main stage for his best form.
- Win distribution: consistently strong on weekends (Saturday shows a particularly high win rate), and several daytime hours where he peaks.
- Head-to-head highlights: most-played opponent is Harshad S — a rivalry with dozens of encounters and many decisive moments.
- Average decisive game length: often long for blitz — Nigel’s wins average well over 80 moves, underlining endurance and technical strength.
Representative game (blitz)
A short extract that captures Nigel’s taste for opening skirmishes followed by patient technique. Click to replay in the viewer below.
Rivals, collaborators & community
Nigel is an active opponent against several well-known players and a frequent participant in competitive online arenas. His most-played adversary is Harshad S, and other recurring names include nihalsarin and manudavid2910 — matches that often produce instructive, entertaining games for spectators.
Personality & off-board notes
Off the board, Nigel mixes dry humor with serious study. He’s the sort of Grandmaster who might sacrifice a piece for style in blitz and then annotate the idea afterward with a laugh. Fans appreciate his candid post-game commentary and willingness to try unusual openings just to make chess a bit more entertaining.
- Nickname idea: "The Blitz Mechanic" — fixes positions under time pressure.
- Training focus: sharp opening prep + endgame technique to capitalize on long, decisive games.
Visuals & quick links
Quick chart of recent Blitz performance:
Profile note: fans can follow Nigel’s games for fast-paced, instructive entertainment — he’s a must-watch in any blitz pool.
Quick takeaway
Nice run, Nigel — your recent blitz shows clean attacking instincts, sharp opening choices and generally strong technique. The single biggest limiter right now is the clock: a number of games ended on time or with you under heavy Zeitnot. Fixing simple clock habits will give you immediate rating juice while you keep working on tactics and endgame conversion.
What you did well (recent games)
- Proactive kingside play — h4 / Rg1 / g-file pressure appears in several wins and creates practical problems for opponents.
- Good tactical feel in sharp middlegames — you win material or open lines at the right moment instead of waiting for the opponent to blunder.
- Endgame technique is reliable — you convert rook + pawn advantages calmly and coordinate king + rook well when it matters.
- Opening repertoire is consistent. You reach comfortable positions quickly and force opponents into your type of game rather than playing into theirs.
Recurring issues to fix
- Time management. Several losses and one win were affected by low clock. You get into Zeitnot in long endgames; that’s where simple conversion technique + clock discipline wins games.
- Queen adventures / early queen sorties. In sharp lines your queen sometimes leaves home early and becomes a target. That hands opponents free tempi and counterplay — avoid unless it wins concretely.
- Loose pieces / LPDO moments. In tactical melees there were a couple of instances where a piece could be grabbed after a forcing sequence. Slow down 1–2 seconds to re-check if any of your pieces are en prise before you move.
- Over-circling when winning. When you have a clear advantage you sometimes repeat checks or maneuver without simplifying to a winning endgame — this opens swindling chances for the opponent.
Concrete drills (this week)
- Clock drill — 7 days
- Play 8 games of 3|2 (or 5|3). Your goal: finish move 20 with at least 30 seconds on the clock. If you fail, stop, note why, and repeat the drill later that day.
- Practice premoves only for forced recaptures or obviously forced moves. Avoid auto-premoves in messy positions.
- Tactics & blunder check — daily
- 10 mixed tactics with focus on pins, forks and back-rank motifs. After each puzzle, ask: “Which of my pieces became undefended during this sequence?”
- Add 5 “spot-checks” per game: before you move, glance for hanging pieces and checks — make it a habit.
- Endgame micro-sessions
- Three 15‑minute sessions this week on basic rook endgames (Lucena / Philidor), king + pawn races and opposition. Convert technical wins faster and with less risk of flagging.
Opening work (targeted)
Use your openings' strengths and make small improvements — you don’t need big repertoire changes.
- Amar Gambit / Aggressive systems. Keep the sharp lines that work (>85% win rate). Drill the common tactical motifs and the typical pawn‑sac compensation so you recognise when to accept or decline complications.
- Caro-Kann & quieter lines. Your win rate is OK. Focus on the pawn structures that arise after exchanges and study one plan per structure (where to put a knight, where to play the pawn break).
- Practical rule: When the position becomes chaotic, favour moves that make your king safer and reduce opponent counterplay — fewer queen sorties, more minor piece development.
Mini post-mortem of your most recent win
Key moments: you opened lines on the kingside, traded into an ending where your activity and open files were decisive. Your opponent resigned after 17.Qf3 because mate threats and piece activity were overwhelming — great finishing sense.
Replay the game below and tag three positions: one where you felt confident, one where you hesitated, and one tactical moment you want to understand better.
Game viewer:
Opponent shown: Adam Kozak.
Small habits that will move the needle
- Two-second rule: before you move, take two seconds to scan for checks and hanging pieces — saves many LPDO moments.
- When ahead materially: simplify toward a winning endgame (trade queens or heavy pieces when you’re a pawn up and can improve king activity).
- If you’re flagging often: accept slightly worse but simpler positions when you’re under time pressure. Practical chances beat perfect play when the clock is the opponent.
Next steps & follow-up
- Do the 7‑day clock drill + two endgame micro-sessions. After that, send me one annotated win and one annotated loss (just 3–5 lines of annotation each is fine).
- I’ll return with a short analysis of critical positions and a focused 2‑week practice plan (openings + endgame + one recurring tactic theme).
- If you want, I can prioritise reducing time losses (practical anti-flagging recipe) or sharpening conversion in rook endgames — tell me which.
Solid work, Nigel. Fix the tiny clock & hanging-piece habits and your already-strong technique will convert into more consistent rating gains.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| David Zhurbinsky | 3W / 5L / 1D | View |
| Alfredo Asaf Rivera Pérez | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Juan Armando Röhl Montes | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| calmberserk | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Adam Kozak | 6W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Luis Paulo Supi | 3W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Bharath Subramaniyam.H Harishankkar | 3W / 5L / 0D | View |
| GZQSH07 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Seo Jungmin | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Artin Ashraf | 2W / 4L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rubinstein_akiba | 24W / 15L / 3D | View Games |
| Nihal Sarin | 6W / 14L / 2D | View Games |
| Manu David | 7W / 6L / 3D | View Games |
| Igor Kovalenko | 8W / 4L / 2D | View Games |
| cockroachdolly | 10W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2813 | 3107 | ||
| 2024 | 2860 | 2872 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 90W / 55L / 15D | 80W / 61L / 18D | 96.6 |
| 2024 | 120W / 30L / 7D | 98W / 46L / 9D | 84.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 38 | 24 | 11 | 3 | 63.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 18 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 83.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Döry Defense | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 21 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 16 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 13 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 46.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 61.5% |
| Döry Defense | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 43 | 0 |
| Losing | 4 | 2 |