Avatar of Nihal Sarin

Nihal Sarin GM

Username: nihalsarin

Playing Since: 2012-04-05 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Rapid: 2782
180W / 78L / 69D
Blitz: 3317
16521W / 8849L / 3012D
Bullet: 3230
14383W / 7170L / 1812D

Profile

Nihal Sarin is an Indian chess grandmaster renowned for his versatility across rapid, blitz, and bullet formats. A prodigy turned seasoned competitor, he earned the Grandmaster title from FIDE and now competes on the world stage while also engaging fans as a streamer. Nihal Sarin

Career highlights

  • Celebrated for endgame mastery and long, fighting battles; longest documented winning streak reaches 43 games.
  • Notable peak in fast time controls, with impressive performances across blitz, rapid, and bullet formats.
  • A leading figure in Indian chess's new generation, frequently facing the world's top players in elite events.

Preferred time control: Rapid.

Rapid Rating20192020202120222023202527822593YearRapid Rating

Streaming and online presence

Beyond over-the-board tournaments, Nihal streams his games, annotations, and analyses, building a lively online community of fellow fans and aspiring players. Nihal Sarin

Playing style

Known for a dynamic and tenacious approach, Nihal blends sharp tactical ideas with deep endgame understanding. His play often leads to rich, technical battles that test opponents’ resources, and his comeback potential is a well-noted strength in many of his games. Endgame frequency and resilience are standout traits in his repertoire.

Opening repertoire

His openings reflect a flexible, modern mindset, ranging from ambitious gambits to solid systems. This breadth allows him to adapt to different opponents and time controls, keeping his opponents guessing.

  • London System family and related setups
  • Amar Gambit and other aggressive lines
  • Dor̈y/Dory-leaning defenses and Nimzo-Larsen variants

Coach Chesswick's Profile Photo
Coach Chesswick

Feedback for Nihal Sarin — Rapid Games

You’ve shown strong energy in sharp openings and a solid ability to press in middlegames. In recent results, you demonstrated courage to test complicated lines and keep activity high even when the position is dynamic. There are opportunities to tighten time management, improve decision making under pressure, and polish endgame technique to convert more of your advantages into wins. Below are practical steps to build on your strengths and address the core areas for improvement.

What you're doing well

  • Active, sharp opening choices that put immediate pressure on opponents and create practical winning chances.
  • Strong piece coordination when you get activity in the middlegame, especially in positions with opposing king safety and open lines.
  • Resilience in complicated dynamics; you don’t shy away from tactical complications and you look for chances to outmaneuver in the middle game.
  • Positive trend in several time controls, showing you can sustain effort and maintain momentum through long sequences.

Key areas to improve

  • Time management in rapid: develop a quick, consistent pre-move plan. Aim to identify a clear strategic plan within the first 15 moves and limit crisis calculation to the most forcing lines.
  • Decision quality under pressure: when there is no forcing line, switch to evaluating long-term plans (pawn structures, piece activity, king safety) rather than chasing immediate tactical ideas that may misfire.
  • Endgame technique: practice common rook endings, minor piece endgames, and pawn endgames so you can convert small advantages into wins and avoid drawn or losing endings.
  • Exchange decisions: be mindful of trades that simplify into positions where your initiative is reduced or where your opponent’s plan becomes easier to execute.
  • Pattern recognition and prophylaxis: improve anticipation of your opponent’s typical plans after a given structure, so you can pre-emptively neutralize threats or convert gradual advantages.

Opening strategy and repertoire

  • Your sharper lines (e.g., Amar Gambit and other aggressive setups) are a strong weapon for taking initiative. Maintain these as your fighting toolkit, but also incorporate solid, less brittle back-ups to avoid overexposure when an opponent neutralizes your main ideas.
  • When facing solid defenses (like Queen’s Gambit Declined structures and classical replies), strengthen your plan in the middlegame: identify one or two strategic ideas (e.g., break plans on the kingside or queenside, or targeted piece maneuvers) to keep pressure even if the initial tactic fails.
  • Balance your repertoire to reduce risk in rapid events. A dependable, compact set of lines that you know deeply can help you convert more games, especially when you’re short on time.
  • In review, pay attention to how often you land on a favorable endgame after lengthy exchanges. If a line tends to lead to equal chances but with less dynamic play, consider an alternative plan to maintain practical chances.

Training plan and drills

  • Time management practice: dedicate one training block per week to “speed runs” where you play rapid games with strict time controls and a rule to stop calculating after a few forcing moves, then decide a plan and stick to it.
  • Endgame study: each week, pick two endgame themes (for example, rook endings with active king, and king plus two pawns vs king) and drill them with short, practical puzzles or simplified practice games until you can execute the winning idea under time pressure.
  • Pattern recognition: do 3–4 short tactical drills daily focusing on typical middlegame motifs you’ve encountered in your rapid games (minor piece maneuvers, pawn breaks, and defensive resources for the opponent’s initiative).
  • Opening review with purpose: after each game, write down the one or two middlegame plans that arose from your opening. If your opponent neutralizes your main idea, outline a secondary plan you could switch to in the same structure.
  • Post-game analysis habit: for every loss and every uncertain moment in a win, note one concrete improvement and one alternative approach you could try next time.
  • Weekly plan: alternate between sharp opening practice, solid repertoire exercises, and endgame mastery. Include at least 2 full-length rapid games per week and a focused review session.

Sample takeaways from recent games

  • In sharp, initiative-based games, aim to convert small advantages earlier by coordinating rooks and minor pieces toward key files or diagonals before the opponent stabilizes. If you’re ahead in space or king safety, push for a decisive break rather than lingering too long in forcing lines that don’t gain material.
  • When facing a strong defensive opponent, recognize when to simplify to a favorable endgame. If simplification reduces your practical chances, resist trades that clear the way for a solid defense by your opponent.

Next steps

If you’d like, I can tailor a week-by-week program based on your current openings and typical endgames you reach. Here is a placeholder example plan you could adapt: Opening study plan



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
Praggnanandhaa Rameshbabu 453W / 173L / 50D View
Sina Movahed 69W / 50L / 8D View
Trig_King 3W / 0L / 0D View
Amin Tabatabaei 361W / 218L / 82D View
Daniel Naroditsky 1136W / 851L / 232D View
Ediz Gürel 215W / 89L / 44D View
Pranav V 362W / 153L / 55D View
Dmitry Andreikin 26W / 31L / 5D View
Sergei Zhigalko 43W / 31L / 11D View
Miłosz Szpar 1W / 0L / 0D View
Most Played Opponents
Arjun Erigaisi 1229W / 940L / 270D View Games
Daniel Naroditsky 1136W / 851L / 232D View Games
Srinath Narayanan 702W / 370L / 95D View Games
Tuan Minh Le 351W / 314L / 72D View Games
Brandon Jacobson 449W / 190L / 66D View Games

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 3148 3259 2782
2024 3168 3194
2023 3063 3203 2734
2022 3145 3186 2767
2021 3240 3127 2615
2020 3176 3060 2593
2019 3156 3067 2593
2018 2909 1913
2017 2660 2582 2324
2016 2239 2462 1794
2015 2207 2371 1714
2014 1879 2050 1717
2013 1663 1831 1676
2012 1625 1899 1681
Rating by Year2012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202532591625YearRatingBulletBlitzRapid

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 1248W / 569L / 155D 1130W / 661L / 178D 92.4
2024 1428W / 485L / 197D 1329W / 559L / 210D 87.7
2023 2763W / 816L / 399D 2567W / 1017L / 368D 91.3
2022 1656W / 582L / 236D 1518W / 716L / 242D 91.0
2021 1189W / 526L / 168D 1143W / 581L / 151D 80.8
2020 1542W / 927L / 193D 1480W / 1010L / 179D 50.7
2019 1947W / 979L / 262D 1756W / 1131L / 297D 75.9
2018 2839W / 1434L / 458D 2588W / 1650L / 470D 77.3
2017 1724W / 930L / 217D 1571W / 1045L / 246D 81.0
2016 778W / 508L / 114D 707W / 604L / 94D 77.6
2015 611W / 399L / 83D 548W / 482L / 75D 75.0
2014 137W / 63L / 7D 123W / 79L / 12D 70.9
2013 156W / 82L / 4D 133W / 95L / 7D 65.2
2012 403W / 208L / 23D 383W / 213L / 20D 66.9

Openings: Most Played

Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Unknown 3007 1887 1095 25 62.8%
Caro-Kann Defense 896 517 291 88 57.7%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 863 499 276 88 57.8%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 848 537 219 92 63.3%
Amazon Attack 593 351 186 56 59.2%
Döry Defense 574 342 176 56 59.6%
Amar Gambit 546 379 127 40 69.4%
Modern 512 310 142 60 60.5%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 456 287 119 50 62.9%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 425 247 132 46 58.1%
Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 1763 1104 530 129 62.6%
Modern 1323 829 398 96 62.7%
Amar Gambit 1322 870 389 63 65.8%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 1243 793 365 85 63.8%
Unknown 870 408 454 8 46.9%
King's Indian Attack 827 498 271 58 60.2%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 782 473 245 64 60.5%
Caro-Kann Defense 775 473 231 71 61.0%
Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit 723 429 247 47 59.3%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 660 393 212 55 59.5%
Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Sicilian Defense 17 10 5 2 58.8%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 15 10 1 4 66.7%
English Opening: Agincourt Defense 13 7 1 5 53.9%
Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit 11 6 3 2 54.5%
Caro-Kann Defense 11 4 2 5 36.4%
Amar Gambit 10 8 2 0 80.0%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 9 3 2 4 33.3%
Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 8 1 3 4 12.5%
Unknown 8 7 0 1 87.5%
Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation 8 4 3 1 50.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 43 0
Losing 15 1
🐞 Report a Problem