Rohan Rajaram - Candidate Master Extraordinaire
Meet Rohan Rajaram, a chess warrior whose pieces dance across the board with the precision of a grandmaster but with a flair that hints at a secret chess ninja lurking behind the calm exterior. Awarded the prestigious title of Candidate Master by FIDE, Rohan's journey through the ranks is nothing short of a strategic thriller.
Starting humbly in the bullet format with a modest rating around 1242 in 2020, Rohan has rocketed up to a staggering 2819 in 2025—a leap that would make even the fastest pawn promotion blush. Not one to rest on their laurels, Rohan also holds impressive blitz and rapid ratings, climbing consistently over the years with a blitz peak of 2810 and rapid soaring beyond 2100.
What truly sets Rohan apart is their tactical wizardry: boasting a phenomenal 90.91% comeback rate, it’s safe to say giving them material advantage is a risky pursuit. And against the odds, Rohan wins nearly every time after losing a piece — they'd probably win even with one hand tied behind their back!
Known among opponents by the username ninjatrick, Rohan maintains a steady psychological game — with a tilt factor of 21, they might occasionally grimace but never crumble. Plus, their average game length of around 78 moves means they're in it for the long haul, savoring the sweet taste of victory only a well-fought endgame can provide.
A strategist at heart, Rohan’s opening repertoire features mysterious "Top Secret" moves and surprise "Unknown Openings," leaving rivals guessing — and sometimes just scratching their heads. Their record against fierce competitors is impressive, dispatching many with an almost robotic precision, while still showing mercy on a few (win rates hovering around 50% for most... because even Candidate Masters like a little suspense).
Off the board? Possibly plotting the next brilliant combination or brewing that perfect cup of tea while pondering: “If a knight jumps over the bishop, does it scare the queen?” Perhaps. What’s for sure is that Rohan Rajaram’s chess story is one of tenacity, sharp wit, and above all, an insatiable hunger to master the 64-square battlefield.
Keep an eye on this Candidate Master — the board is their dojo, and they're just getting started.
Personalised Feedback for Rohan Rajaram
Snapshot of Your Current Form
• Time-class played most: 3-minute blitz
• Best blitz mark so far:
• Recent score: 5 wins – 5 losses (sample taken from last two sessions)
What You Are Doing Well
- Dynamic pawn play: Your wins against sinistersnake and Ali Sebbar show confident central and wing pawn breaks (…b5, …f5, c5) that seized the initiative early.
- Converting advantages: In the English vs BSWPaulsen you coordinated rooks and minor pieces smoothly, finishing with 33.Rf7# – a textbook exploitation of an exposed king.
- End-game tenacity: Your 63-move grind versus Andrej Ljepic proved you can keep your nerve in equal or even slightly worse endings, creating practical winning chances until the very end.
Patterns That Cost You Games
- Early king exposure in bullet: Three losses to jacky3252 ended in mate before move 15, all featuring Qh7/Qh6 infiltrations. The common factors were:
- Queenside development before completing kingside safety (…h6 or …g6 left undefended squares).
- Slow reaction to direct mating threats in double-fiancetto structures.
- Pawn pushes that weaken dark squares: In the Nimzowitsch-Larsen loss you played …f5 + …h6 creating holes on g6/h6. Opponent’s queen and rook exploited them quickly.
- Clock management: Two time-forfeit losses occurred in positions that were still objectively playable. In ultra-fast games a two-second safety buffer is vital – make your move-confirm click part of the thought process, not the after-thought.
Targeted Improvement Plan
- Opening sanitation (bullet)
- Add an automatic ⟶ …h6 against early Qh5/Qh7 ideas in systems where you fianchetto.
- Prepare a bullet-specific response to 1.b3 and 1.c3 that aims for quick development rather than perfect pawn structure.
- King-safety checklist
Train a five-second scan before every move: “Checks – captures – threats – loose pieces – pawn breaks – mate nets on h7/h2 ”. Building this micro-habit will stop the back-rank & h-file mates that decided four of your recent defeats.
- Clock drills
- Play three 1|0 games where your goal is never to drop below 50 % of initial time until move 15.
- Use premove for forced recaptures only – not speculative tactics.
- End-game refresh
Spend 10 minutes a day on king-and-pawn and minor-piece endings. Your technique is already a strength; sharpening it further will convert more blitz games where tactics fizzle out.
- Prophylactic thinking
Include at least one quiet move in each tactics puzzle session – it conditions you to look for prophylaxis rather than only aggression.
Short-Term Milestones
- Finish the current week with no miniature losses (<20 moves).
- Reach a streak of 5 consecutive games without dropping under 20 s in 3-minute time controls.
- Analyse one bullet game per day, writing a single sentence on what you would change in the opening.
Keep It Up!
Your tactical eye and fighting spirit already match high-2700 opposition. By patching the early king-safety leaks and refining clock discipline, you should comfortably push beyond your current peak in the next rating cycle.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| juriko | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| daybeers | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| maksymboldysh | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| nicolas_flamel_1330 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| purpurice | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Dylan Tang | 125W / 129L / 57D | View |
| kazimirish | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| nissou-ach | 3W / 4L / 0D | View |
| Fernando Fernandez | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ayina29 | 0W / 4L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dylan Tang | 125W / 129L / 57D | View Games |
| Kent Slate | 36W / 146L / 4D | View Games |
| ariecheque | 115W / 22L / 5D | View Games |
| SoupSailor | 70W / 35L / 9D | View Games |
| itskingmayfryt | 78W / 25L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2726 | 2689 | 1632 | |
| 2024 | 2624 | 2590 | 2148 | 1534 |
| 2023 | 1498 | 2231 | 1985 | 1484 |
| 2022 | 1498 | 2214 | 2020 | 1200 |
| 2021 | 1403 | 2055 | 2029 | |
| 2020 | 1355 | 2134 | 2072 | |
| 2018 | 1033 | 1263 | 1532 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1194W / 973L / 168D | 1120W / 1033L / 148D | 79.4 |
| 2024 | 273W / 206L / 47D | 262W / 222L / 47D | 82.0 |
| 2023 | 9W / 12L / 3D | 12W / 3L / 6D | 66.6 |
| 2022 | 22W / 22L / 2D | 26W / 17L / 3D | 63.2 |
| 2021 | 24W / 10L / 4D | 19W / 15L / 1D | 72.7 |
| 2020 | 90W / 53L / 15D | 91W / 51L / 8D | 81.1 |
| 2018 | 5W / 3L / 0D | 3W / 3L / 0D | 92.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 699 | 386 | 260 | 53 | 55.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 466 | 228 | 208 | 30 | 48.9% |
| French Defense | 364 | 201 | 141 | 22 | 55.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 342 | 158 | 161 | 23 | 46.2% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 209 | 116 | 80 | 13 | 55.5% |
| Australian Defense | 188 | 77 | 96 | 15 | 41.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 106 | 47 | 55 | 4 | 44.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 89 | 55 | 33 | 1 | 61.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 88 | 37 | 45 | 6 | 42.0% |
| Czech Defense | 87 | 47 | 33 | 7 | 54.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 73 | 34 | 33 | 6 | 46.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 61 | 37 | 18 | 6 | 60.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 56 | 25 | 25 | 6 | 44.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 51 | 23 | 22 | 6 | 45.1% |
| French Defense | 50 | 26 | 17 | 7 | 52.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 47 | 24 | 20 | 3 | 51.1% |
| Czech Defense | 44 | 26 | 14 | 4 | 59.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 44 | 25 | 18 | 1 | 56.8% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 39 | 21 | 18 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Döry Defense | 36 | 20 | 14 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Slav Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 21 | 0 |