Profile
Norman Who, sometimes logged in as Norman-Who on the virtual boards, is a National Master who earned their title from National. They are best known for their love of Bullet chess, where the clock ticks fast and so do the reactions. A gamer with a sharp sense of humor, they blend quick thinking with steady study, turning rapid-fire decisions into entertaining and effective play.
Off the chair and in front of a screen, they are a calm, witty presence who treats online chess as both sport and marathon—always ready with a quip and a plan to back it up on the board.
Playing Style
Preferred time control appears to be Bullet, where Norman Who shines as a fearless, fast-talking tactician. They mix aggressive ideas with practical defenses, often converting small advantages into quick wins. The pace suits their aggressive curiosity and resilience under clock pressure, producing exciting games that blend creativity with precision.
Their approach is underscored by strong endgame awareness and a penchant for coming back from tricky spots. A notable streak—one of several memorable runs—showcases their ability to stay composed when the seconds disappear.
Achievements and Career Notes
- National Master title earned from National.
- Peak Bullet rating around 2604 in early 2021, illustrating a period of standout speed-chess strength.
- Longest Bullet Winning Streak: 17 games—the kind of run that leaves rivals checking their clocks and their openings.
- Extremely active in Bullet, Blitz, and Rapid formats, with a prolific track record that includes thousands of Bullet games and a broad, exploratory opening repertoire.
- Openings span from Amar Gambit and Colle System variations to English and Ruy Lopez lines, reflecting a fearless willingness to experiment under time pressure.
For a quick glance at their profile, see Norman Who.
Chart snapshots of their activity and ratings can be explored with .
Openings and Versatility
Norman Who maintains a broad and dynamic openings toolkit. Notable lines include Amar Gambit, Colle System variations, Hungarian and English setups, and a variety of attacking ideas that suit fast games as well as deeper battles. This versatility mirrors a long career across Daily, Blitz, and Rapid formats, showing growth, adaptation, and a willingness to try new ideas on the fly.
Quick summary
Good session — multiple clean tactical finishes and a few crisp mates. Your long‑term record is strong, but recent form shows a rating dip (−81 last month). The immediate leak in these games is time management: several games were lost on time even when the position was still playable.
What you did well
- You find mating patterns and open‑file tactics quickly. Example: against s7kovace you opened the h‑file and finished with a decisive rook capture on h3 (Rxh3 mate).
- You coordinate rooks and passed pawns effectively. Against dawsob1237 you used a passed pawn and active rooks to force a back‑rank mate (Rh1 mate).
- Your opening choices are reliable — your Caro‑Kann and Queen’s Gambit setups show good conversion rates in your database.
- You win practical battles: when an opponent weakens around their king you punish it quickly instead of letting chances slip away.
Recurring problems to fix
- Time trouble: multiple games ended with a flag loss. That’s the single biggest rating drain in bullet — focus on simple, quick plans when low on clock.
- Risky pawn storms near your own king. Pushing g/h pawns can pay off but often creates long‑term weaknesses; be selective and calculate the tactical consequences first.
- Endgame simplification under time pressure: you sometimes leave complex pawn structures and run out of time converting a win. Trade into simpler winning endgames sooner.
- Tendency to repeat moves instead of improving secondary pieces — this wastes time and tempo in bullet. Aim to make progress with each move or trade when ahead.
Concrete 2‑week training plan
- Daily (12–20 minutes): tactics focused on mates, back‑rank themes, and basic rook tactics (10–15 puzzles). Prioritize speed and pattern recognition.
- 3× weekly: 20 minutes of rapid games (3+2 or 5+0). Purpose: practice using increment and converting advantages without flagging.
- Twice weekly (15 minutes): practical endgames — rook+pawn vs rook and king+pawn basics. Drill play‑out technique from typical pawn‑structure positions.
- Weekly review: pick 2 games you lost on time and annotate three critical moments: what you intended, what you played, and a faster safe alternative.
- Pre‑move hygiene: for 20 consecutive games, allow pre‑moves only for safe recaptures/pawn moves. Reintroduce riskier pre‑moves later.
Practical in‑game adjustments for bullet
- If you’re ahead materially, simplify: exchange pieces (not pawns) and steer to easier winning endgames instead of hunting complications that cost time.
- When low on time, make low‑risk forcing moves (checks, captures, threats) that limit opponent choices and buy thinking time.
- Use opponents’ long think to your advantage — play solid developing moves that maintain the initiative rather than mirror their waiting moves.
- Keep an escape square for your king and avoid multiple pawn moves in front of it unless you’ve calculated the result.
Game‑specific notes
- Vs s7kovace (win): excellent creation of open files and finishing technique — model the rook‑on‑h‑file idea in similar middlegames.
- Vs dawsob1237 (win): good use of passed pawn + rook coordination to deliver mate. Practice converting passed pawns faster to reduce reliance on the clock.
- Vs iann_08 (win on time): you dominated the position. Work on quicker conversion moves so you don’t need to depend on flagging.
- Vs lukita1212 and liminalboson13 (losses on time): both show winning or equal positions that were lost by the clock. Target these for your weekly review drills.
Targets for the next 30 days
- Cut time‑loss defeats by half by logging every flagged game and the cause (complexity, panic, bad premove).
- Play at least 40 training rapid games (3+2 or 5+0) to force better clock habits.
- Keep your Caro‑Kann and QGA lines, but prune any automatic risky pawn pushes until you can handle the resulting positions quickly.
Next steps I can help with
- Create a 14‑day daily checklist you follow before each session (warm‑up tactics, avoid risky premoves, 3 rapid games warm‑up).
- Generate 10 custom tactical puzzles based on mating motifs seen in your recent wins.
- Do a move‑by‑move quick‑save analysis of one of your "lost on time" games and suggest exact faster alternatives.
Closing encouragement
You already have the tactical vision and conversion skills that win games at higher levels. Fixing the clock habits and doing short targeted drills will convert many of your good positions into clean wins instead of time losses. Tell me which help option above you want first and I’ll prepare it.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| russai | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| am00ss00 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| the_nimzo-larsener | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| trymalgot | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| alex_126 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| artificial_intuition | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kartiksprabhu | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| tidalwaveverified | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| knightmate12 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| magnumscarlsen | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20ofjuly | 41W / 23L / 7D | View Games |
| yoam978 | 26W / 23L / 5D | View Games |
| renzogm | 15W / 22L / 7D | View Games |
| Leo Bispo | 17W / 18L / 8D | View Games |
| Marcin Krysztofiak | 9W / 20L / 13D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2326 | 2176 | ||
| 2024 | 2452 | 1649 | ||
| 2023 | 2337 | 2251 | 2150 | |
| 2022 | 2403 | 2226 | ||
| 2021 | 2474 | 2343 | 2150 | |
| 2020 | 2465 | 2216 | 2000 | |
| 2019 | 2186 | 2225 | 2000 | |
| 2018 | 2267 | |||
| 2015 | 1600 | |||
| 2014 | 1809 | 1753 | 1602 | |
| 2013 | 1800 | 1749 | ||
| 2012 | 1723 | 1515 | 1834 | |
| 2011 | 1175 | 1365 | 1485 | 1147 |
| 2010 | 1202 | 858 | 962 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52W / 48L / 6D | 42W / 55L / 7D | 75.3 |
| 2024 | 178W / 114L / 16D | 155W / 128L / 21D | 77.7 |
| 2023 | 113W / 84L / 10D | 98W / 97L / 10D | 76.5 |
| 2022 | 315W / 262L / 46D | 312W / 265L / 43D | 83.2 |
| 2021 | 629W / 448L / 66D | 579W / 472L / 91D | 82.3 |
| 2020 | 519W / 340L / 54D | 476W / 388L / 65D | 78.0 |
| 2019 | 53W / 35L / 13D | 54W / 43L / 5D | 72.5 |
| 2018 | 3W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 2L / 0D | 75.1 |
| 2015 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 92.0 |
| 2014 | 20W / 14L / 6D | 20W / 19L / 4D | 80.5 |
| 2013 | 82W / 62L / 13D | 73W / 74L / 9D | 76.6 |
| 2012 | 25W / 11L / 1D | 21W / 14L / 4D | 68.7 |
| 2011 | 34W / 64L / 5D | 37W / 65L / 6D | 58.6 |
| 2010 | 10W / 12L / 0D | 6W / 19L / 0D | 42.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 58.3% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 22.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Four Knights Game | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Classical System, Benko Attack | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 330 | 192 | 123 | 15 | 58.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 295 | 162 | 108 | 25 | 54.9% |
| Australian Defense | 198 | 107 | 79 | 12 | 54.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 188 | 100 | 81 | 7 | 53.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 186 | 90 | 86 | 10 | 48.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 158 | 85 | 61 | 12 | 53.8% |
| Döry Defense | 144 | 72 | 62 | 10 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 137 | 68 | 59 | 10 | 49.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 125 | 68 | 50 | 7 | 54.4% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 123 | 65 | 54 | 4 | 52.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruy Lopez | 33 | 17 | 12 | 4 | 51.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 27 | 12 | 13 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 24 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 45.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 24 | 8 | 14 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Döry Defense | 17 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 52.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 17 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 58.8% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 16 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 46.7% |
| Australian Defense | 15 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 53.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Accepted | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 1 |