Liam Masse (OctoTryp)
Meet Liam Masse, known in the chess world as OctoTryp – a player whose name suggests an octopus innovation but whose moves on the board are anything but slippery! Starting out in 2016 with a respectable Daily rating of 1271 and a Blitz low of 945, Liam has danced through the ranks of online chess with a mix of cunning strategy, a bit of luck, and an impressive streak of focus.
Across years, Liam’s play style reveals a reliable steadiness. Not one to easily quit, his early resignation rate is a modest 1.88%, proving he’s there to battle it out until the last pawn or rook drops. His average wins stretch over 56 moves, showing patience that would make any marathon runner nod in approval. When he loses, well, it’s usually after a heroic effort — his average loss spans nearly 58 moves, suggesting Liam fights till the last tick of the clock.
What really sets Liam apart is his tactical savvy. With a comeback rate north of 74%, losing a piece doesn’t scare him; he bounces back with a near-perfect 99.88% win rate after losing material – clearly, this is not a player who panics when the chips are down. And true to his resilience, his longest winning streak is a stunning 15 games, with a current streak of 9, meaning when Liam's on a roll, the chess gods better watch out!
Liam's record shines across all time controls: whether it's the lightning-fast Bullet or the more tactical Rapid games, he maintains solid win rates hovering around 50%. His favorite (and secret) opening has been deployed in thousands of games with a very respectable win rate — if you ask nicely, he might share it… or not.
Off the board, Liam might be the quiet strategist, but online he’s faced a cast of thousands — from frequent foes like dustydusty and sahilc_17 to a string of others where he boasts perfect 100% win rates, sometimes leaving opponents wondering if they're playing a chess grandmaster or a kindly octopus with eight arms of fury.
Finally, a fun fact: Liam truly shines in the evenings, especially around 18:00 to 19:00 hours, with win rates nudging near 58%, proving once and for all that his best moves come when the sun is low and the coffee is strong.
In a world full of kings and queens, Liam Masse is the octopus controlling the board with strategy, patience, and a touch of humor. Watch out, chessboard — OctoTryp is moving in!
Overview of your recent blitz play
Your blitz results show you are willing to enter sharp, tactical battles and you can finish exciting sequences when the position asks for precise calculation. The most recent win demonstrates a strong ability to convert pressure into a clear tactic that ends in checkmate. The other recent games indicate you can handle a variety of opening setups and middlegame plans, but there are moments where king safety and exchange decisions could be tightened. Your opening experience across several systems is a strength, and you can leverage that versatility to keep opponents guessing.
What you did well
- You pursued tactical opportunities and calculated deeply enough to force decisive outcomes in complex positions.
- Your finish in the latest win shows you can translate initiative into a concrete result when the opponent’s king safety is strained.
- You handle a range of openings with confidence, which helps prevent opponents from easily steering the game into their preferred lines.
- In several games you maintained practical play under blitz time pressure, keeping your decisions focused and avoiding premature simplifications.
Areas to improve
- Strengthen king safety and piece coordination in the middlegame to reduce risky exchanges that can swing the balance away from you in blitz.
- Improve time management in sharp, tactical games to avoid getting into time trouble in critical moments.
- Be mindful of over-ambitious plans in the opening. When the position becomes tactical, consider simplifying to reduce the risk of hidden traps or tactical refutations.
- Work on identifying and counting candidate moves quickly, so you don’t miss forcing lines or intermediate threats in the heat of the clock.
Opening repertoire insights
Your data shows solid results across several openings. Notably, you have a respectable win rate with the Nimzo-Larsen Attack and a very good score with the Philidor Defense. Consider leaning into reliable, solid lines in blitz where you can play accurately without heavy memorization, and then add a couple of sharp, well-prepared lines for surprise value. For practical blitz work, focusing on a compact, well-covered set of responses can help you outplay opponents who rely on surprise value.
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack — strong performance; good for dynamic play while keeping some structure.
- Philidor Defense — high win rate; useful when you want solid, resilient middlegame positions.
- French Defense: Advance and Exchange Variations — learn the typical pawn structures and common middlegame plans to avoid long, unclear fights when you’re ahead or behind.
- Other solid options such as Scandinavian or Barnes/Ban-style defenses can be useful against offbeat choices; practice a few solid responses to each.
For quick reference during study, you can review these openings as needed: Nimzo-Larsen Attack, Philidor Defense, and French Defense: Exchange Variation.
Training plan for the next 2 weeks
- Daily tactics practice: solve 6–12 short puzzles focused on typical blitz motifs (forks, pins, discovered attacks, and king hunts).
- Opening study: pick 2 openings to deepen. Prioritize Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Philidor Defense for the next week, then rotate to another option if you feel comfortable.
- Game review routine: after every blitz game, write down the top 3 decision points (why you chose a move, what you missed, and what you would do differently next time).
- Endgame and conversion: 15 minutes of endgame drills twice a week to improve technique in simplifying when ahead and resisting simplifications when behind.
- Blitz practice with a plan: do a 15–20 minute blitz session focusing on applying the learned tactical patterns and opening ideas, then quickly annotate the key moments you found surprising or difficult.
If you want to bookmark a quick reference, you can view your repertoire notes here: liam%20masse.
Progress and momentum indicators
Your 3-month rating change shows positive momentum, while the 6-month change is slightly negative and the 12-month slope is modestly down. This suggests you have short-term improvement but could benefit from stabilizing longer-term fundamentals. To maintain steady growth, emphasize consistent tactical training, reliable opening play, and solid endgame technique in your routine. Focus on building a repeatable process for game analysis and error reduction.
Next steps
- Adopt a compact blitz repertoire centered on Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Philidor Defense, with a couple of prepared replies to common anti-blitz responses.
- Implement a quick pre-move checklist in your thought process: material balance, king safety, key tactical motifs, and candidate moves to compare at least two options before deciding.
- Schedule two short review sessions per week to go over your 3 most recent blitz games and extract concrete improvements.
- Track your progress with a lightweight habit: number of puzzles solved per day and the accuracy of endgame conversions in blitz.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dusty Frye | 91W / 30L / 1D | |
| sahilc_17 | 36W / 20L / 1D | |
| johnnowak12 | 36W / 1L / 0D | |
| vedantjain | 18W / 5L / 1D | |
| kingpauliii | 12W / 6L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1610 | 1241 | ||
| 2024 | 1260 | 1511 | 1216 | |
| 2023 | 1298 | 1511 | 1155 | |
| 2022 | 1307 | 1483 | ||
| 2021 | 1159 | 1331 | 1155 | |
| 2020 | 1109 | 1349 | 1443 | |
| 2019 | 1144 | 1396 | 1404 | 1227 |
| 2018 | 995 | 1359 | 1313 | 1255 |
| 2017 | 1210 | 1292 | 1279 | 1297 |
| 2016 | 747 | 945 | 1115 | 1271 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19W / 0L / 0D | 21W / 1L / 0D | 58.2 |
| 2024 | 15W / 5L / 1D | 13W / 5L / 2D | 53.9 |
| 2023 | 14W / 13L / 0D | 16W / 11L / 0D | 62.4 |
| 2022 | 58W / 40L / 4D | 54W / 49L / 2D | 60.3 |
| 2021 | 65W / 80L / 5D | 80W / 72L / 3D | 58.9 |
| 2020 | 151W / 141L / 5D | 138W / 147L / 2D | 56.5 |
| 2019 | 482W / 415L / 21D | 440W / 469L / 12D | 56.5 |
| 2018 | 457W / 396L / 16D | 416W / 453L / 16D | 58.9 |
| 2017 | 354W / 276L / 11D | 344W / 283L / 14D | 59.1 |
| 2016 | 82W / 78L / 4D | 70W / 93L / 2D | 55.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 20 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Czech Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 42 | 22 | 20 | 0 | 52.4% |
| French Defense | 40 | 26 | 14 | 0 | 65.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 38 | 23 | 14 | 1 | 60.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 35 | 21 | 12 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 24 | 10 | 13 | 1 | 41.7% |
| Australian Defense | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 18 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 61.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 17 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 47.1% |
| Alekhine Defense | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 563 | 293 | 255 | 15 | 52.0% |
| French Defense | 511 | 251 | 250 | 10 | 49.1% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 288 | 145 | 138 | 5 | 50.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 175 | 82 | 88 | 5 | 46.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 166 | 80 | 81 | 5 | 48.2% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 157 | 70 | 84 | 3 | 44.6% |
| Philidor Defense | 145 | 87 | 56 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 139 | 67 | 68 | 4 | 48.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 132 | 68 | 61 | 3 | 51.5% |
| Australian Defense | 126 | 66 | 59 | 1 | 52.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 168 | 90 | 76 | 2 | 53.6% |
| French Defense | 113 | 57 | 56 | 0 | 50.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 55 | 32 | 23 | 0 | 58.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 48 | 22 | 26 | 0 | 45.8% |
| Australian Defense | 47 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 48.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 37 | 21 | 16 | 0 | 56.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 29 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 51.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 28 | 13 | 15 | 0 | 46.4% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 27 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 48.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 26 | 10 | 16 | 0 | 38.5% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 40 | 40 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |