About OrganicChemist23849
Meet OrganicChemist23849, a chess explorer who got their start around 2022 and has since been cooking up a storm on the board with moves sharper than a freshly honed scalpel. From humble beginnings at a rapid rating of 1335, they've brewed their way up to an impressive peak rapid rating of 2339 by March 2025 — clearly not just a one-trick pawn shop!
Specializing in Rapid, Blitz, and Bullet formats, OrganicChemist23849 blends strategic finesse with tactical awareness reminiscent of a lab scientist. Their comeback rate is a staggering 76%, which means losing a piece is more of a temporary reaction than a terminal event. A true endgame enthusiast, over half of their games (54.7%) reach those tense final phases where precision and patience win the day.
White or Black, they maintain a balanced approach, with a White win rate just over 50%, proving they’re comfortable leading the charge or defending the fortress. Their favorite openings in rapid play include the Vienna Game, especially the Falkbeer Vienna Gambit, as well as several Sicilian Defense variations — a recipe for chaos and creativity.
Curiously, their longest winning streak stands at 14 games, showing they can fire off a scientific breakthrough in consecutive fashion. Yet, don’t be fooled — even the best experiment can fail, as their longest losing streak of 13 games reminds us that every chess journey has its setbacks.
Recent Highlights
Just recently, on June 4th, 2025, OrganicChemist23849 triumphed with Black against tough opponents like Slo1959 and Segie61, winning thanks to a combined ferocity and patience that forced resignations – a sign that their lab-tested strategies pay off under pressure.
But science is all about learning, and OrganicChemist isn’t shy about stepping into the ring and learning from losses, resetting their pieces, and returning stronger than before.
Personality & Style
Don’t let the username fool you – while chemistry may be their outer shell, it’s the art of chess that really sparks their curiosity. From cautiously maneuvering through openings to thriving in complex endgames lasting over 60 moves on average, OrganicChemist23849 embodies the perfect mix of calculated experimentation and creative genius.
“Patience, precision, and a touch of madness” might be their game motto – and with the evolving ratings and big comebacks, it’s clear that OrganicChemist23849 is a force to be reckoned with on the digital chessboard!
Overview of your recent blitz play
Your blitz results show you handle sharp, dynamic positions well and you are capable of creating and converting pressure in the middlegame. You have demonstrated solid performance with aggressive openings, particularly when you steer the game into unbalanced structures where tactical ideas and piece activity can carry you to an advantage.
Two recent games show you can execute strong plans with active pieces, while a few sharp losses highlight the need to tighten decision-making in complex moments and when time is tight. In blitz, small improvements in calculation and simplification decisions can have a big impact on conversion and consistency.
What you do well
- Comfort with dynamic openings that lead to tactical, unbalanced positions where your piece activity can outplay a rival who is not fully prepared for the complications.
- Willingness to seize initiative and press with active pieces (rooks, queens, and minor pieces coordinating to generate threats).
- Resilience in long tactical lines and willingness to pursue aggressive plans when the position allows.
Areas to improve (concrete steps)
- Time management in blitz: practice a simple pre-move routine and enforce a 2-ply quiet check before committing to a forcing line. Aim to reduce wild time scrambles by picking 1–2 forcing ideas and then switching to solid, incremental moves.
- Decision-making in complex middlegames: when you see a tactical sequence, first verify whether a simpler, safer line exists that preserves your practical chances. If a tactic looks flashy but risky, pause and test it against a few likely defensive resources.
- Endgame technique and simplification: when you are ahead, look for straightforward routes to convert (activate the king, target active rooks, and head for clear pawn endgames). If behind, practice practical defensive simplifications to regain balance more reliably.
- Opening consistency: your openings show strong potential, but results vary across lines. Build a compact, repeatable 2–3 opening setups with clear middlegame plans, so you can reach familiar positions quickly under time pressure.
Opening performance insights
From the opening data you shared, you perform quite solidly with Bird Openings, including the Dutch Variation family and related lines. These tend to lead to dynamic play where your piece activity and pawn structure can create practical chances. Some other lines (such as certain Dutch and Closed setups) show more variability; they can be good but may require a tighter, more targeted plan to avoid getting tangled in passive positions.
Suggestions:
- Lean into Bird Opening families as a primary repertoire for blitz; build a short sheet of 2–3 main lines with clear middlegame plans.
- Prepare a compact reply to opponent’s common responses in these openings so you reach familiar structures faster and can play with confidence in the critical middlegames.
- For openings that are less familiar or less successful, study a few representative middlegame plans or switch to a more straightforward system when you’re short on time.
If you’d like, you can review specific lines from your recent games to identify which middlegame plans worked best and which led to difficulties. OrganicChemist23849
Strength-adjusted win rate and what it suggests for practice
Your strength-adjusted win rate sits around a solid level, indicating you win more often in competitive blitz than you lose, once you compensate for the level of opposition you face. To push this higher, focus on converting more of your favorable middlegame positions into clear, practical advantages, and sharpen endgame technique to increase your practical wins in tight time controls.
Two-week, practical training plan
- Daily tactics sprint: 15 minutes of chess tactics puzzles focused on short forcing sequences and common tactical motifs (forks, pins, motifs around king safety and back-rank ideas).
- Opening focus: pick Bird Opening variants as your primary repertoire. Spend 20–25 minutes twice this week reviewing 2 main lines each, with emphasis on typical middlegame plans and common pawn structures.
- Endgame practice: 2 sessions per week, 20 minutes each, concentrating on rook endings with pawns and basic queen vs rook endgames to improve conversion chances in blitz finales.
- Game review habit: after each blitz session, spend 5–10 minutes reviewing one loss and one win to extract one practical takeaway from each (e.g., a missed simplification, a timing error, or a better plan in a lukewarm position).
Longer-term tips to support growth
- Refine a compact two-lane game plan: in your chosen openings, define a simple middlegame plan (e.g., target the king-side attack if your pieces align on that side; or push a minority attack on the queen-side in certain structures). This helps you make quicker, more consistent decisions in blitz.
- Use incremental time to your advantage: when possible, avoid rushing at the start and aim to reach critical middlegame moments with a few extra seconds on the clock.
- Maintain a small practical repertoire: focus on a few reliable lines that you understand well, so you can execute them under pressure rather than switching between too many options in blitz.
Next steps and optional resources
If you’d like, I can tailor a 4-week plan based on your exact opening choices and the types of middlegames you find hardest. For convenience, you can reference your profile while you review these notes: OrganicChemist23849
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jorge A González Rodríguez | 11W / 15L / 0D | |
| walkinghobbit | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| eyecall | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| micheldarmon | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| futurogm21 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| atfighter | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| grahamperez | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| deboshirknight | 0W / 1L / 2D | |
| hummer2000 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| hel999 | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| krumnonesymotStaraZagora | 39W / 47L / 4D | |
| nadal-2013 | 53W / 16L / 3D | |
| veritas2023 | 29W / 6L / 2D | |
| tirexbg | 28W / 4L / 0D | |
| Jorge A González Rodríguez | 11W / 15L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2414 | 2253 | 2370 | 1507 |
| 2024 | 2303 | 2166 | 2216 | 1507 |
| 2023 | 2000 | 1896 | 2140 | 1527 |
| 2022 | 1548 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 823W / 856L / 119D | 739W / 910L / 143D | 66.1 |
| 2024 | 995W / 998L / 104D | 940W / 1048L / 117D | 66.5 |
| 2023 | 1903W / 1538L / 115D | 1822W / 1622L / 148D | 56.5 |
| 2022 | 132W / 123L / 0D | 138W / 123L / 3D | 43.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 322 | 189 | 126 | 7 | 58.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 265 | 137 | 117 | 11 | 51.7% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 261 | 144 | 110 | 7 | 55.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 190 | 87 | 94 | 9 | 45.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 184 | 93 | 85 | 6 | 50.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 164 | 82 | 74 | 8 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 149 | 73 | 75 | 1 | 49.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 148 | 64 | 75 | 9 | 43.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 128 | 75 | 51 | 2 | 58.6% |
| Modern | 120 | 62 | 52 | 6 | 51.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation | 386 | 169 | 198 | 19 | 43.8% |
| Bird Opening | 224 | 116 | 97 | 11 | 51.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 219 | 96 | 106 | 17 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 201 | 85 | 105 | 11 | 42.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 187 | 79 | 95 | 13 | 42.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 171 | 82 | 77 | 12 | 48.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 144 | 53 | 82 | 9 | 36.8% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 138 | 70 | 66 | 2 | 50.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 123 | 57 | 61 | 5 | 46.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Gipslis Variation | 111 | 52 | 55 | 4 | 46.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 83 | 46 | 35 | 2 | 55.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 77 | 44 | 28 | 5 | 57.1% |
| Czech Defense | 52 | 25 | 22 | 5 | 48.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 45 | 34 | 10 | 1 | 75.6% |
| Modern | 45 | 26 | 17 | 2 | 57.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 39 | 27 | 10 | 2 | 69.2% |
| Bird Opening | 37 | 18 | 16 | 3 | 48.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 37 | 21 | 12 | 4 | 56.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 37 | 26 | 9 | 2 | 70.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 35 | 23 | 12 | 0 | 65.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 70.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 1 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |