Profile Summary: pallix
Meet pallix, a chess enthusiast whose career spans over a decade, starting back in 2013 with a humble Blitz rating of around 1257. Fast forward a few years, and pallix has stormed their way up to a peak Blitz rating of 2402 in August 2020—so close to grandmaster territory, you’d better believe it! Alongside Blitz, they’ve also conquered the Bullet format, spiking their rating to an impressive 2310 in October 2024. Talk about speedy fingers and quick wit.
Always preferring the rapid-fire excitement of Blitz chess, pallix combines flashy tactics with stubborn resilience — just look at that remarkable 88.64% comeback rate!
Known for their innovative use of openings, pallix has a fondness for the French Defense Advance Variation and the Sicilian Defense Smith-Morra Gambit Accepted, wielding them like a maestro wields a baton. They’ve also shown a powerful grip on the Danish Gambit in Bullet games, boasting a win rate above 85%, which means if you face pallix with the Black pieces in a Bullet match, you better know your stuff.
Their playstyle? Well, pallix is both a lion and a strategist — they rarely roll over early, with a mere 0.8% early resignation rate, they enjoy the thrill of longer battles, averaging around 70-77 moves before deciding a game either way. It’s as if they like to tease their opponents before delivering the final punch.
When it comes to psychological stamina, pallix is quite the zen master with a relatively low tilt factor of 9 (for some, that’s chocolate-fueled perfection!). Their favorite time to dominate the board is reportedly around 2:00 AM, probably catching their opponents snoozing — a true night owl's advantage.
Rarely intimidated by ratings, pallix shows a delightfully perverse streak by winning nearly 70% of games against higher-rated opponents. Clearly, they like to play the underdog while plotting their sneaky victories.
Off the chessboard, pallix’s most played rival is gaasten, a nemesis worthy of a series of epics — 167 battles fought with a mixed record—but more often than not, pallix manages to steal the glory.
Recent Memorable Game
One of the freshest gems from pallix’s collection: a dazzling win by checkmate on June 7, 2025, against mendezvrp. With a swift but clinically precise assault employing the Pirc Defense Main Line - Austrian Weiss Variation, pallix’s queens and rooks swept across the board like a strategist conducting an orchestra. And checkmate was served with a flourish.
For those with an appetite for strategic buffet, pallix’s rich opening repertoire and resilient endgame mastery combine in a dance of brains and bravado. Ready your pawns – towards checkmate and beyond.
Quick match recap
Nice run — you've been sharp and aggressive lately. Below is the PGN viewer for your most recent clean tactical win (you as White vs sensei-ace). Replay it and watch the turning points I call out below.
Game viewer:
What you're doing well
- Strong tactical vision — you see checks, forks and decoys (Bxf7+, Ne6+/Nc7+ sequences in the Danish-style game were excellent).
- Active piece play — you consistently bring pieces into the attack rather than passive maneuvers. That often forces opponents into accuracy issues.
- Good opening variety — your stats show very strong results in lines like the Caro‑Kann and Modern; you're comfortable in both gambit and solid setups.
- Practical pressure — winning on time and finishing mates shows you create real problems for opponents to solve under the clock.
- Upward rating trend — the slopes and recent rating gains mean your study + experience are paying off.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
- Endgame technique: a couple of recent losses came from pawn/king endgame races where activation and king routes decided the result. Work on basic king-and-pawn endgames, opposition and the Lucena/Vergilio ideas.
- Handling complex Sicilian middlegames: some losses (and the game you shared) show trouble when the position becomes unbalanced with many passed pawns and rooks. Study typical plans and pawn breaks instead of just the move order.
- Conversion consistency: you create chances well, but you occasionally trade into positions that leave your opponent counterplay (watch which pieces you exchange when you have the initiative).
- Occasional imprecise defense: when the opponent counterattacks, you sometimes mis-evaluate who needs to be active. Tightening defensive calculation will cut losses.
Concrete next-session plan (30–40 minutes)
- 10–12 minutes tactics: focus on knight forks, discovered attacks and decoy/deflection puzzles (these map directly to your strengths).
- 10 minutes endgame drill: practice king + pawn vs king, opposition and basic rook endgames (Lucena / Philidor principles).
- 10–15 minutes opening study: pick one troubled opening (example: the Sicilian lines where you lost) and study a short 3–4 move plan and one model game. Use Sicilian Defense as a study tag for ideas.
- Play 1–2 rapid training games trying to apply the endgame/defense ideas — review only the critical 5 moves around the turning point.
Opening advice (practical)
- Keep what works: your Caro‑Kann and Modern results are excellent — keep those in your core repertoire and deepen the typical pawn breaks and plans (Caro-Kann Defense, Modern).
- For the Sicilian lines where your win rate dips, study the typical pawn-structure plans rather than memorizing moves. When the board opens, ask: which pieces become active? Which pawn break solves my problems?
- If you enjoy the tactical/gambit style (the Danish-like game), continue it — but revisit the common defensive replies so you don’t overextend when the opponent neutralizes the attack.
Endgame checklist (apply in games)
- Count passed pawns and king routes before trading — if the opponent's king is closer to the pawn race, avoid exchanges that simplify into a losing pawn race.
- Activate your king early in pawn endings — a king that runs to the center often wins tempo in endings.
- In rook endings, prioritize cutting the enemy king off and creating an outside passed pawn (Lucena technique).
Practical training tasks (weekly)
- Do 50 tactical puzzles (quality over quantity) — mark the ones you miss and re-drill until you stop repeating the pattern.
- Run 10 short endgame tablebase drills (K+P vs K, rook vs rook+pawn) and save one loss to analyze each week.
- Analyze your last 5 losses: find the single critical move where the evaluation flipped and write a short note on the right plan.
Time management & psychology
- You handle the clock well overall — keep keeping some buffer time for the complex middlegame decisions.
- When ahead in material in a messy position, slow down and check for counterplay (especially passed pawns and king paths).
- If you feel tilted after a loss, take one quick refresh (5–10 minutes) before the next game — your rating slope shows streaks matter a lot.
Suggested follow-ups
- Replay the included game vs sensei-ace and mark the moment you calculated Nc7/Nxa8 — what calculation method did you use? Try to codify it.
- Pick one lost game vs battleofberezina and create a 3‑move rule: "If X happens, play Y." That reduces hesitation in similar future positions.
- Keep a short notebook (or a single file) of recurring tactical motifs you miss — review weekly.
Final notes & motivation
Your Strength Adjusted Win Rate (~0.63) and recent rating slopes show real improvement. Focus on closing the small technical leaks (endgames, some Sicilian middlegame plans) and you'll convert many of those close losses into wins. Keep the aggressive style — just add a little more endgame discipline.
If you want, I can:
- Generate 10 tailored tactics focusing on the exact motifs you missed recently.
- Create a 2-week study plan that balances tactics, endgame and one opening.
- Annotate one loss of your choice move-by-move.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| reinhardtniegold | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nemenji | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| saltybroccoli | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| keramaron | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| aggot130 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| icreatefatum | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sekatore | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| gm_artur | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| puribhaji | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Zeynal Eyyubov | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Johan Norberg | 39W / 106L / 22D | View Games |
| hehu | 26W / 21L / 1D | View Games |
| bulletcatcher | 13W / 23L / 8D | View Games |
| steiger | 22W / 7L / 4D | View Games |
| alvin hernandez | 24W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2175 | 2212 | 2247 | |
| 2024 | 2158 | 2133 | 1734 | |
| 2023 | 2170 | 2117 | 1731 | |
| 2022 | 2211 | 2143 | ||
| 2021 | 2180 | 2254 | 1754 | |
| 2020 | 1952 | 2313 | ||
| 2019 | 2228 | 1754 | ||
| 2018 | 1904 | 2181 | 1767 | |
| 2017 | 2004 | 2133 | 1860 | |
| 2016 | 2138 | 1825 | ||
| 2015 | 2085 | 2140 | 1861 | |
| 2014 | 1854 | 2053 | 1360 | 1882 |
| 2013 | 1720 | 1919 | 1655 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 85W / 52L / 14D | 84W / 57L / 13D | 71.6 |
| 2024 | 30W / 14L / 4D | 20W / 27L / 1D | 73.7 |
| 2023 | 6W / 8L / 0D | 9W / 7L / 0D | 57.9 |
| 2022 | 14W / 10L / 0D | 9W / 10L / 2D | 67.0 |
| 2021 | 28W / 22L / 2D | 25W / 23L / 2D | 73.6 |
| 2020 | 94W / 63L / 9D | 76W / 74L / 11D | 79.7 |
| 2019 | 18W / 20L / 5D | 19W / 18L / 4D | 75.8 |
| 2018 | 89W / 92L / 12D | 92W / 84L / 16D | 75.4 |
| 2017 | 270W / 202L / 34D | 235W / 241L / 28D | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 86W / 83L / 19D | 90W / 93L / 9D | 76.9 |
| 2015 | 255W / 192L / 29D | 232W / 202L / 38D | 77.6 |
| 2014 | 755W / 394L / 42D | 743W / 403L / 42D | 72.3 |
| 2013 | 131W / 21L / 3D | 120W / 29L / 3D | 64.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 58 | 14 | 35 | 9 | 24.1% |
| Alekhine Defense | 22 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 20 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 65.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 19 | 3 | 14 | 2 | 15.8% |
| English Opening | 14 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 35.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 36.4% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 11 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 27.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 22.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Czech Defense | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 384 | 216 | 147 | 21 | 56.2% |
| Alekhine Defense | 376 | 206 | 150 | 20 | 54.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 251 | 139 | 93 | 19 | 55.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 204 | 100 | 87 | 17 | 49.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 197 | 113 | 72 | 12 | 57.4% |
| Modern | 192 | 99 | 86 | 7 | 51.6% |
| Australian Defense | 184 | 85 | 93 | 6 | 46.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 181 | 91 | 83 | 7 | 50.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 169 | 92 | 66 | 11 | 54.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 146 | 85 | 58 | 3 | 58.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 97 | 67 | 30 | 0 | 69.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 81 | 61 | 19 | 1 | 75.3% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 60 | 47 | 12 | 1 | 78.3% |
| Center Game | 49 | 42 | 7 | 0 | 85.7% |
| French Defense | 48 | 43 | 5 | 0 | 89.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 45 | 30 | 13 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Modern | 43 | 32 | 9 | 2 | 74.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 37 | 30 | 5 | 2 | 81.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 36 | 22 | 11 | 3 | 61.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 30 | 21 | 8 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 61.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Modern | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Center Game | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 32 | 1 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |