Biography
Pancontomate12 is a titled chess player and FIDE Candidate Master, celebrated for fearless speed-chess play and a playful, practical approach to the game. They earned the Candidate Master title from FIDE and, true to their nickname, excel in the Bullet format while keeping a smile on their face. Their preferred time control is Bullet.
Career Highlights
In fast time controls, Pancontomate12 has posted standout results across Blitz, Bullet, and Rapid. Notable peak ratings include Blitz 2428 (2025-04-13), Bullet 2436 (2024-11-21), and Rapid 2221 (2024-11-25). A long-running, well-rounded competitor, they maintain an active presence on the online scene.
- Candidate Master (FIDE)
- Peak Blitz: 2428 on 2025-04-13
- Peak Bullet: 2436 on 2024-11-21
- Peak Rapid: 2221 on 2024-11-25
- Extensive Bullet and Blitz collaboration with strong endgame conversion
Profile: Pancontomate12
Playing Style
A tactically resourceful, endgame-oriented player who thrives under time pressure. Endgame frequency is high (about 72.93%), and Pancontomate12 is noted for comeback resilience (83.91% comeback rate) and solid practical decision-making in sharp positions.
Openings and Preferences
The opening repertoire in Blitz and Bullet blends dynamic gambits with solid, well-tested defenses. Representative lines include:
- Amar Gambit Amar Gambit
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack Nimzo-Larsen Attack
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense English Opening: Agincourt Defense
- Caro-Kann Defense Caro-Kann Defense
- Modern and other flexible choices including the Czech and Bird systems
Titles and Recognition
As a recognized titled player, Pancontomate12 continues to contribute to the chess community with regular competition in Bullet and Blitz, combining competitive success with a light-hearted attitude at the board.
Notes
Rating insights and peaks:
- Rating trajectory:
- Peak Blitz rating: 2428 (2025-04-13)
- Peak Bullet rating: 2436 (2024-11-21)
What you are doing well
You show strong willingness to fight for initiative and to rise to sharp, tactical skirmishes. In several recent games you piece together active piece play and push your attack when your opponent’s king is less protected. You also demonstrate flexibility in handling a varied opening repertoire, which helps you stay creative and less predictable.
- You effectively coordinate rooks and minor pieces to generate king-safety pressure and create practical threats even in complex middlegames.
- Your willingness to try aggressive lines in openings such as the Hungarian Opening variant and Colle System variations keeps your opponent honest and tests their preparation.
- You keep trying to seize the initiative, which often yields practical chances in bullet where concrete tactics can decide the result quickly.
Areas to improve
- Calculation discipline: when a tactical sequence looks promising, double-check whether the sequence truly nets material or a clear positional edge. If lines become chaotic, step back to a safer plan and avoid overcommitting to unclear tactics.
- Endgame technique: several bullets reach endgames with material imbalances or dynamic piece activity. Practice converting small advantages into wins and learn common endgame transitions from your preferred openings.
- Time management: balance speed and accuracy. In faster time formats, set a rough time budget for middlegame decisions to avoid getting pulled into long, speculative lines that backfire later.
- Opening consolidation: while your repertoire is diverse, solidify a core set of lines for White and Black. This helps you win more consistently when opponents steer the game into familiar structures.
- Pattern recognition: deepen study of typical pawn structures and standard middlegame plans for your frequently used openings, so you can spot plan ideas more quickly during the game.
Opening repertoire and practical guidance
Your data shows solid performance in several dynamic, combative setups. Consider leaning into a compact core for consistency, while keeping a few sparingly-used surprise options. Use the following anchors as starting points:
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — steady and solid, good for improving structure and plan clarity. Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit — offers sharp play and clear attacking ideas when you are comfortable with tactical calculation. Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack — solid if you prefer quieter, strategic play with chances on the queenside. Nimzo-Larsen Attack
- Alekhine Defense and similar flexible defenses — useful to surprise opponents and transpose into dynamic positions. Alekhine Defense
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense family — flexible and can transpose into various structures; good for avoiding over-prepared opponents. English Opening: Agincourt Defense
Practice plan for the coming weeks
To build consistency and convert your tactical energy into more decisive results, try this two-week focus:
- Week 1: Pick two White openings you enjoy (for example Colle System and Nimzo-Larsen) and two Black defenses (for example Alekhine Defense and Queen's Gambit Declined family). For each, study the typical middlegame plans and common pawn structures. Add 15–20 minutes of daily tactics practice to sharpen pattern recognition.
- Week 2: Review your last several losses to identify recurring mistakes (missed threats, overextension, or sloppy endgames). Create four model positions that reflect those mistakes and practice solving them. Continue with focused practice on endgames and 1–2 tactical themes you struggle with.
Bonus: quick references to deepen study
If you want to explore specific openings further, you can check these topics in your study plan:
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation practice ideas — Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation
- Hungarian Opening ideas and typical plans — Hungarian Opening
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack key motifs and typical break ideas — Nimzo-Larsen Attack
- Alekhine Defense practical setups and typical responses — Alekhine Defense
Openings performance snapshot (practical takeaway)
From the openings you’ve tried, the most reliable results come from lines that emphasize clear plans and solid pawn structures. Use those as your backbone for bullet play, and reserve your sharper, offbeat lines for when you’re feeling particularly sharp and confident in your calculation.
Want a quick peek at your profile or saved study notes? Access them here: Pancontomate12
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Giulio Fregonese | 1W / 12L / 0D | |
| the_sweet_science25 | 5W / 7L / 0D | |
| yanowsky | 4W / 5L / 0D | |
| n4th4n1214 | 5W / 3L / 0D | |
| sboeck | 1W / 7L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2385 | 2356 | 2219 | |
| 2024 | 2407 | 2342 | 2221 | |
| 2022 | 2189 | 2106 | ||
| 2021 | 2068 | 1904 | ||
| 2020 | 2207 | 1980 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29W / 22L / 2D | 25W / 25L / 3D | 69.8 |
| 2024 | 176W / 101L / 25D | 161W / 126L / 16D | 75.0 |
| 2022 | 27W / 18L / 2D | 22W / 18L / 2D | 64.7 |
| 2021 | 209W / 165L / 18D | 180W / 201L / 9D | 67.6 |
| 2020 | 333W / 236L / 16D | 309W / 263L / 18D | 71.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 20 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 18 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 64.3% |
| Czech Defense | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 61.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 76.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 181 | 88 | 87 | 6 | 48.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 145 | 77 | 61 | 7 | 53.1% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 106 | 63 | 40 | 3 | 59.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 65 | 35 | 28 | 2 | 53.9% |
| Australian Defense | 64 | 33 | 27 | 4 | 51.6% |
| Modern | 64 | 31 | 32 | 1 | 48.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 63 | 34 | 27 | 2 | 54.0% |
| Czech Defense | 58 | 31 | 26 | 1 | 53.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 44 | 21 | 23 | 0 | 47.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 43 | 23 | 17 | 3 | 53.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Hedgehog System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 2 |