Andre de Camargo Almeida (PandazChess)
Andre de Camargo Almeida, better known in the online chess arenas as PandazChess, is a player with a rollercoaster rating journey that could outshine any thriller movie plot. Starting his climb back in 2015 with a modest rapid rating hovering around 1300, Andre has methodically battled his way up to an impressive peak rapid rating of 2381 as of May 2025. Not to be pigeonholed, his blitz and bullet ratings are equally fearsome, maxing out at 2602 and 2537 respectively – making him a serious force in both the lightning-fast and classical time controls.
Career Highlights & Playing Style
Andre's style is a fascinating blend of patience and psychological endurance. With an average moves per win of nearly 80 in rapid games, it's clear he loves a good-long battle, slowly squeezing opponents dry with tactical precision. His knack for comebacks is staggering with a 84.6% comeback rate after losing a piece – proving he’s not just resilient, he’s downright pesky for his foes.
Despite a 17 tilt factor (yes, even panda-chess masters get frustrated), Andre manages to keep his cool and shine brightest at 5 PM, the prime time for his best battles. Fun fact: he resigns early only a little under 2% of the time, which means he’s a fighter who refuses to surrender unless absolutely necessary.
Opening Choices
Ever the enigma, Andre’s “Top Secret” opening repertoire dominates his games with a >50% win rate in rapid, blitz, bullet, and daily formats. However, he’s no one-trick panda – he sprinkles in variations like the Sicilian Defense, French Defense Tarrasch, London System, and the Giuoco Piano, keeping opponents guessing and guessing wrong.
Recent Encounters
Andre’s most recent victory was a dazzling display using the Queen's Gambit Declined, showcasing his deep understanding of complex positions and knack for capitalizing on small mistakes. While he occasionally stumbles (his longest losing streak once lasted 17 games), Andre’s overall win-to-loss record proudly boasts over 1,274 wins in rapid and nearly 9,600 combined wins in blitz and bullet formats.
Fun Facts
- The panda-themed username reflects his calm yet cunning approach – rare moments of chill, then BAM! A surprise chess maul.
- Andre is a bit of a chess time traveler, with ratings jumping impressively through the years, as though fueled by an espresso machine running on pure focus.
- Loves the endgame so much, it shows up in nearly 77% of his games – probably because progessing from ‘panda cub’ to ‘chess grandmaster’ requires ninja-like endgame skills.
- Once won 20 games in a row – quite the streak, proving legends never lose form for long.
Summary
To sum it up, Andre de Camargo Almeida is not just your everyday chess enthusiast; he's a battler with the persistence of a panda snack-hunting in a bamboo forest and the strategic mind of a seasoned grandmaster. Whether blitzing his rivals or grinding out slow, deliberate wins in rapid chess, PandazChess continues to make waves and climb the ranks with style and a bit of humor.
Recent bullet-game feedback
Great effort staying active and creating pressure in fast games. You tend to seek aggressive, practical chances and keep your opponent under constant scrutiny. To turn that energy into consistently stronger results, focus on clarity of plan and efficient use of your time.
- You frequently develop pieces and keep the king safe, which helps you stay in the game even when the pace is frantic.
- You often press with concrete ideas, such as challenging the opponent’s setup and looking for ways to open lines for your pieces.
- You show tenacity in common bullet patterns—working to simplify when you’re ahead in activity and keeping tension when you have initiative.
Key improvement areas for bullet games
- Time management under pressure: avoid spending too long on a single tactic. When unsure, lean on a simple, safe plan (develop, castle, connect rooks) and look for a forcing line that reduces decision fatigue.
- Plan and consistency: in opening and early middle game, stick to a straightforward plan instead of chasing every tactical possibility. A predictable, solid path helps you avoid avoidable mistakes when the clock is ticking.
- Endgame awareness: if the position simplifies, prioritize keeping pieces that control key squares and look for mechanisms to activate your rooks. In many bullet endings, a small improvement in king activity or rook coordination can be decisive.
- Identify and avoid common bullets traps: when you’re ahead in material briefly, verify that your tactics don’t backfire to a tactical counterattack or a perpetual loss of momentum.
- Opening choices for bullet: select a small, reliable set of lines that you understand well and are comfortable pressing from move one. This reduces decision load and increases accuracy in the first critical minutes.
Practical drills for the next week
- Daily 15-minute tactics sessions focusing on two-move combinations and quick tactical motifs (forks, pins, skewers, back-rank ideas).
- Two 10-minute bullet practice sessions per week with a fixed opening plan. Use a 3+0 or 2+1 time control to train quick development and safety moves.
- Endgame micro-drills: practice rook endings with one or two pawns on each side. Learn a simple rule set like “activate the king, centralize the rook, create a passer if possible.”
- Post-game quick review: after every bullet game, note the moment you felt rushed and the moment you felt unsure. Write a one-line takeaway for what you would change next time.
- Simple opening templates: pick two solid setups (for example, a flexible pawn center with quick king safety) and rehearse them against common responses to reduce early time trouble.
Opening approach for bullet
Based on opening performance, you tend to perform well with reliable, solid defenses. Consider keeping one or two steady openings in your repertoire for bullet to minimize first-mew confusion, then add a controlled, sharper line only after you’re comfortable with the typical structures. Focus on quick development, safe king safety, and a clear midgame plan rather than chasing complex tactics right away.
Mindset and time-management strategy
- Before each move in bullet, do a quick “check-in”: what is my strategic goal for this move? What immediate threats exist from the opponent?
- Limit deep calculations to two or three forced lines. If no clear line stands out, pick a solid, simple continuation and proceed.
- Use a few pre-move checks for forced sequences (for example, if you know a typical response, you can prepare a safe follow-up to save seconds).
- Embrace a habit of rotating between pressure-building moves and solid defensive moves to keep both sides of the board active without overthinking.
Quick game-clip placeholder
To visualize a sample bullet sequence, you can imagine a game where you develop pieces smoothly, castle early, and push a timely kingside pawn advance to open lines for your rooks. This placeholder can be replaced with a real clip or PGN snapshot in the future.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| musicenthusiast04 | 700W / 1144L / 234D | View Games |
| saltyclown | 219W / 160L / 21D | View Games |
| Brandon Eshleman | 74W / 78L / 9D | View Games |
| josthappy | 53W / 51L / 4D | View Games |
| sphinxy-9 | 53W / 34L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2351 | 2341 | 2378 | |
| 2024 | 2383 | 2263 | 2320 | 1391 |
| 2023 | 2154 | 2180 | 2195 | 1397 |
| 2022 | 1928 | 1900 | 2101 | 1427 |
| 2021 | 1347 | 1630 | 1718 | 1032 |
| 2020 | 770 | 818 | 1361 | |
| 2018 | 775 | 653 | ||
| 2015 | 848 | 1339 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1802W / 1431L / 245D | 1641W / 1641L / 223D | 83.0 |
| 2024 | 2779W / 2155L / 314D | 2509W / 2351L / 355D | 85.3 |
| 2023 | 2586W / 2322L / 394D | 2551W / 2380L / 330D | 81.3 |
| 2022 | 1638W / 1547L / 177D | 1605W / 1560L / 171D | 73.9 |
| 2021 | 1170W / 879L / 75D | 1023W / 1007L / 73D | 61.5 |
| 2020 | 25W / 19L / 2D | 25W / 19L / 0D | 54.9 |
| 2018 | 0W / 7L / 0D | 2W / 4L / 0D | 43.5 |
| 2015 | 2W / 3L / 0D | 2W / 4L / 0D | 57.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 186 | 88 | 81 | 17 | 47.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 99 | 47 | 47 | 5 | 47.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 93 | 46 | 39 | 8 | 49.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 93 | 53 | 34 | 6 | 57.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 88 | 45 | 36 | 7 | 51.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 71 | 41 | 25 | 5 | 57.8% |
| French Defense | 68 | 38 | 25 | 5 | 55.9% |
| Czech Defense | 64 | 35 | 25 | 4 | 54.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 61 | 33 | 24 | 4 | 54.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 60 | 37 | 22 | 1 | 61.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1068 | 507 | 467 | 94 | 47.5% |
| French Defense | 752 | 379 | 334 | 39 | 50.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 684 | 362 | 280 | 42 | 52.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 679 | 343 | 296 | 40 | 50.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 638 | 322 | 268 | 48 | 50.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 635 | 312 | 289 | 34 | 49.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 608 | 296 | 276 | 36 | 48.7% |
| Modern | 537 | 268 | 239 | 30 | 49.9% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 493 | 286 | 188 | 19 | 58.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 425 | 234 | 169 | 22 | 55.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 842 | 431 | 367 | 44 | 51.2% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 636 | 307 | 283 | 46 | 48.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 624 | 297 | 291 | 36 | 47.6% |
| Australian Defense | 610 | 336 | 238 | 36 | 55.1% |
| French Defense | 569 | 277 | 265 | 27 | 48.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 551 | 293 | 230 | 28 | 53.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 550 | 284 | 232 | 34 | 51.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 328 | 168 | 149 | 11 | 51.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 322 | 165 | 144 | 13 | 51.2% |
| Modern | 304 | 146 | 141 | 17 | 48.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 1 |
| Losing | 17 | 0 |