Player Profile: PeteF7272
Username: PeteF7272
Biography
PeteF7272 is a dedicated chess player with a rich history in rapid, blitz, and other formats of the game. Throughout his career, he has shown considerable skill and determination, often fluctuating in ratings as he navigates through various levels of competition.
Rating History
Beginning his journey in 2014, PeteF7272's rapid rating saw early highs, reaching 1362 in October 2014, before experiencing challenges that brought him down to 753 in January 2024. Similarly, his blitz ratings saw varied performances, with a peak in the mid-1300s before declining in subsequent years. He has actively participated in daily and bullet formats, marking his adaptability in different time controls.
Win/Loss Record
In rapid chess, he boasts a competitive record with 267 wins and 268 losses, representing a completion rate that reflects his growth as a player. His blitz statistics stand at 53 wins against 102 losses, while he has faced more challenges in daily and bullet formats, with fewer wins compared to losses.
Playing Style and Openings Performance
PeteF7272 favors aggressive strategies in his openings, with a win rate of approximately 47.85% in rapid games, demonstrating an effective grasp of opening theory. His gameplay tends to escalate in complexity evidenced by an average of 43.6 moves per win, signifying a calculated approach to securing victories.
Streaks and Psychological Trends
The player has experienced a longest winning streak of 10 games, showcasing his ability to maintain a high level of performance. A notable psychological statistic reflects an 18% tilt factor, indicating areas for improvement to combat psychological pressures during crucial games.
Notable Opponents
PeteF7272 has played against a variety of opponents, with most encounters against users like TAWillis and tawillis, indicating a strong presence in the community.
Conclusion
Overall, PeteF7272 is a resilient and evolving chess player with a diverse skill set across formats. His journey in chess continues as he seeks to improve and embrace the challenges laid out by this timeless game.
Rapid chess improvement: strengths and momentum
Pete, you show a strong willingness to engage in sharp, tactical middlegames and to seek active pieces even when the position is complex. This mindset helps you fight for practical chances in rapid games and keeps your opponents under pressure. You also demonstrate resilience in complicated sequences, which is a valuable trait in time-controlled play. Building on this, the next steps focus on converting dynamic opportunities into solid results and reducing avoidable mistakes.
- Comfort with dynamic positions and willingness to calculate long lines when the pressure is on.
- Ability to pressurize the opponent in the middlegame and test their decision-making under time pressure.
- Relatively solid defensive instincts; you can hold difficult positions and seek practical chances.
Opportunities to improve in rapid games
- Time management: In rapid, you can slip into time trouble during the middlegame. Develop a simple time plan for each phase of the game and use it to protect your critical decisions for the later moves.
- Opening consistency: You face a variety of openings. Focus on a compact, coherent opening repertoire with clear plans rather than many separate lines. This reduces early confusion and gives you a dependable framework to navigate the early middlegame. Consider exploring openings like the Vienna Game and the Nimzowitsch Defense to build solid, principled setups. Placeholder: Vienna-Game and Nimzowitsch-Defense
- Tactical vigilance: Some losses stem from missing straightforward tactics. Increase puzzle work (short daily sessions) and run through common motif drills (tactics, forks, pins, skewers) to improve recognition under time pressure.
- Endgame technique: Practice standard endgames (rook endings, minor-piece endings, opposition, triangle ideas) so you can convert advantages and avoid draws turning into losses.
- Blunder prevention: Use a simple post-opening checklist (check for hanging pieces, unprotected queen, undefended rooks) before making a move in the critical middle game.
- Post-game review routine: After each rapid game, write a brief note with: the plan you aimed for, where you deviated, and what you would play differently next time.
Actionable training plan (four-week focused program)
- Week 1: Puzzle routine and blunder checklists
- 15–20 minutes of tactical puzzles daily, focusing on motifs that previously caused errors.
- In each rapid game, complete a 3-step post-game review using your blunder checklist.
- Week 2: Opening repertoire stabilization
- Choose 2 White replies and 2 Black replies with clear plans; study typical middlegame ideas for each.
- Practice these lines in training games or with a coach/engine in a controlled setting.
- Week 3: Time management discipline
- Set a personal pace target for the first 15 moves and practice maintaining focus into the midgame.
- Track time usage and identify critical moments where you consistently spend too long.
- Week 4: Endgames and practical conversion
- Study common endgames you encounter (rook endings, minor piece endings) and practice practical conversion drills.
- Review any long games from the month to reinforce correct endgame plans.
Opening guidance and repertoire focus
Your openings performance shows engagement with a mix of choices. To streamline improvement, pick a small set of openings with clear plans and study the typical middlegame ideas you should aim for in each. This helps you anticipate opponent responses and reduces guesswork in rapid games. Consider reinforcing lines such as: Amar Gambit, Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense, Modern, and Nimzowitsch Defense.
- Next steps: identify 2 White openings and 2 Black defenses you want to play for the next 1–2 months, and build a short plan for the typical middlegame positions these lead to. Placeholder: Amar Gambit, Vienna-Gambit, Modern, Nimzowitsch-Defense
Next steps and post-game discipline
- Commit to a fixed daily routine of puzzles and 1–2 rapid practice games with a post-game review.
- Schedule a monthly recap to adjust openings, time management strategies, and endgame drills based on what you’ve learned.
- Share your progress with a coach or a training partner for accountability. A quick check-in with petefidler can help keep you on track.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| scmf234 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| bruhgfd | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dirtykiller977 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| m34zk4 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| stalewolf123 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| meihoocapitalm | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| berco1989 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| otto_acht | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| moonlight_109 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| viceroy696 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tommy Willis | 13W / 17L / 0D | View Games |
| yourmomsgirlfriend | 0W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| LuckyAdder99 | 5W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| liharh | 1W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| raphael-uk | 2W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 116 | 252 | 701 | |
| 2024 | 590 | |||
| 2016 | 508 | |||
| 2015 | 601 | 473 | 958 | 1084 |
| 2014 | 686 | 894 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 164W / 200L / 7D | 178W / 179L / 15D | 48.3 |
| 2024 | 2W / 10L / 0D | 6W / 5L / 1D | 53.1 |
| 2016 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 28.0 |
| 2015 | 126W / 136L / 11D | 106W / 152L / 10D | 51.9 |
| 2014 | 40W / 55L / 3D | 46W / 45L / 2D | 50.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 101 | 50 | 49 | 2 | 49.5% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 90 | 50 | 40 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 88 | 43 | 43 | 2 | 48.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 77 | 36 | 37 | 4 | 46.8% |
| Modern | 67 | 30 | 34 | 3 | 44.8% |
| Four Knights Game | 55 | 22 | 32 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 45 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 48.9% |
| French Defense | 43 | 22 | 20 | 1 | 51.2% |
| Australian Defense | 38 | 18 | 19 | 1 | 47.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 35 | 19 | 14 | 2 | 54.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 18 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 38.9% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 16 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 15 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 53.3% |
| Modern | 15 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% |
| French Defense | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 22.2% |
| Australian Defense | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 12.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Center Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 18 | 1 |