Carlos Hinestroza Caicedo
aka Picocolombo
Carlos Hinestroza Caicedo, better known by his online moniker Picocolombo, is quite the formidable tactician and endgame enthusiast on the 64 squares. With a chess career documented extensively from 2017 onwards, Carlos has made a name for himself primarily in Bullet and Blitz formats where his rating has repeatedly flirted in the 2300s—impressive for bullet chess, where every second counts and blunders lurk behind every corner.
His Bullet rating peaked at a scorching 2427 in 2021, and though 2024 saw a bit of a dip to 1934, Carlos’ average Bullet rating over recent years remains a strong 2100+, a clear indicator of resilience and speed. Blitz is where Picocolombo shines with a peak rating of 2435 in 2023, showcasing his ability to navigate fast-paced, pressure-packed games like a grandmaster conducting a symphony.
When not tearing up Bullet or Blitz leaderboards, Carlos dabbles in Rapid and Daily games, proving his versatility—even if those formats are more like his relaxing Sunday stroll than the wild gallop that Bullet chess demands.
Playing Style & Stats
- Psychological resilience is top-notch with a comeback rate of nearly 87% and an astonishing 100% win rate after losing a piece – apparently, Carlos never quits, and he never forgets!
- Endgames are where his heart truly lies, with an endgame frequency of over 80%. He grinds down opponents with patience and precision, proving that every pawn counts.
- Average game length hovers around the 70-move mark for wins, meaning Carlos is comfortable in the long haul—a marathoner in a sprinter’s world.
- White and Black win percentages are close, with a slight edge to Black at 52.41%, perhaps suggesting he’s a sneaky counterpuncher who loves to strike when least expected.
- His early resignation rate is a humble 0.76%, so don’t expect him to fold easily!
Recent Highlights
One of his latest games, played in May 2025 under the alias Picocolombo, showcases a beautifully executed Scandinavian Defense with the Modern Marshall Variation. Demonstrating sharp opening knowledge and cool endgame nerves, Carlos compelled his opponent to resign after 41 moves with precision tactics and positional mastery.
Fun fact: Carlos’ username—Picocolombo—is as crafty as his gameplay, evoking the spirit of an Italian detective: always a few steps ahead, always sniffing out the opponent's weak spots. Keep an eye on him, because in the world of chess, Carlo’s moves tell a story that’s part mystery, part masterpiece, and all action!
Opponent Favorites & Quirks
His most played opponent is bharathravikumar with an impressive head-to-head record, while he has ludicrously perfect win rates against amusingly named opponents like petearrrpan and boingchess—clearly, don’t challenge Carlos if your name rhymes with a frog or a spring.
Carlos is no stranger to long winning streaks, having reached a career-best 32 wins in a row. Currently, however, he’s humbly biding his time with a streak reset to zero, likely plotting his next unbeaten run.
In Conclusion
Carlos Hinestroza Caicedo is not just a chess player; he’s a Blitz Bullet warrior, a Rapid strategist, and a Daily patient. Whether he’s dispatching foes in seconds or grinding them down over dozens of moves, his dedication and sharp play have earned him a respected spot in the online chess community. So next time you see Picocolombo on the board, beware—the crafty detective is on the case, and checkmate is always closer than you think.
Overview of your blitz performance trends
Blitz results show a mix of fluctuations. Short-term figures hint at ups and downs, while a few longer windows point to improvement. The data suggests you’re capable of sharp, tactical play, but you benefit from a steadier routine to avoid time pressure and costly mistakes in the late middlegame and endgame.
- One-month change: your rating dropped by about 127 points, which often points to time trouble or a few costly oversights in quick games.
- Three-month change: a gain of about 457 points indicates meaningful improvement in decision quality and consistency across several events.
- Six-month change: a small gain of about 27 points, signaling periods of stability with occasional slips.
- 12-month change: a slight decline, suggesting the need for a more stable, repeatable process over the year.
What you’re doing well
- You handle sharp, tactical moments well when the position invites tactics, and you can create chances that surprise opponents.
- Your opening choices tend to lead to balanced middlegames with workable plans, helping you avoid early collapses.
- You show resilience in complex positions and can press for opportunities even when the board gets crowded.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: the one-month decline suggests you sometimes rush decisions. Focus on a simple opening routine and safe, principled moves in the first 6–8 moves to buy time for the critical middlegame.
- Decision quality under pressure: adopt a quick 3-step check before committing to a tactic—evaluate king safety, pawn structure, and two candidate plans.
- Endgame conversion: practice common endgames where you have a material edge to improve your ability to convert advantages into wins in blitz.
- Consistency: avoid riskier pawn breaks or speculative lines when the position is unclear. Build a solid, gradually pressing plan and stick to it when time is tight.
Opening performance and plan
Several openings show solid results in your blitz play. To reduce thinking time and keep you in control, consider focusing on a core 2–3 openings and a reliable secondary line you can switch to when an opponent deviates.
- Solid options to build around include resilient defences that lead to balanced middlegames (e.g., Czech Defense or Scandinavian Defense). These often reduce the risk of early mistakes in blitz.
- London System variations can provide practical chances if you keep a clear plan and avoid overextending pieces in the middlegame.
- Maintain flexibility: have one tactical line for dynamic play and one more solid line for heavier time pressure, so you can adapt quickly to opponents’ setups.
Practice plan for the next 2 weeks
- Daily quick tactics: 15–20 minutes of focused tactics to improve pattern recognition and reduce blunders in fast games.
- Blitz drills: two short blitz sessions (3+2 or 5+0) per week to rehearse time management and decision making under pressure.
- Post-game reviews: after each blitz game, note your two most frequent mistakes and write down safer alternatives you could have played.
- Endgame focus: weekly drills on common king-and-pawn endings and rook endings to improve conversion in late-game scenarios.
Progress tracking tips
Keep a simple log of the two most common blunders you encounter and how you fixed them. Track time usage per game and set a goal to improve your average remaining time in the final phase of games.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| jeremytheendboss | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| bharathravikumar | 249W / 176L / 16D | View Games |
| stefanahtarovski | 108W / 108L / 10D | View Games |
| Godswill Ogodogu | 106W / 65L / 8D | View Games |
| bxb13 | 71W / 99L / 5D | View Games |
| dorusah | 79W / 74L / 11D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2414 | 2404 | 1560 | |
| 2024 | 1934 | 2305 | 1268 | |
| 2023 | 2300 | 2306 | 1560 | 1057 |
| 2022 | 2304 | 2328 | ||
| 2021 | 2300 | 2306 | 1732 | |
| 2020 | 2305 | 2158 | 1778 | |
| 2019 | 1965 | 2203 | ||
| 2018 | 2004 | 2102 | ||
| 2017 | 1151 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1199W / 988L / 114D | 1225W / 1004L / 89D | 79.2 |
| 2024 | 2338W / 1788L / 205D | 2313W / 1818L / 200D | 78.0 |
| 2023 | 648W / 694L / 50D | 642W / 693L / 68D | 75.7 |
| 2022 | 3646W / 3685L / 273D | 3798W / 3497L / 259D | 74.3 |
| 2021 | 3542W / 3082L / 284D | 3639W / 2992L / 273D | 73.6 |
| 2020 | 2801W / 2093L / 172D | 2789W / 2083L / 193D | 74.0 |
| 2019 | 2189W / 2016L / 178D | 2113W / 2095L / 169D | 74.8 |
| 2018 | 3053W / 2252L / 119D | 3058W / 2246L / 113D | 69.3 |
| 2017 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 74.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 5004 | 2512 | 2333 | 159 | 50.2% |
| Modern Defense | 4026 | 2075 | 1826 | 125 | 51.5% |
| Czech Defense | 3467 | 1902 | 1459 | 106 | 54.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1524 | 816 | 667 | 41 | 53.5% |
| Australian Defense | 1102 | 549 | 528 | 25 | 49.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1044 | 538 | 471 | 35 | 51.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1012 | 508 | 473 | 31 | 50.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 764 | 368 | 376 | 20 | 48.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 739 | 388 | 325 | 26 | 52.5% |
| Three Knights Opening | 730 | 364 | 344 | 22 | 49.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 4296 | 2413 | 1705 | 178 | 56.2% |
| Modern Defense | 3447 | 1818 | 1504 | 125 | 52.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3396 | 1902 | 1367 | 127 | 56.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2381 | 1260 | 1012 | 109 | 52.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 2158 | 1154 | 908 | 96 | 53.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 1711 | 956 | 688 | 67 | 55.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1083 | 570 | 462 | 51 | 52.6% |
| Australian Defense | 1031 | 594 | 390 | 47 | 57.6% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 821 | 403 | 386 | 32 | 49.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 738 | 385 | 311 | 42 | 52.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 32 | 0 |
| Losing | 17 | 0 |