Kraven Hunter - Chess Profile
Known in the chess world by the fearsome handle PiFischer, Kraven Hunter is a player whose journey resembles a thrilling grandmaster novel — full of sweeping victories, unexpected setbacks, and a flair for the dramatic finale. Starting with a humble Daily rating of 1194 back in March 2015, Kraven rapidly ascended the ranks like a knight galloping across the board, peaking at an impressive 2151 in December 2017.
Playing Style & Strengths
This stalwart strategist boasts an early resignation rate of just 0.55%, proving that surrender isn’t in his vocabulary. With an endgame frequency of nearly 80%, Kraven has mastered the art of squeezing victories from positions many would consider dead draws — a true testament to his finesse in the finale. His average game length hovers around 67 moves for wins and 76 for losses, indicating a preference for strategic, long-term battles rather than quick tactical skirmishes.
Favoring white with a slight edge (52.66% win rate), and black being no less effective battleground (49.29% win rate), Kraven's flexibility is further highlighted by an astounding comeback rate of 85%, showing resilience that would scare even the toughest opponents.
Notable Opening Choices
Kraven has a deep love for the London System, converting about three-quarters of his 37 games to victories. And if you thought he was predictable, think again: the Sicilian Defense Smith Morra Gambit Accepted wields a staggering 93% win rate, ensuring opponents double-check their opening theory notes before facing him.
His repertoire is diverse, from the Nimzo Indian Defense’s classical variations to playing top-secret lines (and no, the last isn’t a spy thriller — just a very sneaky opening).
Rating Highlights and Records
- Peak Ratings: Daily - 2151, Rapid - 2399, Bullet - 2159, Blitz - 2250.
- Win/Loss/Draw Totals: A career tally of 15,203 wins across all game modes attests to Kraven's enduring prowess.
- Longest Winning Streak: A formidable 37 consecutive wins, proving that when Kraven is on fire, the chessboard sizzles.
Psychological Spark & Timing
Kraven is a human calculator and a resilient gladiator. Despite a tilt factor of 15 (the chess equivalent of raising an eyebrow during a tricky move), he bounces back with an inspiring comeback rate. Also, his games peak in brilliance around 14:00 — so if you want to see him play his best, set your clock accordingly.
Recent Battles
In his latest encounters, Kraven demonstrated his penchant for resilient defense and sharp counter-attacks. For example, in a highlight win against "RoyaleWithCheese," he skillfully launched a Dutch Defense, ultimately forcing resignation after a relentless queenside assault. Recent losses, while rare, have provided the fuel for improvement — such is the life of a warrior who prefers learning to resting.
Quirky Tidbits
While most players fear the clock, Kraven treats time trouble as a chance to dazzle, often playing with a calm that would perplex a Zen master. His unique username PiFischer pays homage to legends and constants—the perfect blend of irrational brilliance and cold computation.
Whether battling in blitz or grinding through daily games, Kraven Hunter's chess tale is a captivating mix of perseverance, tactical wizardry, and a sprinkle of humor.
Quick appraisal of your blitz approach
Your recent blitz activity shows you’re close to a balanced score overall, with a strength-adjusted win rate around 49%. Short-term momentum looks positive, but the longer-term trend over the past year has dipped a bit. This suggests you’re capable of good results in the right moments, but there are recurring places where a few mistakes or time pressure moments swing games the other way. The key is to convert more of your promising positions into clean, quick wins and reduce costly errors under time pressure.
What you’re doing well
- You handle a diverse opening set with solid results in some active lines. In particular, you show strength in Scandinavian Defense, Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, and Australian Defense, indicating you’re comfortable navigating open, tactical middlegames and imbalanced positions.
- You can generate steady pressure and often find tactical ideas when opponents overextend or miscoordinate their pieces.
- Recent momentum in the shorter term suggests you can recover quickly after rough starts and seize dynamic chances in the middlegame.
Areas to improve in blitz
- Limit blunders and risky overextensions. Your long-term trend hints at recurring lapses that derail otherwise good positions. Build a quick safety check before critical decisions.
- Improve time management. In blitz, it helps to develop a disciplined pre-move routine and a simple 2-minute review of the top two candidate plans before committing a move.
- Strengthen endgames and conversion technique. When the position simplifies, ensure you convert small advantages decisively rather than letting balance drift to a draw or loss.
- Solidify a compact opening repertoire. Focus on 2–3 high-probability lines (preferably ones you already perform well in) to reduce decision fatigue and learn common middlegame themes from those structures.
- Continue sharpening pattern recognition with regular tactical practice so you spot winning ideas faster and avoid missing forcing lines under pressure.
Opening choices to emphasize
From openings data, you tend to perform well in lines such as:
- Scandinavian Defense — strong practical chances and clear middlegame plans when played actively.
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense — offers sharp, tactical play and good chances for both sides if you’re comfortable calculating on the fly.
- Australian Defense — shows solid results and healthy middlegame challenges for your opponents.
Prune lines with weaker results for you in blitz (for example, some heavily improvisational or highly theoretical paths) to keep the focus on the higher‑yield choices. Consider building a concise repertoire around the strong performers above to reduce decision fatigue in fast games.
Two-week practical plan to boost blitz results
- Daily tactics: complete 15–20 short puzzles (5–10 minutes) to reinforce pattern recognition and reduce impulsive, hopeful moves.
- Opening study: lock in 2–3 high‑quality lines (one from each of the strong openings above) and review 5 common middlegame ideas from each line.
- Post‑game review: after every blitz game, note 1–2 critical moments where you hesitated or misjudged a tactic, and write a one-sentence remedy for next time.
- Time management drill: in practice games, set a rule to pause for a 10–15 second pre-move check after every 7–8 moves to slow down and verify your plan.
- Endgame conversions: once per week, study a simple endgame pattern (e.g., king activity in rook endings, or basic pawn endgames) and practice converting a minor advantage.
Concrete reminders for rapid improvements
- Before moving, quickly answer: What is my plan for the next 2–3 moves, and am I improving my piece activity or pressing a weakness in opponent’s camp?
- If you’re uncertain within a critical moment, choose a safer continuation that secures a plan rather than chasing a speculative tactic.
- Endgames matter in blitz. Invest a portion of your practice time in simple endgame drills to convert advantages reliably.
Optional reference notes (for you to explore later)
You can optionally attach a quick game summary or a short PGN snippet from a representative recent blitz win to review key decisions. If you want, I can generate a compact, annotated outline of one of your recent games focusing on the critical decision points and the planned improvements.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Марья Ефименко | 39W / 147L / 15D | |
| hitorkoal | 99W / 4L / 37D | |
| samuraichessman | 22W / 116L / 1D | |
| likefisher | 107W / 9L / 0D | |
| usa2017 | 67W / 26L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1912 | |||
| 2024 | 1985 | |||
| 2023 | 2100 | 2243 | 1971 | |
| 2022 | 2102 | 2131 | 2243 | 1955 |
| 2021 | 2102 | 2106 | 2170 | 1968 |
| 2020 | 2115 | 2028 | 2120 | 2047 |
| 2019 | 2025 | 2089 | 1963 | |
| 2018 | 1711 | 1590 | 2038 | 1917 |
| 2017 | 2094 | |||
| 2016 | 2001 | |||
| 2015 | 1921 | 2001 | 2034 | |
| 2014 | 1800 | 2001 | 2038 | |
| 2013 | 1983 | 2001 | 1726 | |
| 2012 | 2001 | 2001 | 1825 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10W / 4L / 3D | 6W / 8L / 2D | 62.7 |
| 2024 | 7W / 0L / 1D | 6W / 1L / 2D | 49.5 |
| 2023 | 146W / 102L / 22D | 136W / 127L / 8D | 75.4 |
| 2022 | 646W / 577L / 77D | 621W / 599L / 82D | 73.1 |
| 2021 | 715W / 563L / 84D | 640W / 608L / 96D | 73.2 |
| 2020 | 875W / 662L / 95D | 802W / 717L / 108D | 73.2 |
| 2019 | 1633W / 1292L / 162D | 1445W / 1401L / 197D | 74.3 |
| 2018 | 1574W / 1305L / 120D | 1442W / 1413L / 152D | 73.1 |
| 2017 | 0W / 1L / 1D | 1W / 0L / 1D | 84.8 |
| 2016 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 2L / 0D | 85.5 |
| 2015 | 100W / 90L / 4D | 97W / 89L / 4D | 66.5 |
| 2014 | 487W / 486L / 28D | 478W / 507L / 15D | 69.6 |
| 2013 | 662W / 563L / 37D | 634W / 635L / 31D | 68.3 |
| 2012 | 1527W / 1171L / 80D | 1524W / 1162L / 90D | 71.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 82 | 53 | 16 | 13 | 64.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 58 | 40 | 15 | 3 | 69.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 52 | 40 | 7 | 5 | 76.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 50 | 34 | 6 | 10 | 68.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 49 | 41 | 6 | 2 | 83.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 44 | 27 | 6 | 11 | 61.4% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 37 | 27 | 4 | 6 | 73.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 32 | 14 | 7 | 11 | 43.8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 29 | 15 | 6 | 8 | 51.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 67 | 37 | 27 | 3 | 55.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 35 | 15 | 18 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 35 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 48.6% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 32 | 12 | 17 | 3 | 37.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 30 | 18 | 11 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 28 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 25 | 9 | 15 | 1 | 36.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 25 | 9 | 14 | 2 | 36.0% |
| Czech Defense | 24 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 58.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1350 | 755 | 549 | 46 | 55.9% |
| Australian Defense | 1122 | 602 | 493 | 27 | 53.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 794 | 414 | 354 | 26 | 52.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 517 | 267 | 227 | 23 | 51.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 517 | 279 | 219 | 19 | 54.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 517 | 291 | 211 | 15 | 56.3% |
| French Defense | 493 | 295 | 188 | 10 | 59.8% |
| Czech Defense | 462 | 242 | 200 | 20 | 52.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 378 | 191 | 175 | 12 | 50.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 370 | 174 | 180 | 16 | 47.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 366 | 155 | 197 | 14 | 42.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 271 | 134 | 126 | 11 | 49.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 255 | 150 | 96 | 9 | 58.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 251 | 124 | 116 | 11 | 49.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 242 | 117 | 104 | 21 | 48.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 222 | 108 | 102 | 12 | 48.6% |
| Australian Defense | 221 | 127 | 84 | 10 | 57.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 204 | 106 | 85 | 13 | 52.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 201 | 102 | 91 | 8 | 50.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 170 | 67 | 95 | 8 | 39.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 37 | 0 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |