About pikatnimopete
pikatnimopete is an online chess force of nature best known for blistering blitz play, audacious sacrifices, and an uncanny knack for snatching wins in time trouble. Equal parts tactician and entertainer, this player has built a reputation on fast games, loud chatbox celebrations, and a soft spot for unusual gambits.
Career highlights
Fast-paced, long-running online presence with many streaks, comebacks and headline-making blitz sessions. Notable markers:
- Blitz specialist — preferred time control: Blitz, with heavy activity and striking peak performances.
- Fearless comeback ability: Comeback Rate ~77.66% — excellent under pressure.
- Streak drama: longest winning streak 20 games, longest losing streak 13 games.
- Peak indicator: 2663 (2023-06-14) — a reminder of top-tier short-game moments.
Trend snapshot:
Playing style & strengths
Expect quick decisions, tactical shots, and a willingness to take risks when the clock ticks. This profile is ideal for opponents who enjoy wild positions.
- Endgame-driven: high Endgame Frequency — often grinds into long technical battles even in blitz.
- Avg moves per win ~66 — games usually play out beyond the opening fireworks.
- Strong under material pressure: Win Rate After Losing Piece ~50.66% — resilient and resourceful.
- White win rate edge: WhiteWinRate ~54.86% — comfortable with initiative.
Openings & repertoire
pikatnimopete mixes topical theory with surprise gambits — perfect for blitz unpredictability.
- Trusted systems: Czech Defense, Australian Defense, London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation.
- Sharp choices: Amar Gambit and frequent Sicilian lines (Dragon / Yugoslav Attack).
- Reliable blitz weapons: QGA: 3.e3 c5 shows a high win rate in rapid-fire games.
Blitz sample rates: QGA: 3.e3 c5 (~58.9% win rate), Sicilian Dragon (around ~51.6%) — a mix of textbook aggression and improvisation.
Rivalries & memorable opponents
Regular opponents create episodic rivalries — long-running matchups that fans follow like a serialized drama.
- Frequent foe: jai_adithya — hundreds of games, lots of memorable clashes.
- Other recurring names: kingofchess565419usm, humblespaceman, chess_king1197 — familiar faces in many seasons.
Timing, psychology & quirks
Small habits and big tells — useful intel for opponents, amusing trivia for viewers.
- Best time to challenge: 20:00 (peak performance hour).
- TiltFactor: 13 — can get spicy after a bad loss, so expect drama.
- Early resignation rate low (~1.9%) — rarely gives up; games often run deep.
- Prefers decisive battles: AvgFirstCaptureMove ~6 — likes the action early.
Memorable blitz miniature (replay)
Here’s a compact, replayable blitz fragment that shows the kind of practical play pikatnimopete favors — sharp but sensible:
Fun facts & closing
Off the board, pikatnimopete is chatty, witty, and occasionally fond of dramatic nickname reveals. On the board, expect instant tactics, stubborn endgame play, and a flair for theatrical wins.
- Comeback specialist — never count them out after a blunder.
- One-sided losses are rare, so when a blowout happens it’s a spectacle.
- Viewer tip: tune into blitz sessions for entertaining, educational chaos.
Want more? Replay the blitz chart, check recent rivalries, or jump into a game — pikatnimopete will likely accept the challenge (and trash-talk politely).
Quick summary
Nice session — you scored clean wins with sharp tactics and converted a textbook queen+rook attack, but two losses came from time-forfeit situations. The play shows very good tactical vision and opening familiarity; the immediate area to fix is time management and a few defensive habits under pressure.
Highlights — what you did well
- Sharp tactical intuition: in the win vs Simão Poscidônio Dias you found the sacrificial shot Bxf7+ and followed through accurately to win material and create decisive king exposure.
- Coordination and finishing: in the win vs Austinhahaha you used knight and queen coordination to force mate threats (Qh7+ → Qe8#) — excellent pattern recognition for mating nets.
- Active piece play: you centralize rooks and use lifts (Ree6 / Rh6 / Rxh5) to invade — you understand how to convert activity into concrete gains.
- Repertoire: you’re comfortable in sharp systems (Sicilian/Dragon ideas and QGD lines) and your openings are producing dynamic middlegames where you shine tactically. See Sicilian Defense and Queen's Gambit Declined.
Key weaknesses to fix
- Time management — both recent losses were time forfeits. You often reach critical, complex positions with too little clock left. This turns winning/holdable positions into losses.
- When low on time you tend to keep complications instead of simplifying. Trading into a technical won or drawish endgame is often safer when the clock is short.
- Occasional overreach with speculative sacrifices early in the middlegame without checking defensive resources. The Bxf7 in your win was good because it was concrete — make sure similar shots in other games are equally sound.
- Defensive technique under repeated checks / harassment by the opponent’s queen. In a couple of games you allowed long checks that ate time and coordination.
Concrete moments to review (post-mortem)
- Win vs Simão Poscidônio Dias — study 9.Bxf7+ → 13.Nxe6+ → 14.Nxd8 and the follow-up around 29–35. Those moves show excellent calculation and converting material into mating pressure. Replay: ).
- Win vs Austinhahaha — watch the knight jumps (Nf7, Nd6, Nxf7) that toppled Black’s king safety and led to Qe8#. Replay: .
- Loss on time vs TinoLang60 — pick this game for a focused clock/technical review. Find the moments where you could have simplified or traded to reduce calculation load (mid-to-late middlegame around move 22–30).
- Loss on time vs TrogloditaDiRoccia — replay the long checking sequence and mark positions where a quieter defensive move or a trade would keep the clock under control.
Short training plan (next 2 weeks)
- Daily 10–20 minutes tactics (mixed puzzles). Focus on sacrifices, forks, skewers, mating nets. Goal: 20 solved puzzles per day with accuracy above 80%.
- 3 sessions of clock training: play 10 games of 5+3 or 3+2, but force yourself to keep at least ~10 seconds on average per move in complex positions. Practice simplifying when below 30 seconds.
- Endgame drills: 15 minutes twice a week on basic rook endings and queen+rook vs rook techniques — these steadily increase conversion rate in blitz.
- One opening tune-up: pick your most-played sharp line (e.g., Sicilian Dragon / Yugoslav Attack) and review 3 typical tactical motifs and one safe sideline to reach playable middlegames when low on time.
- Post-mortems: annotate 1 win and 1 loss per day (5–10 minutes each). Mark three critical moves and a time-check comment (“I had X seconds here, should have…”).
Quick practical tips for blitz
- When ahead on the clock, avoid long-winded calculation — force trades to reduce complexity.
- If you see a speculative sacrifice, pause and ask: “What is my follow-up if they decline?” If you can’t see a clear follow-up in 10–15s, don’t play it in blitz.
- Use increment controls (play 5+3 or 3+2 regularly) to train making safe "short" moves — moves that don’t require full calculation but keep pressure.
- Keep a “default plan” in your openings: if opponent deviates, play a familiar developing move and avoid new theory when the clock is low.
Next steps — a 4‑game checklist
- Game 1: Focus on keeping 10–15s on the clock entering the middlegame. If under 20s, trade pieces.
- Game 2: Hunt one tactical pattern from the wins (Bxf7-type sacrifices) and try to find it where appropriate — then verify with analysis after the game.
- Game 3: Practice a “safe” Dragon sideline you can reach quickly; avoid entering the most theoretical Yugoslav lines if you’re low on time.
- Game 4: Finish with a 5+3 game and do a 3-minute review immediately after — mark one thing you did better vs one persistent mistake.
Resources & follow-ups
- Replay your two recent wins above (PGN links embedded) and tag three instructive moments per game.
- If you want, send me one annotated loss and I’ll give a focused line-by-line fix for the key critical positions.
Want me to load a game for you?
Pick one of these and I’ll produce a short annotated mini‑analysis (3–6 key moves) highlighting blunders, alternatives and a simple plan.
- Replay: win vs ProfSimao —
- Replay: win vs Austinhahaha —
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pruthvi_kira | 0W / 3L / 0D | View |
| ravmaster09 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Arqa | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| lordyoung_2011 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| u827883 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mipapaesgascon | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| the_coach89 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| subwooferbishop | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| camuemu | 2W / 4L / 0D | View |
| cachess10 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| kingofchess565419usm | 262W / 302L / 69D | View Games |
| jai_adithya | 368W / 98L / 60D | View Games |
| humblespaceman | 96W / 117L / 6D | View Games |
| chess_king1197 | 94W / 10L / 95D | View Games |
| laitg_1691 | 122W / 28L / 28D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2415 | 2335 | 1613 | |
| 2024 | 2125 | 2441 | 1536 | |
| 2023 | 2108 | 2382 | 1465 | |
| 2022 | 2147 | 2361 | 1414 | |
| 2021 | 1945 | 2336 | 1293 | |
| 2020 | 2292 | 2106 | 1486 | |
| 2019 | 2109 | 2431 | 1573 | |
| 2018 | 2087 | 2426 | 1588 | |
| 2017 | 2158 | 2347 | 1742 | |
| 2016 | 2233 | 2313 | 1724 | |
| 2015 | 2254 | 1931 | 1656 | |
| 2014 | 2208 | 1426 | ||
| 2013 | 2166 | 1732 | 1379 | |
| 2012 | 2201 | 1798 | 1245 | |
| 2010 | 2642 | 2136 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 425W / 458L / 20D | 410W / 472L / 16D | 68.7 |
| 2024 | 279W / 291L / 11D | 254W / 309L / 17D | 69.8 |
| 2023 | 492W / 447L / 34D | 480W / 467L / 24D | 73.6 |
| 2022 | 377W / 340L / 50D | 349W / 362L / 52D | 71.5 |
| 2021 | 360W / 122L / 91D | 330W / 154L / 94D | 58.3 |
| 2020 | 1160W / 604L / 202D | 1070W / 695L / 224D | 59.4 |
| 2019 | 142W / 103L / 7D | 134W / 121L / 8D | 75.1 |
| 2018 | 153W / 106L / 15D | 137W / 118L / 12D | 72.4 |
| 2017 | 265W / 200L / 16D | 239W / 231L / 22D | 74.5 |
| 2016 | 533W / 372L / 33D | 499W / 401L / 49D | 75.3 |
| 2015 | 792W / 639L / 38D | 762W / 681L / 41D | 71.1 |
| 2014 | 269W / 228L / 17D | 268W / 240L / 11D | 77.8 |
| 2013 | 129W / 89L / 9D | 119W / 93L / 15D | 69.0 |
| 2012 | 256W / 117L / 23D | 241W / 142L / 22D | 66.7 |
| 2010 | 189W / 104L / 3D | 183W / 106L / 1D | 72.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 716 | 406 | 298 | 12 | 56.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 692 | 331 | 338 | 23 | 47.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 485 | 244 | 225 | 16 | 50.3% |
| Australian Defense | 467 | 256 | 200 | 11 | 54.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 414 | 209 | 199 | 6 | 50.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 414 | 208 | 191 | 15 | 50.2% |
| French Defense | 375 | 203 | 157 | 15 | 54.1% |
| Modern | 357 | 183 | 162 | 12 | 51.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 348 | 171 | 171 | 6 | 49.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 321 | 179 | 134 | 8 | 55.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 216 | 103 | 76 | 37 | 47.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 195 | 103 | 45 | 47 | 52.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 137 | 84 | 30 | 23 | 61.3% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 132 | 73 | 39 | 20 | 55.3% |
| Italian Game: Classical Variation, Ghulam-Kassim Variation | 65 | 49 | 4 | 12 | 75.4% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 63 | 41 | 9 | 13 | 65.1% |
| Scotch Game | 52 | 43 | 4 | 5 | 82.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 44 | 13 | 12 | 19 | 29.6% |
| Petrov's Defense | 42 | 30 | 3 | 9 | 71.4% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 39 | 28 | 5 | 6 | 71.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 188 | 97 | 66 | 25 | 51.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 187 | 96 | 78 | 13 | 51.3% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 127 | 58 | 64 | 5 | 45.7% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 124 | 73 | 47 | 4 | 58.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 120 | 59 | 58 | 3 | 49.2% |
| Australian Defense | 116 | 60 | 49 | 7 | 51.7% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 113 | 51 | 52 | 10 | 45.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 111 | 58 | 34 | 19 | 52.2% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 109 | 62 | 39 | 8 | 56.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 105 | 54 | 47 | 4 | 51.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 2 |