Sam Schenk: The Relentless Plaster Hippy of Chess
Known in the digital chess realm as PlasterhippyTwitch, Sam Schenk is a machine in human form, crushing boards with the tenacity of a rhino and the subtlety of a magician.
From 2018 until today, Sam has skyrocketed up the bullet ladder, achieving a peak rating of 2663 in October 2024—because apparently, the speed limit doesn’t apply in his games.
Blitz is his true canvas, where his sharp instincts and tactical wizardry paint masterpieces. His highest blitz rating? A solid 2426 reached in early 2024, making opponents second-guess their life choices within seconds.
Sam doesn’t just win; he orchestrates comebacks with a 38% comeback rate and maintains a sturdy 56% win rate after losing a piece. In other words, even if he loses a knight, he somehow turns the tides with a grin.
Beware early resignations though—he maintains a charmingly high Early Resignation Rate of 63.85%. Maybe he just values quality over quantity or maybe he’s got a sixth sense that warns him when he’s about to get pancaked. Either way, it keeps his games quick and spicy!
Opening Repertoire: A Mix of Classical and Wild
- Van t Kruijs Opening — Where he boasts a dazzling 67% win rate in bullet games, his secret jungle move that baffles traditionalists.
- Queens Pawn Opening (Horwitz Defense) — Another sturdy favorite with over a 60% win rate, proving old-school moves still pack a punch.
- Englund Gambit — He’s no stranger to the dance of risk, netting over 56% wins here; a gambit that keeps his foes on their toes.
Playing Style
True to his username's vibe, Sam is a smooth blend of aggression and wizardry. His games average a swift 32 moves to victory, showcasing sharp, precise strikes rather than grinding wars.
He shuffles his pieces swiftly and smartly, taking his first capture usually on move 7, proving that patience is a virtue, but so is seizing the moment. His win rate with white pieces stands at a confident 57.63%, and a solid 56.67% with black, making him a balanced threat regardless of color.
Rivals and Records
Sam has made quite a few enemies on the chess battlefield, with some opponents unevenly battered—like marichess whom he faced 171 times and left quivering after winning about 81% of those skirmishes.
His most recent win was a swift execution, where he outmaneuvered ElijahLogozarStudent with a surgical 29-move game concluding in a dignified resignation.
Despite his overwhelming success, Sam has endured his share of setbacks—his tilt factor at 23 suggests that even the best have off days. But hey, even the greatest souls need a coffee break after a ridiculous blunder.
Fun Fact for the Strategically Curious
Playing at his best around 1 PM, Sam’s uncloaked genius often strikes when the sun shines brightest. So, if you want to challenge him, better set your alarm for that golden hour!
To keep up with his journey, watch for PlasterhippyTwitch — maybe you'll catch a blitz, a bullet, or a rapid spectacle that will make you rethink your chess strategy (and maybe your life choices).
What Sam Schenk is doing well in bullet games
You show a willingness to fight for initiative and you’re comfortable navigating tactical, sharp positions. In several recent games you initiated piece activity and kept pressure on your opponent’s position, which can yield winning chances even when the position is materially balanced. You also demonstrate versatility with your openings, and you’re not afraid to experiment when you see tactical opportunities.
- Willingness to calculate and try tactical shots when the position allows it.
- Ability to generate practical chances through active piece play and king-side or center pressure.
- Flexibility in opening choices, adapting to different structures and lines as needed.
- Resilience to stay engaged in middlegames, even when the position becomes dynamic or chaotic.
Key improvement areas to focus on
- Endgame conversion and accuracy: In several games, the flow of tactics gave you chances, but when trades happened, there were missed chances to convert or to simplify to favorable rook-and-pawn endgames. Practice evaluating endgames after exchanges and look for clear plans (e.g., creating a passed pawn, activating the king, coordinating rooks on open files).
- Opening discipline and repertoire: You’ve shown breadth in openings, but a narrower, coherent white and black repertoire would help you reach familiar middlegame plans more consistently. Pick 2 White setups and 2 Black defenses that suit your style and study their typical middlegame ideas.
- Time management in bullet play: Your clock behavior in fast games can lead to rushed decisions in critical moments. Develop a simple pre-check routine for tactical moments (e.g., identify forcing moves and check candidate lines) to avoid flagging on sharp sequences.
- Calculation discipline and pattern recognition: Strengthen your ability to spot common tactical motifs (forks, discovered attacks, back-rank ideas, and overloaded pieces) by doing short, focused puzzle practice daily (15–20 minutes) on motifs you’ve encountered in your games.
Opening performance and repertoire guidance
Your openings show solid willingness to play dynamic, tactical lines as well as sturdier setups. Notably strong performance appears in more aggressive, tactical openings, while some more ambiguous or “Unknown” lines yielded fewer wins. A sensible plan is to adopt a compact repertoire with clear middlegame aims:
- Choose 2 White go-to openings that lead to lively middlegames (for example, a flexible Queen’s Pawn approach and a tactical, initiative-driven line you enjoy).
- Choose 2 Black defenses that you understand well and that give you practical chances (for example, a solid, central-defensive setup and a counter-attacking option).
- Develop a short cheat-sheet of typical middlegame plans and pawn structures for those lines so you can quickly orient yourself in a game and avoid overcomplicating unnecessarily.
Rating momentum and what it suggests for practice
Your recent rating trajectory shows positive momentum. Shorter-term gains (like a month) are encouraging, and longer-term trend figures indicate you’re trending upward overall. Use this momentum to build durable habits: consistent practice, targeted study, and deliberate review of your mistakes to solidify improvements.
Action plan for the next 2 weeks
- Build a focused two-opening White repertoire and two Black defenses. Create quick reference notes for typical middlegame plans and common pawn structures for each line.
- Endgame drill: practice rook-and-pawn endgames and king activity. Use 5–10 minutes per session to play simplified endings until you can win a clean rook endgame with a passed pawn.
- Tactics routine: commit to 15–20 minutes of daily tactical puzzles, emphasizing motifs that have shown up in your bullet games (forks, overloading, back-rank ideas, discovered attacks).
- Post-game reflections: after every bullet game, write 2 concise points on what went well and 1 concrete improvement you will try next time (e.g., “avoid premature exchanges that simplify into a worse endgame”).
- Play at least two longer bullet-style sessions per week (or a single 5+0 game and a 3+1 game) to train calculation depth while maintaining your practical feel for sharp positions.
Optional note: If you want, I can tailor a starter repertoire list with specific move orders and typical middlegame plans for your preferred openings. Just tell me which two White openings and two Black defenses you’d like to focus on first.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| lyricl | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| 9988otto | 1W / 2L / 1D | View |
| acuratmouse | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| tenaciousdream | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Bludgeon From FICS | 45W / 35L / 1D | View |
| pikassom | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| yellowmoon8040 | 20W / 7L / 0D | View |
| Carlos Hoyos | 55W / 57L / 0D | View |
| dontkno | 3W / 3L / 0D | View |
| 6a6yshka | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nochewycandy | 45W / 143L / 8D | View Games |
| kcplayschess | 106W / 78L / 0D | View Games |
| 6graberbythe9 | 103W / 76L / 1D | View Games |
| legiondestroyer | 53W / 121L / 1D | View Games |
| Epiphany Peters | 139W / 32L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2702 | 1792 | ||
| 2024 | 2606 | 1994 | 1981 | 1511 |
| 2023 | 2470 | 2384 | 1939 | 1480 |
| 2022 | 2490 | 2035 | 1914 | |
| 2021 | 2290 | 2223 | 2000 | |
| 2020 | 2465 | 2202 | 2049 | 1393 |
| 2019 | 2202 | 2045 | 1732 | 853 |
| 2018 | 2177 | 2174 | 1612 | 1481 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 67W / 65L / 4D | 75W / 67L / 3D | 37.1 |
| 2024 | 444W / 399L / 84D | 452W / 421L / 58D | 65.7 |
| 2023 | 619W / 507L / 37D | 665W / 502L / 33D | 25.3 |
| 2022 | 3296W / 2175L / 142D | 3270W / 2204L / 143D | 19.0 |
| 2021 | 1517W / 903L / 88D | 1436W / 991L / 76D | 27.5 |
| 2020 | 346W / 207L / 46D | 345W / 205L / 43D | 56.8 |
| 2019 | 54W / 33L / 2D | 55W / 33L / 5D | 64.5 |
| 2018 | 402W / 242L / 41D | 359W / 286L / 33D | 72.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 802 | 441 | 308 | 53 | 55.0% |
| Unknown | 627 | 253 | 369 | 5 | 40.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 558 | 316 | 208 | 34 | 56.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 496 | 265 | 196 | 35 | 53.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 405 | 198 | 177 | 30 | 48.9% |
| Modern | 383 | 236 | 125 | 22 | 61.6% |
| Czech Defense | 380 | 193 | 166 | 21 | 50.8% |
| French Defense | 225 | 137 | 77 | 11 | 60.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 223 | 130 | 78 | 15 | 58.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 212 | 118 | 88 | 6 | 55.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12219 | 6927 | 5219 | 73 | 56.7% |
| Modern | 229 | 128 | 79 | 22 | 55.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 176 | 103 | 58 | 15 | 58.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 136 | 77 | 43 | 16 | 56.6% |
| Australian Defense | 122 | 64 | 47 | 11 | 52.5% |
| Czech Defense | 96 | 50 | 35 | 11 | 52.1% |
| Modern Defense | 94 | 60 | 30 | 4 | 63.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 79 | 53 | 20 | 6 | 67.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 76 | 52 | 21 | 3 | 68.4% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 64 | 41 | 19 | 4 | 64.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 61 | 44 | 11 | 6 | 72.1% |
| Australian Defense | 58 | 40 | 11 | 7 | 69.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 52 | 46 | 4 | 2 | 88.5% |
| French Defense | 51 | 40 | 11 | 0 | 78.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 51 | 45 | 6 | 0 | 88.2% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 49 | 44 | 2 | 3 | 89.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 47 | 26 | 10 | 11 | 55.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 41 | 34 | 3 | 4 | 82.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 39 | 35 | 4 | 0 | 89.7% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 33 | 21 | 4 | 8 | 63.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Unknown | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Modern Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 70 | 0 |
| Losing | 23 | 2 |