Benjamin Gledura - Grandmaster Extraordinaire
Meet Benjamin Gledura, a chess virtuoso known on the digital battlefield as promen1999. Awarded the prestigious title of Grandmaster by FIDE, Benjamin doesn't just play chess—he dances a complex ballet of strategy, sacrifice, and slick tactics that would make even the most seasoned opponents sweat.
Starting with humble beginnings around 2013 with blitz ratings just shy of 1800, Benjamin's meteoric rise in the chess world has been nothing short of phenomenal, soaring to a peak blitz rating over 3000 in late 2024 — a number that sounds like the score of an intergalactic video game rather than a chess rating! His rapid and bullet prowess are no joke either, boasting peak ratings north of 2800 and 2600 respectively, proving his skills are equally sharp when the clock ticks faster than a caffeine-fueled squirrel.
On average, Benjamin plays some marathon battles, averaging over 80 moves per win — clearly, he likes to keep the crowd on the edge of their seats! His endgame frequency is impressively high at nearly 84%, showcasing patience and mastery in turning the tide just when others have given up hope. Moreover, his comeback rate hovers around a dizzying 88%, meaning if you manage to snag a piece from him, don’t celebrate just yet — he might still come back and haunt your king.
Benjamin's chess philosophy includes a bit of early resignation, at less than 1% (he knows when to save energy for the next war), and a psychological tilt factor modest enough to keep his cool under pressure. With peak win rates hitting nearly 48% as White and 43% as Black, and an uncanny knack for winning 60% of the games against lower-rated opponents, he flexes both confidence and sportsmanship.
His opening repertoire? Oh, it's as mysterious as “Top Secret,” with over 4000 games played in blitz alone under that category—whether it's the Indian Game or the subtle nuances of the Caro-Kann Defense, Benjamin knows how to keep his rivals guessing. Facing him means preparing for a wide array of strategic surprises that could include the Reti, Sicilian, or even the elusive Kings Fianchetto.
Off the board, Benjamin is as calculating as on it—his best times to strike are mid-mornings to early afternoons, when his win rates spike, suggesting that this Grandmaster might be fueled by a perfect mix of strong coffee and sharp tactics. Beware if you challenge him around 2 PM to 3 PM; his win rate in that hour hits an eyebrow-raising 55.9%—clearly his brain cells are firing at their finest.
Recent battles have been fierce and thrilling. In May 2025, Benjamin clinched a graceful victory with the black pieces in a King's Indian Defense, resignations and calculated pressure hounding his opponents into submission. Yet, even the mightiest falter: a tough loss to Nihal Sarin reminded everyone that even Grandmasters sometimes have to bow out, proving chess remains a game of endless growth and humility.
So whether it's blitz, bullet, rapid, or the slower daily grind, Benjamin Gledura is a chess force to be reckoned with—an intellectual gladiator navigating the 64 squares with grace, grit, and just the right amount of cunning mischief. Opponents beware: when promen1999 is on the board, you're not just playing a game; you're stepping into a storm of mind-bending brilliance!
Quick summary
Benjamin — good session. You converted two technical wins with clean rook play and outside passers, but you also dropped decisive games after allowing opponent counterplay and passed pawns. Your short‑term rating is up and the data shows clear strengths to exploit.
- Wins: active rooks, created outside passers and converted methodically.
- Losses: tactical/positional slips when opponents generated counterplay and passed pawns.
- Overall: with small fixes (tactics & endgames) your practical score should improve quickly.
What you did well
- Rook activity — you repeatedly reached open files and the 7th rank, then converted cleanly.
- Creating passed pawns — you pushed passed pawns and used them to open files for rooks and kings.
- Practical decision‑making — you turn small advantages into endgame wins instead of hunting speculative tricks.
- Opening choices that score: King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation and the Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG) 4...f5 line show strong win rates for you.
Where you should improve
- Defensive tactics — a few losses came from missing counter‑tactics (forks, back‑rank motifs, knight jumps). Spend time on defensive pattern drills.
- Opponents’ passed pawns — you sometimes allowed blockades to fail or the opponent’s pawn to queen; practice blockade + king activation earlier.
- Trade evaluation — avoid simplifying when the resulting pawn structure or passer favors the opponent; ask “Does this trade reduce my winning chances?”
- Time management — try to keep a ~10–15s reserve in rapid to avoid low‑accuracy moves in critical moments.
Concrete 4‑week plan
- Daily (20–30 min): Tactics — emphasize defensive motifs (pins, forks, removing defenders, between moves).
- 3×/week (30–45 min): Endgames — drill rook + pawn vs rook, Lucena and Philidor positions, king + passer races.
- 2×/week (30 min): Opening consolidation — pick your top KID and DDG lines and build short plans for opponent sidelines.
- Weekly: Post‑mortem two recent games — find the turning move and at least one defensive resource you missed. Use engine only after your analysis.
- Practical: Play 2 rapid games focusing on clock discipline and applying endgame technique.
Example tactical reminder (short PGN)
Practice spotting defenders and counter‑forks. Here’s a short, clean opening fragment to run tactics on:
Tip: when you see a capture or breakthrough, check for enemy forks or hidden pins before committing.
Game‑specific takeaways from your recent session
- Win vs Alexander Rustemov — you forced exchanges to open a rook file and used a passed pawn to create decisive entry squares. Keep doing that: simplify when the resulting pawn structure gives you a clear passer and active rooks.
- Win vs Jules Moussard — excellent exploitation of kingside weaknesses and coordinated rooks. Good tactical awareness when the opponent weakened around their king.
- Loss vs Nihal Sarin — the position turned when your opponent created a protected passer and invaded with heavy pieces. Next time, prioritize blockade and piece activity over material grabbing.
Opening notes
- Double down on the lines with strong historical results for you: King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation and Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5.
- Against the Ruy Lopez-type structures you recently faced, avoid early simplifications that create far advanced passed pawns for the opponent — keep tension and active pieces.
- Prepare 1–2 short responses to the common sidelines you just saw so you save time and avoid surprises.
Practical tips for rapid play
- When spotting a tactic, mentally scan for hidden defenders and counterchecks before playing the capture.
- If you gain a pawn, improve piece activity first (rooks to open files, king to the center in endgames) before chasing more material.
- Keep 10–15 seconds as a reserve on the clock through move 20; spend more time only on real turning points.
- After a loss, do five easy tactics to reset focus before the next game.
How I can help next
- Do a focused post‑mortem on any of the games above — say which one and I’ll annotate the critical moments.
- I can produce a 2‑week tactics pack concentrated on the defensive motifs you miss most.
- If you want, I’ll make a one‑page cheat sheet for your top 3 openings with common replies and plans.
Tell me which game or task you want next — e.g. “Annotate loss vs Nihal Sarin” — and I’ll start.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Manolache Marius | 0W / 1L / 2D | View |
| Ян Дьомін | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Lucas Do Valle Cardoso | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| feel_special | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Dmitry MIschuk | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| thechosenone009 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Semyon Puzyrevsky | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| W_Amadeus | 37W / 59L / 56D | View Games |
| Hrant Melkumyan | 36W / 35L / 3D | View Games |
| David Paravyan | 25W / 36L / 9D | View Games |
| Yaacov Norowitz | 28W / 32L / 3D | View Games |
| Daniel Naroditsky | 15W / 36L / 9D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2882 | 2636 | ||
| 2024 | 2800 | 3036 | 2610 | |
| 2023 | 2785 | 2902 | 2630 | |
| 2022 | 2748 | 2526 | ||
| 2021 | 2791 | 2700 | ||
| 2020 | 2683 | 2690 | 2838 | |
| 2019 | 2760 | 2798 | ||
| 2018 | 2355 | 2600 | ||
| 2017 | 2441 | 2585 | ||
| 2016 | 2265 | |||
| 2015 | 2284 | |||
| 2014 | 2312 | |||
| 2013 | 2178 | 2247 | 1631 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 45W / 44L / 12D | 40W / 48L / 12D | 86.0 |
| 2024 | 148W / 127L / 49D | 141W / 130L / 50D | 87.2 |
| 2023 | 148W / 126L / 64D | 124W / 161L / 57D | 89.9 |
| 2022 | 50W / 45L / 13D | 49W / 40L / 10D | 91.6 |
| 2021 | 70W / 47L / 15D | 54W / 62L / 13D | 79.6 |
| 2020 | 350W / 317L / 97D | 321W / 355L / 77D | 87.6 |
| 2019 | 139W / 101L / 32D | 117W / 126L / 32D | 86.4 |
| 2018 | 2W / 5L / 1D | 3W / 4L / 0D | 82.5 |
| 2017 | 20W / 13L / 2D | 18W / 18L / 2D | 81.2 |
| 2016 | 1W / 1L / 1D | 1W / 1L / 1D | 69.7 |
| 2015 | 6W / 8L / 3D | 5W / 9L / 1D | 78.1 |
| 2014 | 8W / 3L / 2D | 9W / 4L / 0D | 77.0 |
| 2013 | 126W / 63L / 30D | 116W / 69L / 31D | 72.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 139 | 71 | 49 | 19 | 51.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 126 | 58 | 51 | 17 | 46.0% |
| Döry Defense | 87 | 46 | 34 | 7 | 52.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 84 | 44 | 30 | 10 | 52.4% |
| Modern | 80 | 33 | 35 | 12 | 41.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 75 | 39 | 31 | 5 | 52.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 74 | 22 | 31 | 21 | 29.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 71 | 24 | 34 | 13 | 33.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 69 | 34 | 28 | 7 | 49.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 69 | 29 | 28 | 12 | 42.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 20.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 33.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 14.3% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 14.3% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 33.3% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 58.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 22.2% |
| Czech Defense | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Modern | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 20.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System Reversed, 4. g3 g6 5. Bg2 Bg7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |