Siar Yaran - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Siar Yaran, also known on the chess battlefield as psychokiller48, is no ordinary player. Proudly holding the title of FIDE Master, Siar's chess journey is a thrilling saga of resilience, strategic wizardry, and more than a sprinkle of flair.
Starting from humble daily games under 2000 Elo, Siar quickly blitzed through the ranks, achieving blistering blitz ratings that peaked impressively above 2700 in recent years. For context, that's enough skill to make rookies sweat and grandmasters pause for thought.
This chess ninja's rapid-fire moves in bullet chess are equally impressive, boasting ratings surging past 2800 at peak moments—a speed demon on the board! Yet, Siar doesn't just win with flashy quick tactics; the playing style reveals a deep love for endgames and long battles, often stretching to around 75 moves a game—a testament to their battle-hardened patience and endurance.
With an astonishing win rate after losing a piece of nearly 100%, Siar is the comeback kid of chess, refusing to bow even when the odds look grim. Opponents beware: if you take a piece from Siar, you're probably just setting a trap for your own downfall.
And speaking of opponents, Siar has a vendetta against early resignation, rarely folding under pressure, and delightfully enjoys grinding out wins even in the toughest fights. The longest winning streak? A jaw-dropping 18 games in a row, proving that sometimes, the name psychokiller48 is no exaggeration.
When Siar isn’t dominating the 64 squares, they enjoy keeping opponents guessing with an undisclosed (or "Top Secret") repertoire that yields a respectable 53–56% win rate—clearly, they're holding back some killer moves for the big moments.
Known on forums and in tournaments as a tenacious tactician with a playful streak, Siar Yaran's chess narrative is one of passion, perseverance, and prowess. Whether blitzing, bulleting, or casually daily battling, Siar consistently delivers chess fireworks and has earned a special place among chess aficionados worldwide.
Quick summary for Siar Yaran
Great run — your recent rapid streak shows strong tactical vision and a reliable nose for converting small advantages into full points. You repeatedly finish complicated middlegames and avoid needless draws. Below I’ll highlight what's working, what to fix, and a short, practical plan you can start tomorrow.
What you're doing well
- High conversion rate: you turn small advantages into wins instead of letting the game fizzle. (Many of the games end after you simplify into winning material or a dominant rook/endgame.)
- Active piece play: your rooks and knights repeatedly get to good squares and create concrete threats — you look for the forcing plan, not passive moves.
- Opening traps and practical chances: your use of surprise lines (for example the Blackburne Shilling Gambit and sharp sidelines) is scoring — you get opponents out of book and into uncomfortable, tactical positions.
- Endgame technique under pressure: you convert extra pawns and use passed pawns well (several wins finished by queening or decisive rook activity).
Main areas to improve
- Opening consistency: you score well with aggressive, tricky lines, but there's a gap when opponents meet you with solid, principled responses (example: the one loss in the Scotch line). Pick a main setup to master so you avoid surprise structural weaknesses.
- Positional prophylaxis and king safety: in a couple of games your king was fine because tactics worked out — but against stronger defensive players those kingside/center weaknesses can be punished. Spend a little time asking after each move: "Does this create a permanent hole or a target?"
- Calculation vs. intuition balance: your intuition finds good candidate moves, but there are moments where calculating one extra ply avoids a small blunder (loose pieces / hanging tactics). Before captures or forcing sequences, double-check opponent replies.
- Time management in critical moments: in rapid you frequently have moments that deserve 15–30 seconds of thought (endgame pawn races, rook endgames). Don’t rush those — using a little extra time usually nets a simpler win.
Concrete practice plan (weekly)
- Daily (15–25 minutes): 25 tactics focusing on endgame mates, forks, and rook/queen tactics. Emphasize verifying your calculation — treat each as a forced-line test, not a quick guess.
- 3× week (20 minutes): endgame drills — Lucena and basic rook vs. rook/pawn endgames, king + pawn vs king. Spend at least one session converting a single extra pawn under the clock.
- 2× week (30–40 minutes): opening study — pick 2 main setups you’ll play as White and Black (keep the winning traps for blitz, but build a solid backbone for rapid). For example, deepen one line of the Semi-Slav Defense and one Italian/Giuoco line so you avoid transposition surprises.
- Post-game routine (5–10 minutes after each game): tag the game with the critical moment and write a one-sentence “what I missed.” Over a month you'll see patterns to correct faster than by random review.
Tactical and positional things to drill
- Pattern list: back-rank mates, knight forks, pins that win material, and X-ray tactics involving rooks and queens.
- Trading decisions: practice positions where you must decide whether to trade into a winning endgame or keep pieces on for attack. Make it a rule: if you trade down, have a concrete plan for the pawn structure or passed pawn.
- Weak-square awareness: when you push pawns to gain space, mark the new holes. If you create an outpost, try to place a knight there within two moves.
Practical in-game checklist (use this during rapid)
- Before every capture: count checks and captures — "Does opponent have a tactic back?" (1 quick check.)
- When ahead in material: simplify to an endgame only if you can visualize the winning plan (passed pawn, better king activity, or clear zugzwang).
- If the opponent plays an early queen excursion: ask yourself if you can exploit it with development + attack rather than trying to hit the queen immediately.
- At move 15–20: pause for 10–20 seconds and make a plan (where to put rooks, which pawn breaks to prepare). Many games swing because no plan was set.
Selected game to review (use the viewer)
Here’s a representative win where you convert activity into a winning endgame. Open it, step through the tactics and note the moment you forced simplification into a won rook endgame.
Opponent: anakcatur1381
Short-term targets (next 2 weeks)
- Solve 200 tactical puzzles (aim for quality over speed). Mark 3 positions you missed and re-study patterns there.
- Pick one lost game (the Scotch) and write a 5-line mini-analysis: where the plan failed and what alternative you would play next time.
- Practice 5 rook endgame positions from both sides (winning and defending) — spend them on the board or a TB to feel the technique.
Notes and resources
- Keep playing the tricky lines (they’re profitable), but pair them with a solid backup line for rapid/classical where you know the structure well.
- Review a few wins versus different opponents: e.g., grol4, czgrinder, wewewe33 — you’ll spot recurring motifs.
Final encouragement
You have excellent momentum (conversion, tactics, and varied openings). With focused practice on one or two weak spots (opening depth + basic endgames) you’ll turn this streak into a stable rating increase. If you want, send one loss (PGN) and I’ll give a 5–7 move concrete fix you can memorize for future games.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pham Nam Quan | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Sandeep Sethuraman | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| theeshelbyy | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mahdirezaee7 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Axel Bachmann | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| umering | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Clément Candelot | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| silvermiracle | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| slik-floyd | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| qwerrrrty | 2W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hoang Minh Tho Do | 96W / 69L / 9D | View Games |
| DrawDenied-Twitch | 45W / 69L / 4D | View Games |
| Tiago Pereira Rodrigues | 52W / 56L / 10D | View Games |
| elseres | 60W / 34L / 4D | View Games |
| ZURAB AZMAIPARASHVILI | 41W / 47L / 5D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2807 | 1919 | ||
| 2024 | 2718 | 1906 | ||
| 2023 | 2824 | 2732 | ||
| 2022 | 2618 | 2601 | 1906 | |
| 2021 | 2624 | 2808 | 2133 | 1906 |
| 2020 | 2538 | 2638 | 1883 | |
| 2019 | 2502 | 2580 | 1853 | |
| 2018 | 2463 | 2467 | 2133 | |
| 2017 | 2502 | 2502 | 2026 | |
| 2016 | 2416 | 2365 | 1852 | |
| 2015 | 1346 | 2240 | ||
| 2014 | 1952 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 185W / 153L / 20D | 190W / 142L / 33D | 77.3 |
| 2024 | 120W / 80L / 14D | 97W / 102L / 14D | 81.7 |
| 2023 | 108W / 66L / 12D | 95W / 70L / 11D | 83.1 |
| 2022 | 321W / 216L / 37D | 283W / 256L / 36D | 82.2 |
| 2021 | 1066W / 683L / 97D | 928W / 771L / 144D | 79.2 |
| 2020 | 1150W / 855L / 96D | 1029W / 940L / 117D | 76.2 |
| 2019 | 1872W / 1293L / 120D | 1789W / 1369L / 124D | 77.2 |
| 2018 | 1620W / 990L / 118D | 1385W / 1087L / 162D | 80.0 |
| 2017 | 679W / 455L / 43D | 625W / 505L / 68D | 77.2 |
| 2016 | 949W / 729L / 64D | 836W / 768L / 87D | 75.9 |
| 2015 | 146W / 95L / 10D | 120W / 110L / 11D | 77.7 |
| 2014 | 29W / 13L / 2D | 25W / 13L / 6D | 79.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 731 | 383 | 310 | 38 | 52.4% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 457 | 275 | 158 | 24 | 60.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 448 | 241 | 171 | 36 | 53.8% |
| Döry Defense | 431 | 226 | 179 | 26 | 52.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 378 | 193 | 161 | 24 | 51.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 369 | 215 | 137 | 17 | 58.3% |
| Alekhine Defense | 345 | 195 | 129 | 21 | 56.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 338 | 185 | 135 | 18 | 54.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 335 | 202 | 121 | 12 | 60.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 315 | 170 | 133 | 12 | 54.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 679 | 371 | 278 | 30 | 54.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 559 | 314 | 227 | 18 | 56.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 489 | 280 | 195 | 14 | 57.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 444 | 265 | 161 | 18 | 59.7% |
| Australian Defense | 416 | 229 | 171 | 16 | 55.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 348 | 199 | 136 | 13 | 57.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 308 | 169 | 129 | 10 | 54.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 288 | 183 | 93 | 12 | 63.5% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 236 | 138 | 92 | 6 | 58.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 235 | 141 | 88 | 6 | 60.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Classical Variation, Ghulam-Kassim Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation, Alekhine Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Marshall Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 2 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |