Chess Biography of purusottamchaulagain
purusottamchaulagain’s passion for chess began to take shape in 2020, when they first competed in fast-paced Bullet games, quickly rising from a humble 975 rating to a solid 1190 by year’s end. Even in those early matches, their tenacity and strategic sense were evident, foreshadowing a promising future.
The years that followed saw a remarkable transformation in their Blitz performances. Starting in 2020 with a rating just above 900, they soared to a career-high Blitz rating of 2168 in 2025, settling near 2118 by the end of that period. Over hundreds of Blitz games, their creative opening choices—ranging from classic Sicilian lines and the ever-flexible Nimzo-Indian to deep d4 structures—revealed a versatile playing style that blended risk-taking with calculated planning.
In Rapid play, purusottamchaulagain impressed with ever-advancing skills, peaking around 2047. They not only stepped up to complex middlegames but also boasted a strong 79% endgame frequency, with typically long, hard-fought struggles resulting in a respectable average of nearly 69 moves per victory. The contrast between their 61.96% win rate as White and 45.9% when playing Black underscores a preference for seizing the initiative early, while a comeback rate of 88.89% highlights their capacity for dramatic turnarounds.
Beyond raw statistics, what truly stands out is purusottamchaulagain’s commitment to growth. Their longest winning streak of 13 games and consistently high-level play demonstrate a mindset focused on resilience and adaptation. As each year has passed, they have further refined their openings, improved tactical awareness, and embraced the strategic and psychological complexities that make chess a lifelong pursuit.
Overview of recent rapid games
You’ve shown willingness to engage in dynamic, tactical lines and to experiment with a range of openings. In your recent wins and draws you’ve demonstrated resilience and fighting spirit in middlegames, while a recent loss highlights the challenge of converting complex positions into solid endings. The ratings and trend data suggest a positive trajectory over the longer term, but there is room to tighten decision-making in critical moments and strength in endgames.
What you did well
- Openings with practical play: You’ve found useful ideas in several openings, including sharp lines in the London System family and Scandinavian setups. This shows you’re comfortable navigating unfamiliar branches and keeping the initiative.
- Active piece play in middlegames: In several games you challenged your opponent’s structure and created dynamic imbalances, which kept opponents under pressure rather than letting them dictate the rhythm.
- Resourceful handling of back-rank and tactical motifs: When you found tactical opportunities, you leveraged them to create chances and complicate the position for your opponent.
Key improvements from your recent loss
- Endgame technique and conversion: The loss shows the difficulty of converting a complex middlegame to a win and the risk of letting passed pawns decide the game. Practice rook-and-pawn endgames and king activity in rook endings to convert advantages or hold draws.
- After exchanges, protect your king and pieces: In long tactical shifts, ensure your king safety and keep a coherent piece cohesion. If you’re uncertain about a line, consider simplifying to a position where your pieces coordinate more clearly.
- Watch for overextension: Avoid pushing too many pawns on the flank if it weakens the central control or creates easy targets for your opponent’s counterplay. Aim to balance pawn structure with piece activity.
Openings performance snapshot
Your openings show strengths in some headlined lines and room for consolidation in others. Notably, you have solid results with the London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation and strong results in Scandinavian themes. Consider reinforcing 1- or 2-branch plans you trust most, so you can transition from opening to middlegame with a clear concept.
- Leveraged openings to seize early initiative in several games. Keep building on these themes by outlining a simple middlegame plan for your chosen lines.
- Some openings led to complex middlegames where precise calculation mattered more. For those lines, develop a quick-check routine (what is the immediate tactical threat, what are the king safety concerns, what are the most forcing moves) to avoid getting dented in the middle game.
Action plan: practical steps to improve
- Choose a focused core repertoire: pick 1–2 openings you play well and want to deepen, plus a reliable anti-variation for opponents who deviate from your main lines. Build a concise plan for the first 15 moves and typical middlegame ideas you should aim for.
- Structured post-game reviews: after every rapid game, identify one turning point where the balance shifted, one decision you would redo with more calculation, and one endgame scenario to study from the game (preferably with a simple rook endgame example).
- Endgame mastery: dedicate a short weekly block to rook endgames and king activity. Practice 10–15 minute drills that improve technique in rook endings with pawns on both sides.
- Blunder awareness routine: implement a “two-step check” before critical moves (verify threats and captures, then re-check for hidden tactics). This helps reduce sudden blunders in sharp positions.
- Pattern recognition with openings: for your strongest lines, memorize a few key middlegame plans and common pawn structures. This helps you transition from opening to middlegame with a clear plan rather than relying on memory alone.
- Time and pace management: build a simple pacing plan (e.g., allocate a steady portion of time to the critical middlegame moves and reserve a small buffer for the endgame). This helps avoid time pressure that leads to mistakes in late middlegame and endgame.
Quick win-tracking tips
To make progress faster, try these short exercises:
- Daily 15-minute tactic blitz focusing on patterns that appeared in your recent games (forks, pins, discovered attacks).
- Weekly 1-hour endgame session with rook endings and passed pawn scenarios.
- Monthly review of 3 chosen openings with a specific middlegame plan sheet you can reference in rapid games.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| haliiarkadii | 3W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| Oleg Tkachakov | 5W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| pravin3000a | 6W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
| yakov378 | 7W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| ali khani | 4W / 2L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2162 | 1966 | ||
| 2024 | 1789 | |||
| 2021 | 1885 | 1966 | ||
| 2020 | 1190 | 2014 | 1994 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 122W / 112L / 10D | 101W / 127L / 17D | 76.2 |
| 2024 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 58.0 |
| 2021 | 1W / 4L / 0D | 3W / 3L / 0D | 65.1 |
| 2020 | 78W / 31L / 4D | 60W / 47L / 7D | 73.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 148 | 81 | 63 | 4 | 54.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 76 | 35 | 35 | 6 | 46.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 72 | 37 | 30 | 5 | 51.4% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 37 | 18 | 17 | 2 | 48.6% |
| Australian Defense | 29 | 13 | 15 | 1 | 44.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 25 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 56.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 23 | 7 | 15 | 1 | 30.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 19 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 36.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 18 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 16 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 43.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Tiviakov Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Neo-Gruenfeld, 6.O-O c6 7.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Gipslis Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.e3 O-O | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 7 | 2 |