Who is Daniil Rakitin
Daniil Rakitin is a rising chess talent known for sharp blitz battles and thoughtful endgame technique. A titled player, he earned the FIDE Candidate Master title and has become a familiar name in fast time controls where nerves and imagination duel on every board. In online and over-the-board scenes, he blends tactical flair with solid fundamentals, often turning seemingly quiet positions into sparkling finishes.
Career highlights
His aggressive blitz play has yielded moments of breakthrough, with peak blitz performances catching attention in mid-2025. Notably, he reached a peak Blitz rating around 3025 in July 2025 and a peak Bullet rating near 3034 around the same period. His long-running streaks reflect a persistent drive, including a noteworthy 18-win run in blitz events. He is also celebrated for his resilience, balancing rapid-fire attacks with patience when the position demands it.
Playing style and openings
Rakitin favors Blitz, where his quick instincts and deep preparation shine. His repertoire in fast games includes an array of dynamic systems and sharp gambits. Notable openings in his recent Blitz results include:
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation
- Amar Gambit
- King's Indian Attack
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation
- Scandinavian Defense and related lines
He also records strong results in several flexible defenses and aggressive sidelines, adapting his choices to the tempo and opponent’s setup.
Profile and ongoing journey
Beyond titles and peak ratings, Daniil’s profile paints a picture of sustained activity and growth. He has logged hundreds of high-intensity games across 2024 and 2025, with a particular emphasis on Blitz and Bullet formats. Fans and fellow players note his strategic depth, timely improvisation, and a tendency to press advantages when the time control compresses the decision space.
For a closer look at his recent activity and career trajectory, you can view the profile placeholder here: Daniil Rakitin.
Fun fact
His approach to the clock is as much a mental game as the board, turning even drawish positions into entertaining stalemates of wit and courage.
What you’re doing well
You consistently choose active openings and look for chances to seize the initiative, which helps you create practical winning chances in blitz. In several games you navigated tactical sequences smoothly and kept your opponent under pressure, even when the position became messy.
- You coordinate pieces well in dynamic middlegames, keeping your rook and queen active to threaten multiple targets.
- Your willingness to pursue aggressive ideas in sharp lines can yield winning chances when your opponent missteps in time trouble.
- You adapt to different opponents and their plans, demonstrating flexibility in how you approach middlegame transitions.
Areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: allocate a clear plan in the first stages of the game and avoid long forceful sequences when you are under time pressure. Quick, safe development and a simple plan can prevent rushed decisions later.
- Calculation discipline: in complex middlegames, try to identify 2–3 concrete candidate moves and check their key tactical ideas before committing to exchanges or long sequences.
- Endgame technique: when the position simplifies, practice converting small advantages with straightforward play and predefined endgame plans (e.g., king activity, passed pawns, and simple rook endgames).
- Opening consolidation: streamline your opening repertoire to reduce early mistakes. Aim to know the typical development and typical middlegame plans for 2–3 lines, so you spend less time navigating unfamiliar structures.
Opening choices and practical plans
You’ve used a mix of open and semi-open defenses and sharp tactical lines. To improve consistency in blitz, consider focusing your study on 2–3 dependable openings you understand well, and build clear middlegame plans for them. For example:
- Italian Game (classical and related lines) can give you clear piece activity and straightforward development, making it a solid choice for blitz when you want quick, tangible plans.
- Balanced, solid alternatives like the Caro-Kann or a controlled Vienna setup can reduce early tactical risks and give you safer middlegames to navigate under time pressure.
- Reserve riskier gambits for slower games. In blitz, leaning on principled development and concrete goals tends to yield more reliable results than speculative lines.
If you’d like, I can tailor a short reading/listening plan that aligns with the openings you actually enjoy and provide a simple2–3 move plan you can rely on in the first 10 moves.
Training and practice plan
- Daily 15–20 minutes of tactical puzzles focused on motifs you encounter in blitz (pins, skewers, overloads, back-rank weaknesses).
- Two short opening sessions per week: pick 2 openings to study deeply (their typical plans, common middlegame ideas, and typical endgames).
- Endgame drills: practice simple rook endings and king-and-pawn endings to improve conversion in time pressure.
- Post-game review habit: after each blitz game, note one moment where you could have chosen a safer plan or found a stronger continuation with less risk.
Next steps and quick study ideas
- Identify 2–3 openings you enjoy and build a concise “plan map” for each (development, key pawn breaks, typical targets). Use these as your blitz anchors.
- Practice with a clock: in your next training sessions, set a strict time budget for the opening phase (e.g., 3–4 minutes total) to improve decisions under pressure.
- Run a mini-review series: pick your last 3 blitz games, and for each, write one improvement note and one thing you did well. Return to these notes before the next session.
- Optional deeper dive: if you want, I can generate a focused 2-week plan centered on your favorite openings and a set of endgame drills tailored to your current strengths and gaps.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Artin Ashraf | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Wesley So | 0W / 2L / 1D | |
| lionking2009 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| onegust | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Vahap Sanal | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| scofieldmichael01 | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| sergeant_james | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| Evgenij Shuvalov | 6W / 2L / 1D | |
| Elham Amar | 6W / 3L / 0D | |
| jarred-vanderbilt | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Arash Tahbaz | 11W / 39L / 6D | |
| Kevin Bordi | 17W / 19L / 9D | |
| Shelev Oberoi | 21W / 18L / 4D | |
| dazzlinganomaly01 | 18W / 19L / 3D | |
| tydfger | 26W / 9L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2940 | 3087 | 2405 | |
| 2024 | 2942 | 2931 | ||
| 2023 | 2836 | 2712 | 2382 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 427W / 248L / 47D | 403W / 304L / 41D | 44.3 |
| 2024 | 204W / 97L / 35D | 172W / 119L / 36D | 90.5 |
| 2023 | 204W / 105L / 25D | 177W / 132L / 30D | 93.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 146 | 92 | 45 | 9 | 63.0% |
| Modern | 67 | 36 | 25 | 6 | 53.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 54 | 32 | 20 | 2 | 59.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 54 | 36 | 15 | 3 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 51 | 30 | 19 | 2 | 58.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 47 | 28 | 15 | 4 | 59.6% |
| Modern Defense | 44 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 40 | 17 | 21 | 2 | 42.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 37 | 22 | 12 | 3 | 59.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 32 | 17 | 12 | 3 | 53.1% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 762 | 451 | 305 | 6 | 59.2% |
| Elephant Gambit | 39 | 23 | 10 | 6 | 59.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 34 | 19 | 10 | 5 | 55.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 26 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 57.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 21 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 61.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 21 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 21 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 47.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 20 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 65.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 20 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 16 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 3 |