Chuck Diebert (RaspyBoar) — Rapid chess profile
Chuck Diebert, who plays online as RaspyBoar, is a determined Rapid specialist with a taste for long endgames and gradual pressure. Comfortable in Blitz too, Chuck's approach mixes stubborn positional play with a knack for tactical comebacks — the kind of player who prefers to outlast opponents rather than outflash them. Keywords: Chuck Diebert, RaspyBoar, rapid chess, blitz, endgame technique.
Track his recent trend:
.Playing style & favorite openings
Patient, methodical and resilient: Chuck often steers games into long middlegames and technical endgames where he can press small advantages. His high endgame frequency and long average decisive lengths show he enjoys deep, strategic battles.
- Preferred time control: Rapid (his strongest format).
- Strengths: high comeback rate, strong endgame technique, steady play under time pressure.
- Openings to study from his play:
- Amazon Attack — very successful in faster time controls.
- Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack — a personal favorite with strong win-rates.
- Czech Defense — used frequently as a counterpunch.
He tends to perform particularly well around 06:00 — early morning blitzes beware.
Memorable game — a RaspyBoar comeback
Below is a compact replay of a typical RaspyBoar game: a standard opening, tense middlegame, and a gritty endgame finish. Use the embedded viewer to step through the turning points.
Quick stats & competitive edge
Chuck's results show a player who grinds — long games, frequent endgames, and a willingness to fight back from worse positions.
- Recorded strengths: comeback rate ~85% and a healthy win-rate after material losses (~50.6%).
- Volume & form: vast Blitz experience complemented by solid Rapid results; notable peak achievements include Rapid and Blitz highs (see inline stats).
- Notable streaks: longest winning streak was 16 games; current challenging patch includes a 5-game losing streak, showing the usual ups-and-downs of a busy online competitor.
Peek at a peak rating marker for reference: 2047 (2025-08-21).
Rivalries, habits & fun facts
Chuck is as much a grinder off the clock as on it: he prefers quiet, focused sessions and is known to play long series against familiar opponents.
- Nickname: RaspyBoar — a handle that sticks in chat and on leaderboards.
- Frequent opponents: has hefty mini-rivalries with players like jhonsaut, zlatkosavica and cccp66.
- Practice habits: favors weekend sessions (Saturday/Sunday win-rates are slightly higher) and early-morning games.
Study his approaches in the Amazon Attack and the Pirc/Austrian setups to mirror his strategic plans: Amazon Attack and Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack.
Want to compare a head-to-head? Check a sample profile vs a rival: Heromantap.
Quick overview
Nice run recently — your win/loss ratio and opening results show you’re doing many things right. Below I focus on specific patterns from your most recent games (a clear loss vs rold0811, a few clean wins) and give targeted, practical steps to tighten weak spots and turn small errors into consistent gains.
What you’re doing well
- Strong opening preparation in many systems — you’re getting playable middlegames out of lines like the Queen’s pawn setups and some aggressive sidelines (keep that up). See your success with lines like Caro-Kann Defense and Queen's Pawn Opening.
- Good attacking instincts — in multiple wins you created decisive threats, pushed pawns forward at the right time and converted by active piece play rather than brute force.
- Effective use of piece activity — you look for active squares for rooks and queens instead of passive waiting moves, which often forces opponents into mistakes.
- Resilience — you keep fighting in long games and often manufacture counterplay where others would give up.
Recurring issues to fix
From the loss vs rold0811 (Modern/Modern-like structure) and other recent games, these come up repeatedly:
- Missed tactics and concrete calculation around move transitions. There were moments where a forcing sequence by the opponent won material because the tactical reply wasn’t calculated far enough.
- Allowing long-term counterplay when simplifying — exchanging into positions where your opponent’s passed pawn(s) or rook activity become decisive. Think twice before simplifying if the resulting pawn structure favors the opponent.
- Endgame technique under pressure — when the opponent got a passed h-pawn and promoted, the defense became awkward. Polish rook + pawn / rook vs rook scenarios and king activity in pawn races.
- Occasional time pressure choices. You play actively, but make sure the moves you choose in the last few minutes are the most concrete, not the most ambitious.
Concrete improvements — 4 week plan
- Daily tactics (20–30 minutes): focus on forks, skewers, discovered checks and sacrifices that win material. Prioritize puzzles that require 3–5 moves of calculation, not single-move refutations.
- Calculation routine: before every move, run this short checklist — checks, captures, threats. Ask: “If I play this, what’s my opponent’s strongest forcing reply?” Force yourself to calculate candidate lines for 30–60 seconds in critical positions.
- Endgame drills (3× per week, 20 minutes): practice rook vs rook, rook+king vs rook, and basic passed pawn races. Practice defending a file and cutting off the enemy king.
- Postgame review habit: review every loss and close game with one engine run to find the decisive tactical moment, then replay the critical sequence until you can see it without the board. Do this for your last 3 losses first.
- One weekly long offline session (45–60 minutes): go through a favorite opening line you play (for example Modern or your successful Queen’s Pawn lines) and focus on move orders and typical pawn breaks so you don’t stumble into passive setups.
Specific moments from your recent loss (study this position)
I’ve added the full game so you can step through the important transition where tactical chances and pawn structure change the evaluation. Replay the line and stop at any capture or check — those moments decided the game. You can review the opponent rold0811’s idea and your replies.
Use this viewer to step through the moves slowly and look for the decisive tactics around move 21–28:
Short-term checklist for your next 10 rapid games
- Before each game: 2–3 minutes reviewing one opening line you’ll play and the typical pawn break you want to reach.
- During the game, on every candidate move: run the 3-step filter — checks, captures, threats (15–60 seconds).
- If the position becomes unclear, trade down to simpler positions only when you’ve calculated the end result — avoid simplifying into a passive structure where the opponent’s passed pawn or rook activity will decide the game.
- After each game: tag one turning point (best move for you and opponent). Reviewing 5 turning points gives fast improvement.
Study resources and next steps
- Run daily tactics sessions (start with 20 puzzles per day) and keep a log of which motifs you miss most often.
- Work 2× weekly on endgames (rook endgames and passed pawn races) until you can convert or defend simple positions reliably.
- Keep building on openings where you have high win rates (for example your successes in lines such as Caro-Kann Defense and the London-style lines). Drill common middlegame plans from those openings.
Wrap-up — one final plan
Focus the next month on: (1) tactical calculation routine, (2) targeted endgame drills, (3) disciplined simplification decisions. If you do those three things consistently, the small mistakes that turn wins into draws or losses will shrink quickly and your conversion rate in long, tactical games will improve.
If you want, send one specific game you feel uncertain about and I’ll give a short move-by-move review focusing on the exact turning point and what to look for next time.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| leftonec | 3W / 3L / 0D | View |
| knightmeetsbishophere | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Vladimir Kizov | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| diegogoitia11 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| g1ust | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| abelcapa | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| tarrash_talker | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| malimukes | 5W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kotovq | 2W / 3L / 0D | View |
| uwgeoeng | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jhonson Samosir | 5W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
| cccp66 | 3W / 5L / 3D | View Games |
| heromantap | 7W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| zlatkosavica | 6W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| iuliu333 | 4W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1672 | 2139 | 2038 | |
| 2024 | 1802 | 2091 | 2040 | |
| 2023 | 1736 | 1926 | 1923 | |
| 2022 | 1818 | 2079 | 1865 | |
| 2021 | 1095 | 2012 | 1509 | |
| 2020 | 876 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 585W / 445L / 36D | 507W / 516L / 42D | 71.0 |
| 2024 | 711W / 495L / 49D | 602W / 606L / 56D | 73.9 |
| 2023 | 138W / 121L / 12D | 130W / 136L / 14D | 76.8 |
| 2022 | 896W / 596L / 57D | 746W / 735L / 70D | 73.4 |
| 2021 | 124W / 44L / 7D | 111W / 58L / 6D | 67.4 |
| 2020 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 43.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 1348 | 663 | 614 | 71 | 49.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 906 | 497 | 374 | 35 | 54.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 350 | 206 | 126 | 18 | 58.9% |
| Australian Defense | 346 | 185 | 153 | 8 | 53.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 278 | 137 | 128 | 13 | 49.3% |
| Modern | 273 | 142 | 123 | 8 | 52.0% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 242 | 128 | 90 | 24 | 52.9% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 231 | 144 | 80 | 7 | 62.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 218 | 125 | 84 | 9 | 57.3% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 177 | 105 | 66 | 6 | 59.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 263 | 136 | 124 | 3 | 51.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 134 | 87 | 45 | 2 | 64.9% |
| Australian Defense | 93 | 52 | 37 | 4 | 55.9% |
| Modern | 55 | 23 | 31 | 1 | 41.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 51 | 26 | 25 | 0 | 51.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 51 | 30 | 20 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 46 | 22 | 24 | 0 | 47.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 41 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 48.8% |
| French Defense | 38 | 23 | 15 | 0 | 60.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 37 | 20 | 17 | 0 | 54.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 5 |