NM Rodrigo de Mello (RdgMx)
Meet NM Rodrigo de Mello, a chess aficionado who has been waging war on 64 squares with a combination of sharp tactics, strategic depth, and the occasional streamer's flair. Rodrigo isn’t just a National Master; he’s also a streamer, bringing his love for chess to audiences who enjoy seeing strategic brilliance mixed with some online banter and occasional blunders.
Rodrigo’s chess journey started modestly — from rating lows in the 1300s in bullet and blitz games a decade ago, he has steadily climbed the ranks, hitting a peak blitz rating of 2319 in March 2024. That’s right, this is a guy who knows how to blitz and still keep his cool under pressure. Needle in the haystack moments include a blitz longest winning streak of 33 games — basically, a chess tsunami.
His favored weapon? The London System – aka “I don’t want to memorize too many openings but I want to crush you anyway.” With over 1,600 blitz games featuring the London System and a win-rate north of 64%, Rodrigo proves that a solid foundation and good positional understanding go a long way. He also dabbles effectively in the Indian Game and French Defense, showing off a versatile opening repertoire that’s tough to crack.
Rodrigo’s tactical awareness is as sharp as his streaming commentary, boasting a striking 81% comeback rate when behind — the type of resilience that makes for great content and even better chess. His win-rate climbing to 65.3% when playing white and a solid 60% with black makes him a formidable opponent regardless of color. But beware: the only weakness seems to be early resignation – Rodrigo tries to keep the drama on the board rather than playing the “I give up” card too soon.
When not streaming or studying lines, Rodrigo is a bit of a chess philosopher, averaging over 75 moves per win, savoring the deep endgame battles where most mortals would have surrendered long ago. (He’s also clocked as a morning player with the best results around 6 AM, the early bird catches the pawn, as they say.)
Recent games show Rodrigo’s never backing down. On June 1, 2025, he clinched a victory against the elusive gatotodopoderoso on time in a classic London System battle, wielding patience and precision to squeeze the last drop of advantage from the position. On tough days, like a recent loss to capatoday, he shows the humility of a seasoned fighter, ready to come back stronger and maybe crack a joke about blundering a piece (after all, even National Masters have their off days).
Rodrigo de Mello is more than just a player; he’s a chess streamer with a growing army of viewers who appreciate the blend of serious chess and entertaining personality. Whether you’re here for the instructional content, the thrilling games, or just to see one more attempt to overthrow the chess hierarchy, RdgMx delivers with style and grit.
In short: Rodrigo de Mello — cracking openings, streaming laughs, and making chess a little more fun, one move at a time.
Overview and how to improve
You’ve shown strong willingness to fight in blitz and you’re comfortable playing the London System style. Your games demonstrate solid piece development, good pressure when your opponent’s position is slightly loose, and an ability to convert middlegame advantages into decisive results. To keep progressing, focus on tightening decision making in busy positions, improving endgame technique, and managing time more consistently so you can convert more good positions into wins.
Win game: what to learn and how to build on it
- What you did well: You kept pieces active and aimed to create concrete threats against the opponent’s king. You looked for forcing moves when the position opened up and leveraged the initiative to push toward a decisive finish.
- Areas to improve: When you reach a sharp middlegame with many forcing lines, pause occasionally to verify the safety of your own king and the alignment of your heavy pieces. If your attack starts to fizzle or you feel time pressure, consider a practical simplification that preserves your initiative (for example trading to a favorable endgame or reducing material when you have a clear structural edge).
- Practical tip: after you’ve built a space advantage or a kingside attack, try to settle on a concrete plan within the next 3–4 moves (for example: push a pawn lever, target a weak square, or open a file for rooks) and avoid wandering into too many competing ideas at once.
Loss game: how to tighten up and rebound
- What went well defensively: You fought to stay active in a challenging endgame, keeping chances alive through piece activity and counterplay ideas.
- What to work on: In long blitz battles, staying on the right side of the balance is crucial. When you see the opponent gaining activity on open files or when pieces target key squares, prioritize simplifying to a position where your king and pawns stay safe. If you’re behind in the endgame, aim to activate your king and look for practical pawn trades that reduce the opponent’s winning chances rather than chasing complex tactics that risk a slip.
- Practical tip: in complex rook/knight endings or middlegame tensions, set a short time budget for evaluating two clear plans (e.g., “activate king + contest the open file” vs. “trade down to a rook ending”) and commit to one within a couple of moves.
Draw game: turning resilience into conversions
- What went well: You maintained defensive discipline in a messy position and found opportunities to seek counterplay, which is essential in blitz draws.
- What to work on: In drawn middlegames, look for small but concrete improvements that push toward a practical goal, such as a positional plan to improve a knight’s outpost, or a controlled sequence of trades that leaves you with a clear endgame plan. If the position is balanced, creating a single decisive idea (a pawn break, a rook lift to an open file, or a minor piece maneuver to a stronger square) can be the difference between a draw and a win.
- Practical tip: after key exchanges, quickly assess whether you can force a simplification to a favorable rook endgame, or whether you can seize the initiative with a stable pawn break or a targeted piece maneuver. If not, prioritize solidifying your king’s safety and reducing tactical chances for your opponent.
Opening choices and study plan
- You’ve been successful with the London System family of structures, which indicates comfort with solid, flexible setups. Strengthen this by building a concrete middlegame plan that you can rely on after your standard first moves, so you don’t have to improvise in the heat of blitz.
- To diversify your toolkit, consider a controlled secondary line that you can switch to when opponents anticipate your usual plans. This helps you avoid being out-prepared in the opening phase and keeps your opponents guessing.
- Actionable plan: pick one solid system (London System or a French/other compact system you’re comfortable with) and two common middlegame plans that arise from it. Study 10 model middlegame positions per week from those lines and practice the plan-cycles in quick training games or puzzles.
Endgames, tactics, and overall training plan
- Endgames: Blitz endgames benefit from clear king activity and simple, rule-based technique. Regularly drill rook endings (two rooks with pawns vs two rooks with pawns) and king-and-pawn endings to gain confidence in converting advantages or saving difficult positions.
- Tactics: Maintain a daily short tactic workout (10–15 minutes) focused on common blitz motifs you’ve encountered (back-rank patterns, typical forks, and tactical shots against exposed kings).
- Time management: In blitz, a reliable approach is to allocate a steady portion of the clock to the opening phase (the first 8–10 moves) and reserve a comfortable buffer for the critical middle game. Aim to keep at least a few seconds per move in the late middlegame to avoid rushed decisions.
Practice plan and next steps
- Weekly plan: 3 focused practice sessions (20–30 minutes each) including 1) tactical drills, 2) 1 endgame drill set, and 3) 1 opening-middlegame study using your main system and one secondary line.
- Pattern focus: reinforce concepts like king safety in aggressive setups, effective rook activity on open files, and identifying when to simplify to a favorable endgame.
- Progress check: after two weeks, review a few blitz games to confirm improvements in conversion, endgame technique, and time usage. If you notice persistent trouble in certain positions (e.g., rook endings or open-file battles), tailor the drills to address those specifically.
Profile and future notes
Keep an eye on how your openings are performing across different opponents, and consider keeping a small note log of typical middlegame plans you encounter in your main lines. This will help you keep a consistent plan in blitz and reduce indecision under time pressure. NM Rodrigo de Mello
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| draken_tr_s123 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ildoetje | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| lowkichess | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| alpha_0zero | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| karta82 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| adonisaguiler | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| expertise | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| gijon95 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sele86 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| nedkonedyalkov | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gilson da Silva Costa | 388W / 182L / 40D | |
| leviryann | 202W / 90L / 9D | |
| otavio700 | 164W / 15L / 17D | |
| Hyoukami | 83W / 97L / 11D | |
| Daniel Pereira | 115W / 53L / 15D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1982 | 2261 | 2214 | 1751 |
| 2024 | 2074 | 2199 | 2210 | 1735 |
| 2023 | 2018 | 2142 | 2208 | 1747 |
| 2022 | 2010 | 2166 | 2170 | 1666 |
| 2021 | 1971 | 2035 | 1881 | 1955 |
| 2020 | 2085 | 2087 | 1813 | 1861 |
| 2019 | 1809 | 2040 | 1331 | 1863 |
| 2018 | 1898 | 2062 | ||
| 2017 | 1831 | 1967 | ||
| 2016 | 1899 | 1771 | ||
| 2015 | 1612 | 1983 | 1200 | |
| 2014 | 1765 | 1200 | ||
| 2013 | 1597 | 1881 | ||
| 2012 | 1200 | |||
| 2011 | 1388 | 1943 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 869W / 433L / 90D | 773W / 545L / 94D | 80.1 |
| 2024 | 1025W / 431L / 123D | 937W / 556L / 96D | 83.7 |
| 2023 | 1275W / 571L / 129D | 1182W / 678L / 122D | 82.3 |
| 2022 | 846W / 370L / 84D | 792W / 426L / 82D | 80.9 |
| 2021 | 1997W / 809L / 175D | 1856W / 972L / 166D | 77.7 |
| 2020 | 121W / 62L / 14D | 111W / 85L / 7D | 79.6 |
| 2019 | 107W / 57L / 13D | 98W / 73L / 8D | 78.4 |
| 2018 | 18W / 11L / 4D | 21W / 12L / 0D | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 22W / 5L / 0D | 19W / 5L / 0D | 71.8 |
| 2016 | 25W / 6L / 3D | 22W / 9L / 0D | 73.3 |
| 2015 | 9W / 2L / 0D | 8W / 4L / 1D | 72.5 |
| 2014 | 0W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 67.2 |
| 2013 | 5W / 1L / 0D | 3W / 2L / 0D | 71.0 |
| 2012 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 2.0 |
| 2011 | 5W / 1L / 0D | 5W / 0L / 0D | 64.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2931 | 1907 | 812 | 212 | 65.1% |
| Australian Defense | 1241 | 811 | 358 | 72 | 65.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 993 | 662 | 273 | 58 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 938 | 589 | 282 | 67 | 62.8% |
| French Defense | 906 | 565 | 297 | 44 | 62.4% |
| East Indian Defense | 827 | 541 | 224 | 62 | 65.4% |
| Döry Defense | 694 | 390 | 239 | 65 | 56.2% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 622 | 375 | 216 | 31 | 60.3% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 472 | 254 | 168 | 50 | 53.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 371 | 218 | 136 | 17 | 58.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 396 | 251 | 123 | 22 | 63.4% |
| Australian Defense | 220 | 128 | 84 | 8 | 58.2% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 171 | 94 | 62 | 15 | 55.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 159 | 94 | 55 | 10 | 59.1% |
| French Defense | 157 | 97 | 53 | 7 | 61.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 88 | 43 | 39 | 6 | 48.9% |
| Döry Defense | 77 | 42 | 33 | 2 | 54.5% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 69 | 35 | 34 | 0 | 50.7% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 45 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 48.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 43 | 24 | 15 | 4 | 55.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 107 | 74 | 25 | 8 | 69.2% |
| Australian Defense | 37 | 24 | 12 | 1 | 64.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 30 | 19 | 11 | 0 | 63.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 26 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 65.4% |
| Döry Defense | 18 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 61.1% |
| French Defense | 17 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 70.6% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 15 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 76.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 49 | 37 | 6 | 6 | 75.5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Australian Defense | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 71.4% |
| French Defense | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 33 | 1 |
| Losing | 20 | 0 |