Avatar of NM Rodrigo de Mello

NM Rodrigo de Mello

Username: RdgMx

Location: São Paulo

Playing Since: 2011-04-09 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Daily: 1751
149W / 40L / 11D
Rapid: 2214
296W / 111L / 22D
Blitz: 2261
9137W / 4692L / 984D
Bullet: 1982
1084W / 700L / 95D

NM Rodrigo de Mello (RdgMx)

Meet NM Rodrigo de Mello, a chess aficionado who has been waging war on 64 squares with a combination of sharp tactics, strategic depth, and the occasional streamer's flair. Rodrigo isn’t just a National Master; he’s also a streamer, bringing his love for chess to audiences who enjoy seeing strategic brilliance mixed with some online banter and occasional blunders.

Rodrigo’s chess journey started modestly — from rating lows in the 1300s in bullet and blitz games a decade ago, he has steadily climbed the ranks, hitting a peak blitz rating of 2319 in March 2024. That’s right, this is a guy who knows how to blitz and still keep his cool under pressure. Needle in the haystack moments include a blitz longest winning streak of 33 games — basically, a chess tsunami.

His favored weapon? The London System – aka “I don’t want to memorize too many openings but I want to crush you anyway.” With over 1,600 blitz games featuring the London System and a win-rate north of 64%, Rodrigo proves that a solid foundation and good positional understanding go a long way. He also dabbles effectively in the Indian Game and French Defense, showing off a versatile opening repertoire that’s tough to crack.

Rodrigo’s tactical awareness is as sharp as his streaming commentary, boasting a striking 81% comeback rate when behind — the type of resilience that makes for great content and even better chess. His win-rate climbing to 65.3% when playing white and a solid 60% with black makes him a formidable opponent regardless of color. But beware: the only weakness seems to be early resignation – Rodrigo tries to keep the drama on the board rather than playing the “I give up” card too soon.

When not streaming or studying lines, Rodrigo is a bit of a chess philosopher, averaging over 75 moves per win, savoring the deep endgame battles where most mortals would have surrendered long ago. (He’s also clocked as a morning player with the best results around 6 AM, the early bird catches the pawn, as they say.)

Recent games show Rodrigo’s never backing down. On June 1, 2025, he clinched a victory against the elusive gatotodopoderoso on time in a classic London System battle, wielding patience and precision to squeeze the last drop of advantage from the position. On tough days, like a recent loss to capatoday, he shows the humility of a seasoned fighter, ready to come back stronger and maybe crack a joke about blundering a piece (after all, even National Masters have their off days).

Rodrigo de Mello is more than just a player; he’s a chess streamer with a growing army of viewers who appreciate the blend of serious chess and entertaining personality. Whether you’re here for the instructional content, the thrilling games, or just to see one more attempt to overthrow the chess hierarchy, RdgMx delivers with style and grit.

In short: Rodrigo de Mello — cracking openings, streaming laughs, and making chess a little more fun, one move at a time.


Coach's Avatar

Overview and how to improve

You’ve shown strong willingness to fight in blitz and you’re comfortable playing the London System style. Your games demonstrate solid piece development, good pressure when your opponent’s position is slightly loose, and an ability to convert middlegame advantages into decisive results. To keep progressing, focus on tightening decision making in busy positions, improving endgame technique, and managing time more consistently so you can convert more good positions into wins.

Win game: what to learn and how to build on it

  • What you did well: You kept pieces active and aimed to create concrete threats against the opponent’s king. You looked for forcing moves when the position opened up and leveraged the initiative to push toward a decisive finish.
  • Areas to improve: When you reach a sharp middlegame with many forcing lines, pause occasionally to verify the safety of your own king and the alignment of your heavy pieces. If your attack starts to fizzle or you feel time pressure, consider a practical simplification that preserves your initiative (for example trading to a favorable endgame or reducing material when you have a clear structural edge).
  • Practical tip: after you’ve built a space advantage or a kingside attack, try to settle on a concrete plan within the next 3–4 moves (for example: push a pawn lever, target a weak square, or open a file for rooks) and avoid wandering into too many competing ideas at once.

Loss game: how to tighten up and rebound

  • What went well defensively: You fought to stay active in a challenging endgame, keeping chances alive through piece activity and counterplay ideas.
  • What to work on: In long blitz battles, staying on the right side of the balance is crucial. When you see the opponent gaining activity on open files or when pieces target key squares, prioritize simplifying to a position where your king and pawns stay safe. If you’re behind in the endgame, aim to activate your king and look for practical pawn trades that reduce the opponent’s winning chances rather than chasing complex tactics that risk a slip.
  • Practical tip: in complex rook/knight endings or middlegame tensions, set a short time budget for evaluating two clear plans (e.g., “activate king + contest the open file” vs. “trade down to a rook ending”) and commit to one within a couple of moves.

Draw game: turning resilience into conversions

  • What went well: You maintained defensive discipline in a messy position and found opportunities to seek counterplay, which is essential in blitz draws.
  • What to work on: In drawn middlegames, look for small but concrete improvements that push toward a practical goal, such as a positional plan to improve a knight’s outpost, or a controlled sequence of trades that leaves you with a clear endgame plan. If the position is balanced, creating a single decisive idea (a pawn break, a rook lift to an open file, or a minor piece maneuver to a stronger square) can be the difference between a draw and a win.
  • Practical tip: after key exchanges, quickly assess whether you can force a simplification to a favorable rook endgame, or whether you can seize the initiative with a stable pawn break or a targeted piece maneuver. If not, prioritize solidifying your king’s safety and reducing tactical chances for your opponent.

Opening choices and study plan

  • You’ve been successful with the London System family of structures, which indicates comfort with solid, flexible setups. Strengthen this by building a concrete middlegame plan that you can rely on after your standard first moves, so you don’t have to improvise in the heat of blitz.
  • To diversify your toolkit, consider a controlled secondary line that you can switch to when opponents anticipate your usual plans. This helps you avoid being out-prepared in the opening phase and keeps your opponents guessing.
  • Actionable plan: pick one solid system (London System or a French/other compact system you’re comfortable with) and two common middlegame plans that arise from it. Study 10 model middlegame positions per week from those lines and practice the plan-cycles in quick training games or puzzles.

Endgames, tactics, and overall training plan

  • Endgames: Blitz endgames benefit from clear king activity and simple, rule-based technique. Regularly drill rook endings (two rooks with pawns vs two rooks with pawns) and king-and-pawn endings to gain confidence in converting advantages or saving difficult positions.
  • Tactics: Maintain a daily short tactic workout (10–15 minutes) focused on common blitz motifs you’ve encountered (back-rank patterns, typical forks, and tactical shots against exposed kings).
  • Time management: In blitz, a reliable approach is to allocate a steady portion of the clock to the opening phase (the first 8–10 moves) and reserve a comfortable buffer for the critical middle game. Aim to keep at least a few seconds per move in the late middlegame to avoid rushed decisions.

Practice plan and next steps

  • Weekly plan: 3 focused practice sessions (20–30 minutes each) including 1) tactical drills, 2) 1 endgame drill set, and 3) 1 opening-middlegame study using your main system and one secondary line.
  • Pattern focus: reinforce concepts like king safety in aggressive setups, effective rook activity on open files, and identifying when to simplify to a favorable endgame.
  • Progress check: after two weeks, review a few blitz games to confirm improvements in conversion, endgame technique, and time usage. If you notice persistent trouble in certain positions (e.g., rook endings or open-file battles), tailor the drills to address those specifically.

Profile and future notes

Keep an eye on how your openings are performing across different opponents, and consider keeping a small note log of typical middlegame plans you encounter in your main lines. This will help you keep a consistent plan in blitz and reduce indecision under time pressure. NM Rodrigo de Mello



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
draken_tr_s123 1W / 0L / 0D
ildoetje 0W / 0L / 1D
lowkichess 1W / 0L / 0D
alpha_0zero 0W / 1L / 0D
karta82 0W / 1L / 0D
adonisaguiler 0W / 1L / 0D
expertise 0W / 1L / 0D
gijon95 0W / 1L / 0D
sele86 1W / 0L / 0D
nedkonedyalkov 1W / 0L / 1D
Most Played Opponents
Gilson da Silva Costa 388W / 182L / 40D
leviryann 202W / 90L / 9D
otavio700 164W / 15L / 17D
Hyoukami 83W / 97L / 11D
Daniel Pereira 115W / 53L / 15D

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 1982 2261 2214 1751
2024 2074 2199 2210 1735
2023 2018 2142 2208 1747
2022 2010 2166 2170 1666
2021 1971 2035 1881 1955
2020 2085 2087 1813 1861
2019 1809 2040 1331 1863
2018 1898 2062
2017 1831 1967
2016 1899 1771
2015 1612 1983 1200
2014 1765 1200
2013 1597 1881
2012 1200
2011 1388 1943
Rating by Year20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202522611200YearRatingBulletBlitzRapidDaily

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 869W / 433L / 90D 773W / 545L / 94D 80.1
2024 1025W / 431L / 123D 937W / 556L / 96D 83.7
2023 1275W / 571L / 129D 1182W / 678L / 122D 82.3
2022 846W / 370L / 84D 792W / 426L / 82D 80.9
2021 1997W / 809L / 175D 1856W / 972L / 166D 77.7
2020 121W / 62L / 14D 111W / 85L / 7D 79.6
2019 107W / 57L / 13D 98W / 73L / 8D 78.4
2018 18W / 11L / 4D 21W / 12L / 0D 80.2
2017 22W / 5L / 0D 19W / 5L / 0D 71.8
2016 25W / 6L / 3D 22W / 9L / 0D 73.3
2015 9W / 2L / 0D 8W / 4L / 1D 72.5
2014 0W / 2L / 0D 1W / 1L / 0D 67.2
2013 5W / 1L / 0D 3W / 2L / 0D 71.0
2012 0W / 0L / 0D 1W / 0L / 0D 2.0
2011 5W / 1L / 0D 5W / 0L / 0D 64.5

Openings: Most Played

Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 2931 1907 812 212 65.1%
Australian Defense 1241 811 358 72 65.3%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 993 662 273 58 66.7%
French Defense: Exchange Variation 938 589 282 67 62.8%
French Defense 906 565 297 44 62.4%
East Indian Defense 827 541 224 62 65.4%
Döry Defense 694 390 239 65 56.2%
French Defense: Advance Variation 622 375 216 31 60.3%
French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation 472 254 168 50 53.8%
Amar Gambit 371 218 136 17 58.8%
Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 396 251 123 22 63.4%
Australian Defense 220 128 84 8 58.2%
French Defense: Exchange Variation 171 94 62 15 55.0%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 159 94 55 10 59.1%
French Defense 157 97 53 7 61.8%
Amar Gambit 88 43 39 6 48.9%
Döry Defense 77 42 33 2 54.5%
French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation 69 35 34 0 50.7%
Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted 45 22 22 1 48.9%
East Indian Defense 43 24 15 4 55.8%
Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 107 74 25 8 69.2%
Australian Defense 37 24 12 1 64.9%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 30 19 11 0 63.3%
French Defense: Exchange Variation 26 17 8 1 65.4%
Döry Defense 18 11 6 1 61.1%
French Defense 17 12 2 3 70.6%
French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation 16 8 6 2 50.0%
French Defense: Advance Variation 15 12 3 0 80.0%
Amazon Attack 15 10 5 0 66.7%
East Indian Defense 13 10 2 1 76.9%
Daily Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 49 37 6 6 75.5%
Unknown 20 14 6 0 70.0%
Australian Defense 14 10 3 1 71.4%
French Defense 10 8 1 1 80.0%
Döry Defense 10 7 2 1 70.0%
French Defense: Exchange Variation 8 7 0 1 87.5%
French Defense: Advance Variation 8 8 0 0 100.0%
East Indian Defense 7 4 2 1 57.1%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 7 7 0 0 100.0%
Amazon Attack 6 4 2 0 66.7%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 33 1
Losing 20 0