Rochelle Wu (aka Roachelley)
Woman Grandmaster of the Chess World
Meet Rochelle Wu, a chess virtuoso whose claim to fame is the prestigious title of Woman Grandmaster awarded by FIDE. Rochelle’s journey on the 64 squares is nothing short of an epic saga filled with strategic maneuvers, daring gambits, and the occasional heroic time scrambles.
Starting from humble beginnings with rapid ratings in the low 1100s back in 2013, Rochelle steadily climbed the ladder of chess excellence with a fierce competitive spirit. By 2021, their rapid rating peaked impressively at 2219, not to mention a blitz peak of a breathtaking 2722 in mid-2022 and a bullet peak soaring above 2700 in early 2025. Talk about speed and precision—Rochelle doesn’t just play chess; they blitz through the ranks like a queen on a mission.
When it comes to playstyle, Rochelle loves a good endgame showdown, with an endgame frequency of over 72%, paired with a tactical awareness so sharp that comebacks happen nearly 81% of the time—because surrender is just not in their vocabulary. Their average moves per win hover around 75, showing patience and persistence. Don’t be fooled by those flashy openings; it’s the long grind and psychological chess that make Rochelle a formidable foe. Fun fact: their best time to launch attacks is noon—who knew that chess and lunch hours go hand in hand?
With over 3,000 wins in both blitz and bullet formats combined, Rochelle has proven themselves a fierce competitor across all time controls. Opponents beware, whether it’s a timed blitz war or a marathon daily match, Roachelley’s got the resilience and skill to pull off brilliant victories—even when it’s down to the wire (or the clock).
Rochelle’s latest encounters continue to thrill the chess community, with recent wins achieved through smart use of openings like the Alapin Sicilian Defense and the Reti Opening Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack. They even manage to win on time—showing an uncanny flair for squeezing out every last second of advantage.
In short, Rochelle Wu is a tactical dynamo with a grandmaster title, a penchant for dramatic comebacks, and enough chess mileage to inspire anyone looking to conquer the board. With each game, they rewrite their own legend—one move, one sacrifice, one victory at a time.
Feedback for Rochelle Wu
Rochelle, your recent games show a very solid understanding of structure and positional play, along with good tactical awareness. Here are some highlights and suggestions to help continue your improvement:
Strengths:
- Opening Knowledge: You consistently choose sound openings like the Slav Defense, Sicilian Defense classical lines, and English Opening setups. Your development and castling are generally timely, which sets you up well in the middlegame.
- Endgame Technique: Several of your wins show good technique in converting small advantages into wins, especially in rook and minor piece endgames. Your ability to exploit passed pawns and active king moves are commendable.
- Calculations & Tactical Awareness: Your games often demonstrate sharp calculation, especially in sequences leading to material gain or decisive imbalances. You handle complexity well and punish opponent inaccuracies effectively.
Areas to Improve:
- Handling Pressure in Complex Positions: Some of your losses come from complications where your opponent applied pressure quickly (for example, in the King's Indian Defense structures). Working on maintaining composure and looking for defensive resources in these moments will be key.
- Watch for Traps and Pin Tactics Early: A few games showed quick losses due to tactical oversights around pins or forks in the opening to early middlegame phase. Slowing down in the first 10 moves to look for opponent tactical threats can reduce these errors.
- Time Management: In faster games, aim to balance your time usage so you have enough for critical moments, especially when the position sharpens. Avoid rushing moves that can turn a promising position unfavorable.
Next Steps
- Analyze your recent losses closely, especially focusing on the turning points — try to spot where your assessment of the position diverged from the best moves.
- Practice tactical puzzles related to pins, forks, and skewers to strengthen your tactical vision and avoid early mistakes.
- Review typical middlegame plans and endgame techniques for your favorite openings, to deepen strategic understanding.
- Consider playing longer time control games occasionally to practice thorough calculation and improve patience.
Great work overall! Keep up the consistent practice and study, and your performance will continue to rise.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vijay Srinivas Anandh | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| jat0123 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Vidip Kona | 0W / 2L / 1D | |
| Richard Leyva Proenza | 6W / 2L / 0D | |
| Sadok Znaidi | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Hrant Aleksanyan | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| Steo Hat | 3W / 5L / 0D | |
| zolidernas | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| drabmajor | 7W / 4L / 0D | |
| jp29265 | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Anis Achour | 535W / 406L / 130D | |
| canwedoit | 226W / 503L / 47D | |
| Gus Huston | 147W / 149L / 19D | |
| Nicholas Rosenthal | 76W / 109L / 14D | |
| Koosha Jaferian | 48W / 102L / 23D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2681 | 2716 | 2140 | |
| 2024 | 2649 | 2517 | 2141 | |
| 2023 | 2601 | 2589 | 2095 | |
| 2022 | 2558 | 2540 | 2087 | 1798 |
| 2021 | 2578 | 2449 | 1952 | 1797 |
| 2020 | 2392 | 2178 | 2077 | |
| 2019 | 2245 | 2246 | 2029 | 1787 |
| 2018 | 2377 | 2325 | 1813 | |
| 2017 | 2249 | 2167 | 1760 | 1753 |
| 2016 | 2089 | 2127 | 1714 | 1787 |
| 2015 | 1693 | 1629 | 1690 | 1807 |
| 2014 | 1249 | 1320 | 1642 | 1539 |
| 2013 | 1362 | 1326 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 826W / 775L / 130D | 777W / 831L / 111D | 76.8 |
| 2024 | 280W / 224L / 42D | 235W / 258L / 53D | 76.2 |
| 2023 | 344W / 371L / 72D | 341W / 373L / 85D | 76.7 |
| 2022 | 840W / 759L / 149D | 762W / 874L / 132D | 72.8 |
| 2021 | 340W / 307L / 68D | 340W / 332L / 43D | 73.4 |
| 2020 | 97W / 105L / 15D | 110W / 90L / 15D | 72.7 |
| 2019 | 27W / 56L / 9D | 25W / 52L / 12D | 70.9 |
| 2018 | 283W / 283L / 54D | 278W / 311L / 41D | 73.5 |
| 2017 | 243W / 288L / 63D | 263W / 270L / 63D | 72.1 |
| 2016 | 685W / 653L / 76D | 619W / 705L / 68D | 72.3 |
| 2015 | 256W / 288L / 38D | 268W / 290L / 26D | 64.9 |
| 2014 | 82W / 96L / 15D | 85W / 95L / 13D | 67.3 |
| 2013 | 31W / 23L / 4D | 30W / 21L / 6D | 58.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 799 | 354 | 397 | 48 | 44.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 541 | 198 | 306 | 37 | 36.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 420 | 208 | 182 | 30 | 49.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 340 | 125 | 190 | 25 | 36.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 277 | 137 | 112 | 28 | 49.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 255 | 106 | 140 | 9 | 41.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 237 | 91 | 130 | 16 | 38.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 204 | 88 | 99 | 17 | 43.1% |
| Modern | 201 | 87 | 104 | 10 | 43.3% |
| Australian Defense | 187 | 82 | 88 | 17 | 43.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 421 | 220 | 186 | 15 | 52.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 318 | 159 | 137 | 22 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 240 | 112 | 103 | 25 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 232 | 99 | 124 | 9 | 42.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 207 | 93 | 101 | 13 | 44.9% |
| Slav Defense | 206 | 105 | 81 | 20 | 51.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 199 | 86 | 92 | 21 | 43.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 177 | 98 | 63 | 16 | 55.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 147 | 70 | 63 | 14 | 47.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 137 | 71 | 60 | 6 | 51.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 32 | 14 | 16 | 2 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 30 | 17 | 10 | 3 | 56.7% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 20 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 45.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 18 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 17 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 47.1% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 15 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 13 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 53.9% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 15 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 53.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 14 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 78.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 35.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 54.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 66 | 4 |