Meet Robert Fontaine
Robert Fontaine is a dedicated chess enthusiast whose passion for the game has spanned multiple time controls—from methodical Daily matches to fast-paced Bullet and Blitz challenges. Over the years, Robert has played thousands of games, building a solid foundation of chess understanding while continuously pushing his limits.
In his career, Robert has demonstrated a strong White win rate of over 56%, while still maintaining a 51% success rate as Black. He is known for entering long endgames—around 86% of his games lead into endgame scenarios—requiring concentration and strategic play. With an average of 82 moves per successful game, his wins are often the result of patient maneuvering and well-timed tactics.
One of Robert’s most remarkable statistics is his ability to stage comebacks. Despite encountering challenging positions, he fights on, hinting at a high resilience factor and a never-give-up mindset. His longest winning streak stands at an impressive 18 games in a row, underscoring a capacity for consistent performance over extended periods.
While Robert’s style is largely methodical, he also shows confidence in tactical flurries. He is more prone to tilt if multiple losses gather, but typically manages to regain composure quickly. Notably, he posts better results in certain evening hours, weaving his chess activity around a schedule that favors prime performance points.
Today, Robert continues to refine his skills, with thousands of recorded matches and a strong interest in continuous improvement. His heartfelt dedication and love for chess drive him to experiment with different openings, test new strategic ideas, and aim for peak form in every game he plays.
Whether in a grueling Daily matchup or a split-second Bullet duel, Robert Fontaine’s commitment to pushing his creative foresight and mental toughness has made him a formidable—and ever-evolving—opponent.
What you’re doing well
- Your opening choices show variety and solid foundation. You handle structured defenses like the Carо-Kann and the French with resilience, and you also explore aggressive lines such as Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Amar Gambit. This variety helps you fight different styles and keeps opponents guessing. You can see strong performance in several openings, especially those that lead to dynamic middlegames.
- You manage the clock effectively in several blitz games, often staying ahead on the clock or turning your time pressure into practical advantages. This is a valuable strength in fast time controls and can help you convert small advantages into wins.
- Your ability to press and maintain activity in middlegame phases is clear in multiple recent games. You look for ways to activate pieces and create practical chances, which is key in blitz where exact lines may be less important than movement and initiative.
- Endgame awareness is a real strength in some games; you know when to simplify and keep things practical, which helps you convert advantages and reduce risk in time pressure.
What to improve
- Endgame conversion: In several long blitz endings, there were missed chances to convert small advantages. Practice common endgame patterns (rook endings with pawns, opposite-colored bishops, and king activity) so you can push to a clean win rather than relying on opponent mistakes.
- Time management under pressure: While you often handle the clock well, blitz games can slip into rough time pressure in the later stages. Develop a simple time budget for each phase (opening, middlegame, endgame) and practice sticking to it in training games.
- Decision discipline in the middlegame: In some games, aggressive lines lead to complex positions where a solid, simpler plan could yield a clearer path to advantage. When you sense the position becoming too tactical, consider reverting to a straightforward plan (open files, piece activity, control of the center) to avoid overcomplication.
- Opening preparation alignment: Your openings perform well, but a few lines can become speculative in blitz. Solidify 1–2 reliable repertoires for fast games and add 1 or 2 flexible options to adapt to opponents’ responses.
Actionable plan for the next weeks
- Endgame drills: Practice practical rook endings and simple king-and-pawn endings. Use a few focused drills (e.g., king activity in pawn endings, rook behind passed pawns) to build confidence under time pressure.
- Time budgeting routine: In every training blitz game, assign a soft time limit for the first 20 moves (e.g., a few seconds per move in the opening, then a steady pace in the middlegame). Review where you spent too long and adjust in the next game.
- Opening refinement: Choose 2–3 openings that currently give you the best results and study concise plans for each. Add 1 flexible option to keep opponents guessing. Consider bookmarking a quick reference for typical middlegame ideas in each opening.
- Post-game review habit: After each blitz session, spend 10–15 minutes annotating 2–3 critical moments per game. Note where you felt pressure, where you found a good plan, and where a simpler path would have worked better.
Openings performance snapshot
Your opening results show strength in several dynamic lines. Notably, Czech Defense and Nimzo-Larsen Attack have particularly solid win rates, and aggressive setups like Amar Gambit and London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation also perform well for you. If you want to lean into the strongest zones, consider continuing to deepen those lines while keeping a compact, reliable fallback option for tougher opponents. For quick reference, you can explore specific openings such as Czech Defense and Nimzo-Larsen Attack in your study plan, and you can review your profile for a quick overview of your preferences and progress Robert Fontaine.
Quick drills you can start with
- Endgame practice: do three 5-minute rook endings per session to build conversion confidence.
- Time management: run 5 blitz practice games with a strict 1-second increment per move to train fast, accurate decision-making.
- Opening repetition: pick 1 line from the Nimzo-Larsen Attack and 1 line from the Czech Defense to drill key middlegame plans and typical piece placements.
Profile reference
For a quick look at your overall progress and to review game notes, check your profile: Robert Fontaine.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| bodhiknight | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| marcoriehle | 0W / 5L / 0D | View |
| Denis Trifonov | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Ankit Ray | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| revivingheart | 2W / 2L / 0D | View |
| dinamicosking | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| armanrathore | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chessique666 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Gerasimenyuk Mikhail | 4W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Shachar Gindi | 2W / 6L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Konstantin Kodinets | 47W / 29L / 13D | View Games |
| Yuri Vovk | 16W / 33L / 4D | View Games |
| BethRussel | 23W / 15L / 9D | View Games |
| russist | 46W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
| caraguru | 20W / 18L / 6D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2630 | 2730 | 2551 | 2104 |
| 2024 | 2626 | 2693 | 2558 | 2104 |
| 2023 | 2559 | 2586 | 2558 | 2097 |
| 2022 | 2644 | 2616 | 2558 | |
| 2021 | 2641 | 2558 | 2097 | |
| 2020 | 2635 | 2558 | ||
| 2019 | 2462 | 2636 | 2558 | 2097 |
| 2018 | 2540 | 2621 | 2558 | 2079 |
| 2017 | 2429 | 2500 | 2555 | 2077 |
| 2016 | 2471 | 2405 | 2060 | |
| 2015 | 2516 | 2491 | 1898 | |
| 2014 | 2428 | 2386 | 1901 | |
| 2013 | 1394 | 2032 | 2020 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 478W / 361L / 92D | 467W / 390L / 80D | 85.0 |
| 2024 | 286W / 195L / 55D | 262W / 223L / 47D | 84.1 |
| 2023 | 107W / 64L / 8D | 87W / 87L / 11D | 82.5 |
| 2022 | 115W / 87L / 27D | 106W / 103L / 15D | 82.4 |
| 2021 | 167W / 97L / 21D | 136W / 125L / 23D | 88.3 |
| 2020 | 355W / 245L / 56D | 308W / 267L / 61D | 91.3 |
| 2019 | 283W / 179L / 36D | 248W / 210L / 43D | 87.5 |
| 2018 | 458W / 292L / 76D | 406W / 327L / 82D | 89.6 |
| 2017 | 306W / 193L / 68D | 312W / 203L / 52D | 88.1 |
| 2016 | 107W / 63L / 11D | 110W / 57L / 12D | 80.0 |
| 2015 | 128W / 71L / 15D | 115W / 84L / 15D | 80.9 |
| 2014 | 302W / 140L / 32D | 276W / 157L / 39D | 81.9 |
| 2013 | 45W / 19L / 10D | 53W / 13L / 7D | 73.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 685 | 342 | 294 | 49 | 49.9% |
| Modern | 492 | 249 | 206 | 37 | 50.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 423 | 231 | 165 | 27 | 54.6% |
| Czech Defense | 399 | 225 | 139 | 35 | 56.4% |
| French Defense | 337 | 174 | 130 | 33 | 51.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 291 | 164 | 94 | 33 | 56.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 266 | 148 | 95 | 23 | 55.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 234 | 133 | 85 | 16 | 56.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 225 | 127 | 76 | 22 | 56.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 210 | 115 | 79 | 16 | 54.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Two Knights Attack, Mindeno Variation | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| QGD: Semi-Tarrasch, 5.cxd5 Nxd5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 37 | 28 | 7 | 2 | 75.7% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 35 | 21 | 12 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 33 | 23 | 9 | 1 | 69.7% |
| Modern | 33 | 23 | 9 | 1 | 69.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 21 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 52.4% |
| Czech Defense | 17 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 52.9% |
| Australian Defense | 17 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 58.8% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 17 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 64.7% |
| Modern | 15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 86.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
| French Defense | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 58.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Philidor Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 10 | 2 |