Early life and beginnings
Roman Gavrilin's chess journey began with a curiosity as bright as his favorite time control. Growing up in the vibrant online chess scene, he learned the game at local clubs and through late-night practice, where quick thinking and a fearless attitude quickly became his trademarks. His early years were a blend of study, snappy tactics, and a growing love for the drama of fast games.
Titles and recognition
Roman earned the National Master title from the National Chess Federation, marking him as a standout player within his country. This official recognition reflected a serious competitive resolve and a readiness to test his mettle against strong fields in national events and beyond.
Streaming and online presence
Beyond the board, Roman Gavrilin shines as a streamer. He brings sharp analysis, quick-fire games, and a generous sense of humor to his audience. Viewers tune in for practical openings, tactical ideas, and the light-hearted banter that makes long sessions feel like a pair of friendly grandmaster duels rather than an exam room.
Playing style and preferred time control
Bullet chess holds a special place in his repertoire, with a penchant for high-pressure positions, fast decisions, and dynamic, tactical clashes. He complements speed with solid fundamentals, aiming to keep the initiative and outplay opponents before the clock runs out.
Humor and personality
Rom Gav brings personality to the stream—serious about the game, but never afraid to smile at a tricky tactic or a surprising blunder. His blend of insight and wit has earned him a loyal following among players who enjoy learning through entertainment as much as through study.
Legacy and influence
As a titled player and understood streamer, Roman contributes to the growing fusion of chess as sport and community entertainment. He inspires aspiring players to pursue rigorous study while embracing creativity and fun on the online stage, proving that a strong game can be learned, shared, and enjoyed by many.
Feedback for Roman Gavrilin (“Romkachess”)
1. What you’re already doing well
- Opening versatility. As Black you handle both the Sicilian (Najdorf & sidelines) and off-beat systems such as the Philidor, while with White you switch smoothly between 1.e4 and 1.d4/London structures. This keeps opponents out of preparation.
- Initiative-seeking play. Your recent wins against jammmmm256 show a willingness to seize space (…c5/…e5 break vs the London and 9.a4! vs the Caro-Kann) and convert it into durable piece activity.
- Daily-chess discipline. In correspondence time controls you rarely blunder pieces and your calculation depth is evident (e.g. 15.cxd5! in the Accelerated London game, exploiting the pin on the d-file).
2. Recurrent themes to improve
2.1 Time management in fast chess
Five of your last seven live games were lost on time from playable or even better positions. In bullet/blitz you often enter an excellent technical ending (see diagram after 30……Rb8 vs Bobancio) but run out of seconds.
- Adopt a “draw-ish bailout” rule when under 5 s: exchange queens or force repetition instead of searching for the absolute best move.
- Use your opening repertoire to reach familiar pawn structures so you can play the first 15 moves nearly on autopilot.
2.2 Over-pressing in equal positions
The loss vs mukesh_micro (Daily, Canal Attack) is instructive: after 21…Nb7 you pushed unprepared kingside pawns and weakened dark squares, allowing …f5–f4. A quieter plan (doubling rooks on the e-file and only then advancing f4) would have kept the bind.
2.3 Tactical oversight vs engines/strong bots
Against Coach-David-BOT the motif 18…Nxf3+ exploited an absolute pin on the g-file — a textbook example of a deflection-with-check tactic. Drilling 3-to-5-move forcing sequences daily (e.g. via Puzzle Rush ≤20 s per move) will hard-wire these patterns.
3. Opening-specific pointers
- Najdorf move orders. In several blitz games you reached ∆Nc5, …d5 breaks too late and allowed White’s a4/b4 steamroller. Study 6…e5 (& …Be6) vs 6.Bg5 to learn the thematic …h6 & …g5 counter-strike.
- Philidor/Lion. The plan ‹…h5/…g5› is powerful, but remember centre first. Insert …c6 or …exd4 before a5/a4 appears, or you’ll be left with loose pawns as happened versus Fox1397.
- Closed Sicilian as Black. After 2.Nc3 d6 3…e5 you reached a fine Benko-style bind but exchanged queens on d5, removing winning chances. Consider the thematic …f5 pawn lever instead.
4. End-game and technical conversion
When you do reach rook endings with time on the clock you convert confidently (see 17…h6 → 0-1 vs Jammmmm256). Two tweaks will raise your ceiling:
- King activity. In several Sicilian endgames your king remained on g8 while the opponent’s marched to d4. Make it a habit to play …Kg7, …Kf6 the moment queens are off.
- Opposition drills. Practise “rook & 4 vs rook & 4” endings against an engine at 10 s per move; aim for <90 % engine score loss.
5. Suggested study plan (next 4 weeks)
- Daily: 15 tactical puzzles + 1 annotated classic game (focus on Carlsen end-game technique).
- Alternate days: play one 10|5 rapid game, self-annotate, then compare with engine to identify “first tactical miss”.
- Weekend: 30-minute opening refresher — build mini files for (a) Najdorf vs 6.Bg5, (b) Philidor Lion with early …c6.
6. Stats & tracking
Keep an eye on your progress:
- Peak ratings: 2711 (2024-03-19), 2737 (2025-02-01)
- Momentum charts: ,
Stay disciplined with the clock, sharpen your tactical eye, and your already impressive playing strength will become even more formidable. Good luck in your upcoming events!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Paul Rieger | 163W / 20L / 9D | |
| Hartsa Voude | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| Michael Klenburg | 1W / 2L / 2D | |
| aungkhin01 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| 4thandone | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| google113 | 10W / 2L / 0D | |
| raderadic | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| jammmmm256 | 58W / 5L / 0D | |
| tomato38 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| discover_the_truth114 | 7W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gangster_h | 192W / 174L / 36D | |
| tanahio | 319W / 58L / 23D | |
| Paul Rieger | 163W / 20L / 9D | |
| motthew | 112W / 6L / 0D | |
| Queen's Gambit | 102W / 7L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2738 | 2651 | 2373 | 1783 |
| 2024 | 2703 | 2658 | 2272 | 1637 |
| 2023 | 2559 | 2701 | 2226 | 1907 |
| 2022 | 2500 | 2563 | 2209 | 2004 |
| 2021 | 2411 | 2464 | 2195 | |
| 2020 | 2426 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1577W / 526L / 131D | 1565W / 619L / 151D | 70.6 |
| 2024 | 2882W / 1324L / 203D | 2852W / 1492L / 232D | 74.0 |
| 2023 | 1239W / 862L / 179D | 1122W / 935L / 210D | 82.0 |
| 2022 | 498W / 320L / 70D | 419W / 384L / 80D | 86.5 |
| 2021 | 96W / 94L / 12D | 75W / 107L / 21D | 77.8 |
| 2020 | 91W / 81L / 15D | 68W / 108L / 8D | 85.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 609 | 363 | 207 | 39 | 59.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 368 | 237 | 108 | 23 | 64.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 302 | 183 | 88 | 31 | 60.6% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 256 | 173 | 69 | 14 | 67.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 210 | 123 | 77 | 10 | 58.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 196 | 140 | 46 | 10 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 180 | 104 | 63 | 13 | 57.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 180 | 124 | 45 | 11 | 68.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 173 | 91 | 67 | 15 | 52.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 169 | 106 | 48 | 15 | 62.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 43 | 36 | 5 | 2 | 83.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 42 | 36 | 2 | 4 | 85.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 41 | 21 | 15 | 5 | 51.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 20 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 19 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 73.7% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 19 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 84.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 68.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 16 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 15 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 93.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 608 | 347 | 231 | 30 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 530 | 327 | 173 | 30 | 61.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 518 | 340 | 158 | 20 | 65.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 421 | 273 | 131 | 17 | 64.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 410 | 257 | 129 | 24 | 62.7% |
| Döry Defense | 359 | 175 | 155 | 29 | 48.8% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 352 | 204 | 136 | 12 | 58.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 340 | 178 | 141 | 21 | 52.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 326 | 209 | 103 | 14 | 64.1% |
| Modern | 298 | 150 | 138 | 10 | 50.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 109 | 92 | 11 | 6 | 84.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 86 | 52 | 27 | 7 | 60.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 75 | 62 | 10 | 3 | 82.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 50 | 38 | 11 | 1 | 76.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 50 | 40 | 2 | 8 | 80.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 43 | 36 | 4 | 3 | 83.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 41 | 36 | 4 | 1 | 87.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 39 | 29 | 8 | 2 | 74.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 33 | 31 | 2 | 0 | 93.9% |
| Döry Defense | 30 | 22 | 3 | 5 | 73.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 62 | 1 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |