Profile
Yonathan Uritsky is a FIDE Master known for nimble calculation, sharp instincts, and a Bullet-first approach that keeps opponents on their toes. He earned the FIDE Master title from FIDE and has built a reputation as a fearless rapid-fire competitor who can squeeze life out of the clock. A keen thinker with a sense of humor about the chaos of the 60-second rush, Yonathan makes fast games feel almost classical in their clarity.
A compact chart of his rating progress is available:
.Chess Journey
From casual online games to titled competition, Yonathan has consistently demonstrated growth in high-speed formats. He peaked in Blitz at 2708 in early 2025 and reached a Bullet peak of 2645 by March 2025, signaling a period of rapid development and confidence under pressure. His preferred time control is Bullet, where quick thinking, concrete plans, and a calm clock-handling mindset shine.
- FIDE Master title awarded by FIDE.
- Peak Blitz: 2708 (2025-02-01).
- Peak Bullet: 2645 (2025-03-01).
- Primary strength shown in fast time controls and endgame conversion in short battles.
Openings & Style
Yonathan blends disciplined, strategic systems with aggressive, initiative-rich ideas. His Blitz and Bullet openings show a fondness for solid setup with dynamic possibilities, including the Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation and Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation, alongside a broad Caro-Kann and English repertoire. This mix reflects a player who enjoys pressing the attack while keeping texture in reserve for the endgame grind.
- Blitz: Colle System — Rhamphorhynchus Variation: 38 games, 23W-11L-4D (60.53% win rate).
- Blitz: Nimzo-Larsen Attack — Classical Variation: 29 games, 16W-10L-3D (55.17% win rate).
- Bullet: Colle System — Rhamphorhynchus Variation: 54 games, 30W-21L-3D (55.56% win rate).
- Bullet: Nimzo-Larsen Attack and related systems show aggressive talentry in fast games.
Notes
Yonathan Uritsky remains an active, evolving presence on the scene, balancing study with practical play. For more glimpses into his ongoing journey, you can view his profile: yonathan_uritsky.
Hey Yonathan — quick feedback from your recent bullet games
You showed a good willingness to engage in sharp, tactical play and to press for initiative in complex positions. Your openings align with a concrete, solid plan, and you’ve demonstrated the ability to convert favorable moments into a win. There are a few clear areas to tighten up to keep the momentum going, especially under the time pressure typical in bullet.
What you’re doing well
- You choose active, principled openings that fit your style, particularly the Nimzo-Larsen Attack family. This gives you clear middlegame plans and targets to aim for.
- You recover quickly from tense middlegame moments and look for forcing moves when you have an opportunity to seize the initiative.
- You keep piece development and king safety in play while the clock is ticking, which helps sustain pressure in fast time controls.
Key areas to improve
- Time management under pressure: bullet often comes down to a couple of precise decisions in the last minutes. Build a simple clock strategy, like reserving a small, fixed amount of think time per phase and using quick checks to avoid blunders in the heat of the moment.
- Calculation discipline in sharp positions: when you enter tactical sequences, constrain your candidate moves to 2–3 forcing lines. If none feel obvious, switch to a safe, improving move rather than chasing multiple speculative ideas.
- Endgame technique: many bullet games hinge on converting even small material or positional advantages. Practice rook endgames and king activity with practical drills to convert plus positions more reliably.
- Selective simplification: in some wins you can simplify into winning endgames, but in losses you sometimes get tangled in too many trades. Learn to recognize when simplifying preserves the advantage and when it risks a drawn or worse ending.
- Review and pattern recognition: after each game, note one strong decision you made and one recurring mistake (e.g., a recurring tactic you overlook or a risky exchange). This helps break patterns over time.
Opening-focused plan to amplify your strengths
Your strength with Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation suggests continuing to deepen that line. Consider building a compact mini-repertoire around this opening and related setups (Colle and English family moves that transpose). For the next 2–3 weeks, aim to study: typical middlegame plans, common pawn structures, and the usual tactical nets your opponents deploy against these systems.
Practical steps you can take next
- Pick 2–3 standard middlegame themes from Nimzo-Larsen and practice them with focused drills. For example, how to contest the d5 square, how to activate the light-squared bishop, and how to plan breaks like e4 or c4 when appropriate.
- Implement a quick post-game review ritual: 5 minutes to identify one best decision and one mistake, then write a single improvement note for the next game.
- Schedule short, deliberate endgame practice sessions (rook endings and king activity) to improve conversion chances in bullets.
- In time trials, simulate “slow-bullet” conditions (short, structured practice games) to train staying calm and making solid, incremental improvements under pressure.
Keep an eye on your progress
Your rating history shows moments of improvement over recent periods. Maintain the momentum by sticking to the focused opening study, applying disciplined calculation, and consistently reviewing your games. If you want, I can tailor a 2-week drill plan around Nimzo-Larsen and your other top openings to maximize strength in upcoming bullets.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| shaharhochstadt | 12W / 1L / 0D | |
| Egehan Yildiz | 3W / 2L / 1D | |
| Bella Khotenashvili | 2W / 2L / 1D | |
| Goltsev Dmitry | 1W / 3L / 1D | |
| Marcel Winkels | 5W / 0L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2596 | 2641 | ||
| 2024 | 2544 | 2640 | ||
| 2023 | 2549 | 2452 | 1600 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 70W / 46L / 11D | 66W / 53L / 11D | 84.7 |
| 2024 | 60W / 53L / 11D | 58W / 55L / 5D | 79.7 |
| 2023 | 41W / 33L / 5D | 42W / 37L / 5D | 79.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 39 | 18 | 18 | 3 | 46.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 38 | 23 | 11 | 4 | 60.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 29 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 55.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Benko Gambit | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 13 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 53.9% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 54 | 30 | 21 | 3 | 55.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 40 | 16 | 22 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 53.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 38.5% |
| King's Indian Attack | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.4% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benko Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 1 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |