Ivan Rozum - Grandmaster of the 64 Squares
Meet Ivan Rozum, a chess Grandmaster whose brain is so sharp it probably checks for "brain forks" every morning. Earning the prestigious title from FIDE, Ivan has proven time and again that the 64 squares are his personal playground. Whether blitzing through opponents or grinding out wins in bullet, Rozum’s game is a mix of strategy, precision, and a dash of cheeky unpredictability.
Rise and Rating
Since bursting onto the scene in 2016, Ivan’s blitz rating has danced gracefully around the 2600 to 2787 mark — peaking at an electrifying 2787 in May 2025, enough to make even the toughest grandmasters nod in respect. His bullet rating wasn’t far behind, also hitting a blazing 2787, showcasing his lightning-fast decision-making under pressure. Rapid play? He’s got that covered too with a respectable peak rating of 2483.
Playing Style & Approach
Rozum is not one to shy away from long, intricate battles, with average games lasting over 80 moves. He loves to see how far he can push a position — because why finish a game quickly when you can savor every tense moment? With a strong penchant for comebacks (making a comeback after losing a piece nearly 50% of the time!), Ivan is the kind of opponent you cheer for when behind, and fear when ahead.
Openings – The "Top Secret" Arsenal
Almost 1,300 games in various time controls show Ivan’s favorite mystery weapon: the intriguingly named "Top Secret" opening system — boasting a win rate of over 52% in blitz alone. He also dabbles with the Indian Game, Sicilian French Variation, Benko Gambit, and even pulls out the Van Geet Opening like a magician does a rabbit from a hat. Opponents probably wonder, "What on Earth will he play next?"
Noteworthy Achievements & Stats
- Over 675 wins in blitz games alone, with a nearly balanced, battle-hardened record of wins and losses signaling fierce competition at every turn.
- Longest win streak of 10 games – because losing isn’t his style (though he faced a losing streak of 10 once, proving even geniuses have their off days).
- Excels particularly on Sundays and evenings, with a peak win rate hitting 70% at 11 PM and 62% at 10 PM — clearly an unstoppable night owl.
Recent Highlights
As recent as May 24, 2025, Ivan showcased his prowess in a blitz game against chess_master_8820, clinching victory by resignation and reinforcing his status as a tactical beast. He also dispatched ShazilTheGOAT2006 with a finishing checkmate — proving that nicknames don’t always guarantee wins when Ivan’s on the board.
Opponent Whisperer
With a remarkable 100% win record against many recent rivals such as chess_master_8820, shazilthegoat2006, and burgerandbishop, Rozum_Ivan clearly knows how to put the pressure on. Though there are a few pesky players like sonicdravise and alphafischer2019 who managed to catch him off-guard, the overall dominance speaks volumes.
Summary
In summary, Ivan Rozum isn’t just a Grandmaster by title — he’s a seasoned chess gladiator with a flair for the dramatic and a love for long, tense duels. If you ever face him, beware: he’s got Top Secret moves, night-owl timing, and a mind sharp enough to checkmate your hopes in style.
Quick summary
Nice win in your most recent blitz game vs Georgi Filev. You steered a queenless middlegame into a minor-piece + passed pawn ending and converted with good piece play and king activity. Below are concrete things you did well and a focused plan to tighten your blitz performance.
Key moments (plain English)
- You traded queens early to head into a favorable minor-piece ending — that simplified your decision-making in blitz and reduced tactical risk.
- You used the knight aggressively: jumping into d6 and later capturing on a5/c6 to win material and create a passed pawn. Good eye for outposts and forks.
- Your king was an active participant in the endgame — coming up the board to support pawns and restrict the opponent’s knight. That sealed the conversion.
- You converted without creating unnecessary complications — patient, straightforward technique under the clock.
Replay the final phase quickly:
What you did well (blitz strengths)
- Opening choice and simplification: trading into a favorable structure shows good practical judgement — you prefer to convert advantages rather than complicate in short time controls.
- Piece activity: knight leaps and the active king were decisive — you spot tactical targets and convert them cleanly.
- Endgame technique: creating and pushing a passed pawn, then bringing the king to help — textbook conversion under time pressure.
- Time management: you kept decent time on the clock throughout the game, allowing clean execution in the final phase.
Recurring issues & what to fix
- Excess pawn advances early (sometimes): pushes like an early g-pawn can be fine, but in some games they create targets. Be selective — ask whether the pawn improves piece coordination or weakens squares.
- Opening coverage gaps: your Opening Performance shows some weaker areas (for example the Czech Defense suffers a low win rate). Patch the noisy lines you face most often rather than learning many new sidelines.
- Risk tolerance in blitz: you simplify well when ahead, but when equal you sometimes miss cleaner plans and allow counterplay. When the position is equal, prefer small improvements (centralize, improve worst piece) instead of speculative pawn grabs.
- Transition technique: occasionally the conversion from a material advantage to a clearer win takes more moves than necessary — aim to exchange into an easily winning pawn endgame sooner when safe.
Concrete, short-term blitz plan (next 2–4 weeks)
- Daily 15 minutes tactics (mixed themes); focus on forks, discovered checks and knight tactics — those are decisive in your games.
- 3× per week: Play 10 blitz games but immediately annotate 2 lost/won games (5–10 minutes each) to find recurring decision patterns.
- Openings: spend 30–60 minutes a week shoring up your worst-performing lines (start with the Czech Defense). Keep favorite weapons like the Caro-Kann Defense and the Amar Gambit as “go-to” repertoire — reinforce main plans, not move-by-move memorization.
- Endgame drills: 2× week, 15 minutes practicing basic king + pawn, knight vs bishop, and rook endings — quick study pays off in blitz conversions.
- Clock discipline: set a personal rule for 3|0 or 5|0 blitz — avoid playing too many flagging lines and don’t premove into potential captures that lose material.
Concrete, medium-term plan (1–3 months)
- Tactics bank: reach a streak of 50 solved tactical puzzles at 80%+ accuracy. Then raise speed; blitz games become easier when pattern recognition improves.
- Opening toolkit: pick 2 lines to deepen (your best: Caro-Kann & Amar Gambit). Prepare typical pawn structures and 3–4 short plans each side — not long theory.
- Endgame fundamentals: build a short repertoire for common simplifications (how to trade into winning king+pawn endgames; convert knight + passed pawn vs knight).
- Play a small arena or mini-tournament of 5 min + 0 to test conversion under pressure and monitor trend slope — your recent trend is positive, keep the upward momentum.
Specific drills and resources (short list)
- Tactics: mixed-motif puzzle rushes — focus on forks, pins and discovered attacks for 15 minutes/day.
- Endgames: 10 exercises on king-and-pawn endings and knight vs bishop positions each week.
- Opening review: make two one-page cheat-sheets—one for White, one for Black—covering typical middlegame plans and 5–7 sample move orders.
- Blitz routine: 5-minute pre-game warmup (10 tactics + 2 quick endgames) and 1-minute post-game review of critical moment.
Small behavioral adjustments for bigger gains
- When ahead materially, prefer exchanges that simplify and reduce counterplay — trading into a won endgame is often the fastest path to victory in blitz.
- Avoid speculative pawn storms unless they directly improve piece activity; ask “who benefits from the half-open file?” before pushing.
- Keep calm in the middle game — a 10–15 second pause to re-evaluate tactics often saves a greater time loss later.
Notes from your overall profile (how to leverage strengths)
Your long-term data shows strong peaks and a consistently rising recent trend (1–6 month slopes positive). Use that confidence: double down on what works (piece activity, simplification) and systematically patch the weaker openings like the Czech Defense. Your Strength Adjusted Win Rate (~51%) means you are performing well against similar strength opponents — small targeted fixes will push that higher.
Suggested immediate priority: tactics + 1 weak opening (Czech) + 1 endgame theme. That combination produces the largest practical boost for blitz conversions.
Final checklist before your next session
- Warm up with 10 tactical puzzles.
- Review one page of opening plans (not long theory).
- Decide your blitz “safety rules” (no premoves into captures, simplify when up).
- Play 5 games and annotate the two most instructive afterwards.
Great job on the recent win — keep the momentum. If you want, I can build a 4-week calendar with daily tasks tailored to your openings and the Czech Defense repair plan.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Georgi Filev | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| shhahw | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Artavazd Hayrapetyan | 24W / 13L / 1D | View Games |
| uzbektiger95 | 13W / 20L / 2D | View Games |
| Blitzfanboy | 13W / 14L / 0D | View Games |
| Vladimir Seliverstov | 12W / 13L / 1D | View Games |
| Vitaliy Bernadskiy | 9W / 14L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2819 | 2432 | 812 | |
| 2024 | 2636 | 2355 | ||
| 2023 | 2751 | 2326 | ||
| 2021 | 2688 | |||
| 2020 | 2705 | 2722 | 2377 | |
| 2019 | 2677 | 2745 | ||
| 2018 | 2656 | 2663 | ||
| 2017 | 2624 | 2644 | ||
| 2016 | 2746 | 2606 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32W / 18L / 1D | 33W / 14L / 3D | 94.1 |
| 2024 | 3W / 3L / 1D | 9W / 3L / 0D | 89.6 |
| 2023 | 1W / 1L / 1D | 1W / 3L / 1D | 88.4 |
| 2021 | 18W / 5L / 2D | 12W / 9L / 4D | 94.7 |
| 2020 | 84W / 60L / 12D | 82W / 59L / 11D | 85.9 |
| 2019 | 7W / 5L / 0D | 8W / 4L / 0D | 86.6 |
| 2018 | 26W / 22L / 1D | 16W / 23L / 7D | 85.3 |
| 2017 | 72W / 64L / 7D | 67W / 69L / 10D | 92.0 |
| 2016 | 130W / 92L / 15D | 111W / 110L / 14D | 84.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 64 | 35 | 26 | 3 | 54.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 44 | 20 | 22 | 2 | 45.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 36 | 18 | 14 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 33 | 20 | 12 | 1 | 60.6% |
| Döry Defense | 27 | 12 | 13 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 21 | 9 | 12 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 21 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Czech Defense | 20 | 6 | 11 | 3 | 30.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 20 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 18 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Semi-Tarrasch, 5.e3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Classical Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 26 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 57.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 21 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 38.1% |
| Modern | 21 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 17 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 58.8% |
| Czech Defense | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% |
| King's Indian Attack | 12 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 9 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |