Overview — Sajid0987654321
Sajid0987654321 is a prolific online chess player known as much for long usernames as for long games. A Daily specialist by preference, Sajid mixes a patient, endgame-first approach with sparks of tactical ferocity. Expect marathon games, surprising comebacks and an uncanny ability to punish casual blunders.
- Username: Sajid0987654321
- Preferred time control: Daily
- Typical game length: long — average decisive games often exceed 75 moves
Career highlights & milestones
Sajid’s career is a story of steady climbs, big streaks and memorable peaks. Highlights include a monster winning run and notable peak performances across fast time controls.
- Longest winning streak: 47 games
- Longest losing streak: 28 games (because even legends have off days)
- Current losing streak: 2 games
- Notable peak ratings: 2965 (2025-10-25) and 2956 (2025-10-22)
- Rating trend snapshot (Bullet 2020–2025):
Playing style & strengths
Sajid combines stubborn endgame play with strong tactical recovery skills. Many games head into the later phases — Sajid's Endgame Frequency is high — and comebacks are common.
- Endgame frequency: very high (favors long, technical play)
- Avg moves per win: ~77; avg moves per loss: ~72 — Sajid grinds out wins
- Comeback rate: ~84% — won plenty after tough positions
- Win after losing a piece: ~48% — resilient under pressure
- Early resignation rate: low (~3.5%) — rarely quits early
- Best time to play: usually evenings (peak performance around 20:00)
Openings & repertoire (what Sajid plays)
Sajid has experimented widely, but certain lines recur across time controls. The Amar Gambit is a signature choice in Bullet and Rapid; the Sicilian family and Scandinavian show up in many formats. Below are key openings and how Sajid fares with them.
Bullet — favorite lines
- Amar Gambit — heavy usage, solid results (Amar Gambit)
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — consistent performer
- Australian Defense — reliable practical choice
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack — strong win rate
- Sicilian Defense — aggressive and successful
Blitz & Rapid — frequent weapons
- Blitz: Blackburne Shilling Gambit & Taimanov/Sicilian lines
- Rapid: Amar Gambit and London Poisoned-Pawn show high win rates
- Daily: Sicilian and Scandinavian are impressive in correspondence-like games
Explore one of Sajid’s typical mini-skeleton games:
Notable opponents & head-to-heads
Sajid has many repeat opponents. Some matchups are one-sided, others are fiercely contested.
- ladycockroach: +48 −22 =4 — many battles, overall advantage (Sajid)
- xeyuz_chxss: +47 −0 =0 — dominating run (xeyuz_chxss)
- prodigy0002: +33 −4 =1 — very favorable head-to-head (prodigy0002)
- badluck_2012 and manudavid2910: competitive rivalries with mixed results
When to challenge Sajid
Timing matters. Sajid’s best hours and days show patterns you can game.
- Best hours: 20:00 and 19:00 often produce the highest win rates (peak hourly win rates: ~61% and ~59% respectively)
- Best day: Friday and Saturday see slightly higher win percentages
- Preferred time control: Daily — bring your patience and opening prep
Fun facts & personality
Sajid plays long games, loves weird openings (Amar Gambit fans, unite), and posts username strings that double as phone numbers. Expect gritty endgames, surprising tactical swipes, and occasional comedic upsets.
- High comeback ability — don’t celebrate early
- Often wins long endgames rather than blitzing quick mates
- Collects odd opening lines and turns them into practical weapons
Want a quick peek at Sajid’s best peak in Bullet and Blitz? 2965 (2025-10-25) | 2956 (2025-10-22)
Quick reference
- Username: Sajid0987654321
- Preferred time control: Daily
- Style: endgame-oriented, resilient, late-game grinder
- Top openings to prepare against: Amar Gambit, Sicilian Defense, Scandinavian Defense
Quick summary
Nice work — you’re getting practical wins by simplifying into favorable endgames and by using tactical, surprise openings when they work. You also have a clear area to improve: avoid extremely-short resignations and build a small, reliable opening repertoire so you can reach playable middlegames more often.
Highlight: your most recent win (review)
Opponent: xeyuz_chxss — You were Black and won after trading into an endgame where your pieces were better placed and you converted steadily.
- What you did well:
- You used pawn breaks and piece exchanges to simplify into a favourable endgame — exchanging rooks on the c-file and then trading into a position where your knight and active king controlled key squares.
- You played the central break c5 and followed up with timely knight jumps; that created concrete targets and limited White’s counterplay.
- When the position simplified you didn’t panic — you kept improving piece placement and eventually pushed your opponent into passivity and a resignation.
- What to watch:
- A few moments could be cleaner around the exchange sequence — always double-check tactics before exchanging into an endgame (look for forks, outposts, and passed-pawn races).
- Time use in daily games: you spent very different amounts of time on various moves. For daily games that’s okay, but try to keep a consistent thought process (assess threats, candidate moves, and a short plan) so you don’t miss simple tactics.
Replay the game quickly here:
Suggested short exercise: review the exchange sequence with an engine or on paper and check whether any alternative exchanges would improve your winning chances even faster.
Concerns from recent losses (pattern)
Several recent losses end very early (one resignation after just two moves). That suggests two things to fix immediately:
- Don’t resign extremely early — playing out short games gives experience against common responses, and many early “lost” positions are playable at your level.
- The opening 1.b3 (the Nimzowitsch–Larsen idea) requires a basic follow-up plan — if you play it, learn the standard replies and plans (see Nimzo-Larsen Attack). If you don’t want to study that line, choose a different first move and stick with it.
Actionable: before resigning, ask yourself two quick questions: “Is there a tactic for me?” and “Can I improve the worst-placed piece?” If the answer to both is maybe/yes, keep playing.
Patterns & strengths to keep building
- You win often with active piece play and by simplifying into tidy endgames — this is a real strength. Focus on converting similar simplified positions consistently.
- Your success with surprise or offbeat openings (e.g., some Scandinavian / Blackburne-style traps) shows you can leverage opponents’ mistakes. Keep using these selectively, but don’t rely on them exclusively.
- You tend to take control of central squares when you have the chance — continue to prioritize development and centralization in the opening.
Concrete next steps (what to practice this week)
- Tactics — 20 puzzles per day (focus: forks, pins and discovered attacks). Short, focused repetition beats random solving.
- Opening basics — pick 2 first-move options (one as White, one as Black). Learn the 5–7 typical moves and the main middlegame plans. If you play 1.b3, study the typical reply ...e5 and follow-ups; or switch to 1.e4/1.d4 for simpler theory.
- Endgames — review king + pawn vs king, basic rook endings, and simple knight vs pawn scenarios. Spend 15 minutes, three times this week, practicing one key endgame each session.
- Post-game review — after each daily game, spend 10 minutes: mark the turning point and find one move you could improve. If unsure, run one short engine check to confirm your idea.
Simple 4-week plan (easy to follow)
- Week 1: Tactics focus + openers — 20 puzzles/day, 3 short opening lessons (10–15 minutes each).
- Week 2: Endgames + review — practice 3 endgame positions, review 5 of your recent games and note recurring mistakes.
- Week 3: Play longer daily games and apply plans — try to never resign before move 10; annotate one game per week.
- Week 4: Consolidate — pick your best-performing opening from the month and create a 10-move cheat-sheet of typical plans and pawn structures.
Small, regular steps beat big, unfocused sessions. Aim for consistency: 20–30 minutes/day is enough to see steady progress.
Quick reminders & resources
- Before exchanging pieces, pause and ask: “Does this simplify into a winning endgame or into my opponent’s active play?”
- When you’re unsure in the opening, play simple developing moves (knight, bishop, castle) rather than trying to “trap” the opponent every game.
- Study recommendation: one model game per week where your chosen opening is played — learn the plan, not every move.
Want, I can: review a specific game in depth, create a 10-move opening cheat-sheet for your favorite first move, or build a 4-week tactics schedule tailored to your available time. Tell me which and I’ll prepare it.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pham Nam Quan | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| turkage | 3W / 5L / 0D | View |
| thenotoriousachen | 5W / 1L / 0D | View |
| bouquiner | 6W / 5L / 1D | View |
| Erekle Tabatadze | 5W / 5L / 0D | View |
| artfounder9 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| joyful_lead29 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| alonyoav | 11W / 7L / 1D | View |
| fiviter | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kheni19474 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| 🪳🪲Just a glamorous cockroach | 48W / 22L / 4D | View Games |
| xeyuz_chxss | 47W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| badluck_2012 | 16W / 25L / 3D | View Games |
| prodigy0002 | 33W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| Manu David | 7W / 24L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2807 | 2858 | 2168 | 1158 |
| 2024 | 2666 | 2716 | 1103 | |
| 2023 | 2514 | 2477 | 2172 | 1103 |
| 2022 | 2318 | 2418 | 2184 | 1122 |
| 2021 | 2284 | 2152 | 2218 | 1183 |
| 2020 | 2055 | 2006 | 2082 | 1394 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 424W / 374L / 59D | 400W / 395L / 54D | 83.5 |
| 2024 | 271W / 293L / 41D | 237W / 317L / 36D | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 209W / 244L / 31D | 189W / 268L / 30D | 77.3 |
| 2022 | 492W / 539L / 75D | 479W / 566L / 63D | 77.7 |
| 2021 | 318W / 218L / 34D | 283W / 233L / 31D | 77.5 |
| 2020 | 1045W / 637L / 94D | 990W / 690L / 102D | 72.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 371 | 170 | 185 | 16 | 45.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 186 | 97 | 82 | 7 | 52.1% |
| Australian Defense | 133 | 69 | 59 | 5 | 51.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 121 | 67 | 50 | 4 | 55.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 109 | 53 | 52 | 4 | 48.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 97 | 57 | 34 | 6 | 58.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 90 | 57 | 27 | 6 | 63.3% |
| Modern | 75 | 37 | 35 | 3 | 49.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 72 | 43 | 27 | 2 | 59.7% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 71 | 36 | 29 | 6 | 50.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 238 | 115 | 107 | 16 | 48.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 186 | 76 | 89 | 21 | 40.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 181 | 73 | 93 | 15 | 40.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 169 | 75 | 85 | 9 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 141 | 75 | 59 | 7 | 53.2% |
| Australian Defense | 131 | 68 | 57 | 6 | 51.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 130 | 57 | 68 | 5 | 43.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 127 | 62 | 57 | 8 | 48.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 126 | 74 | 47 | 5 | 58.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 120 | 54 | 55 | 11 | 45.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 54 | 26 | 23 | 5 | 48.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 43 | 28 | 13 | 2 | 65.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 38 | 22 | 13 | 3 | 57.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 31 | 25 | 5 | 1 | 80.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 29 | 8 | 18 | 3 | 27.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 29 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 65.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 26 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 65.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 25 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 64.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 22 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 59.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 21 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 38.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 30.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Australian Defense | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 47 | 0 |
| Losing | 28 | 2 |