Profile of Satria Wibowo
Satria Wibowo, also known by the handle saka2601, is a chess player whose career reads like an evolutionary tale of strategic adaptation. With a rapid, ever-changing style, Satria has ventured through the openings of chess theory like a biologist exploring a new ecosystem, discovering territory from the classic Kings Pawn Opening to the daring Nimzowitsch Defense.
His blitz record may resemble a hasty sprint—with a blazing start in rating yet a series of losses that suggest the need to adjust his metabolic rate on the chessboard. Meanwhile, in the realm of rapid play, Satria has shown resilience and adaptability reminiscent of nature’s best comeback stories. Having battled over 293 games in one rapid season and recording multiple wins against challenging opponents, he has proved that even when the odds are not solely in his favor, survival of the fittest—and the craftiest—prevails.
Much like the precision of genetic coding, his opening repertoire is a study in diversity: from the structured strategy of the Scandinavian Defense to the unpredictable twists of the Pirc Defense, every move is calculated for maximum effect. His statistics even reveal a curious win rate in the finer details: when his pieces are on the board, his tactical awareness shines with a 66.67% comeback rate and a near-perfect win rate in overcoming the setbacks of losing a piece.
Whether operating under the cool mid-day sun or the glittering lights of late-night tournaments—where win rates fluctuate as dynamically as day and night—Satria’s performance reflects both the grace of a seasoned predator and the experimental spirit of an evolutionary biologist. With an early resignation rate lower than expected and a flair for endgame precision, he is a master of turning setbacks into learning opportunities, much like a species evolving through adversity.
In summary, Satria Wibowo is not just a chess player; he is an ever-evolving strategist who continues to adapt his game with the ingenuity of nature itself. Eyes set on constant improvement, he is inspiring both on and off the board—a true testament to the art of chess and the science of survival.
Quick summary for satria wibowo (satria wibowo)
Nice grit in your rapid games — you play sharp, look for attacking chances, and you score with energetic sacrifices. Recent wins show you can convert complex positions into a mating net; recent losses show time management and some missed defensive resources are costing you. Below are clear, actionable steps to keep the strengths and fix the recurring leaks.
Examples (reviewable)
Study these two recent games to see the patterns I mention below.
- Win (you were Black, strong finishing promotion/mate):
- Loss (time losses and tactical swings — good review for defense/time):
What you're doing well
- Aggressive tactical sense — you spot Nxf7 and similar forks that destabilize the enemy king and open attackers.
- Conversion ability — when you win material you often follow up actively and look for mating patterns (good finishing technique in several wins).
- Opening choices that suit your style — lines like the French and Scandinavian show above-average results in your Openings Performance data. Keep using openings where you feel comfortable and score well.
- Resilience under sharp play — you don't shy away from complications and often create practical problems for your opponents.
Key areas to improve (highest impact)
- Time management: a clear pattern of games ending by flag (both wins and losses on time). With 10|0 rapid you must ration your clock — practise allocating time: 3–5 moves in the opening in 3–4 minutes, 15–25 minutes for middlegame planning and calculation, and save 1–2 minutes for endgame tactics. Consider adding a short increment control for practice.
- When to sacrifice vs when to consolidate: your attacking instincts are good, but some speculative wins cost you material parity or time when they fail. Before a sac, ask: “Do I have a concrete follow-up or just practical chances?” If not, improve calculation or postpone the sac.
- King safety and back-rank / passed-pawn awareness: games show both successes and a costly missed defense against pawn promotion threats. Always check for opposing passed pawns and whether your own king can be infiltrated on back ranks.
- Opening consistency: you have big variance across openings (very good in some, weak in others such as Caro-Kann/Australian). Narrow your main repertoire to 2–3 systems you study and practice; keep secondary lines for surprise only.
Concrete practice plan (next 2–6 weeks)
- Daily 15–20 minute tactics: focus on calculation depth, not speed. After solving, spend 1–2 minutes reviewing the key forcing moves and motifs you missed.
- 3× weekly 20–30 minute opening study sessions: pick 2 main openings you score best with (e.g., French Defense and Scandinavian Defense or your personal favorites) and learn one typical middlegame plan and 3 common tactical traps for each.
- Weekly rapid training block (5 games at 10|0) with a postmortem: after each game, mark one thing you did well and one mistake. If possible, use the first two losses/wins of each session as “teaching games” to analyze deeply.
- Clock drills: play 10 games with a 10|5 (10 minutes + 5 second increment) to build the habit of keeping some seconds per move — this reduces flag losses and helps calculation under pressure.
Quick tactical & positional checklist (use during games)
- Before each move: check for captures, checks, and threats (3-second rule).
- If you see a sacrifice, verify at least 2 defensive resources opponent can play and one forced continuation for you.
- Before trading into an endgame: ask “Is my king safer? Are there passed pawns? Do I lose time?”
- When opponent has a passed pawn, calculate promotion squares and whether you can blockade or force king to stop it.
Openings — how to prioritize
Your Openings Performance shows clear strengths (examples: French Defense, Barnes Defense, Czech Defense). Do this:
- Solidify the top 2 openings where your WinRate and comfort are highest — learn one basic pawn break and one typical tactical idea for each.
- Avoid frequent switching between many rare openings during a session — consistency reduces time lost in the opening and improves move recall.
- For weaker systems (Caro-Kann, Australian), either drop them or prepare one safe emergency line to get you to a playable middlegame.
Mini-postmortem homework (for the two example games)
- Win game: identify the exact sequence that created the passed pawn/promotion race; note three moves you (or the opponent) could have improved earlier to avoid the race or speed it up.
- Loss game: find the moment when time pressure started to dominate — could an early simplification or a quicker decision have conserved time? Mark one defensive resource you missed (king steps, interposition, or trade).
Next steps & target
Short term (2–4 weeks): reduce time losses and stick to 2 main openings; you should see the 1-month trend stop dropping (aim to recover the -23 loss). Mid term (3 months): stabilize calculation and gain +50–100 points by reducing tactical oversights and flag losses.
- Target checklist: fewer than 5% of your rated games lost on time; 60%+ conversion rate when you gain a clear material advantage.
If you want, I can
- Run a short annotated review of one specific game you choose (I can highlight 5 critical moments).
- Create a 4-week daily plan tailored to the openings you prefer.
- Give a checklist for time allocation per phase tailored to 10|0 and 10|5 controls.
Tell me which option you prefer and which game to analyze next (you can paste a game link or pick one from the examples above).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| moichoi1thang1nam1tuan | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| suychjs | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| fruitypuncho | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| pawn_frog | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| soldatkanak13 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| jiixei | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| xebec-rocks | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| kentoshia | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| bubukille | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| haisenatedd | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| dapenpler | 1W / 12L / 0D | View Games |
| Mbanana1 | 3W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| taweelski | 0W / 3L / 1D | View Games |
| jamzh | 1W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
| pabloaquino36 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 435 | |||
| 2023 | 279 | 560 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 248W / 263L / 28D | 253W / 251L / 31D | 65.3 |
| 2023 | 1W / 7L / 0D | 1W / 6L / 0D | 47.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 156 | 71 | 81 | 4 | 45.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 139 | 58 | 70 | 11 | 41.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 130 | 63 | 62 | 5 | 48.5% |
| French Defense | 124 | 64 | 54 | 6 | 51.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 69 | 37 | 28 | 4 | 53.6% |
| Czech Defense | 61 | 33 | 27 | 1 | 54.1% |
| Australian Defense | 43 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 39.5% |
| Bishop's Opening | 31 | 16 | 12 | 3 | 51.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 29 | 10 | 16 | 3 | 34.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 29 | 12 | 14 | 3 | 41.4% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 2 |