Sandromareco: A Chess Profile
Sandromareco is a dedicated and resilient chess competitor whose career has been marked by a steady rise in performance and a versatile style of play. Specializing in blitz chess, his journey began in 2014 with a respectable starting rating of 2283 and has since evolved into consistently fierce performances, reaching a peak of over 2900 in recent years. His rating progression from 2014 to 2024 shows his remarkable development, with notable triumphs in blitz formats and solid performances in rapid, daily, and bullet games.
Renowned for his aggressive approach in fast-paced blitz and rapid formats, Sandromareco is also distinguished by his deep understanding of the endgame; his high endgame frequency of 85.5% reflects an ability to convert small advantages into victories. His games are normally lengthy affairs, with an average of about 79 moves per win, demonstrating both strategic depth and endurance. Though he has faced losses and setbacks, his comeback rate is an amazing 92.9%, and he boasts an almost perfect win rate after trailing in material, a testament to his tactical awareness and resilience.
His opening repertoire is as diverse as it is effective. Sandromareco has scored absolute success in many niche variations ranging from the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack to several lines in the Sicilian Defense and Indian Game systems. In blitz encounters, his prepared choices and customized systems have frequently yielded a 100% win rate in select openings, linking his practical play with a solid theoretical foundation. He is also known to adjust his strategies adeptly, evidenced by a professional approach to time management and an ability to maintain composure even when confronted with pressure – his tilt factor is kept low at 7, and his psychological trends indicate a balanced mindset in rated games compared to casual matches.
Sandromareco’s career also includes distinguished streaks – his longest winning run of 34 games underlines his potential when everything comes together, even though his current winning streak has seen a reset. His performance metrics by day and hour of play reveal a player who continues to strive for consistency and excellence. Whether playing as White or Black, his win rates of 54% on White and 50% on Black show a well-rounded game.
Overall, Sandromareco embodies the modern chess player: a relentless student of the game, constantly refining his opening repertoire, tactical calculations, and endgame strategy. His steady rating improvement over the years and his impressive comeback abilities in critical situations make him a formidable opponent whose journeys across time reflect both his passion and commitment to chess excellence.
Quick summary
Solid results in recent blitz: clean conversion of a pawn-run into a queen and a textbook mating net, plus a technical win creating and queening a passed pawn. The loss was a time-forfeit in a complicated middlegame. Overall strength-adjusted win rate (~0.52) and long-term rating history show you’re performing at a very high level — focus areas are mainly time management in blitz and some concrete middlegame cleanups.
Games to review (quick links)
- Win vs basi1isk6 — clever queen/rook infiltration, promotion and mating net.
- Win vs Jan Vykouk — excellent king/knight activity, created a passed pawn and queened it (see replay below).
- Loss vs Lion-993 — flagged on the clock after getting into a messy middlegame with active enemy queen + rook. Time trouble was decisive.
Replay the promotion win (fast review):
What you did well
- Creating and converting passed pawns: your game vs Jan Vykouk shows excellent technique — you traded into a favorable endgame and pushed the passed pawn convincingly until promotion.
- Active piece play: you put rooks and queen on aggressive files and used infiltration (back-rank and seventh-rank ideas) to force decisive tactics.
- Tactical alertness under pressure: in the checkmate win vs basi1isk6 you spotted decisive tactics (queen/rook checks and mating patterns) and finished cleanly.
- Broad opening repertoire and practical results — your openings performance shows many lines with good win rates (e.g., Sicilian Closed, Modern, Nimzo-Larsen).
Where to improve (priority list)
- Time management in blitz: the loss vs Lion-993 ended on time. You repeatedly went to single-digit seconds in complex positions — that cost you the game despite a playable position. Practice decisions that simplify when the clock is low.
- Middlegame simplification plan: in Catalan/closed positions you sometimes get tangled in tactical complications. When equal-ish material and little time remains, aim to exchange into an endgame you know how to win or to simplify to reduce calculation load.
- Pre-move and move-selection discipline: when low on time avoid speculative long tactical lines unless you see them clearly. Favor safe, improving moves that reduce opponent counterplay.
- Specific tactical cleaning around queens/major pieces: a couple of games show near-misses where a deeper one- or two-move tactic would have improved evaluation earlier. Quick tactics training will sharpen this.
Concrete next steps (this week)
- Do 20 minutes/day of tactics puzzles with a 3–5 second recognition target — focus on motifs you miss in blitz (pins, back‑rank, queen forks).
- Play 10 games at 3+2 increment (not pure 3|0). The extra 2 seconds dramatically reduces flag losses and trains practical decision-making with increment.
- Pick one opening you want to tighten for blitz (example: Sicilian Defense: Closed or Catalan Opening) and make a one‑page cheat sheet of typical middlegame plans and one tactical motif to watch for in each line.
- Endgame drill: run 10 practice positions each day of king+pawn vs king and rook endgames where tempo and queening races matter — you convert passed pawns well, make it bulletproof.
Blitz-specific habits to adopt
- If clock <10s: switch to "practical moves" — improving a piece, simplifying, or creating a single threat — rather than searching for the perfect tactic.
- Use increment: when possible, play 3+2 or 5+3 in practice; you’ll learn to use the increment to “buy” one accurate move at critical moments.
- One-second rule for candidate moves: if you can’t calculate a forcing sequence in 3–4 seconds, play the safe, improving move.
- Pre‑game warmup: 5 tactical puzzles and one 5-minute game to get into rhythm before blitz sessions.
Opening notes from the recent games
- Against the Sicilian structures (B46 Taimanov lines in the first PGN) you handled central breaks and used a queenside pawn advance to generate counterplay — keep the plan of ...d5 / ...d4 ideas in your notes for these lines.
- In the Catalan/closed game that ended on time, you had dynamic chances after Bxf6 gxf6 and central pressure — prepare typical tactical responses to queen + rook activity so you don't need to spend huge amounts of time calculating them over the board. See your one‑page cheat sheet.
30‑day practice plan (compact)
- Days 1–10: Tactics 20 min/day + 3× 3+2 games. Focus: pattern recognition (forks, pins, back‑rank).
- Days 11–20: Endgames 15 min/day + opening review (one page) for one opening you play often. Play 5× 5+3 games.
- Days 21–30: Mixed — 10 tactical puzzles, 10 endgame drills, 5× 3+2 games. Track flag losses: aim to cut them by 75%.
Final notes & encouragement
You already have the technique and tactical sense to beat strong opponents — your conversion and queen/rook coordination are excellent. The fastest rating gains in blitz will come from shaving off flag losses and making quicker, practical decisions under time pressure. Small disciplined changes (increment practice, a one‑page opening plan, targeted tactics) will pay immediate dividends.
If you want, I can:
- Generate a 1-page cheat sheet for the Sicilian Closed and your Catalan lines.
- Create a targeted 14-day tactics set based on the motifs that cost you time in these games.
- Annotate one of these recent games move-by-move focusing on clock and decision moments (ideal for practice with increment).
Which of those would you like first?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| basi1isk6 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Edgar Karagyozian | 1W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Arif Abdul Hafiz | 2W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Jan Vykouk | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Lion-993 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| meandmybirdie | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| flowerboy814 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| roland_joseph_nakamura | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| NooMerccyy | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Giga Quparadze | 23W / 44L / 14D | View Games |
| Dariusz Swiercz | 25W / 20L / 10D | View Games |
| Sergey Zablotsky | 26W / 16L / 1D | View Games |
| Alexander Rustemov | 16W / 13L / 8D | View Games |
| Daniel Naroditsky | 11W / 19L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2894 | |||
| 2024 | 2903 | |||
| 2023 | 2885 | 2535 | ||
| 2022 | 2842 | 2616 | ||
| 2021 | 2749 | 2656 | ||
| 2020 | 2796 | 2629 | ||
| 2019 | 2365 | 2759 | 2796 | |
| 2018 | 2667 | 2649 | ||
| 2017 | 2623 | 2606 | ||
| 2016 | 1467 | |||
| 2015 | 1403 | |||
| 2014 | 2283 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4W / 3L / 1D | 4W / 3L / 1D | 78.1 |
| 2024 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 1D | 95.2 |
| 2023 | 46W / 38L / 13D | 43W / 44L / 11D | 82.6 |
| 2022 | 24W / 11L / 8D | 19W / 18L / 7D | 88.3 |
| 2021 | 15W / 16L / 8D | 14W / 19L / 9D | 81.3 |
| 2020 | 53W / 40L / 8D | 46W / 41L / 15D | 89.1 |
| 2019 | 179W / 137L / 34D | 174W / 149L / 31D | 85.8 |
| 2018 | 38W / 16L / 10D | 34W / 24L / 7D | 85.0 |
| 2017 | 85W / 42L / 18D | 80W / 40L / 24D | 82.8 |
| 2016 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 44.0 |
| 2015 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 58.5 |
| 2014 | 17W / 0L / 0D | 17W / 1L / 0D | 60.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 90 | 39 | 42 | 9 | 43.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 33 | 16 | 12 | 5 | 48.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 33 | 13 | 18 | 2 | 39.4% |
| Döry Defense | 30 | 19 | 6 | 5 | 63.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 29 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 58.6% |
| Modern | 29 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 62.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 29 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 62.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 28 | 13 | 12 | 3 | 46.4% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 28 | 10 | 15 | 3 | 35.7% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 27 | 13 | 11 | 3 | 48.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Catalan Opening | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 34 | 1 |
| Losing | 7 | 0 |