Vahap Sanal — The Grandmaster Extraordinaire
Meet Vahap Sanal, a chess Grandmaster who commands the board with the skill and cunning of a seasoned warrior—armed not with swords, but with pawns and queens. Known across the realms of bullet and blitz chess as SantoBlue, Vahap’s journey from a humble beginner in 2015 to a feared opponent barely a decade later is nothing short of epic.
Starting with a modest bullet rating of 1146, Vahap rocketed upwards, smashing through ceilings like a knight on a mission, peaking at a blistering 3022 at the height of his blitz wizardry. His games are a delightful cocktail of tactical awareness and psychological warfare, boasting a comeback rate over 91%—yes, he makes Houdini look like an amateur.
But don’t be fooled by the stats alone. Vahap’s style is a blend of marathon endgames (82.94% frequency)—because why settle for a quick knockout when you can stretch the suspense?—and an aggressive “never-say-die” attitude that results in nearly a 99% win rate even after losing a piece. Losing is not in this player’s vocabulary; more like “temporarily misplaced material.”
His longest winning streak soared to 18 games, which surely had opponents questioning if they were players or pawns in a grander plot. And while his current streak might be taking a breather, the chess world knows that a true Grandmaster’s fire never dims for long.
Opponents beware: Vahap’s win rates against some of the fiercest challengers swing wildly—from completely crushing specific rivals (100% wins over some) to occasionally tasting defeat. But whether friend or foe, everyone agrees he plays with unmatched passion and precision.
Off the board, Vahap might be plotting his next mind-bending combination or perhaps pondering the existential mystery of why pawns always seem to get stuck in the corners. On the board, he is a chess gladiator, tirelessly seeking the perfect move and the sweet satisfaction of checkmate.
If chess is a battlefield, Vahap Sanal is the fearless general who turns every game into an unforgettable saga. So, if you ever meet him online or over-the-board, get ready to witness a masterclass in resilience, strategy, and the occasional cheeky gambit.
Personalized Coaching Feedback for Vahap Sanal (SantoBlue)
1 · Big Picture
Your recent streak ({{last_30_games}} games) shows a healthy win rate and a willingness to enter sharp, double-edged positions. The diagram below suggests you score best during late-evening sessions, while early-morning games cost you points:
2 · What You’re Doing Well
- Opening Ambition. The Jaenisch Gambit (
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5) and early…h5/h4ideas in the Slav display confidence and often catch opponents unprepared. - Practical Endgame Technique. In your
win vs Sergey Grigoriants you nursed the
c-pawnfrom move 55 all the way to promotion while managing only seconds on the clock. - Conversion vs lower-rated. You generally secure the full point against opposition rated <2700, keeping your near its all-time high.
3 · Recurring Issues to Tackle
- Time-Pressure Quality Drops. Six of your last seven losses featured <10 seconds when the blunder occurred. Flagging improvements will translate directly into rating gains.
- Late-Middle-Game Pawn Blunders.
Example (loss vs waterfall055):
Both 29…Re7?and the follow-up allowedQxe7with an immediate collapse. Similar one-move tactics appear in three other recent defeats. - Handling Fixed Pawn Structures in the Slav.
When you play …
c6-c5too early (e.g. vs Jeffery Xiong), the resulting IQP leaves you with long-term weaknesses.
4 · Action Plan
- Clock Discipline Drill. For one week, play 20 blitz games where you must have >30 seconds entering move 20. Abort if you violate the rule. This conditions faster decision-making.
- Daily 10-minute Tactics Burst. Focus on motifs
involving
overloaded piecesandback-rank weaknesses. Your misses often fall into these categories. (Overloaded Piece, back-rank%20mate) - Slav Endgame Review. Build a mini-database of your last 15 Slav games that reached endgames. Annotate pawn–break decisions with “Would Stockfish still play …c6-c5 here?” Aim for one annotated game per day.
- Upgrade the Jaenisch Repertoire Sheet.
Top opponents now sidestep with
4.d3. Prepare a crisp plan (…fxe4, …Nf6, …d6), and add it to your notes.
5 · Positional Theme for the Week
“Good Knight vs Bad Bishop.” Several of your Italian and Petroff games reach structures where your knight dominates a locked bishop — yet you trade it too early. Study master examples (e.g. Carlsen–Aronian 2015) and try to maintain the knight until the queenside breaks open.
6 · Motivation Corner
You already compete toe-to-toe with 2700-level blitz players. Tightening the three focus areas above is realistically worth +60 Elo in the next quarter. Keep the fighting spirit — just add a few extra seconds on the clock and the points will follow.
“Play the position, not the clock — but make sure the clock never beats you.”
Good luck in your upcoming sessions! — Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Arif Abdul Hafiz | 15W / 6L / 0D | View |
| Amilal Munkhdalai | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| supermanaa | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| laijfer | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Maksym Dubnevych | 4W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Petros Trimitzios | 18W / 10L / 2D | View |
| FarewellToKings2112 | 1W / 3L / 2D | View |
| epjdcdu86 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| thunderbolt135 | 1W / 2L / 1D | View |
| AcceleratingWreckingBall | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Deniz Ozen | 244W / 177L / 48D | View Games |
| Burak Firat | 240W / 195L / 31D | View Games |
| Dmitrij Kollars | 165W / 193L / 44D | View Games |
| Nihal Sarin | 77W / 153L / 17D | View Games |
| Jose Martinez | 71W / 126L / 20D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2867 | 2984 | 2494 | |
| 2024 | 2935 | 2895 | 2510 | |
| 2023 | 2896 | 2872 | 2488 | |
| 2022 | 2937 | 2870 | 2551 | |
| 2021 | 2901 | 2886 | ||
| 2020 | 2884 | 2903 | 2540 | |
| 2019 | 2770 | 2859 | 2663 | |
| 2018 | 2671 | 2740 | ||
| 2017 | 2713 | 2585 | ||
| 2016 | 2569 | 1940 | ||
| 2015 | 2062 | 1809 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 394W / 279L / 67D | 360W / 313L / 70D | 93.6 |
| 2024 | 314W / 212L / 76D | 271W / 281L / 54D | 92.4 |
| 2023 | 448W / 329L / 84D | 394W / 354L / 84D | 92.5 |
| 2022 | 479W / 363L / 91D | 442W / 398L / 77D | 93.5 |
| 2021 | 594W / 488L / 96D | 510W / 564L / 101D | 92.8 |
| 2020 | 821W / 754L / 133D | 742W / 830L / 124D | 90.1 |
| 2019 | 1164W / 1025L / 188D | 1005W / 1204L / 175D | 87.6 |
| 2018 | 1000W / 925L / 126D | 886W / 1003L / 145D | 78.7 |
| 2017 | 296W / 215L / 38D | 264W / 263L / 25D | 79.3 |
| 2016 | 23W / 4L / 1D | 21W / 6L / 1D | 68.9 |
| 2015 | 11W / 2L / 0D | 8W / 4L / 0D | 61.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 624 | 317 | 259 | 48 | 50.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 498 | 262 | 186 | 50 | 52.6% |
| Czech Defense | 487 | 243 | 199 | 45 | 49.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 479 | 231 | 219 | 29 | 48.2% |
| Unknown | 422 | 202 | 220 | 0 | 47.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 388 | 182 | 171 | 35 | 46.9% |
| Modern | 371 | 165 | 169 | 37 | 44.5% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 360 | 179 | 143 | 38 | 49.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 352 | 160 | 165 | 27 | 45.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 328 | 145 | 150 | 33 | 44.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 202 | 97 | 93 | 12 | 48.0% |
| Australian Defense | 141 | 75 | 55 | 11 | 53.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 120 | 50 | 66 | 4 | 41.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 115 | 62 | 45 | 8 | 53.9% |
| King's Indian Attack | 108 | 49 | 51 | 8 | 45.4% |
| Modern | 98 | 40 | 51 | 7 | 40.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 95 | 46 | 44 | 5 | 48.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 86 | 37 | 45 | 4 | 43.0% |
| Czech Defense | 77 | 42 | 32 | 3 | 54.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 76 | 29 | 40 | 7 | 38.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 37.5% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 16.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 4 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |