SaulMN: The Blitz Battler
Meet SaulMN, a chess player whose favorite time control is Blitz—because why spend hours on one game when you can make 60 moves in less than 10 minutes and still call it a victory (or a learning experience)? Since his debut in 2015, Saul has maneuvered through thousands of games with the speed of a cheetah and the cunning of a fox, climbing up the rating charts to a peak Blitz rating of 2424 in September 2024.
Rating Rollercoaster
Starting humbly around 1000 in Blitz back in 2015, Saul didn’t let a few bumps (or a lot of bumps) on the road stop him. He steadily improved, gliding past 2200 by 2022 and cracking the 2300s by 2023. His Rapid and Bullet ratings tell a tale of versatility, hitting highs of 1609 and 2327 respectively—though Bullet seems to be the speed demon’s second favorite after Blitz.
Playing Style & Prowess
SaulMN is a strategist with patience: averaging about 73 moves per win and even more in losses, he’s not one for quick trades. In fact, he rarely resigns early (just 1.83%), choosing to soldier on in endgames—he spends about 80% of his games dancing through the final phase. His cleverness shines with a remarkable 85.21% comeback rate, meaning Saul rarely admits defeat without a fight.
The Opener’s Gambit
Ever mysterious yet effective, Saul’s top opening is named Top Secret—a fitting title for a player who often surprises his opponents. Among known openings, Saul favors the Indian Game Knights Variation and the Sicilian Defense Nyezhmetdinov Rossolimo Fianchetto Variation when precision is needed.
A Rival to Remember
He has a love-hate relationship with the chessboard, balancing 2581 wins vs 2469 losses in Blitz—and a nice collection of draws in the mix.
Recent Battles
In one of his latest victories, Saul clutched a win on time against bad1972 after maneuvering through a tense king and rook endgame—talk about nerves of steel! On the flip side, the recent bitter taste of defeat came from Wichol, showing that even greats have their days to learn from.
Peek at the latest victorious game in PGN format
[Event "Live Chess"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2025.05.15"]
[Round "-"]
[White "bad1972"]
[Black "SaulMN"]
[Result "0-1"]
[CurrentPosition "1R6/8/6p1/7p/5P1P/6P1/p5K1/r1k5 w - - 14 60"]
[Timezone "UTC"]
[ECO "A46"]
[ECOUrl "https://www.chess.com/openings/Indian-Game-Knights-Variation...4.Bg2-Be7-5.O-O-O-O-6.b3"]
[UTCDate "2025.05.15"]
[UTCTime "06:16:56"]
[WhiteElo "2177"]
[BlackElo "2218"]
[TimeControl "180"]
[Termination "SaulMN won on time"]
[StartTime "06:16:56"]
[EndDate "2025.05.15"]
[EndTime "06:23:13"]
1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. g3 Be7 4. Bg2 O-O 5. O-O d5 6. b3 c5 7. Bb2 b6 8. c4 Bb7
9. Ne5 Qc7 10. cxd5 exd5 11. Nc3 Rd8 12. e3 Nc6 13. Nxc6 Bxc6 14. Qd2 Rd7 15. Rfd1
Rad8 16. Rac1 Qb7 17. h4 h5 18. Bf3 g6 19. Kg2 Bf8 20. Ne2 Bg7 21. Nf4 Ne4 22. Bxe4
dxe4 23. Qc2 Bb5 24. d5 Bd3 25. Qd2 Bxb2 26. Qxb2 Qc7 27. Rd2 b5 28. Nxd3 exd3 29. e4
c4 30. bxc4 bxc4 31. Rxd3 Rc8 32. Rdc3 Qe5 33. Qe2 Rxd5 34. Rxc4 Rxc4 35. Qxc4 Rd4
36. Qc8+ Kg7 37. f3 Rd2+ 38. Kh3 Rxa2 39. Qc3 Qxc3 40. Rxc3 a5 41. Rc6 a4 42. Ra6 Kf8
43. f4 Ke7 44. e5 a3 45. Ra5 Ra1 46. Ra4 a2 47. Kh2 Ke6 48. Ra6+ Kf5 49. Ra5 Kg4 50. Ra3
Kf5 51. Kg2 f6 52. exf6 Kxf6 53. Ra5 Ke6 54. Ra6+ Kf5 55. Ra5+ Ke4 56. Ra4+ Kd3 57. Ra3+
Kc2 58. Ra8 Kb2 59. Rb8+ Kc1 0-1
In Summary
SaulMN is a fierce and consistent competitor whose chess journey is marked by resilience, strategic depth, and the love of the fast-paced thrill of Blitz chess. Whether he’s grinding through a skeletal endgame or blazing through opponents at lightning speed, Saul’s games are a testament to the art of balance between brain and speed.
Pro tip: If you want to catch him at his best, challenge SaulMN around 3 AM — that's reportedly his “best time of day to play,” perhaps fueled by coffee and midnight inspiration!
What went well in your recent blitz games
Your data shows you’ve had a strong and growing short-term uptick, with a +60 rating change over the last three months and a positive three-month trend. That suggests you’re identifying good plans and converting them into results when you play solidly. You also show solid performance with several straightforward openings, which helps you reach comfortable middlegames quickly.
- Opening choices that suit blitz well: you’re doing well with flexible, solid setups like the Reti Opening and Colle System. These tend to lead to clear middlegame plans without requiring heavy memorization, which is great for fast games.
- Consistent middlegame pressure when you stick to principled development: you tend to develop pieces smoothly and keep your pawn structure intact, which gives you chances to outplay opponents in the middle game.
- Ability to steer toward practical endgames: several lines show you carry your advantage into simplified positions where technique can decide the result.
What to watch and improve
- Longer-term consistency: the 6-month and 12-month trends are down, so focus on stabilizing performance across more games. Build routines that you can repeat in every blitz session to avoid dips after a few rough games.
- Blunder avoidance under time pressure: blitz magnifies small oversights. Before moving, do a quick check for tactical threats against you and look for simple forcing moves that improve your position rather than speculative complications.
- Endgame conversion: work on turning small material or activity advantages into clean wins. Practice rook endings and basic knight vs bishop/endgame patterns so you’re confident in tight finish scenarios.
- Avoid heavy theoretical lines in blitz: openings like the Sicilian and some heavily analyzed branches can flood your mental bandwidth. Lean into the openings that have shown stronger results for you (Reti, Colle, Slav, London variations) and keep your plans simple and practical.
Opening plan for blitz play
Your openings performance data suggests you thrive with flexible, solid systems. A focused blitz repertoire can help you reproduce the positives more often.
- Primary choices to lean on: Reti Opening and Colle System, which currently show strong win rates and straightforward middlegame plans. These keep the game in comfortable, practical territory.
- Reliable alternatives: Slav Defense and London System variants offer solid structures and manageable plans in blitz. They’re good backup options when you want to avoid heavy preparation.
- Tip for blitz: prioritize ease of use and clear middlegame ideas over deep theoretical lines. If you’re unsure, default to a solid, familiar plan rather than venturing into complex lines you haven’t practiced.
Strength-adjusted win rate insights
Your strength-adjusted win rate sits around 0.511, which is a solid baseline for blitz. With targeted improvements—especially in time management, consistent endgames, and selective opening choices—you can push this higher. Use this as a confidence gauge: small, repeatable improvements compound quickly in fast time controls.
Training plan for the next two weeks
- Daily tactics: 15 minutes of focused puzzles (forks, pins, double attacks, and pattern recognition) to keep your tactical instincts sharp for quick decisions.
- Opening practice: 2 short sessions per week reviewing your primary openings (Reti, Colle, Slav, and London variants) with 2-3 typical middlegame plans for each so you’re ready to execute quickly in blitz.
- Endgame mastery: 2 short endgame drills per week (rook endings, basic pawn endgames, and minor-piece endings) to improve your ability to convert advantages.
- Post-game reviews: after each blitz session, write a 1-2 sentence note on the decision that mattered most and one thing you’ll do differently next time.
- Time-management drills: in practice games, set a target to complete the early moves confidently within 2 minutes, then use the remaining time to refine the middlegame plan. In sessions, try to preserve a few seconds per move rather than rushing at any moment.
Next steps
Let’s reassess in two weeks. If you’d like, share a couple of your recent blitz games and I’ll tailor a precise, action-focused improvement plan around your actual positions and decision points.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mehdi_king | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bavitdaroyan13official | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Alexey Shelest | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| gdnchess2009 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ebilski0106 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| tacticaldeep | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| sanslimite | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| storm1304 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| u13065636607 | 4W / 3L / 0D | View |
| godly-eren | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Barbero | 4W / 40L / 0D | View Games |
| arnipro | 10W / 28L / 4D | View Games |
| horaciochesspro | 15W / 11L / 7D | View Games |
| gonzalez27 | 12W / 14L / 1D | View Games |
| Aleksandar Dovijanic | 10W / 15L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2448 | 2459 | 1507 | 1004 |
| 2024 | 1541 | 2360 | 1506 | 1705 |
| 2023 | 2278 | 2281 | 1506 | 1733 |
| 2022 | 1946 | 2186 | 1583 | 1728 |
| 2021 | 1903 | 2018 | 1609 | 1070 |
| 2020 | 1887 | 1869 | 1226 | 1809 |
| 2019 | 1174 | 1816 | 1700 | |
| 2018 | 1033 | 1514 | 1299 | 1390 |
| 2017 | 1112 | 1418 | 1293 | |
| 2016 | 1004 | 777 | ||
| 2015 | 1138 | 1003 | 1376 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 243W / 187L / 36D | 223W / 214L / 35D | 86.1 |
| 2024 | 160W / 132L / 27D | 157W / 137L / 25D | 84.2 |
| 2023 | 281W / 217L / 44D | 228W / 273L / 42D | 83.4 |
| 2022 | 169W / 129L / 28D | 155W / 139L / 17D | 80.6 |
| 2021 | 50W / 24L / 8D | 44W / 28L / 5D | 77.5 |
| 2020 | 51W / 74L / 4D | 53W / 74L / 6D | 70.8 |
| 2019 | 276W / 198L / 28D | 240W / 241L / 33D | 80.9 |
| 2018 | 334W / 270L / 28D | 290W / 337L / 29D | 78.5 |
| 2017 | 131W / 106L / 10D | 112W / 119L / 18D | 83.4 |
| 2016 | 78W / 69L / 10D | 77W / 63L / 9D | 62.5 |
| 2015 | 31W / 31L / 2D | 24W / 33L / 1D | 67.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 343 | 170 | 155 | 18 | 49.6% |
| Réti Opening | 253 | 136 | 101 | 16 | 53.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 218 | 124 | 81 | 13 | 56.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 183 | 88 | 89 | 6 | 48.1% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 175 | 90 | 76 | 9 | 51.4% |
| Slav Defense | 174 | 85 | 74 | 15 | 48.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 172 | 81 | 78 | 13 | 47.1% |
| Australian Defense | 167 | 75 | 81 | 11 | 44.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 155 | 82 | 63 | 10 | 52.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 147 | 60 | 73 | 14 | 40.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Réti Opening | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 75 | 44 | 26 | 5 | 58.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 64 | 37 | 22 | 5 | 57.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 41 | 18 | 19 | 4 | 43.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 40 | 18 | 19 | 3 | 45.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 37 | 19 | 16 | 2 | 51.4% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 34 | 19 | 13 | 2 | 55.9% |
| Döry Defense | 27 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 25 | 10 | 13 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 23 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 43.5% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 23 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 43.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 15 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 80.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Réti Opening | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 2 |
| Losing | 17 | 0 |