Lorenzo Marmo: The ScaccoMarble Maestro
Meet Lorenzo Marmo, affectionately known in the chess biosphere as ScaccoMarble, a player whose games are a symphony of biology-inspired strategy and relentless tactical maneuvers. With a rating history that ebbs and flows like the tides of evolution, Lorenzo has adapted and thrived across various formats including Blitz, Rapid, Daily, and Bullet.
Since his earliest recorded matches in 2021, where his blitz rating started at a sprightly 974 before evolving towards a more grounded 534 in 2025, Lorenzo has shown resilience akin to a cellular organism adjusting to its environment. His daily chess prowess peaks over 1100, hinting that patience and long-term growth are part of his game DNA.
Opening Moves: The Genetic Code of Lorenzo’s Playstyle
Lorenzo is no stranger to classic openings, exhibiting a fondness for the King's Pawn Opening variations, particularly the King's Knight Variation, boasting an impressive 51% win rate in blitz. Like DNA strands twisting in the nucleus of his strategy, he also weaves in defenses such as the Philidor and Petrov’s Defense, each a delicate balance between aggression and defense.
In Rapid and Daily formats, Lorenzo's win rates improve remarkably, suggesting that his strategic mutations favor slower-paced environments where he carefully cultivates an endgame frequency of over 72%. Much like a cell dividing with precision, his average moves per win hover around 65—proof that he’s not a rapid replicator but a thoughtful strategist.
Stats that Speak: More Than Just a Chess Player
- Comeback Rate: An astonishing 79.8%, meaning when he’s down a piece, Lorenzo’s tactical "genes" kick into overdrive with a 100% win rate after losing a piece.
- Longest Winning Streak: 9 games—he knows how to stick to a plan like DNA to the double helix!
- Playing Style: This strategist resigns early only 2.55% of the time, showing endurance that any biologist would admire in a survival specialist.
- Psychological Resilience: A tilt factor of 7 indicates he rarely lets frustration mutate his focus.
Peer Relationships and Rivalry Bio-Logs
Lorenzo has sparred extensively with numerous opponents, notably holding positive win rates over regular challengers like hankmadukas (68.75%) and angieirs (88.89%). His interactions show an evolutionary pattern of overcoming familiar threats while keeping his “gene pool” rich with diverse encounters.
When and How Lorenzo Evolves
Time and day analysis reveal that Lorenzo’s peak performance hours hit around 16:00 and 19:00, with win rates soaring past 60%—perhaps his internal circadian rhythm is synced for those prime-time moves! His Monday to Saturday game win rates exhibit a well-balanced “ecological niche” in the weekly chess ecosystem.
In a nutshell, Lorenzo Marmo is a delightful chess phenotype—ever-adapting, calculating, and surprising. Whether he’s engineering a clever opening or spiraling down to a crushing endgame, his bio-chess logbook is rich with triumphs, slight mutations, and above all, a passion for this cerebral sport that’s nothing short of evolutionary.
Quick summary
Lorenzo — nice work: your recent results show clear momentum (rating trend strong over 3–6 months) and you're converting winning chances cleanly in blitz. At the same time a few recurring tactical/king-safety mistakes are costing games. Below I’ve pulled practical, game-specific points and a short training plan you can apply immediately.
What you're doing well
- Active piece play and aggressive finishing — your wins show you spot mating nets and finish them cleanly (good pattern recognition when you’re attacking).
- Good conversion ability — when you get a material/positional edge you generally convert it instead of overcomplicating.
- Large practice volume — the number of games you play (and the positive long-term slope) is building practical experience faster than most players.
- Opening variety — you use a mix of sharp lines and gambits which keeps opponents guessing and creates practical chances (your strength-adjusted win rate ~0.50 is solid for such variety).
Recurring problems to fix (with examples)
Summary first, then examples you can replay:
- King safety breakdowns: In several losses you walked the king into danger (central king moves and premature king step-forward after the opponent opens files). Example: the game vs inmburu ended with a direct queen infiltration and mate — that sequence is a classic “leave the king in the center” trap. Rewatch this line to see how one pawn push and an exchanged piece let the queen and knight coordinate for mate.
- Weakening pawn moves around your king: Pushing the g- or h-pawns in front of your king in blitz without a concrete reason was punished in a couple of games — opponents opened lines and used the queen/rook battery. Before moving the pawn in front of your castled king, ask: “Does this create a hook / open file for their queen/rook?”
- Underestimating opponent counterplay on the queenside / center: In a win you converted nicely once the opponent’s king got trapped on the queenside; flip that idea — when you attack, always check for counterplay on the opposite wing or in the center (knight forks, checks, discovered checks).
- Occasional tactical oversight around checks and knight forks: A few losses feature a decisive knight jump or check that was overlooked. Solve puzzles that force you to count checks/captures/attacks before each move.
Concrete, short-term drills (30 minutes a day)
- 10–15 tactical puzzles (focus: back-rank mates, knight forks, discovered checks). Use a mix of 2–3 minute puzzles and 10–20 second bursts to simulate blitz pressure.
- 5 minutes: replay the loss vs inmburu and one loss vs itzhakswisa move-by-move without engine first. Ask: “What was my single worst move? Was my king safe?”
- 10 rapid games (5+3 or 10+0) in the next 48 hours — slower blitz helps correct recurring strategic errors without destroying your instincts.
- Back-rank drills: practice simple endgame positions with rook vs rook to internalize creating luft and keeping back-rank mates away.
Opening & repertoire advice
- Solidify one safe mainline for the side you prefer to keep the king safe in blitz. For example, review the fundamentals of the Philidor Defense and one anti-attacking setup — you play Philidor a lot, tighten the typical pawn breaks and where your king should sit.
- Practice one anti-gambit reply and one simple, low-risk variation you can play quickly under time pressure — this reduces blunders in the opening phase.
- When you choose sharp lines/gambits (like those you play often), memorize the critical 5–6 move patterns so you don’t drift into uncomfortable positions early on.
Time management and decision checklist (for blitz)
- First 10 moves: spend no more than 30–40 seconds on any non-critical move. Save time for tactics later.
- Before every move quickly run through: “Checks? Captures? Threats?” (3-second audit).
- If you plan to attack the king, confirm you are not creating a new mating net against your own king (look for open files to your king after pawn pushes).
- If you see a visible tactic for the opponent (knight jump, queen check), address it immediately even if it costs a tempo.
Longer-term training plan (4–6 weeks)
- Week 1–2: Tactics bulk (20 puzzles/day) + 10 rapid games/week + review losses within 24 hours.
- Week 3: Focused opening study — choose one Philidor line and one safe anti-gambit; learn typical piece placements and pawn breaks.
- Week 4–6: Endgame basics and practical conversion drills (king+pawn vs king, rook endgames, basic mating patterns). Continue puzzles and weekly rapid games to test improvements.
Short checklist to use after each game
- Identify 1 mistake that cost you the game (or 1 best move that won it) — write it down.
- Was the king safe at all times? If not, flag the move that created weakness.
- Check if you missed a simple tactic — how could you have seen it? (Hint: count checks/captures/attacks).
- Pick one opening or endgame theme from the game to study for 10 minutes.
Useful example games to replay
- Loss to inmburu — typical mating net after kingside weaknesses (replay the critical sequence above using the small viewer included).
- Loss to itzhakswisa — queen infiltration on the kingside; shows why removing defenders is dangerous in the opening.
- Win vs rashad250490 — good finish with queen infiltration (study how you increased piece activity and closed escape squares).
Final encouragement & next steps
Your recent rating slope and long-term trend show you're improving fast — keep the volume and pair it with these small, focused habits (tactics + king-safety checklist + 10 rapid games). I expect clear, measurable gains in 2–4 weeks if you follow the plan. If you want, I can prepare a 2-week puzzle set focused on back-rank and knight forks or annotate one of your losses move-by-move — tell me which game you prefer.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| asfunz | 5W / 1L / 0D | View |
| alehan23 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| narayanantr | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| jaironthekingdeadpool | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| tarshde | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| moonsone | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| st1nghh | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| wooooyaaaa | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| salutcestjoel | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bembem131 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| hankmadukas | 15W / 6L / 1D | View Games |
| stocasio97 | 13W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
| angieirs | 8W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| asfunz | 5W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| lorenzomento | 4W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 619 | 810 | 1014 | 1035 |
| 2024 | 672 | 569 | 539 | 1076 |
| 2022 | 627 | |||
| 2021 | 751 | 977 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1075W / 923L / 104D | 960W / 1027L / 91D | 71.7 |
| 2024 | 26W / 11L / 1D | 26W / 17L / 1D | 56.5 |
| 2022 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 11.0 |
| 2021 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 76.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 680 | 316 | 330 | 34 | 46.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 389 | 175 | 197 | 17 | 45.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 312 | 159 | 136 | 17 | 51.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 300 | 157 | 127 | 16 | 52.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 279 | 139 | 128 | 12 | 49.8% |
| Czech Defense | 247 | 105 | 130 | 12 | 42.5% |
| Elephant Gambit | 176 | 89 | 80 | 7 | 50.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 135 | 59 | 67 | 9 | 43.7% |
| Modern Defense | 121 | 56 | 60 | 5 | 46.3% |
| French Defense | 98 | 42 | 46 | 10 | 42.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 76 | 35 | 38 | 3 | 46.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 42 | 27 | 14 | 1 | 64.3% |
| Petrov's Defense | 30 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 26 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Czech Defense | 17 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Elephant Gambit | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 64.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 30.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Center Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 9 | 2 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |