Hugo Wernberg: The FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Known in the chess world by the enigmatic handle Schack-Hugo, Hugo Wernberg is a proudly titled FIDE Master, a badge of honor achieved by only the most dedicated of board warriors. Hugo’s journey began humbly, with bullet ratings wobbling below 1050 in 2013, but like a well-executed gambit, they quickly started outsmarting the clock and opponents alike.
Over the years, Hugo’s rating graph resembles a thrilling novella, full of dramatic ups and downs, intense battles, and delightful victories. With a current bullet peak rating soaring to a jaw-dropping 2748 as of June 2024, Schack-Hugo has firmly entrenched themselves among the lightning-fast tactical gladiators of the chess universe.
While their blitz gameplay peaked impressively at 2614, and rapid chess bested at 2284, Hugo’s daily chess peak at 1803 adds a touch of serenity to their blitzkrieg style. Not one to shy from risk, their opening repertoire includes secret weapons labeled simply as Top Secret — evidently because even the best databases are left scratching their heads.
Hugo’s style is equal parts patience and fury — with an average of about 67 moves per game, they relish both the long con and the sharp tactical skirmishes. A comeback artist with a 75% recovery rate after setbacks, this player knows how to tilt adversity on its head (though the titular tilt factor hovers modestly at 24, they are definitely no stranger to frustration).
When does Hugo perform best? Interestingly, their winning chances spike hilariously late at night — 2 AM is apparently the magic hour when the king moves with royal confidence and the pawns behave especially politely.
Recent Adventures on the Board
In an epic clash on June 3rd, 2025, Schack-Hugo outmaneuvered "christianallen359" in a stubborn battle lasting over 60 moves, winning on time after a crafty display in the Saragossa Opening. Previous days showcased brilliant checkmates using the Englund Gambit and the Colle System, proving that Hugo’s tactical prowess is as versatile as it is lethal.
Of course, not every duel ends in victory. Recently, Hugo tasted defeat in nail-biting encounters, including a tough loss against "Jpicks17" by clock, reminding us all even FIDE Masters have their off days — or perhaps those times the queen forgot her morning coffee.
With thousands of games played, over 9,000 wins across all formats, and an unyielding spirit, Hugo Wernberg continues to inspire with a blend of determination, wit, and a touch of chessboard wizardry. Whether you catch Schack-Hugo blazing through bullet time controls or calmly threading endings in daily games, this FIDE Master reminds the chess world: it's not just about the pieces on the board — it’s about the heart behind the player.
Positives from Your Recent Games
Hugo, your recent blitz games show some encouraging aspects of your play:
- Opening Preparation: You successfully played the Smith-Morra Gambit in your winning game, showing good understanding of aggressive openings that create imbalances early on.
- Active Piece Play: Throughout your winning game, you made effective use of piece activity, particularly using your bishop and queen to exert pressure on your opponent’s king side and critical squares.
- Time Management: You maintained a solid time advantage in your win, managing to put pressure on the opponent even as their clock dwindled, leading to a time victory.
- Adaptability: In some losses, you experimented with less common openings like the Saragossa Opening, showing willingness to diversify your repertoire.
Areas to Improve
To strengthen your blitz results and climb higher, focusing on these aspects will be helpful:
- Opening Consistency: Your win rate in various openings like the Sicilian Defense and Barnes Opening is below 40%. Consider focusing on a smaller set of openings and deeply learning common plans and traps to improve consistency.
- Endgame Awareness: Some losses and draws indicate missed tactical opportunities or vulnerabilities in the endgame. Practicing key endgame positions will help convert advantages and save difficult positions.
- Minimizing Blunders: Blitz is fast-paced but review your losses to identify any recurring tactical mistakes, especially involving piece coordination and king safety.
- Handling Pressure: Your recent rating shows a slight decline over 1, 3, and 6 months despite positive short-term slopes, which implies fluctuations in form. Training to maintain composure and clear thinking, especially in critical moments, is important.
Suggestions for Your Next Steps
- Deepen Opening Repertoire: Since your wins are strongest with gambit-style openings (e.g., Amar Gambit) where you maintain over 54% success, reinforce these lines. Study the typical middlegame ideas and common opponents’ responses.
- Tactical Training: Regular blitz tactics solving and reviewing your games for missed combinations can improve your sharpness and reduce errors under time pressure.
- Analyze Losses Thoroughly: Use your losses, such as those involving unfamiliar openings like the Saragossa Opening, as learning tools by exploring alternative moves or strategies that could have prevented defeat.
- Time Allocation Practice: Continue balancing quick moves with critical thinking on key positions to enhance your time management during blitz games.
Additional Resources
You can revisit your most recent winning game here for self-review: View your recent win.
Studying master games in your favorite openings, combined with practical blitz play and tactical exercises, will support your ongoing improvement.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| jayrx | 3W / 1L / 0D | View |
| rururkowiec | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Vermontien | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| just_bahodirovv | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Teodor-Cosmin Nedelcu | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Anselm Wagner | 27W / 37L / 3D | View Games |
| fredmorch | 53W / 11L / 2D | View Games |
| Alexander Tsarkov | 32W / 21L / 1D | View Games |
| cockroachdolly | 19W / 33L / 1D | View Games |
| arvin2005 | 21W / 23L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2680 | 2573 | 2232 | |
| 2024 | 2560 | 2478 | 2217 | |
| 2023 | 2543 | 2503 | 2201 | 1357 |
| 2022 | 2411 | 2292 | 1953 | 1212 |
| 2021 | 2291 | 2120 | 2063 | 1153 |
| 2020 | 2388 | 2174 | 2130 | 1774 |
| 2019 | 2011 | 1894 | 1747 | 1516 |
| 2018 | 1871 | 1866 | 1831 | 1605 |
| 2017 | 1776 | 1763 | 1758 | 1762 |
| 2016 | 1391 | 1625 | 1719 | 1689 |
| 2015 | 837 | 1157 | 1549 | 1418 |
| 2014 | 806 | 984 | 1427 | 1445 |
| 2013 | 685 | 631 | 1075 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1527W / 1198L / 84D | 1299W / 1312L / 105D | 39.3 |
| 2024 | 1024W / 765L / 114D | 937W / 835L / 109D | 76.1 |
| 2023 | 613W / 383L / 78D | 574W / 402L / 81D | 84.7 |
| 2022 | 515W / 405L / 47D | 466W / 419L / 54D | 82.5 |
| 2021 | 333W / 298L / 29D | 306W / 306L / 36D | 82.2 |
| 2020 | 229W / 210L / 49D | 207W / 240L / 34D | 91.5 |
| 2019 | 35W / 29L / 6D | 38W / 31L / 7D | 76.2 |
| 2018 | 239W / 221L / 30D | 254W / 204L / 25D | 73.4 |
| 2017 | 302W / 239L / 27D | 287W / 239L / 25D | 73.8 |
| 2016 | 313W / 195L / 32D | 288W / 228L / 31D | 69.4 |
| 2015 | 248W / 228L / 20D | 243W / 224L / 24D | 62.5 |
| 2014 | 204W / 408L / 14D | 209W / 406L / 10D | 60.2 |
| 2013 | 26W / 95L / 1D | 26W / 97L / 0D | 49.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1716 | 980 | 640 | 96 | 57.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 525 | 249 | 244 | 32 | 47.4% |
| Czech Defense | 490 | 264 | 197 | 29 | 53.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 403 | 220 | 154 | 29 | 54.6% |
| Australian Defense | 369 | 196 | 145 | 28 | 53.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 258 | 128 | 109 | 21 | 49.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 257 | 119 | 119 | 19 | 46.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 233 | 118 | 102 | 13 | 50.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 226 | 114 | 102 | 10 | 50.4% |
| Modern | 210 | 109 | 89 | 12 | 51.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3613 | 1783 | 1806 | 24 | 49.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 240 | 130 | 106 | 4 | 54.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 120 | 47 | 67 | 6 | 39.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 110 | 49 | 57 | 4 | 44.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 98 | 47 | 48 | 3 | 48.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 97 | 41 | 48 | 8 | 42.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 96 | 46 | 44 | 6 | 47.9% |
| French Defense | 92 | 40 | 48 | 4 | 43.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 89 | 39 | 48 | 2 | 43.8% |
| Czech Defense | 84 | 42 | 38 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 133 | 63 | 60 | 10 | 47.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 106 | 60 | 40 | 6 | 56.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 78 | 40 | 31 | 7 | 51.3% |
| Scotch Game | 78 | 35 | 37 | 6 | 44.9% |
| Philidor Defense | 73 | 41 | 30 | 2 | 56.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 50 | 23 | 25 | 2 | 46.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 48 | 24 | 22 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 46 | 23 | 22 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 44 | 26 | 15 | 3 | 59.1% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 40 | 21 | 18 | 1 | 52.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 49 | 0 |
| Losing | 24 | 1 |