Sepehr Sakhawaty - The Bullet Blaze
Meet Sepehr Sakhawaty, a formidable chess player whose bullet rating has soaring peaks and thrilling valleys, much like a rollercoaster designed by a grandmaster with a penchant for drama! With a peak bullet rating touching an impressive 2764 as of March 2025, Sepehr has proven to be a speed demon on the board, combining lightning-fast tactics with unexpected resilience.
Playing Style and Stats
Sepehr specializes in bullet chess, boasting over 10,000 games in the top-secret opening category alone. There’s no official “Top Secret” opening in real chess, but for Sepehr, it might as well be—it’s where the magic happens with a roughly 44% win rate. Other favorites include the nimble Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack and its various intriguing variations, where he holds win rates ranging from a modest 35% to a sweet 74% depending on the line—talk about a versatile repertoire!
Strengths and Quirks
- Endgame Wizardry: Sepehr loves the grind, with an endgame frequency of over 83%. Patience might not be his strong suit (we see those bullet games!), but when it comes to sealing the deal late, he’s no amateur.
- Comeback King: When the chips are down, don’t count him out! He has a fabulous 65.6% comeback rate, showing that losing a piece is just a minor hiccup on his road to victory.
- Tilt Factor: At 13, Sepehr’s tilt is just enough to remind us he’s human—beat him once and watch his mischievous determination light up the board!
- Sharp Timing: His best playtime seems to be around 8 AM, so if you want to catch him off guard, a midnight challenge might be your cheeky move.
Notable Matches and Moments
Among his vast sea of games, a recent heroic bullet win stands out: a nail-biting duel using the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack's Modern Variation where Sepehr outmaneuvered his opponent Nocturne59, skilfully juggling pieces until the clock ran out on the adversary. Unfortunately, even masters face setbacks, and losses like one to steohat show that nobody dares claim invincibility against Sepehr.
Playstyle Summary
Sepehr’s games average around 77 moves per victory and 88 per loss, indicating his love for strategic depth rather than the typical bullet blitzkrieg. He adopts both aggressive and positional ideas, frequently using the mysterious "Top Secret" openings to keep opponents guessing. With a balanced win rate as both White (~47%) and Black (~41%), plus an impressive ability to press on after setbacks, Sepehr embodies the spirit of a true chess gladiator.
Fun Fact:
Despite his bullet prowess, Sepehr also has a relatively low early resignation rate (~0.26), showing a fighting spirit that refuses to quit—even when the clock’s ticking like a Swiss watch.
Whether dodging checkmates or pushing pawns at lightning speed, Sepehr Sakhawaty continues to carve his name into the chess world - sometimes brash, always brilliant, and except on Sundays when his win rate dips just a little... but hey, who’s perfect?
Quick summary
Nice recent run — your rating trend is positive and your strength-adjusted win rate is ~51.5%. You show a strong feel for sharp blitz themes (opposite-side castling attacks, fast mates) and you get practical results from aggressive openings like the Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Scandinavian Defense. Below are concrete things to keep and things to improve, plus a short weekly practice plan.
What you're doing well
- Calculating forcing sequences quickly — you convert tactical opportunities decisively (example: the tiny game where White Qh5-Qxf7# — you take advantage of opponents' early mistakes).
- Choosing sharp, practical openings that create chances in blitz (good win rates with Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Scandinavian Defense).
- Attacking instinct in opposite-side castling games — you push pawns and bring rooks/queens to the enemy king swiftly (see the h-pawn storm and final Rh1# sequence in your latest win).
- Resilience — many wins come from practical pressure and playing for the win rather than passive draws.
Key areas to improve (and how)
- Time management / flag risk
- Problem: a recent loss / some wins were decided by clock — you sometimes get into long endgames with too little time.
- Fix: practice with increment (5+3 or 3+2) and force yourself to keep 10–15s buffer in complex positions. Train the habit: spend longer on critical decisions early, and switch to “one-look” moves for routine recaptures or simple developing moves.
- Tactical consistency
- Problem: you find tactics but occasional missed tactics cost games (especially when under time pressure).
- Fix: 15–25 minutes daily of mixed-tactic puzzles; focus on pattern repetition (pins, forks, double attacks, back-rank). Do sets of 20 puzzles with an accuracy target (e.g., 90%).
- Endgame technique
- Problem: long technical endgames and pawn races surface in your play — converting and defending under time pressure needs polish.
- Fix: drills: king & pawn vs king basics, Lucena and basic rook endgames, and simple queen vs rook checkmate knowledge. Spend 3–4 sessions a week (10–15 min) on these.
- Opening refinement (targeted)
- Keep and deepen the lines that work (Nimzo-Larsen, Scandinavian). You have good stats there — add 1–2 key theoretical moves and common tactical motifs to memory.
- Avoid or rework low-performing lines (e.g., Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation shows a low win rate). Either cut them from blitz repertoire or learn the critical reply ideas so you don't get surprised.
Short notes on the most recent games
-
Win (vs sojojoafg — Scandinavian-style game)
Good exploitation of opposite-side castling: you castled opposite, launched the h‑pawn and used piece activity to open lines. The finishing sequence (rook to h1 mate) is a classic blitz theme: advance pawns, open a file, and coordinate heavy pieces. Repeat this theme in training: practice attacking a castled king when files open on the flank.
Replay (key moves):
-
Quick win (as White — scholar-style)
You converted an opponent's early mistake (queen-side negligence) with precise tactics — good eye for fast wins. Be cautious: quick mates are great, but check for opponent traps when you grab material early.
-
Loss on time in a long game
Takeaway: you handled a complicated middlegame but the clock ran out. When the position becomes a long technical grind, simplify or start playing faster practical moves to avoid flagging.
Practical weekly blitz training plan (2–4 hours/week)
- Daily 15–25 min tactics (mixed motifs). Use timed sets and track accuracy.
- 2× per week: 30–40 min focused opening study — pick one main line (e.g., a specific Scandinavian reply or a Nimzo-Larsen plan) and learn 5 typical middlegame plans.
- 2× per week: 15 min endgame drills (rook + pawn, king + pawn races, basic mate patterns).
- 2× per week: 30–60 min rapid games (10+0 or 15+10), then 10–15 min review of mistakes — slower games improve calculation depth.
- After each blitz session: 10 minutes review — at least one critical mistake and one critical success to learn from.
Quick pre-move checklist (use in blitz)
- Any immediate captures or checks for both sides?
- Does my move leave a piece hanging or allow a tactic?
- Am I walking into a fork/pin/skewer?
- If the position is complex and my time is low, can I simplify safely?
Small adjustments that give big returns
- When you see opposite-side castling, prioritize pawn storms and piece activity over material grabs.
- Before each move under 10s, do a 3-second tactical scan (checks, captures, threats).
- Keep a short, well-practiced repertoire for blitz — less theory, more typical plans.
- Learn two clean endgame wins (rook+king vs king and king+pawn ladders) — these save many flagged or time-trouble games.
Follow up
If you'd like, I can:
- Make a 4-week personalized training schedule.
- Annotate one of the recent games move-by-move with a focus on decision points (pick which one: the Scandinavian win, the long loss on time, or the quick mate).
- Create a short tactics set tailored to the motifs you miss most.
Tell me which option you'd prefer or paste a game link and I’ll annotate it.
References / quick links
- Opponent pages: sojojoafg, kakashi16432, qaderi7
- Openings to review: Nimzo-Larsen Attack, Scandinavian Defense, consider avoiding Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation in blitz until you study it more.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| sojojoafg | 33W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| iliachess2007 | 11W / 79L / 3D | View Games |
| Krasimir Rusev | 15W / 34L / 3D | View Games |
| shirpov | 19W / 16L / 3D | View Games |
| sojojoafg | 33W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| Dr. Norbert Barth | 14W / 18L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2471 | 2400 | 2000 | |
| 2024 | 2565 | 2291 | ||
| 2023 | 2601 | 2305 | ||
| 2022 | 2232 | 2218 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 239W / 257L / 48D | 214W / 293L / 32D | 83.9 |
| 2024 | 600W / 669L / 101D | 556W / 727L / 78D | 85.1 |
| 2023 | 398W / 415L / 48D | 355W / 456L / 55D | 81.4 |
| 2022 | 92W / 106L / 11D | 89W / 110L / 14D | 82.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2393 | 1038 | 1190 | 165 | 43.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 876 | 332 | 496 | 48 | 37.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 773 | 338 | 394 | 41 | 43.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 441 | 170 | 245 | 26 | 38.5% |
| Australian Defense | 352 | 159 | 171 | 22 | 45.2% |
| English Opening | 87 | 33 | 44 | 10 | 37.9% |
| King's Indian Attack | 31 | 13 | 15 | 3 | 41.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 29 | 9 | 13 | 7 | 31.0% |
| Bird Opening | 21 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 52.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 35.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 164 | 84 | 67 | 13 | 51.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 112 | 53 | 50 | 9 | 47.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 80 | 43 | 33 | 4 | 53.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 63 | 33 | 26 | 4 | 52.4% |
| Australian Defense | 35 | 16 | 17 | 2 | 45.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 28 | 13 | 14 | 1 | 46.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 26 | 11 | 15 | 0 | 42.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 26 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 53.9% |
| French Defense | 22 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 14 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 4 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |