Sepehr "Seppppppy" Golsefidy — Quick Bio
Sepehr Golsefidy, often seen online as Seppppppy, is a National Master with a taste for fast, furious chess. Born to pester kings and queens at blitz time controls, Sepehr made his mark with relentless energy, an appetite for gambits, and a knack for turning chaotic middlegames into sweet victories (or dramatic comebacks).
Career Highlights
Sepehr rose through the ranks playing thousands of online games across Bullet, Blitz, Rapid and Daily. He earned the National Master title from National and became particularly feared in short time controls. Highlights include a string of peak performances in 2024–2025 and a Bullet peak that would make a stopwatch blush.
- Title: National Master (National)
- Preferred time control: Blitz — Sepehr is a true blitz specialist who thrives under the ticking clock.
- Known for: aggressive openings, resilient comebacks, and a high ComebackRate (yes, he fights back).
Playing Style & Personality
Sepehr blends practical tactics with psychological pressure. He plays quickly, trusts intuition in chaotic positions, and is not above a cheeky trap to unsettle opponents. Expect gambits, surprise lines, and a willingness to play sharp, double-edged positions rather than long technical endgames.
- Strengths: High ComebackRate, strong tactical awareness, comfortable in high-variance positions.
- Quirks: loves the Blackburne Shilling and other offbeat lines for the element of surprise — laughter optional, resignation sometimes early (but not always).
- Best time of day to face him: mornings around 09:00 — he’s often sharpest then.
Favorite Openings (Blitz-focused)
Sepehr's opening table reads like a daring menu for blitz players: familiar defenses mixed with spicy gambits and a few offbeat experiments. Below are the openings he leans on most when the clock is hungry.
- Unknown / Irregular (lots of creative sidelines)
- Caro-Kann Defense
- Amar Gambit
- Blackburne Shilling Gambit (yes, seriously)
- French Defense (Advance Variation)
- Sicilian Defense & Alapin
- Scandinavian and Barnes Defense for surprise value
Notable Opponents & Rivalries
Sepehr has faced a long list of frequent adversaries online. A few names crop up often — some cause him headaches, others inspire classic thrillers.
- chessplayer109485 — a marathon rivalry with many encounters
- rodgy — another regular with a rich history of decisive games
- yujiarun18, theitalianstallione, gol-dad — familiar names in his rotation
Memorable Blitz Moment (PGN)
Here’s a tiny, sharable illustration of Sepehr’s blitz taste — a compact tactical skirmish he might use as a training riff:
(Paste the PGN into a viewer to replay — the viewer will derive FEN from the moves.)
Statistics Snapshot & Placeholders
Sepehr's activity and style create a vivid statistical portrait — heavy blitz play, thousands of games, and a tendency to win more when playing against lower-rated opponents. Below are some live placeholders to enrich the profile.
- Peak Blitz rating (for quick reference): 2492 (2025-01-05)
- Peak Bullet rating: 2650 (2025-07-31)
- Rating history (Blitz 2018–2025):
Personal Notes & How to Find Him Online
Friendly, competitive, and prone to using a five‑p character username for emphasis — Sepehr goes by Seppppppy in some circles. If you want a fast, brutal lesson in handling chaos on the board, queue him for a blitz match. He may crack a joke, or he may crack your defense — sometimes both.
- Nickname: Seppppppy
- Approach: play energetically, avoid falling for cheap traps, and keep your clock running.
- Fun fact: his AvgMovesPerWin is unusually long for blitz — he grinds wins out of complicated positions.
Quick summary
Nice session — you won sharp tactical scraps and punished opponents' inaccuracies, but a few recurring issues cost you: time trouble, occasional missed defensive resources, and vulnerability to mating nets on the kingside. Below I highlight what you did well, common mistakes from the sample games, and a short, practical plan to improve your blitz results.
Games I looked at
- Win vs evil_doctor — key tactical strike with an advanced pawn capture and follow-up pressure. Replay:
- Win vs jsnagy — exploited central tactics and decisive queen activity.
- Loss vs elcano1522 — a mating-net occurred after you overextended and your opponent coordinated major pieces on your king.
- Loss (time) vs sayantan912 and another flagged loss — time management shows up as a pattern.
What you're doing well (keep doing this)
- Active tactical awareness — you spot forcing captures (the e-pawn → f6 ideas) and punish loose kings quickly.
- Piece activity — you often get rooks and queen into attacking squares instead of passive moves.
- Willing to simplify when it helps — you convert material/tactical edges rather than playing fancifully.
- Strong opening variety — your database shows you aren’t afraid to play offbeat lines and seize practical chances (this creates many opportunities in blitz).
Recurring mistakes & how they cost you
- Time trouble/flagging — several games ended on the clock. In blitz you won a lot by tactics, but losing on time erases the skill advantage. Fix: keep a small time buffer and simplify decisions in quieter positions.
- Underestimating opponent mating ideas — in the Benko/central game your king became exposed and opposing queen+rook coordinated for mate. Practice recognizing mating motifs (back-rank, mating nets around g2/g7, intercepted flight squares).
- Occasional overextension — tactical sacrifices without concrete follow-up can backfire if the opponent defends precisely. Before a sac, ask: “If they decline or counter, do I still have compensation?”
- Endgame technique — some close endgames (rook + pawns) were lost or flagged. A few basic endgame patterns would increase conversion rate.
Concrete improvements — Drill plan (daily / weekly)
- Daily (15–25 min): 12–15 tactics focusing on mating nets, forks, and queen/rook coordination. Speed up pattern recognition so you don’t spend clock time hunting moves.
- 3× per week (30–45 min): Fast endgame practice — rook + pawn basics, opposition, king activity, basic Lucena/Philidor ideas. Even 10 well-chosen endgames lift your conversion rate.
- 2× per week (20–30 min): Play 5+1 or 3+2 instead of 1|0 or pure 3|0 sessions. The increment reduces flag losses and lets you practice making good moves under a small constant time cost.
- Weekly (post-game): Do a quick post-mortem on your losses before using an engine — write down candidate moves you missed, then check with engine to correct thinking patterns. See Post-mortem.
- Openings: pick stable, low-memory lines against the most common responses you face. For example, shore up defenses vs Benko Gambit and common tactical traps so you don’t get surprised.
Concrete checklist to use during blitz games
- First 10 moves: use ~10–15 seconds per move to avoid falling into early time trouble.
- Before any pawn sac or tactical shot, check for the opponent’s strongest reply — 1 quick candidate move and 1 fast tactical refutation is often enough in blitz.
- When up material, swap pieces to simplify and avoid time-consuming complications — aim to trade into a won king-and-pawn or rook ending.
- Defend g2/g7 and back rank proactively: give your king a luft or keep a piece that guards the back rank.
Study resources & small goals (next 4 weeks)
- 30 tactics/day target for 4 weeks — measure accuracy, not speed, then compress time per tactic weekly.
- Study 10 classic mating patterns (Greek gift, back-rank, smothered mate, etc.) and test recognition in tactics.
- Master one defensive routine vs king-side attacks: if you see Nxg5/Nxh7 ideas, learn the prophylactic and counterplay patterns.
- Track progress: aim to reduce "lost on time" games by 50% next month — play more increment games and practice 5+1.
Short-term checklist before your next session
- Warm up with 5 tactical puzzles (mating nets) so your pattern recognition is primed.
- Play 15 minutes of 5+1 games — treat each one as training: focus on time distribution and conversion, not only wins.
- After the session, pick your worst loss, write 3 candidate moves you missed, then run an engine to see why.
Final note — momentum & mindset
Your Strength Adjusted Win Rate (~51%) and long-term rating history show you belong at a high level; small targeted changes in time management and defensive pattern recognition will convert many of those close losses into wins. Keep the aggressive instincts — just pair them with a slightly more conservative clock plan and sharper defensive pattern drills.
Placeholders for follow-up
- Want a detailed, move-by-move review of any single game above? Reply with which game (opponent name or PGN) and I’ll produce a short annotated line-by-line coach report.
- If you want I can generate a 4-week training calendar tailored to your calendar and preferred time per day.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| unknown-virus | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| yaroslav203 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| slovaklegend | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| elynn2h | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| aakashchhabra10 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mbakkor | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| unizighty | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| stormali | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| equilibrio5 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| bdima | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chessplayer109485 | 596W / 974L / 318D | View Games |
| rodgy | 523W / 378L / 41D | View Games |
| Avery Yu | 208W / 138L / 10D | View Games |
| theitalianstallione | 161W / 128L / 24D | View Games |
| gol-dad | 110W / 153L / 18D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2372 | 2416 | 2049 | 1325 |
| 2024 | 2363 | 2425 | 2039 | 1366 |
| 2023 | 2323 | 2259 | 2056 | 2056 |
| 2022 | 2166 | 2216 | 1963 | 1463 |
| 2021 | 2063 | 2152 | 1952 | 1409 |
| 2020 | 2013 | 2106 | 2031 | 1558 |
| 2019 | 1284 | 1815 | 1437 | 1084 |
| 2018 | 1067 | 1507 | 1420 | 1118 |
| 2017 | 1485 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1197W / 1272L / 107D | 1156W / 1280L / 129D | 71.6 |
| 2024 | 1333W / 1366L / 144D | 1266W / 1436L / 148D | 71.8 |
| 2023 | 691W / 601L / 66D | 688W / 634L / 74D | 69.7 |
| 2022 | 650W / 567L / 76D | 668W / 583L / 75D | 68.9 |
| 2021 | 1838W / 1792L / 328D | 1561W / 2043L / 323D | 64.4 |
| 2020 | 1231W / 953L / 112D | 1136W / 1092L / 92D | 59.2 |
| 2019 | 437W / 373L / 25D | 414W / 419L / 27D | 48.6 |
| 2018 | 317W / 245L / 15D | 262W / 305L / 15D | 45.7 |
| 2017 | 3W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 52.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1358 | 716 | 592 | 50 | 52.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 702 | 330 | 325 | 47 | 47.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 676 | 312 | 314 | 50 | 46.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 585 | 324 | 239 | 22 | 55.4% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 561 | 277 | 247 | 37 | 49.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 545 | 229 | 275 | 41 | 42.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 465 | 221 | 218 | 26 | 47.5% |
| Australian Defense | 382 | 175 | 182 | 25 | 45.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 380 | 180 | 175 | 25 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 359 | 154 | 180 | 25 | 42.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1279 | 572 | 648 | 59 | 44.7% |
| Australian Defense | 514 | 246 | 246 | 22 | 47.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 386 | 170 | 205 | 11 | 44.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 377 | 194 | 157 | 26 | 51.5% |
| French Defense | 364 | 183 | 163 | 18 | 50.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 343 | 174 | 158 | 11 | 50.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 327 | 167 | 149 | 11 | 51.1% |
| Modern | 272 | 130 | 132 | 10 | 47.8% |
| Czech Defense | 236 | 121 | 110 | 5 | 51.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 227 | 101 | 114 | 12 | 44.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 20 | 22 | 0 | 47.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 32 | 18 | 13 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 21 | 7 | 14 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 17 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 47.1% |
| Australian Defense | 16 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 31.2% |
| Unknown Opening* | 15 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 48 | 25 | 20 | 3 | 52.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 36 | 21 | 9 | 6 | 58.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 34 | 18 | 15 | 1 | 52.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 33 | 9 | 13 | 11 | 27.3% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 26 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 57.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 24 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 23 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 43.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 23 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 69.6% |
| French Defense | 22 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 40.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 21 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 47.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 28 | 1 |
| Losing | 29 | 0 |