Shamsiddin Vokhidov - Grandmaster Extraordinaire
Meet Shamsiddin Vokhidov, a chess Grandmaster whose skills on the 64 squares could make even Magnus Carlsen pause for thought. Known to the internet chess universe as Shield12, Shamsiddin is a formidable force with a rating that peeks beyond 3000 in blitz—a dazzling accomplishment few mortals achieve.
Career Highlights
Starting from humble blitz beginnings with ratings hovering around 1000 in early 2019, Shamsiddin’s meteoric rise was faster than a queen’s dash across the board. By mid-2024, the peak blitz rating hit an astonishing 3097, a testament to relentless study, tactical wizardry, and possibly a secret stash of magic coffee.
Not content with blitz dominance alone, Shield12's bullet play is no less terrifying, boasting a peak rating over 3026, while rapid games showcase a solid presence with peaks near 2700.
Playing Style & Strengths
Shamsiddin exhibits a deep tactical awareness, shrugging off setbacks with a comeback rate above 86%. The average moves per game clock in around 84, showing a penchant for methodical battles rather than quick-fire skirmishes. Blessed with an Early Resignation Rate under 2%, this Grandmaster rarely gives up—much like a chess-themed superhero who never yields.
White pieces love Shamsiddin, with a win rate north of 56%, while the Black pieces are handled with a tough-as-nails 51% win rate. And if you think luck might play a part, the Tilt Factor suggests Shamsiddin keeps cool under pressure most of the time.
Signature Openings and Secret Weapons
Among the labyrinth of opening theory, Shamsiddin favors some classified repertoire known as "Top Secret," which yields a win rate over 57% in blitz—allegedly guarded with laser tripwires. Classic lines like the Queens Gambit Declined and Caro Kann Defense also make an appearance with near-perfect results in games played.
Memorable Recent Battles
Recent victories have come with swift style and graceful resignations from opponents—for example, a recent crushing defeat delivered to "powerofapoint" after a strategically brutal English Opening. You can relive this masterpiece here. And while losses do happen (even superheroes have off days), Shamsiddin's resilience promises many thrilling comebacks yet to come.
The Human Behind The Moves
Behind the pieces, Shield12 is a blend of fierce competitor and cool calculator, often unleashing pawns and knights with the precision of a seasoned tactician. Whether grinding through 3000+ rated blitz arenas or outmaneuvering foes in rapid time controls, Shamsiddin's journey continues upward—where kings tremble and queens gleam.
In a world full of casual gamers and weekend warriors, Shamsiddin Vokhidov stands as a living proof that dedication, wit, and a killer instinct can turn a game of seemingly endless possibilities into a personal playground of genius.
Recent performance snapshot
You’ve had a win and two losses in your most recent rapid results. This pattern shows you can seize initiative and finish pressure-heavy positions, but there is also a need to tighten middle‑game decisions and improve conversion of small advantages into wins. The data also hints at some inconsistencies in how results are labeled in a few entries, so treat the three most recent games as one win and two losses for planning purposes.
- You demonstrated willingness to complicate positions and fight for activity in the middlegame during the win, which is a strong sign of resilience and calculation under pressure.
- In the losses, sharper tactical resources from your opponents challenged your structure and timing. This suggests a focus area on preventing over-extension and improving defensive resource management in open or dynamically balanced positions.
- Time management and maintaining a clear plan in the middlegame would help you convert promising positions into decisive results more consistently in rapid time controls.
For quick reference, you can review your latest games and look for recurring decision points where you spent time or where you missed a simpler line. shamsiddin_vokhidov
Openings performance at a glance
Your opening results show which lines tend to give you the most and least trouble. Here are the highlights based on the data:
- Strong performers:
- Four Knights Game: solid results with 63% wins, few losses, and many draws. This suggests you’re comfortable with flexible piece development and relatively safe, balanced structures.
- Caro-Kann Defense: excellent performance with a 75% win rate. This is a great solid option to add to your black repertoire, especially against 1.e4.
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation: 70% win rate, showing you can steer into calmer, positional lines against aggressive Sicilian setups.
- Areas to study and potentially adjust:
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense (20% win rate across the sample) indicates this line is challenging for you. Consider refining anti-Berlin plans or choosing different Black responses when facing 1.e4 e5.
- QGD: Ragozin (20% win rate) and Moscow Variation of the Sicilian (18%) show you’re sometimes outmatched in these open-structure, theory-heavy lines. Consider strengthening your knowledge and practice in these setups or choosing alternatives with clearer play for you.
- General caution with high-variance lines (e.g., certain Sicilian branches) where results are mixed. If you stay with these, pair them with a concise, worked-repertoire of standard middlegames and endgames to reduce risk.
Bottom line: lean into the Caro-Kann, Four Knights, and Alapin lines more often, and gradually broaden from there with a simple, well-studied plan. For deeper context, you can explore opening notes in your practice journal or a quick reference like: Four Knights Game
Rating trends and what they suggest
Your rating changes show a steady, if modest, upward trajectory over longer horizons, with a small short-term wobble. Specifically, you had small gains in the last month and three months, and a larger positive shift over six months. The data also includes two short-term slope values that appear inconsistent (one unusually large positive figure); this likely indicates a data entry or calculation quirk. Please re-check the six-month slope value to confirm there isn’t a labeling error.
- Short-term trend (1–3 months): small gains in rating but a negative slope readout in the numbers provided. This could reflect time pressure or occasional risky choices in rapid games.
- Medium-term trend (6 months): stronger overall improvement, but one data point looks suspicious (a very large slope). Treat this as likely a data issue and verify with your rating source.
- Longer-term trend (12 months): positive, suggesting sustained growth overall when you apply consistent effort over a year.
Actionable takeaway: keep a steady practice routine focused on consistent opening plans, calculation drills, and endgame technique. If you want to keep improving your rating more reliably in rapid, pair the openings that perform best with a simple, repeatable middlegame plan and a faster, safer way to simplify when ahead. See your profile for a continuous record and progress view: shamsiddin_vokhidov
Concrete steps to improve in the next 4 weeks
- Solidify your best openings: focus on Caro-Kann as Black, Four Knights as White, and Alapin against Sicilian. Build a short, two-line response plan for each to reduce decision fatigue in the first 10 moves.
- Daily calculation practice: 15–20 minutes of tactical puzzles tuned to typical middlegame patterns you encounter in rapid, followed by 15 minutes of slow, careful calculation from a known position.
- Endgame proficiency: spend 2–3 sessions per week on endgames that frequently arise from the openings you use most. Aim to convert even small advantages into a win with precise technique.
- Time management: in each game, aim to reach critical middlegame moments with at least 10–15 minutes on the clock by the 15th move. Practice prioritizing safe, forcing lines to avoid time trouble.
- Post-game review routine: quickly annotate each game after play, focusing on: the moment you chose a plan, key tactical moments, and whether you could have traded into a simpler endgame. Use this to adjust your next session’s study plan.
Optional practice aids you can try:
Notes and quick checks
Two quick checks you can do now to keep improving:
- Revisit the Berlin Defense results and extract a few reliable, practical lines that you understand deeply. Practice these in 10–15 minute sessions to build familiarity under time pressure.
- Reinforce the confident openings (Caro-Kann, Four Knights, Alapin) with a short repertoire sheet. Write down exact plan A and plan B for each and review it weekly.
If you’d like, I can generate a focused, four-week study plan tailored to your preferred openings and time controls. You can also view your ongoing progress on your profile: shamsiddin_vokhidov
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| eagle_2019 | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Shelev Oberoi | 4W / 5L / 1D | |
| Bharath Subramaniyam.H Harishankkar | 4W / 5L / 1D | |
| Ruslan Gadzhiev | 4W / 5L / 1D | |
| holden-caulfield | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| karlsbetter | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| Arman Mikaelyan | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| Hari Madhavan N B | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| VBBraining | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| highnessvictory | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Naroditsky | 32W / 61L / 15D | |
| Nihal Sarin | 25W / 65L / 15D | |
| Hikaru Nakamura | 11W / 70L / 7D | |
| Peter Michalik | 27W / 31L / 9D | |
| Eric Hansen | 18W / 31L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3017 | 3030 | 2634 | |
| 2024 | 2947 | 2990 | 2587 | |
| 2023 | 2906 | 2969 | 2597 | |
| 2022 | 2907 | 2931 | 2604 | |
| 2021 | 2892 | 2807 | 2489 | |
| 2020 | 2820 | 2855 | 2521 | |
| 2019 | 2590 | 2864 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 275W / 114L / 42D | 239W / 146L / 47D | 86.1 |
| 2024 | 248W / 119L / 53D | 232W / 135L / 58D | 85.7 |
| 2023 | 321W / 147L / 95D | 281W / 191L / 87D | 87.3 |
| 2022 | 289W / 131L / 48D | 259W / 152L / 52D | 89.6 |
| 2021 | 172W / 82L / 35D | 152W / 107L / 32D | 92.5 |
| 2020 | 362W / 223L / 91D | 340W / 237L / 89D | 91.4 |
| 2019 | 354W / 271L / 85D | 318W / 299L / 83D | 87.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 199 | 101 | 72 | 26 | 50.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 172 | 100 | 50 | 22 | 58.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 150 | 99 | 40 | 11 | 66.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 135 | 77 | 42 | 16 | 57.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 135 | 57 | 53 | 25 | 42.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 117 | 58 | 42 | 17 | 49.6% |
| Modern | 116 | 57 | 43 | 16 | 49.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 111 | 72 | 30 | 9 | 64.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 111 | 58 | 39 | 14 | 52.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 109 | 59 | 38 | 12 | 54.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 139 | 82 | 50 | 7 | 59.0% |
| Modern | 87 | 46 | 35 | 6 | 52.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 78 | 53 | 22 | 3 | 68.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 39 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 51.3% |
| King's Indian Attack | 36 | 24 | 8 | 4 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 34 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 55.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 31 | 15 | 12 | 4 | 48.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 30 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 28 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 60.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 24 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 20 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 20.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 19 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 63.2% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 15 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 20.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 45.5% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 11 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 18.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 70.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 30 | 2 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |