Seth Rose (sjhose)
Daring and resilient, Seth Rose has been happily entangled in the checkered battlefield since at least 2009, steadily making his mark across all time controls. Known online as "sjhose," this player’s journey is a blend of fierce determination and a charming penchant for late-game heroics.
With a peak blitz rating of an impressive 2496 achieved in April 2025, Seth has shown he’s no slouch in lightning-fast games. He also conquered the bullet format, peaking at 2310, and made reliable strides in rapid chess with a peak at 2364. Daily chess? He’s comfortably holding his own at a peak 1830.
While his preferred time control is blitz – where he's lured more than 52,000 battles – our guy does enjoy the rush of shorter formats and the strategic depth of slower games alike. His opening book favors the well-hidden mysteries of the Top Secret line in blitz, but he’s not afraid to bring out classics like the Queen's Gambit Declined or the Ruy Lopez when the situation turns serious.
Seth's games are known for their average length of around 75 moves, reflecting his persistent endgame prowess. Yes, this finisher loves an endgame - often nudging games towards the climax where the magic really happens! His resilience shines brightest here, boasting a remarkable 83.67% comeback rate after falling behind.
He's no stranger to the darker side of chess psychology, dealing with a manageable tilt factor of 16 – that's okay, even Magnus probably tilts occasionally – but he always tries to play his best around 11:00 AM, his statistically sweetest hour.
Seth's record reveals a vast array of opponents, but he particularly has a soft spot (or not) for those frequently faced like blksnakemoan007 with whom his battles tally up to 180 games, and jessefastenberg with about 159 intense encounters. If you ever meet him across the board, expect a challenging game – he’s as versatile as he is tenacious.
Notable Stats:
- Total blitz games: 52,000+
- Blitz win rate: ~49%
- Longest win streak: 21 games
- Longest losing streak: 16 games (because sometimes the chess gods say "not today")
- Avg first capture move: 6.4 (talk about patience before biting!)
Playing Style & Quirks
Seth is a practical tactician with a unique blend of risks and resilience. His style avoids the early surrender (hooray), resigning less than 1% of games prematurely, which means he fights to the last knight – or pawn! Also, his endgame frequency is nearly 80%, so expect slender advantage, long games, and gradual outplays.
As a master of comebacks, he's known to bounce back from a losing piece 46% of the time, showing that giving up isn't his style. His focus on time management is clear since he has won more than 8,000 games on timeout and resigned with honor in over 14,000 victories!
Recent Pokemons slain:
- A thrilling victory over gu_nogueira by timeout, with a strong Caro-Kann Defensive System setup.
- A sneaky checkmate against elokhammer with the Queen's Pawn Chigorin variation.
- A time-win last-minute clutch against r00kb0tt0m, proving that speed and strategy go hand in hand.
Keep an eye on "sjhose" at your next online tournament – he’s a fighter who respects the game and brings plenty of surprises to the table. Don’t be fooled by the rating peaks; this player’s spirit is what makes him truly grandmaster of his own epic saga.
What you’re doing well
You show solid basic development and steady piece activity across your daily games. When you land a good middlegame or find a tactical chance, you tend to coordinate your pieces well and create practical threats. You also demonstrate resilience in defense, keeping lines closed and looking for counterplay even in complex positions.
- Consistent piece development: you bring pieces into play efficiently in many openings, which helps you reach functional middlegames quickly.
- King safety and structure: you often complete your king’s safety plan early, which reduces early tactical risk.
- Pressure when the opportunity arises: you take chances when there are clear tactical or positional targets, which can tip the balance in your favor.
Key learning from your recent games
- Occasional overextension: at times, pushing pawn advances or committing to aggressive plans without sufficient support or a clear follow-up can give your opponent easy counterplay. Aim to build a concrete plan before committing to a break.
- Endgame clarity: in longer games, ensure you keep a simple, executable plan as pieces simplify. When ahead in material or activity, look for practical routes to convert your advantage rather than chasing flashy tactics.
- Time management in the opening: quick decisions in the early moves can leave you scrambling later. Develop a small, repeatable opening checklist to avoid wasted tempo.
Opening and move-choice improvements
- Solidify a few dependable opening setups: pick 2-3 lines you’re comfortable with and study typical middlegame plans for them. This helps you reach good middlegames more consistently and reduces uncertainty.
- Understand typical pawn structures: focus on recognizing the main pawn breaks and the best squares for your pieces in each structure. This improves your ability to decide when to open files or tighten the position.
- Prepare a simple move-order plan: know your first 6–8 moves well so you can avoid early awkward positions and keep your pieces harmonized.
Practical training plan to raise your game
- Daily tactics and pattern recognition: spend 15–20 minutes solving tactical puzzles that emphasize forks, pins, skewers, and discovered attacks. Focus on improving calculation speed and accuracy.
- Opening study with a purpose: each week pick two openings you want to improve. For each, write down the typical plan, key pawn breaks, and common middlegame motifs to watch for.
- Post-game analysis habit: after every game, review one mistake and one good decision. If possible, annotate the moment you chose a suboptimal plan and consider a better alternative.
- Time management drill: practice short, focused practice games with a strict time limit. After the game, note where clock management affected your decisions and set a one-sentence remedy for next time.
Next steps and quick activities
- Try a 2-ply opening forecast: before making the first 3 moves, name a likely plan (development, control of the center, king safety) and compare with what actually happened in the game to reinforce planning habits.
- Play one 15–minute game per day focusing on keeping a clear plan. After the game, write a brief note: “What was my plan? Did I follow it? If not, why?”
- Review your strongest recent game to identify the key decision that led to a favorable outcome, and extract a general principle you can reuse in future games.
Sample review snapshot
For quick reference, you can review your recent games in a readable format using the provided game records. If you want, I can generate a concise, plain-language summary of a specific game and highlight the turning points and suggested improvements. This helps you focus on concrete changes rather than abstract ideas.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3r1r1r3 | 3W / 1L / 1D | View |
| auonr | 3W / 5L / 1D | View |
| s2501 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chelo_1988 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| xenfon1 | 3W / 2L / 1D | View |
| yor_tactician | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| squareoverthere | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| danquigleyusa | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Wouter Bik | 4W / 5L / 1D | View |
| obewanknob | 3W / 3L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| blksnakemoan007 | 104W / 89L / 17D | View Games |
| jessefastenberg | 120W / 37L / 2D | View Games |
| merty-shango | 53W / 44L / 16D | View Games |
| lukemaster101 | 35W / 52L / 5D | View Games |
| thusspokezara | 77W / 12L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2212 | 2264 | 2420 | 1957 |
| 2024 | 2002 | 2240 | 2140 | 1768 |
| 2023 | 2203 | 2243 | 2088 | 1810 |
| 2022 | 2205 | 2215 | 2157 | 1779 |
| 2021 | 2063 | 2087 | 2072 | 1614 |
| 2020 | 2173 | 2037 | 1955 | 1543 |
| 2019 | 1732 | 1909 | 1529 | 1637 |
| 2018 | 1569 | 1901 | 1464 | 1682 |
| 2017 | 1454 | 1718 | 1371 | 1555 |
| 2016 | 1153 | 1524 | 1312 | 1464 |
| 2015 | 914 | |||
| 2014 | 1020 | |||
| 2013 | 952 | 1087 | ||
| 2012 | 973 | 1077 | 1096 | 1200 |
| 2011 | 900 | 878 | 1167 | |
| 2010 | 929 | 1105 | ||
| 2009 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 971W / 846L / 126D | 818W / 961L / 151D | 84.2 |
| 2024 | 647W / 576L / 83D | 522W / 702L / 88D | 82.5 |
| 2023 | 785W / 766L / 153D | 686W / 892L / 106D | 83.2 |
| 2022 | 2793W / 2448L / 371D | 2548W / 2676L / 381D | 81.9 |
| 2021 | 2882W / 2137L / 331D | 2576W / 2437L / 335D | 80.9 |
| 2020 | 1717W / 1390L / 183D | 1634W / 1479L / 196D | 80.6 |
| 2019 | 1856W / 1459L / 212D | 1693W / 1659L / 183D | 78.9 |
| 2018 | 1394W / 1068L / 102D | 1268W / 1199L / 109D | 75.7 |
| 2017 | 1008W / 813L / 88D | 936W / 885L / 88D | 74.4 |
| 2016 | 795W / 690L / 61D | 784W / 717L / 54D | 67.9 |
| 2015 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 0W / 2L / 0D | 53.0 |
| 2014 | 10W / 8L / 1D | 5W / 14L / 1D | 61.8 |
| 2013 | 99W / 86L / 3D | 81W / 99L / 5D | 59.8 |
| 2012 | 167W / 170L / 10D | 166W / 172L / 9D | 60.7 |
| 2011 | 8W / 14L / 0D | 4W / 15L / 1D | 52.5 |
| 2010 | 24W / 40L / 4D | 28W / 33L / 4D | 60.0 |
| 2009 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 3.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 3417 | 1984 | 1259 | 174 | 58.1% |
| Australian Defense | 2076 | 1045 | 908 | 123 | 50.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 1232 | 648 | 516 | 68 | 52.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1105 | 535 | 520 | 50 | 48.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1086 | 525 | 481 | 80 | 48.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1085 | 481 | 541 | 63 | 44.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 1060 | 483 | 503 | 74 | 45.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1048 | 478 | 492 | 78 | 45.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 987 | 472 | 453 | 62 | 47.8% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 948 | 494 | 401 | 53 | 52.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 275 | 168 | 98 | 9 | 61.1% |
| Australian Defense | 265 | 150 | 103 | 12 | 56.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 184 | 97 | 83 | 4 | 52.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 112 | 48 | 57 | 7 | 42.9% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 96 | 60 | 30 | 6 | 62.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 96 | 54 | 41 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 84 | 48 | 31 | 5 | 57.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 80 | 48 | 29 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 80 | 33 | 44 | 3 | 41.2% |
| Philidor Defense | 74 | 33 | 39 | 2 | 44.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 15 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 46.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 44.4% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 37 | 23 | 13 | 1 | 62.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 30 | 21 | 9 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 29 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 62.1% |
| Australian Defense | 24 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 79.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 20 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 20 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 45.0% |
| Slav Defense | 19 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 63.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 18 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 18 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 61.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 70.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 0 |
| Losing | 16 | 4 |