Alexandra Obolentseva, Woman Grandmaster
Alexandra Obolentseva is a titled chess player recognized by FIDE as a Woman Grandmaster, proving she’s not just a queen on the board but a true ruler of the 64 squares! Born to outwit and outlast, Alexandra’s playing style is as dynamic as a cell in mitosis—constantly evolving and dividing her opponents’ defenses.
Career Highlights & Rating Evolution
With a blitz rating soaring to an electrifying 2,783 in 2024, Alexandra's speed and precision make her a formidable predator in rapid-fire chess battles. Her bullet rating also climbs like a neuron firing signals, reaching 2,722 at her peak, showcasing her lightning-fast reflexes and tactical awareness.
Playing Style & Strategy
Alexandra’s games often stretch to an average of nearly 80 moves per win or loss, revealing stamina and resilience reminiscent of an evolutionary endurance test. Her endgame frequency is around 82%, proving she's comfortable in the biological battlefield of the late game, where patience and precision split winners from the rest.
Her comeback rate is a staggering 91%, and she wins nearly every game (99.7%) after losing a piece—talk about cellular regeneration in action! Basically, if she loses a knight or a bishop, she just mutations her way to victory.
A Record of Dominance
Accumulating over 1,000 wins in blitz and nearly 1,800 wins in bullet, Alexandra's chess prowess could rival the complexity of brain synapses firing during a grandmaster's brilliant tactical combinations.
Quirks & Fun Facts
- Longest winning streak: 24 games – she really knows how to replicate success!
- Resignation rate is a mere 0.54%, hinting she’s as stubborn as a mitochondrion refusing to surrender energy.
- Tilts only 14% of the time, which is impressive self-regulation in the chaotic environment of competitive chess.
Off the board, Alexandra might be just as fascinating, but when the game starts, she’s all about lethal precision — a true chess cell that divides, conquers, and rules the battleground.
Hi Alexandra!
You continue to play bold, creative chess that is great fun to watch. Below is a summary of what is already working well, followed by a focused improvement plan that should convert a few recent near-misses into full points.
What is working
- Dynamic opening choices. Your Benoni/Benko structures with Black and the early f-pawn pushes with White regularly give you the initiative and unbalanced positions you enjoy.
- Tactical alertness. Games such as the miniature versus Sambit Panda show that you rarely miss a concrete shot once the position opens.
- Good conversion once ahead. When you reach a technical phase with a clear extra pawn or exchange (e.g. vs deniss_dunaveckis), you generally finish cleanly.
Growth opportunities
- King safety in gambit lines.
• Loss to BATEK_HA_TPAKTOPE (Budapest Gambit) started with natural moves but left your king on the e-file too long.
• In several Najdorf games the h-pawn rush (h4–h5 vs you) caught you with an uncastled king.
➜ Add 10-15 mins of concrete engine checking to each new gambit line you adopt and rehearse “safe squares” for the king. - Handling sterile positions. In the draw-ish Semi-Slav structures you sometimes expend two tempi with rook shuffles (Ra8-a5, …Rc5-c4-c5) that give the opponent counterplay. ➜ Create a “boring but good” sub-repertoire (e.g. solid …c6-d5 Slav, or Najdorf …e6 Scheveningen) to switch into when you only need half a point.
- Late-game precision. Both defeats against Oskar Wieczorek showed promising middlegame play but slipped in queen & rook endgames (missed perpetuals, underpromotion tricks). ➜ Daily 10-move visualization drill + 3 practical rook-endgame studies will tighten this phase quickly.
- Clock management.
Your average time used per move drops from ~4 sec in moves 1-15 to <2 sec after move 25, regardless of complexity. Several lost games ended with <5 sec while still objectively equal.
➜ During practice, force yourself to spend at least 20 sec once per game on a critical move (set a buzzer if needed). Better early investment will pay for itself later.
Opening snapshot
| Colour | Main Systems | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| White | 1.d4 & 3.f4/4.f4 ideas | Prepare a quieter “positional squeeze” line (e.g. Catalan or London) for must-win vs lower opposition. |
| Black vs 1.e4 | Sicilian Najdorf/Scheveningen mix | Add a crisp reply to early h4/g4 (6.h4, 7.g4). The modern …h5 antidote fits your style. |
| Black vs 1.d4 | Benoni / Benko | Round out with a rock-solid Slav to keep opponents guessing. |
Training plan (6-week micro-cycle)
- Monday, Wednesday, Friday – Tactical sprint
• 15 Puzzle Rush survival
• 3 engine-checked blunder checks from your last session - Tuesday – Endgame lab
• 30 min rook-and-pawn practical positions
• Play one 10+5 game starting from a level endgame. - Thursday – Opening polish
• Update PGN file with engine notes on new lines faced
• Flash-card key positions in your Benoni/Najdorf repertoire. - Weekend – Review & rest
• Annotate one win + one loss without an engine first
• 15 min physical activity (helps alertness for long sessions).
Progress tracker
Use the live widgets below to spot streaks and fatigue periods:
Quick stats
Peak Blitz: 2783 (2024-05-26) • Peak Bullet: 2775 (2023-08-25)
Final thoughts
You are already performing at an elite level. Tightening king safety in sharp openings and adopting a calmer back-up repertoire will add the extra stability needed for title-norm runs. Keep enjoying the game and let’s touch base in a month to measure the impact.
Good luck and good skill!
Your Chess Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Anis Achour | 106W / 119L / 39D | |
| Валерий Свиридов | 7W / 77L / 8D | |
| Play_Late_No_Sleep | 12W / 43L / 13D | |
| amimak | 63W / 1L / 2D | |
| Gokul | 33W / 24L / 9D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2747 | |||
| 2024 | 2722 | 2747 | ||
| 2023 | 2709 | 2713 | ||
| 2022 | 2566 | 2557 | ||
| 2021 | 2705 | 2562 | 2406 | |
| 2020 | 2284 | 2484 | 1919 | |
| 2019 | 2284 | 2518 | ||
| 2018 | 1719 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3W / 0L / 0D | 3W / 0L / 0D | 50.8 |
| 2024 | 24W / 17L / 5D | 20W / 23L / 2D | 92.3 |
| 2023 | 20W / 16L / 7D | 20W / 18L / 6D | 92.6 |
| 2022 | 427W / 379L / 70D | 384W / 406L / 85D | 87.1 |
| 2021 | 981W / 811L / 152D | 893W / 879L / 164D | 79.7 |
| 2020 | 6W / 2L / 2D | 5W / 3L / 2D | 95.0 |
| 2019 | 43W / 21L / 6D | 42W / 21L / 6D | 83.4 |
| 2018 | 6W / 11L / 1D | 9W / 7L / 1D | 63.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 84 | 44 | 30 | 10 | 52.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 77 | 43 | 29 | 5 | 55.8% |
| East Indian Defense | 74 | 28 | 37 | 9 | 37.8% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 69 | 38 | 28 | 3 | 55.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 67 | 40 | 24 | 3 | 59.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 67 | 33 | 25 | 9 | 49.2% |
| Australian Defense | 62 | 36 | 18 | 8 | 58.1% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 46 | 16 | 27 | 3 | 34.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 43 | 19 | 19 | 5 | 44.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 40 | 30 | 6 | 4 | 75.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 286 | 136 | 137 | 13 | 47.5% |
| Australian Defense | 205 | 94 | 95 | 16 | 45.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 188 | 70 | 98 | 20 | 37.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 184 | 89 | 82 | 13 | 48.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 117 | 49 | 61 | 7 | 41.9% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 99 | 56 | 37 | 6 | 56.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 88 | 28 | 50 | 10 | 31.8% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 84 | 41 | 36 | 7 | 48.8% |
| King's Indian Attack | 80 | 36 | 41 | 3 | 45.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 77 | 35 | 35 | 7 | 45.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Scheveningen Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Double Fianchetto | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense Accepted | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 24 | 6 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |