SmokeDream: The Phantom of the Chessboard
In the vast ecosystem of online chess, SmokeDream is a unique species—a player whose tactical DNA reads like a gripping genetic sequence of resilience, strategy, and occasional mild chaos.
Evolutionary Journey
Since emerging in 2020, SmokeDream has journeyed through fascinating rating habitats: peaking at a rapid metabolism-fueled 834 in Rapid chess, and hunting down victories with an average Bullet rating oscillating around the mid-400s to 500s in recent years. Their chess life cycle shows a commendable persistence, evolving from humble beginnings to holding a solid standing in Blitz and Rapid formats.
Opening Repertoire - The DNA of Strategy
Like a cunning fox navigating its forest of moves, SmokeDream favors the King's Pawn openings, with a particular knack for the Leonardis Variation—demonstrating a win rate climbing up to an infectious 62.5% in Bullet games. Queens Pawn openings also spark delight in their play, boasting nearly 62% success, proving that SmokeDream’s gambits are anything but extinct.
Yet beware the Englund Gambit! While it appears in their toolkit, SmokeDream's performance suggests it’s a rare mutation—winning only about a third of the time, a clear sign that this gambit is best reserved for curious evolutionary experiments.
Playing Style: Adaptive & Persistent
This player has a comeback rate of over 54%, akin to a phoenix rising from the ashes or a bacteria dodging antibiotics. Even more impressive, when a piece is lost, a perfect 100% win rate follows, signaling a survival instinct that biology textbooks would envy!
Though early resignations happen (~9.4%), SmokeDream’s endgame frequency (43.7%) and an average of about 45 moves per win reveal a patient strategist, capable of stretching battles longer than a sea cucumber’s nap.
Behavioral Traits & Psychological Profile
SmokeDream exhibits a modest tilt factor of 11, suggesting emotional spikes sharper than a Venus flytrap’s snap but nothing a steady mindset can’t contain. However, they face a usual predator’s dilemma: rated games come with a bit less pollen—showing about 12% fewer wins compared to casual matches.
Time-wise, moves during afternoon hours (particularly 14:00-16:00) tend to photosynthesize their best results, with win rates soaring as high as 66.7%—clearly their prime hunting and mating times on the 64-cell savannah.
Rivals and Conquests
SmokeDream’s natural predators and prey vary wildly, but some notable prey include opponents like “kingjulianthethirdjr,” who’s been checkmated in a 100% success spree, while others pose formidable challenges. Their longest victory streak spans a regal 12 wins, akin to a well-timed seasonal bloom.
The Final Move
Whether striking like a lumbering walrus or scheming like a crafty octopus, SmokeDream’s style blends persistence, occasional eccentric gambits, and a touch of wild unpredictability. A player to watch in the online biosphere of chess, SmokeDream's journey reminds us all: even the faintest smoke can spark a dream.
Quick summary
Nice win vs murf743 — you found a decisive queen infiltration and finished with a clean mating idea. Recent losses show a repeating theme: kingside weakening and early queen outings that opponents punish with tactical replies. Below are concrete, practical things to keep doing and a focused plan to stop the same mistakes repeating.
What you did well (in the win)
- You opened lines and kept pieces active — the rooks and queen coordinated quickly to exploit the weakened back rank and the enemy king escape squares.
- You recognised the tactical target: after forcing an exchange on f6 you used the queen to invade and then h8 for mate — good pattern recognition for mating nets.
- You completed development and used a rook to control the central file before launching the decisive tactic — tidy, efficient play.
- Good composure in the middlegame: you didn’t panic and converted the initiative into a concrete mate.
Replay the finishing sequence:
Recurring problems to fix
- King safety: you often push f- and g-pawns early (g4, f4, f3) before castling. That opens fatal diagonals and allows opponent checks like Qf2 / Qf2# or bishop/knight forks. Try not to weaken the pawn shield before your king is safe.
- Queen sorties too early: bringing the queen out on move 2–4 (Qf3/Qh5/Qe4) invites tempo-gaining attacks and tactical replies. Develop minors (knights, bishops) first; then bring the queen when it has safe squares.
- Ignoring tactical replies: in several losses the opponent punished with simple tactical moves (Nd4, Bh3, ...). Before each pawn push or queen move, scan for immediate checks, captures and threats — “CCP”: checks, captures, threats.
- Vulnerable back rank / uncastled king: sometimes you lose control of escape squares. After trading pieces, ask: can my king get mated on the back rank? Create luft or avoid unnecessary piece trades until the king is safe.
Concrete drills (do these this week)
- 20–30 tactics puzzles daily focused on mates and forks — prioritize patterns like Qf2 mate, back-rank mates and knight/queen forks. Even 10 minutes a day helps pattern memory.
- Play 5 rapid games where your only goal is safe development: no pawn moves in front of your king until you’ve castled. Review those games and note where you were tempted to push.
- Practice "checks, captures, threats" habit: before you make a move, spend 3–5 seconds scanning the board for opponent tactics. Make it a checklist until it becomes automatic.
- Study one line of Bishop's Opening (or the lines you face most). Learn the typical responses and basic traps—your Bishop’s Opening games show a lot of early tactical finishes against you; learning a safe setup will reduce quick losses.
Opening notes (practical)
- Your win came from a Vienna-style centre and quick mobilization — that's a good fit for your attacking instincts. Consider practicing a few main-line plans from the Vienna Game so you arrive at middlegames you recognise.
- The Bishop's Opening has hurt you lately. Either (A) choose a simpler, safer system against it (develop knights and keep the pawn shield intact), or (B) learn a short 5–10 move repertoire so you don't drift into unfamiliar tactical waters early.
Short notes on the recent games
- Win vs murf743 — strong finish after exchange on f6 and queen invasion. Good conversion.
- Loss vs bolu5090 — early g4 and Qf3 allowed tactical replies and a fast kingside collapse. Avoid launching pawns before castling.
- Loss vs keerthi21_b — similar pattern: f- and g-pawn pushes created fatal diagonal and the opponent delivered a quick mate. Same remedy: castle early and be careful with pawn storms when the king is still in the center.
- Loss vs as27patel and sidag99 — there are a couple of games where central tension and piece activity favored your opponent; focus on piece coordination and watch for tactics around the centre.
Plan for your next 30 games
- Games 1–10: "safe development" experiment — avoid early f/g pawn pushes and queen sorties; force yourself to castle before pawn storms.
- Games 11–20: mix in a prepared line from the Vienna or a solid reply vs Bishop’s Opening; study 5 model games in that line.
- All the time: 10–15 minutes daily tactics (mates, forks, back-rank) and quick post-mortem for every loss — write down the turning move.
Final tips
- Before any pawn push in front of your king ask: "Does this create checks, weak squares, or diagonals to my king?" If yes, postpone.
- When you see Qf2/Qf3 ideas from either side, always check for back-rank and diagonal mates first.
- Small habits win games: a quick 5-second tactical scan before moving reduces most "surprise" mates.
If you want, I can: (A) annotate one of the losses move-by-move, (B) build a 10-move Bishop’s Opening cheat-sheet for you, or (C) generate a 2-week tactic plan. Which would you prefer?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| staprer | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| skateorelse | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| zahramehri21 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| osho_2025 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| chesschamp1528 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| fluttershy8 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| zaiterm | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| notachillguy0221 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| longhie666 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| martinh193 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| jpsoccerlegend | 71W / 54L / 4D | View Games |
| Blaise Potts | 6W / 8L / 1D | View Games |
| adrieisme | 7W / 1L / 5D | View Games |
| mark_potts | 5W / 5L / 1D | View Games |
| Xavier Coultrip | 4W / 3L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 187 | 323 | 629 | 497 |
| 2024 | 568 | 290 | 539 | 497 |
| 2023 | 658 | |||
| 2022 | 664 | |||
| 2021 | 406 | 450 | 523 | 541 |
| 2020 | 389 | 834 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 436W / 390L / 19D | 385W / 452L / 15D | 44.0 |
| 2024 | 249W / 254L / 18D | 260W / 244L / 17D | 51.0 |
| 2023 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 87.5 |
| 2022 | 5W / 2L / 1D | 5W / 2L / 1D | 41.8 |
| 2021 | 140W / 135L / 17D | 126W / 142L / 19D | 51.9 |
| 2020 | 0W / 3L / 1D | 2W / 2L / 0D | 62.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 208 | 106 | 100 | 2 | 51.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 103 | 55 | 48 | 0 | 53.4% |
| Bishop's Opening | 91 | 45 | 46 | 0 | 49.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 78 | 30 | 48 | 0 | 38.5% |
| Australian Defense | 71 | 29 | 41 | 1 | 40.9% |
| Elephant Gambit | 56 | 29 | 26 | 1 | 51.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 47 | 22 | 25 | 0 | 46.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 44 | 19 | 24 | 1 | 43.2% |
| French Defense | 43 | 17 | 26 | 0 | 39.5% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 39 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 51.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 215 | 97 | 112 | 6 | 45.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 94 | 49 | 37 | 8 | 52.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 79 | 45 | 31 | 3 | 57.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 67 | 29 | 36 | 2 | 43.3% |
| Bishop's Opening | 61 | 22 | 38 | 1 | 36.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 56 | 29 | 25 | 2 | 51.8% |
| Elephant Gambit | 53 | 16 | 37 | 0 | 30.2% |
| Australian Defense | 45 | 19 | 23 | 3 | 42.2% |
| Center Game | 40 | 23 | 15 | 2 | 57.5% |
| French Defense | 40 | 18 | 20 | 2 | 45.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 287 | 148 | 129 | 10 | 51.6% |
| Bishop's Opening | 76 | 31 | 42 | 3 | 40.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 72 | 33 | 32 | 7 | 45.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 72 | 37 | 29 | 6 | 51.4% |
| Elephant Gambit | 57 | 19 | 34 | 4 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 55 | 34 | 18 | 3 | 61.8% |
| Australian Defense | 48 | 21 | 26 | 1 | 43.8% |
| Center Game | 37 | 21 | 14 | 2 | 56.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 35 | 10 | 24 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 28 | 12 | 14 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 1 |