Avatar of SmokeDream

SmokeDream

Playing Since: 2020-10-18 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Daily: 497
0W / 5L / 0D
Rapid: 578
558W / 556L / 47D
Blitz: 270
511W / 513L / 46D
Bullet: 325
541W / 562L / 14D

SmokeDream: The Phantom of the Chessboard

In the vast ecosystem of online chess, SmokeDream is a unique species—a player whose tactical DNA reads like a gripping genetic sequence of resilience, strategy, and occasional mild chaos.

Evolutionary Journey

Since emerging in 2020, SmokeDream has journeyed through fascinating rating habitats: peaking at a rapid metabolism-fueled 834 in Rapid chess, and hunting down victories with an average Bullet rating oscillating around the mid-400s to 500s in recent years. Their chess life cycle shows a commendable persistence, evolving from humble beginnings to holding a solid standing in Blitz and Rapid formats.

Opening Repertoire - The DNA of Strategy

Like a cunning fox navigating its forest of moves, SmokeDream favors the King's Pawn openings, with a particular knack for the Leonardis Variation—demonstrating a win rate climbing up to an infectious 62.5% in Bullet games. Queens Pawn openings also spark delight in their play, boasting nearly 62% success, proving that SmokeDream’s gambits are anything but extinct.

Yet beware the Englund Gambit! While it appears in their toolkit, SmokeDream's performance suggests it’s a rare mutation—winning only about a third of the time, a clear sign that this gambit is best reserved for curious evolutionary experiments.

Playing Style: Adaptive & Persistent

This player has a comeback rate of over 54%, akin to a phoenix rising from the ashes or a bacteria dodging antibiotics. Even more impressive, when a piece is lost, a perfect 100% win rate follows, signaling a survival instinct that biology textbooks would envy!

Though early resignations happen (~9.4%), SmokeDream’s endgame frequency (43.7%) and an average of about 45 moves per win reveal a patient strategist, capable of stretching battles longer than a sea cucumber’s nap.

Behavioral Traits & Psychological Profile

SmokeDream exhibits a modest tilt factor of 11, suggesting emotional spikes sharper than a Venus flytrap’s snap but nothing a steady mindset can’t contain. However, they face a usual predator’s dilemma: rated games come with a bit less pollen—showing about 12% fewer wins compared to casual matches.

Time-wise, moves during afternoon hours (particularly 14:00-16:00) tend to photosynthesize their best results, with win rates soaring as high as 66.7%—clearly their prime hunting and mating times on the 64-cell savannah.

Rivals and Conquests

SmokeDream’s natural predators and prey vary wildly, but some notable prey include opponents like “kingjulianthethirdjr,” who’s been checkmated in a 100% success spree, while others pose formidable challenges. Their longest victory streak spans a regal 12 wins, akin to a well-timed seasonal bloom.

The Final Move

Whether striking like a lumbering walrus or scheming like a crafty octopus, SmokeDream’s style blends persistence, occasional eccentric gambits, and a touch of wild unpredictability. A player to watch in the online biosphere of chess, SmokeDream's journey reminds us all: even the faintest smoke can spark a dream.


Coach Chesswick's Profile Photo
Coach Chesswick

Quick summary

Nice win vs murf743 — you found a decisive queen infiltration and finished with a clean mating idea. Recent losses show a repeating theme: kingside weakening and early queen outings that opponents punish with tactical replies. Below are concrete, practical things to keep doing and a focused plan to stop the same mistakes repeating.

What you did well (in the win)

  • You opened lines and kept pieces active — the rooks and queen coordinated quickly to exploit the weakened back rank and the enemy king escape squares.
  • You recognised the tactical target: after forcing an exchange on f6 you used the queen to invade and then h8 for mate — good pattern recognition for mating nets.
  • You completed development and used a rook to control the central file before launching the decisive tactic — tidy, efficient play.
  • Good composure in the middlegame: you didn’t panic and converted the initiative into a concrete mate.

Replay the finishing sequence:


Recurring problems to fix

  • King safety: you often push f- and g-pawns early (g4, f4, f3) before castling. That opens fatal diagonals and allows opponent checks like Qf2 / Qf2# or bishop/knight forks. Try not to weaken the pawn shield before your king is safe.
  • Queen sorties too early: bringing the queen out on move 2–4 (Qf3/Qh5/Qe4) invites tempo-gaining attacks and tactical replies. Develop minors (knights, bishops) first; then bring the queen when it has safe squares.
  • Ignoring tactical replies: in several losses the opponent punished with simple tactical moves (Nd4, Bh3, ...). Before each pawn push or queen move, scan for immediate checks, captures and threats — “CCP”: checks, captures, threats.
  • Vulnerable back rank / uncastled king: sometimes you lose control of escape squares. After trading pieces, ask: can my king get mated on the back rank? Create luft or avoid unnecessary piece trades until the king is safe.

Concrete drills (do these this week)

  • 20–30 tactics puzzles daily focused on mates and forks — prioritize patterns like Qf2 mate, back-rank mates and knight/queen forks. Even 10 minutes a day helps pattern memory.
  • Play 5 rapid games where your only goal is safe development: no pawn moves in front of your king until you’ve castled. Review those games and note where you were tempted to push.
  • Practice "checks, captures, threats" habit: before you make a move, spend 3–5 seconds scanning the board for opponent tactics. Make it a checklist until it becomes automatic.
  • Study one line of Bishop's Opening (or the lines you face most). Learn the typical responses and basic traps—your Bishop’s Opening games show a lot of early tactical finishes against you; learning a safe setup will reduce quick losses.

Opening notes (practical)

  • Your win came from a Vienna-style centre and quick mobilization — that's a good fit for your attacking instincts. Consider practicing a few main-line plans from the Vienna Game so you arrive at middlegames you recognise.
  • The Bishop's Opening has hurt you lately. Either (A) choose a simpler, safer system against it (develop knights and keep the pawn shield intact), or (B) learn a short 5–10 move repertoire so you don't drift into unfamiliar tactical waters early.

Short notes on the recent games

  • Win vs murf743 — strong finish after exchange on f6 and queen invasion. Good conversion.
  • Loss vs bolu5090 — early g4 and Qf3 allowed tactical replies and a fast kingside collapse. Avoid launching pawns before castling.
  • Loss vs keerthi21_b — similar pattern: f- and g-pawn pushes created fatal diagonal and the opponent delivered a quick mate. Same remedy: castle early and be careful with pawn storms when the king is still in the center.
  • Loss vs as27patel and sidag99 — there are a couple of games where central tension and piece activity favored your opponent; focus on piece coordination and watch for tactics around the centre.

Plan for your next 30 games

  • Games 1–10: "safe development" experiment — avoid early f/g pawn pushes and queen sorties; force yourself to castle before pawn storms.
  • Games 11–20: mix in a prepared line from the Vienna or a solid reply vs Bishop’s Opening; study 5 model games in that line.
  • All the time: 10–15 minutes daily tactics (mates, forks, back-rank) and quick post-mortem for every loss — write down the turning move.

Final tips

  • Before any pawn push in front of your king ask: "Does this create checks, weak squares, or diagonals to my king?" If yes, postpone.
  • When you see Qf2/Qf3 ideas from either side, always check for back-rank and diagonal mates first.
  • Small habits win games: a quick 5-second tactical scan before moving reduces most "surprise" mates.

If you want, I can: (A) annotate one of the losses move-by-move, (B) build a 10-move Bishop’s Opening cheat-sheet for you, or (C) generate a 2-week tactic plan. Which would you prefer?



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
staprer 0W / 1L / 0D View
skateorelse 1W / 0L / 0D View
zahramehri21 0W / 1L / 0D View
osho_2025 1W / 0L / 0D View
chesschamp1528 1W / 0L / 0D View
fluttershy8 1W / 0L / 0D View
zaiterm 0W / 1L / 0D View
notachillguy0221 0W / 1L / 0D View
longhie666 1W / 0L / 0D View
martinh193 1W / 0L / 0D View
Most Played Opponents
jpsoccerlegend 71W / 54L / 4D View Games
Blaise Potts 6W / 8L / 1D View Games
adrieisme 7W / 1L / 5D View Games
mark_potts 5W / 5L / 1D View Games
Xavier Coultrip 4W / 3L / 2D View Games

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 187 323 629 497
2024 568 290 539 497
2023 658
2022 664
2021 406 450 523 541
2020 389 834
Rating by Year202020212022202320242025834187YearRatingBulletBlitzRapidDaily

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 436W / 390L / 19D 385W / 452L / 15D 44.0
2024 249W / 254L / 18D 260W / 244L / 17D 51.0
2023 0W / 0L / 0D 1W / 1L / 0D 87.5
2022 5W / 2L / 1D 5W / 2L / 1D 41.8
2021 140W / 135L / 17D 126W / 142L / 19D 51.9
2020 0W / 3L / 1D 2W / 2L / 0D 62.5

Openings: Most Played

Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Barnes Opening: Walkerling 208 106 100 2 51.0%
Amar Gambit 103 55 48 0 53.4%
Bishop's Opening 91 45 46 0 49.5%
Scandinavian Defense 78 30 48 0 38.5%
Australian Defense 71 29 41 1 40.9%
Elephant Gambit 56 29 26 1 51.8%
Amazon Attack 47 22 25 0 46.8%
Barnes Defense 44 19 24 1 43.2%
French Defense 43 17 26 0 39.5%
Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense 39 20 18 1 51.3%
Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Barnes Opening: Walkerling 215 97 112 6 45.1%
Amazon Attack 94 49 37 8 52.1%
Amar Gambit 79 45 31 3 57.0%
Scandinavian Defense 67 29 36 2 43.3%
Bishop's Opening 61 22 38 1 36.1%
Barnes Defense 56 29 25 2 51.8%
Elephant Gambit 53 16 37 0 30.2%
Australian Defense 45 19 23 3 42.2%
Center Game 40 23 15 2 57.5%
French Defense 40 18 20 2 45.0%
Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Barnes Opening: Walkerling 287 148 129 10 51.6%
Bishop's Opening 76 31 42 3 40.8%
Amar Gambit 72 33 32 7 45.8%
Scandinavian Defense 72 37 29 6 51.4%
Elephant Gambit 57 19 34 4 33.3%
Barnes Defense 55 34 18 3 61.8%
Australian Defense 48 21 26 1 43.8%
Center Game 37 21 14 2 56.8%
Amazon Attack 35 10 24 1 28.6%
Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense 28 12 14 2 42.9%
Daily Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Petrov's Defense 1 0 1 0 0.0%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 1 0 1 0 0.0%
Barnes Opening: Walkerling 1 0 1 0 0.0%
Australian Defense 1 0 1 0 0.0%
Amazon Attack 1 0 1 0 0.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 12 0
Losing 11 1
🐞 Report a Problem