Ray Robson - The SpicyCaterpillar of Chess
Meet Ray Robson, a true Grandmaster in the kingdom of 64 squares, affectionately known in the chess hive as "spicycaterpillar." A title bestowed upon him by FIDE, this player has evolved far beyond the humble beginnings of a pawn, metamorphosing into a formidable force on the board with a brain finely attuned to the delicate dance of tactics and strategy.
With a blitz rating that tiptoes around 3157 in recent cycles, Ray’s rapid-fire maneuvers often leave opponents bug-eyed and checking their positions twice. His bullet rating, zooming above 3100, is a testament to his lightning-fast neural reflexes—he truly thrives in the heat of battle where every second counts, proving he's not just a slow and steady kind of player but a quicksilver predator in the wild.
Ray’s chess repertoire is as diverse as a caterpillar's menu. From the Sicilian Defense Najdorf English Attack to the Caro-Kann Defense Advance, his openings flourish with a win rate often surpassing 60%, a reminder that even the smallest larvae can hatch into kings of complex strategies. Not to mention his beloved Kings Fianchetto Opening, boasting an impressive 74% win rate in bullet games—clearly a favorite leaf to munch on.
Known for staggering 46-game winning streaks, Ray's resilience bugs many opponents into submission. His endgame frequency nears 76%, highlighting an aptitude for wrangling even the most sneaky pawns and knights into checkmate traps. Remarkably, his tactical awareness shines with a comeback rate over 82% and a 94% win rate after losing a piece — talk about a metamorphosis from adversity!
When not buzzing around openings and endgames, Ray tends to his psychological garden, managing a tilt factor just over 50%, showing he's as human as the rest of us but with nerves rooted firmly in calm soil.
Whether facing the queen bee or an underdog pawn, Ray Robson’s record against opponents is a checklist of triumphs—he's sprouted victories across thousands of games, often at breakneck speeds that leave others wondering if they played against a chess machine or a mischievous insect determined to crawl to the top.
So next time you see a "spicycaterpillar" inching across the board, beware — for beneath that seemingly harmless slug lies a fierce chess predator, ready to cocoon your defenses and emerge victorious.
Feedback for Ray Robson
Ray, your recent games show both strengths and areas for improvement that can guide your preparation and growth:
Strengths
- Positional Understanding: Your handling of complex middlegame structures demonstrates a solid grasp of positional play, such as preparing and executing timely pawn breaks and piece maneuvers.
- Calculation: You calculated sharp tactical sequences accurately, especially in the transition to the endgame, as seen in your ability to convert favorable material imbalances.
- Opening Preparation: You showed good variety and familiarity with openings like the London System, the Sicilian French Variation, and the English Opening patterns, helping you steer the game into playable territories.
- Endgame Technique: Your ability to convert winning endgames and manage material advantages under pressure is commendable and a definite asset.
Areas to Focus On
- Time Management: In several games, time pressure appeared to influence decision quality toward the later stages. Try to allocate your time more evenly throughout the game to maintain precision, especially in critical positions.
- Handling Counterplay: In some losses, the opponent generated active counterplay that challenged your position. Enhancing skills in prophylaxis and defensive resourcefulness will improve resilience against dynamic threats.
- Opening Consistency: Although you have a strong opening repertoire, deepen your knowledge in select lines to gain an edge and avoid positional concessions early on. For example, refining how to respond against pawn thrusts targeting your center like ...d4 or ...b4 could be beneficial.
- Mistake Minimization: Review moments where small inaccuracies led to material loss or positional decline—sharp tactical awareness paired with thorough board vision can reduce such errors.
Recommendations
- Continue analyzing your recent games focusing on critical junctures where the evaluation swung, especially in complex tactical struggles.
- Integrate focused endgame studies to sharpen precision under time pressure.
- Practice openings with a coach or training software, targeting typical middlegame plans from your preferred openings.
- Use to monitor your performance trends and adjust your training accordingly.
Overall, your chess foundation is very promising. Careful refinement of the above areas can elevate your play and sustain your competitive edge. Keep up the great work!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bogdan Daniel Deac | 3W / 1L / 1D | |
| e5-its-e5-patzers | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Ivan Mesquita V. Gonçalves | 17W / 1L / 0D | |
| mudinoss | 5W / 1L / 0D | |
| Mykola Bortnyk | 52W / 40L / 11D | |
| RigorousEarners | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| soloadelante | 4W / 1L / 0D | |
| Petros Trimitzios | 27W / 12L / 1D | |
| playtowin2020 | 9W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Naroditsky | 419W / 1032L / 122D | |
| Brandon Jacobson | 335W / 346L / 35D | |
| Alexander Rustemov | 367W / 115L / 104D | |
| Nikolas Theodorou | 222W / 200L / 23D | |
| LacusSomniorum | 241W / 156L / 31D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3203 | 3222 | 2682 | |
| 2024 | 3141 | 3087 | 2687 | |
| 2023 | 3101 | 3135 | 2699 | |
| 2022 | 3244 | 3070 | 2572 | |
| 2021 | 3212 | 3078 | 2661 | |
| 2020 | 3185 | 3064 | 2557 | |
| 2019 | 2751 | 2967 | 2439 | |
| 2018 | 2865 | 2857 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 665W / 177L / 67D | 642W / 186L / 95D | 90.5 |
| 2024 | 259W / 88L / 29D | 230W / 108L / 38D | 87.9 |
| 2023 | 939W / 586L / 92D | 866W / 628L / 127D | 86.3 |
| 2022 | 546W / 395L / 49D | 517W / 422L / 52D | 78.8 |
| 2021 | 1009W / 597L / 94D | 944W / 583L / 118D | 73.9 |
| 2020 | 1463W / 864L / 101D | 1354W / 975L / 126D | 72.0 |
| 2019 | 814W / 509L / 106D | 728W / 603L / 108D | 73.1 |
| 2018 | 27W / 1L / 3D | 24W / 6L / 2D | 91.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1032 | 577 | 447 | 8 | 55.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 311 | 189 | 98 | 24 | 60.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 237 | 170 | 51 | 16 | 71.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 230 | 146 | 65 | 19 | 63.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 181 | 122 | 44 | 15 | 67.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 171 | 102 | 49 | 20 | 59.6% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 143 | 81 | 47 | 15 | 56.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 139 | 81 | 44 | 14 | 58.3% |
| Modern | 128 | 82 | 38 | 8 | 64.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 113 | 62 | 38 | 13 | 54.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1148 | 689 | 427 | 32 | 60.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 684 | 405 | 244 | 35 | 59.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 563 | 315 | 213 | 35 | 56.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 506 | 287 | 200 | 19 | 56.7% |
| Australian Defense | 490 | 305 | 170 | 15 | 62.2% |
| Modern | 486 | 282 | 182 | 22 | 58.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 428 | 245 | 166 | 17 | 57.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 362 | 239 | 111 | 12 | 66.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 286 | 165 | 108 | 13 | 57.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 275 | 124 | 134 | 17 | 45.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 18.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 46 | 8 |
| Losing | 54 | 0 |