About Ivashentseva Dominika
Ivashentseva Dominika is a rising chess talent who has earned the Woman Candidate Master (WCM) title from FIDE. Known for sharp blitz instincts, tenacious defense, and a good sense of humor at the board, she blends creativity with practical play in every game. She loves the clock as much as the fight, and her friends joke that her blitz moves arrive before the coffee cools.
Career and playing style
Dominika thrives in fast time controls, with Blitz as her preferred battleground. She combines tactical flair with solid endgames and a knack for turning difficult positions into fighting chances. Her resilience leads to impressive comebacks, even when the position looks squeeze-tight.
- Preferred time control: Blitz
- Playing style: tactical, resourceful, strong in endgames
- Notable trait: high comeback potential and practical decision-making under pressure
Opening palette and highlights
Her Blitz repertoire is diverse, spanning Sicilian Dragon Variations with Yugoslav Attack, the Australian Defense, and flexible Queen's Gambit-based lines. She enjoys dynamic battles and chooses practical, sharp lines when the clock starts to hiss.
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack
- Australian Defense
- Queen's Gambit: 3.e3 c5 and related flexible setups
Profile
Keep up with her ongoing chess journey and achievements on her profile page: ivashentsevadominika
Strengths observed in your blitz play
You tend to look for active, practical chances even in tight positions. This willingness to complicate can put pressure on opponents and create opportunities to escape tricky lines. You also demonstrate resilience, continuing to fight for the initiative and keep fights alive when the position is dynamic. In several games, your willingness to press and seek concrete play helped you generate practical winning chances.
Key areas to focus on for improvement
- Opening preparation: Your recent games show a mix of openings. Narrow your repertoire to 2–3 reliable lines and study their typical middlegame plans so you start each game with a clear idea rather than improvising from the first few moves.
- Time management in blitz: Try to allocate your clock more evenly and avoid spending too long on non-critical moves. Develop a simple 2-step approach: (1) pick a concrete plan or target and (2) quickly verify only the major forcing options.
- Endgame technique: In blitz, converting advantages in rook endings and simplified endgames is common. Practice standard rook endgames, king activity, and technique for converting material plus position to a win.
- Calculation discipline: Improve efficiency by focusing on forcing moves (checks, captures, threats) first. If a line seems unclear, switch to a safe, solid alternative rather than over-calculating deeply without a clear plan.
- Pattern recognition and pawn structures: Build familiarity with typical pawn structures arising from your preferred openings (for example, Alapin Sicilian or related lines). Recognizing typical plans and break ideas will help you choose stronger continuations faster.
- Trading with a purpose: Avoid trades that reduce your winning chances or transform a favorable position into a mere equal one. Trade to simplify when ahead or to activate your pieces, not just to relieve tension.
Practical training plan for the next 4 weeks
- Daily tactics: Solve 15–20 tactical puzzles focusing on patterns you encounter often (forks, pins, double attacks, clearance, Euwe-style king safety ideas).
- Endgame practice: Do two short rook endgame drills per week and review basic king-and-rook technique, aiming to convert a simple win from a rook endgame in under 15 moves.
- Opening study (2–3 lines): Pick your main lines (e.g., Alapin Sicilian and a flexible reply) and learn 12–15 typical middlegame plans for each, including common pawn breaks and piece maneuvers.
- Post-game review routine: After each blitz game, spend 5–10 minutes noting the turning point, a better alternative move, and whether you followed your planned approach.
- Time-saving habits: During games, first identify a plan, then scan for only the two strongest variations to confirm your move choice, reducing time pressure on critical moments.
Openings guidance aligned with your repertoire
Your openings show engagement with several dynamic choices. Consider consolidating around a few lines and building solid middlegame plans. For example, refine your approach in the Alapin Sicilian family to emphasize quick central control, and pair it with a flexible reply to avoid getting pushed into passive positions. Practice typical pawn breaks and counterplay ideas that arise in the Australian Defense and related setups so you can respond with confidence when opponents apply early pressure.
Post-game review routine suggestion
Adopt a short, consistent post-game routine after each blitz game: (1) identify the key turning point, (2) write down one better alternative move, (3) check if you followed your planned approach, (4) note any time pressure moments and how you managed them. This habit will reinforce learning from both wins and losses and help you track progress over time.
Optional note
If you’d like, I can annotate specific recent games move-by-move to illustrate concrete improvement opportunities. You can share additional PGNs or tag particular positions you found challenging. ivashentseva%20dominika
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| biscuitsandcoffee | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| didiyak | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| namdelafuente | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Rick GC | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| itssabrinacarpintero | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| TikiLASC_2010 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| la_manche_seo | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Adnan Sitnic | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| yoelpolanco | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ufish | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Marcel Winkels | 5W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| macedoniagreat | 1W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| Alexander Reprintsev | 0W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| Alexei Gubajdullin | 1W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| Daniel Gutiérrez Olivares | 1W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2155 | 2510 | ||
| 2024 | 2215 | 2304 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 75W / 84L / 11D | 71W / 89L / 11D | 98.3 |
| 2024 | 73W / 77L / 7D | 61W / 81L / 17D | 95.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 24 | 7 | 14 | 3 | 29.2% |
| Australian Defense | 23 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 47.8% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 22 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 40.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 21 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 47.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 21 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 38.1% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 20 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 45.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 17 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 47.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 16 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 14 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 13 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 46.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 9 | 4 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |