Dharma Tjiam (aka T-Jam) - International Master
Meet Dharma Tjiam, affectionately known in chess circles as T-Jam, the relentless International Master who makes the 64 squares his personal playground. With a blend of steady tactical awareness and endgame prowess, T-Jam has danced through countless blitz battles, leaving opponents baffled and board critics applauding.
Rating & Style
Starting with a blitz rating just shy of 2000 in 2017, Dharma soared to an impressive peak rating above 2450 in 2019, proving to be a fearsome blitz competitor. Daily games exhibit a respectable rating evolution too, hovering near 1800 at their peak.
T-Jam isn’t just about fast moves – with an average win game lasting over 74 moves, patience and precision define their style. While white pieces bring a slightly better edge (57.75% win rate) than black, every color gets their tactical genius on display. Their knack for comebacks is nearly legendary, boasting an astonishing 89% comeback rate and a jaw-dropping 99.8% chance of winning even after losing a piece. Talk about turning lemons into lemonade!
Competitive Spirit & Opponents
Whether facing a well-known rival or a new challenger, Dharma’s win rates vary wildly but often in their favor – a true chameleon on the battlefield. They’ve squared off most frequently against koningkobe and gubajdullin, and have charmingly exchanged chess “words” with a vast roster of opponents with win rates ranging from zero to a flawless century.
Chess quirks & fun facts
- Longest winning streak: 10 games (because why stop at 9?)
- Current hot streak: 4 wins and climbing
- Favorite time to dominate: Noon and 1 PM, where winning hovers near a sparkling 75%
- Early resignations: Just under 4%, proving T-Jam fights till the last move
In summary
Dharma Tjiam, or T-Jam, is more than a title holder; they're a strategic whirlwind with a flair for the dramatic comeback and a serious knack for blitz chess. Their game tells the story of resilience, deep thinking, and a bit of fun sprinkled over the chessboard. If you’re lucky enough to play against them, prepare for a fast-paced, mentally exhilarating rollercoaster ride!
Hi Dharma (T-Jam)!
Great work keeping your blitz rating around 2454 (2019-01-11) and scoring tactical wins such as your recent French Exchange victory. Below are some targeted pointers to help you climb to the next level.
1. Opening refinement
- French Exchange (Winawer-delayed)
Your 4.exd5 line is solid but can be a little tame. Consider adding 4.e5 or 4.Bd2 to keep more tension and create winning chances without simplifying too early. - Sicilian attack setups
Repeated early pawn thrusts (f-pawn & h-pawn) yielded mixed results. In the loss vs Noor323 the sequence 11.Ne4 … gxh5 led to a weak king. Try delaying pawn storms until you complete development and have the initiative initiative. - Have a “plan B” vs flexible defences such as the French/Carlsbad where opponents avoid your prepared lines. Building a small repertoire tree (two replies per opponent’s main choice) will keep you versatile.
2. Middlegame decisions
- Model example: In the win against Chessgmalready, the manoeuvre 22.Re5! 24.Rae1! showed fine coordination. Keep looking for force multipliers – pieces that simultaneously hit several targets.
- Over-extension alerts: Loss vs BeautifulmindMD – after 20.a5 b5 21.cxb5 Nd5! the queenside pawn rush created backward targets. Before advancing a pawn past the 5th rank, ask “Can it be supported in two moves?” If not, reconsider.
- Make prophylactic moves when you already have an edge. In multiple games you skipped luft for your king and were hit by back-rank tricks.
3. Endgame technique
- In several losses (e.g. vs PARINOV56) winning chances evaporated after material imbalance. Practise converting R+P vs R rook endings; this crops up often after your tactical middlegames.
- Adopt a simple method: activate king > improve worst piece > create passed pawn – in that order.
4. Time management
Your average clock on move 15 in winning games is 2:12, but only 1:24 in lost games. The correlation is clear – protect your think-time. Two habits help:
- Use the opponent’s time to map candidate moves (at least two).
- Set an internal alarm at 1:00; switch to safe moves instead of hunting the perfect continuation.
5. Tactical workout routine
Daily puzzle rush, but focus on defensive motifs (interposition, perpetual, drawing tactics). Your attacking sense is strong; shoring up defence will balance your style.
6. Suggested study plan
- Opening: build a 10-line “emergency kit” you can play on autopilot when low on time.
- Middlegame: annotate your own critical decisions each week; mark whether they were forcing, prophylactic, or neutral.
- Endgame: play King-and-Pawn vs King races against an engine from random positions for 10 minutes a day.
- Review performance trends with and to spot your best playing windows.
7. Inspiration corner
Replay the miniature below whenever you need a confidence boost:
Keep up the fighting spirit, Dharma. Aim to convert just one extra advantageous position per session and you’ll break the next rating ceiling soon. Good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| koningkobe | 21W / 7L / 5D | |
| gubajdullin | 3W / 18L / 2D | |
| Jasper Bonenkamp | 12W / 1L / 2D | |
| nlbbanka | 5W / 9L / 0D | |
| Fedor_Afanasiev | 5W / 5L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2326 | |||
| 2020 | 2276 | 1839 | ||
| 2019 | 2368 | 1802 | ||
| 2018 | 2419 | 1771 | ||
| 2017 | 2115 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 63.0 |
| 2020 | 37W / 17L / 3D | 34W / 18L / 5D | 72.4 |
| 2019 | 175W / 110L / 26D | 165W / 118L / 41D | 77.2 |
| 2018 | 99W / 53L / 20D | 99W / 67L / 8D | 82.5 |
| 2017 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 42.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 43 | 24 | 19 | 0 | 55.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 38 | 22 | 14 | 2 | 57.9% |
| Modern | 37 | 21 | 13 | 3 | 56.8% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 35 | 18 | 12 | 5 | 51.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 32 | 17 | 12 | 3 | 53.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation | 28 | 15 | 9 | 4 | 53.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 27 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 55.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 26 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 57.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 25 | 12 | 11 | 2 | 48.0% |
| Australian Defense | 22 | 7 | 14 | 1 | 31.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bronstein Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Tartakower, 8.Bd3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Main Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 4 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |