Profile
Ingvar Thor Johannesson is a titled chess player who earned the FIDE Master title from FIDE. He is also a streamer who shares his games and thoughts under the moniker Th3ChessViking.
Rapid is his preferred time control, where he blends quick tactical flair with steady positional play — and the occasional dramatic flourish for the camera.
Curious observers can view his profile here: Ingvar Thor Johannesson.
Playing style and repertoire
Johannesson is known for a flexible and aggressive approach in blitz and rapid. His openings reflect a willingness to seize the initiative with dynamic systems such as the Benoni Defense, the French Defense: Winawer Variation, and related lines, paired with solid endgame technique.
- Favoured openings: Benoni Defense, French Defense: Winawer Variation, Dory Defense, English Opening variants.
- Strengths: sharp calculation, active piece play, and resilience in long endgames.
Streaming and community
As a streamer, Ingvar builds a welcoming space where fans watch live games, study ideas, and share jokes. He explains his ideas clearly, often mixing humor with practical chess insight, which makes his streams enjoyable for both newcomers and club players alike.
Honors and notable moments
Ingvar Thor Johannesson is a FIDE Master and a prolific content creator. He has achieved standout results across rapid and blitz formats, including peaking at a Blitz rating of 2710 in January 2025 and a Bullet peak of 2736 in September 2025. His daily streams and games showcase a blend of deep preparation and spontaneous creativity.
For more personal profile details, see Ingvar Thor Johannesson.
Quick summary
Nice mix of dynamic attacking wins and practical results. You score well in sharp, unbalanced positions and finish games cleanly when you get the initiative. A few recent games show recurring weak spots: handling closed/locked pawn structures on the queenside and occasional time-management lapses. Below are focused, practical suggestions you can start using tomorrow.
What you’re doing well
- Active piece play and tactical awareness — you spot decisive tactics and mating nets (example: the game where you finished with Qb7# vs speir01).
- Rook + queen coordination — you convert open-file and back-rank chances reliably.
- Comfort in messy positions — you thrive in unpredictable, unbalanced middlegames (good for using practical chances and flagging opponents under pressure).
- Strong results with offbeat openings — you’ve converted tricky lines (Amazon Attack, Barnes, Australian) into wins consistently.
Where to improve (highest impact)
- Time management: some games end with wins on time and some losses on time. Practice owning the clock: keep 10–15 seconds buffer before making non-forcing moves in rapid games.
- Queenside pawn-structure play: in your most recent loss you faced a locked c-pawn / a pawn push structure and then lost the initiative. Work on plans when the opponent plays c4 and a queenside pawn wedge — know when to break or fix the structure.
- Piece exchanges into unclear endgames: avoid simplifying when the resulting pawn structure favors your opponent (check trades that give them a strong passed pawn or outpost).
- Prophylaxis and patience: when you have the initiative, check for opponent counterplay ideas before committing to tactical operations — especially pawn storms that open lines to your own king.
Concrete training plan (weekly)
- Daily tactics (20–30 minutes): focus on forks, pins, back-rank and mating patterns. Aim for mixed difficulty; emphasize accuracy over speed.
- Two focused endgame sessions per week (30 minutes): rook endings, basic queen vs rook, and king+pawn vs king. These win or save many rapid games.
- One opening session (45 minutes): tighten the main responses in your most-played lines — for example study plans and simple move orders for Sicilian Defense and the Indian Game structures you encounter. Write 3‑move plans for typical middlegames.
- One slow game per week (longer time control): practice technique, avoid flagging, and practice planning rather than tactical quick fixes.
- Weekly review (1 hour): pick your most instructive loss and win, and annotate them. Find the turning point and write a short plan for how you’d play next time.
Mistakes to watch for in your recent games
- Allowing the opponent to close the center/lock pawns without a clear plan — you want either a plan to open it (break) or a piece plan for the closed structure.
- Premature material grabs on the flank without central control — flank captures can leave you exposed to central counterplay.
- Trading into positions where your opponent gets a strong knight outpost or outside passed pawn.
- Relying on opponents to blunder on the clock — important to keep improving actual conversion so you don’t need the clock edge.
Practical tips for your next rapid session
- When your opponent plays an early c4 (or b4) push on the queenside, immediately ask yourself: can I fix their pawn, open the center, or create a target? If not, prepare a piece maneuver instead of a pawn race.
- If you’re ahead in material, swap off pieces (not pawns) to reduce counterplay — but check resulting pawn structures first.
- Keep the clock healthy: on move 10–20, stop and take 10–20 seconds to form a 3-move plan — that investment saves time later.
- Use your strong opening lines (your win rates show real edges in offbeat systems) but prepare concrete responses to the most common replies so you don’t drift into unfamiliar territory early.
Example position to study
Replay the decisive tactical finish from your Rook/Queen invasion game (fast mate). Try to find the finishing sequence before you step through the moves.
Tap to open the replay:
Next steps — 30 minute checklist
- 15 minutes: tactics set (mixed motifs, focus on pins & back-rank).
- 10 minutes: review one loss — mark the turning move and write a better plan.
- 5 minutes: set one opening goal for the week (e.g., “prepare 3 replies to the opponent’s early c4 in the Indian Game”).
Want a deeper dive?
If you like, tell me which specific game (link or opponent) you want fully annotated — I can provide move-by-move alternatives, highlight the turning point, and suggest practice problems tailored to the mistakes in that game. Examples: Barkly Balacouston, speir01, naxosepataw.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 107W / 132L / 10D | View Games |
| Marc Esserman | 54W / 81L / 7D | View Games |
| Karl Tolentino | 30W / 17L / 7D | View Games |
| yoam978 | 30W / 18L / 3D | View Games |
| bayhacker | 21W / 19L / 9D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2673 | 2672 | ||
| 2024 | 2564 | 2663 | ||
| 2023 | 2701 | 2512 | 2144 | 2152 |
| 2022 | 2614 | 2587 | ||
| 2021 | 2539 | 2562 | 2144 | 2152 |
| 2020 | 2468 | 2419 | 2144 | 2152 |
| 2019 | 2403 | 2505 | 2501 | 2186 |
| 2018 | 2414 | 2464 | 2307 | 2060 |
| 2017 | 2491 | 2418 | 2367 | 2184 |
| 2016 | 2509 | 2409 | ||
| 2015 | 2501 | 2420 | 2495 | 2175 |
| 2014 | 2491 | 2402 | 2495 | 2235 |
| 2013 | 2504 | 2302 | 1935 | 2277 |
| 2012 | 2220 | |||
| 2011 | 1811 | 2381 | 1038 | 2367 |
| 2010 | 1600 | 2339 | 2139 | |
| 2009 | 2520 | |||
| 2008 | 2275 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 110W / 64L / 14D | 94W / 84L / 12D | 82.4 |
| 2024 | 766W / 530L / 84D | 685W / 595L / 95D | 83.9 |
| 2023 | 675W / 412L / 87D | 638W / 431L / 93D | 84.0 |
| 2022 | 85W / 50L / 12D | 72W / 61L / 15D | 80.8 |
| 2021 | 415W / 244L / 35D | 366W / 267L / 57D | 83.1 |
| 2020 | 896W / 610L / 107D | 899W / 614L / 105D | 81.6 |
| 2019 | 755W / 478L / 96D | 711W / 500L / 106D | 82.9 |
| 2018 | 219W / 87L / 25D | 176W / 127L / 24D | 87.0 |
| 2017 | 466W / 334L / 69D | 436W / 349L / 65D | 81.8 |
| 2016 | 215W / 74L / 13D | 181W / 108L / 15D | 81.7 |
| 2015 | 84W / 19L / 4D | 88W / 18L / 4D | 66.4 |
| 2014 | 1067W / 347L / 53D | 1063W / 383L / 54D | 73.9 |
| 2013 | 940W / 393L / 77D | 887W / 452L / 68D | 76.4 |
| 2012 | 3W / 3L / 1D | 3W / 7L / 0D | 28.4 |
| 2011 | 13W / 1L / 1D | 12W / 2L / 1D | 37.4 |
| 2010 | 14W / 9L / 2D | 12W / 9L / 2D | 38.2 |
| 2009 | 18W / 1L / 2D | 15W / 3L / 1D | 42.2 |
| 2008 | 46W / 0L / 3D | 44W / 0L / 4D | 45.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 514 | 305 | 174 | 35 | 59.3% |
| French Defense | 482 | 267 | 192 | 23 | 55.4% |
| English Opening | 461 | 275 | 165 | 21 | 59.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 435 | 285 | 139 | 11 | 65.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 395 | 242 | 132 | 21 | 61.3% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 373 | 221 | 136 | 16 | 59.2% |
| Döry Defense | 332 | 204 | 113 | 15 | 61.5% |
| Benoni Defense | 294 | 170 | 110 | 14 | 57.8% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 289 | 158 | 113 | 18 | 54.7% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 273 | 162 | 95 | 16 | 59.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoni Defense | 622 | 357 | 233 | 32 | 57.4% |
| Döry Defense | 618 | 346 | 226 | 46 | 56.0% |
| French Defense | 608 | 328 | 235 | 45 | 54.0% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 591 | 334 | 215 | 42 | 56.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 510 | 293 | 174 | 43 | 57.5% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 410 | 221 | 151 | 38 | 53.9% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 396 | 230 | 128 | 38 | 58.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 383 | 232 | 123 | 28 | 60.6% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 382 | 241 | 115 | 26 | 63.1% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 365 | 208 | 134 | 23 | 57.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benoni Defense | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| French Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: MacCutcheon Variation, Wolf Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Benoni Defense: Modern Variation | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Catalan Opening | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Classical Variation | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Australian Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird's Defense Deferred | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 42 | 1 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |