Profile
Colin Stapczynski Alex Chenevey, known online as TheChessCouch, is a chess streamer who turns lightning-fast Blitz sessions into entertaining learning experiences. A natural showman with a knack for clear explanations, he grew a community of players who love sharp tactics, quick thinking, and a healthy side of humor. Fans can follow his journey and profile through Colin Stapczynski Alex Chenevey.
Streaming Career
Since debuting on the scene, TheChessCouch has built a loyal following by streaming Blitz and Bullet games, mixing high-caliber play with approachable commentary. His preferred time control is Blitz, where his rapid decision-making and practical insights shine. He collaborates with fellow creators, hosts live Q&As, and keeps a steady cadence of streams that welcome players of all levels.
- Blitz-focused streams with live analysis and audience interaction
- Regular collaboration with other chess creators and communities
- Consistent schedule that helps fans study openings and tactics in real time
Playing Style and Openings
Colin’s style blends aggressive initiative with solid endgame technique. In fast-paced games, he relies on dynamic openings that put pressure on opponents while remaining adaptable to each position. Notable Blitz openings in his repertoire include the Scandinavian Defense, London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation, Caro-Kann Defense, and Amazon Attack, reflecting a versatile approach suited to quick decision-making and practical results.
- Scandinavian Defense — Blitz: strong results across 561 games (Wins 397, Losses 129, Draws 35; WinRate 70.77%)
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation — 289 games (Wins 208, Losses 67, Draws 14; WinRate 71.97%)
- Caro-Kann Defense — 184 games (Wins 131, Losses 47, Draws 6; WinRate 71.2%)
- Amazon Attack — 175 games (Wins 133, Losses 36, Draws 6; WinRate 76%)
He often heads toward practical endgames, with endgames frequent in his Blitz play and a readiness to simplify when the position calls for it. For a quick peek into his play style, you can explore a sample game line:
For fans who want a quick visual of his trajectory, a profile chart is available:
.
Feedback for Colin Stapczynski
You’ve shown a willingness to enter sharp, tactical waters and to press for activity when the position allows. Your games indicate you’re not afraid to clash in the middlegame, which is a strength in rapid where dynamic play often decides the outcome.
What you’re doing well
- Active piece play and fighting spirit in middlegame clashes. You don’t shy away from tactical ideas when they’re available.
- Good willingness to develop and castle promptly, which helps you keep your king safe while you connect rooks and pressure files.
- Resourceful use of open lines and rooks to create threats, especially when you can coordinate pieces on key files.
What to improve
- Keep a tighter handle on king safety and piece coordination in the early middlegame. In some games, aggressive ideas or premature queen activity left your king exposed or your pieces uncoordinated.
- Improve calculation discipline. In sharp lines, it’s easy to be attracted by flashy tactics; train to pause and verify two or three candidate replies for your opponent’s threats before committing to a plan.
- Endgame conversion. When the position simplifies, focus on concrete plans to convert advantages (or hold difficult endgames) rather than trading too many pieces without a clear plan.
- Time management in rapid. Set a personal clock cue for critical decision points (e.g., after 15–20 moves) to ensure you have enough time to double-check critical variations.
Practical steps you can take
- Practice a two-minute drill: in a set of positions, identify the top two candidate moves for both sides and explain the tactical motifs you’re aiming to exploit. This builds quick, reliable calculation habits.
- Study a focused defense/growth plan for one opening you enjoy (for example, a Scandinavian-related line you play as Black) and create a simple, repeatable middlegame plan from the typical structures you reach.
- Annotate a couple of recent games, noting where you could have avoided a risky tactic and where a simpler plan (develop, contest the center, and threaten the enemy king) would have sufficed.
Feedback for Alex Chenevey
You’ve demonstrated courage in taking on sharp lines and you often create dynamic chances by maximizing piece activity and rooks on open files. When you steer into tactical threads, you show the potential to outplay opponents in the middlegame.
What you’re doing well
- Strong initiative and willingness to complicate the position when the opponent’s king is exposed or when lines are open for your pieces to work.
- Effective use of rooks and heavy pieces on open files to create pressure and to coordinate attacks, especially when you can force weaknesses in the enemy camp.
- Resistance in defense and a capable ability to recover from rough middlegame positions by seeking active counterplay.
What to improve
- Solidify your opening approach and move ordering. In some games, quick or premature pawn pushes and premature queen moves allowed your opponent to seize the initiative. Aim for solid development and king safety first, then look for tactical chances.
- Threat recognition and defense. When your opponent creates threats, practice a quick “threat check” routine: what do they want to do next turn, what will I do to neutralize it, and what are my counterplay ideas?
- Endgame readiness. If the game simplifies, maintain a clear plan: which pawn breaks or rook maneuvers will convert the endgame, and which exchanges should you avoid to keep favorable chances?
- Time management. In rapid, precise timing matters. Try to allocate time to verify critical tactical moments and to keep a buffer for the most important decisions late in the game.
Practical steps you can take
- Build a compact two-opening repertoire (one for 1 e4 and one for 1 d4) with clear middlegame plans. Practice applying these plans in 10–12 practice games, focusing on transitioning smoothly to middlegame plans.
- Engage in targeted tactical training that emphasizes two-step checks and forced lines—for example, positions where you must calculate a forcing sequence involving a sacrifice or a piece trade.
- Review recent games for missed defensive resources or underestimated counterplay. Write a short note on one missed resource and one improved defense for each game.
Joint practice recommendations
Both of you can benefit from a shared routine that reinforces decision-making under time pressure and deeper understanding of typical middlegame structures you reach in your favorite openings.
- Weekly tactic focus: 20–25 minutes of tactical puzzles with a timer, emphasizing pattern recognition in common Scandinavian/Caro-Kann structures and related lines you encounter.
- Endgame drill: practice short rook endings and rook-and-minor ending patterns to improve conversion skills and practical technique under time pressure.
- Post-game review session: pick one win and one loss per week, annotate together, and highlight two concrete improvements for each game (one for the middlegame plan, one for defense or endgame handling).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| adithyaonboard | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| alejandrocapanegra | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| amielasir | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ryansocks5 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| bvp2310 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mark3103 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| redasamirsa | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| gmtamayo20 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dasher02 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| aleks_1976 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colin Stapczynski | 4W / 117L / 6D | View Games |
| Braden Laughlin | 17W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| Frank Johnson | 10W / 6L / 2D | View Games |
| maklai1 | 11W / 4L / 3D | View Games |
| x-7135231959 | 4W / 12L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2004 | 2227 | ||
| 2023 | 2126 | |||
| 2021 | 1936 | 2090 | 400 | |
| 2020 | 1900 | 2090 | ||
| 2019 | 2063 | 2128 | ||
| 2018 | 1927 | 1987 | 1681 | |
| 2017 | 2028 | 2065 | 1711 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 224W / 79L / 7D | 202W / 95L / 14D | 81.8 |
| 2023 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 84.8 |
| 2021 | 110W / 62L / 5D | 93W / 62L / 18D | 74.9 |
| 2020 | 33W / 45L / 7D | 43W / 42L / 1D | 67.8 |
| 2019 | 370W / 133L / 21D | 365W / 127L / 26D | 77.1 |
| 2018 | 860W / 310L / 59D | 807W / 353L / 69D | 74.6 |
| 2017 | 228W / 71L / 18D | 218W / 94L / 12D | 74.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 565 | 401 | 129 | 35 | 71.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 297 | 216 | 67 | 14 | 72.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 191 | 136 | 48 | 7 | 71.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 177 | 135 | 36 | 6 | 76.3% |
| Benoni Defense | 166 | 92 | 63 | 11 | 55.4% |
| Australian Defense | 164 | 119 | 40 | 5 | 72.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 164 | 113 | 43 | 8 | 68.9% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 163 | 114 | 42 | 7 | 69.9% |
| Döry Defense | 152 | 93 | 48 | 11 | 61.2% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 98 | 70 | 24 | 4 | 71.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 148 | 97 | 44 | 7 | 65.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 67 | 39 | 21 | 7 | 58.2% |
| Australian Defense | 50 | 31 | 19 | 0 | 62.0% |
| Döry Defense | 47 | 35 | 12 | 0 | 74.5% |
| Benoni Defense | 43 | 21 | 18 | 4 | 48.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 40 | 26 | 11 | 3 | 65.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 40 | 22 | 14 | 4 | 55.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 39 | 27 | 10 | 2 | 69.2% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 28 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 28 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 53.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 25 | 5 |
| Losing | 31 | 0 |