Tillera1: The Chessboard Biologist
Meet Tillera1, a rapid chess enthusiast whose games unfold like a fascinating ecosystem of strategic moves and surprising morphological changes on the board. With a peak rapid rating of 584 in 2025, Tillera1 has endured a turbulent evolutionary journey—climbing to highs, replicating novel tactics, and sometimes facing extinction-level losses with resilient adaptation.
Specializing in openings such as the King's Pawn and Queen's Pawn with win rates hovering around 36% and 49% respectively, Tillera1 exhibits a balanced repertoire. Their favorite “habitats” include the Saragossa and Englund Gambit openings, where survival rates approach a respectable 40-46%. Occasionally, they venture into less-charted territories like the Bishop's Opening, though it tends to be a more hostile environment with a win rate near 23%.
Tillera1's endgame frequency is about 40%, suggesting they enjoy a good long-haul match before hunting for the final kill. Despite an average of nearly 40 moves per win, sometimes the games stretch longer, showing a patience and persistence matched by few predators in the game. Their average moves per loss (about 46) reveal a dogged fighter, unwilling to concede early—though their early resignation rate of 19.44% hints at a selective Darwinian pruning process.
The “experimental” genetic code of Tillera1’s playstyle reveals impressive resilience: a comeback rate over 37% and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece, proving that this player is anything but a sitting duck. A tilt factor of 9 suggests occasional emotional mutations, but their overall "fitness" on rapid boards remains commendable.
Tillera1 thrives especially under the lunar hours of 1 AM, achieving a stellar 66.67% win rate—perhaps a nocturnal predator lurking in the twilight of the chess world. The dawn of battle on days like Friday and Tuesday sees nearly 48% success, proving that their circadian rhythms are as finely tuned as their opening repertoire.
When confronting common opponents such as sbpscbse and karlllsss, Tillera1 either dominates or dips to a 0% survival rate—showing that adaptation to specific opponents can be key to thriving in their complex ecosystem. Their varied success across a wide range of adversaries illustrates a player evolving constantly, crafting novel strategies like a true chess biologist experimenting with natural selection.
In summary, Tillera1 is a fascinating chess organism in the wild: unpredictable, adaptable, and occasionally prone to spontaneous combustion (early resignations), but always ready to face new challenges on the ever-changing chess landscape. Their story is a testament to the beautiful biology of battle on 64 squares.
Hi Tillera1 – here’s some personalised feedback to help you level-up!
1. What you already do well
- Tactical alertness: you punish early queen forays (see your miniatures vs “karaaaaal” and “drachirednoc”).
- Fighting spirit: even with the king on e2 you often find counter-play (Englund Gambit game).
- Willingness to experiment: trying gambits and off-beat set-ups gives you valuable practical experience.
2. Biggest improvement opportunities
a) King safety & early development
In several losses the king stayed in the centre and the minor pieces lagged behind. Aim to castle by move 8-10 in most games and limit early pawn pushes (…f6, …g6, …h5, …a5) until your pieces are out. A simple mental checklist after each move helps: “Am I closer to castling? Did I improve a piece?”
b) Sound openings vs 1.e4
The quick mates after 1…f6 (Barnes Defence) show that the move weakens e6-g5. Replace it with one reliable choice and learn the first 8-10 moves well:
- 1…e5 → Italian / Scotch. Very classical, easy to study.
- 1…e6 → French Defence if you prefer a solid pawn chain.
c) Watch out for “three-move mates” patterns
In the game against zeferzz you were checkmated on move 10:
Whenever you play …f6 or …g6 early, consciously look at the e6-g8 diagonal and the f7 square. Build the habit of running a quick “checks, captures, threats” scan each move.
d) Converting advantages & endgame choices
Against pedrocondelemes you were material up but let the position open while your king was still exposed. Basic endgame principles would have saved you: centralise the king, trade the opponent’s active rook first, and put your own rook behind passed pawns.
e) Time management
Your PGNs show many rapid games decided with 2-3 minutes still on the clock. Spend a little more time on the critical moments (tactics before move 15 and transitions to endgames) and you’ll cut blunders in half.
3. Recommended study plan (4-week micro-cycle)
- Daily: 20 tactical puzzles, focusing on checkmates and double-attack motifs.
- Opening cleanup: prepare one main line as White (e.g. London / Colle) and one as Black vs 1.e4 and 1.d4. Create flashcards of the critical positions.
- Game reviews: for every session pick one win and one loss. Annotate without engine first, then verify.
- Endgame essentials: practise K+P vs K, basic rook endings, and the “Lucena” & “Philidor” positions (LucenaPosition, PhilidorPosition).
4. Your progress dashboard
Peak Rapid rating: (Remember: consistency > spikes!)
5. Quick reference checklist before each move
- Check: “Can my opponent check or capture me?”
- Ask: “Am I improving development or king safety?”
- Plan: identify the weakest square in the enemy camp and aim your pieces there.
Good luck in your next games, Tillera1 – castle early, develop fast, and keep hunting those tactics!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| cayleeisawesome | 1W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
| huycovuakhaitrien | 0W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| murasakibara_acushi | 1W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| pardhu1244 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| rencetana | 0W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 187 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 111W / 113L / 19D | 92W / 124L / 27D | 49.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 73 | 31 | 34 | 8 | 42.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 68 | 22 | 35 | 11 | 32.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 64 | 25 | 37 | 2 | 39.1% |
| Australian Defense | 61 | 29 | 26 | 6 | 47.5% |
| Elephant Gambit | 22 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 36.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 20 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 17 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 29.4% |
| Bishop's Opening | 13 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 23.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 5 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 2 |